At 10/11/07 10:54 AM, RedCoin wrote:
At 10/11/07 10:52 AM, JackPhantasm wrote:
Unless I'm missing something it didn't say anywhere in there that he got in trouble for having the anime.I read it in the thread title.
Actually, lolicon and "digital child pornograhpy" asre completly different things, and I can say this having seen both of them. Lolicon is a simple drawing, which is clearly not real. It even says so in the article.
THIS is the sorta stuff he got arrested for, I believe.(NSFW)
It looks real to a degree, but it isn't.