At 10/11/07 10:54 AM, RedCoin wrote:
At 10/11/07 10:52 AM, JackPhantasm wrote:
Unless I'm missing something it didn't say anywhere in there that he got in trouble for having the anime.
I read it in the thread title.
o
Actually, lolicon and "digital child pornograhpy" asre completly different things, and I can say this having seen both of them. Lolicon is a simple drawing, which is clearly not real. It even says so in the article.
THIS is the sorta stuff he got arrested for, I believe.(NSFW)
It looks real to a degree, but it isn't.