Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Read the PM for "Teh grandiose planzorz"

At 5/15/08 04:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/14/08 11:36 AM, Coop83 wrote: In response to an earlier question on a thread which I can't remember which one it is right now, Greg... I've just had a quick calculate and I'm now in the top 120 of Blammers (Unless people below have passed me, that is)

Coolios. So top 100 is not out of the question, even if you feel top 50 is too far off to shoot for right now. GROOVEH.

Top 50 is within reach - it will just take me some time to get there. Patience ;)

You never know, if I don't get the call up for the cricket match on Saturday, I might be spending some time with this list... Where did I leave that template?

!!!

Sorry, didn't mean to make you choke on your Reese's bar then :P

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Haha, I'm replying to a 2-month old post of gfox's. This is what happens when I think "I'll reply to this later." I end up taking days, weeks or even a few months to reply.

So what, it's just a coincidence that Coop happened to bump the same 2-months-dead topic a few hours earlier THE SAME DAY you decided to "finally" reply to it later? #;-}>

It was there, he noticed again and thought "Oh yeah,. I'd better reply to it."

Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Looks like you and Coop might have to fight over it!

Part of the plan, that may or may not be divulged at a later date.

<suspense>Increased</suspense>

At 5/15/08 04:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Haha, I'm replying to a 2-month old post of gfox's. This is what happens when I think "I'll reply to this later." I end up taking days, weeks or even a few months to reply.

So what, it's just a coincidence that Coop happened to bump the same 2-months-dead topic a few hours earlier THE SAME DAY you decided to "finally" reply to it later? #;-}>

Nah, Coop's bump was just a reminder to reply to your post THEN.

Anyway, no worries. I'd rather you forget to reply to me in topics like this... than in the main topics I concern myself over, continuous-conversation-wise (pentalist, VP, LUL... in that order).

Of course, if I somehow didn't reply to your posts in those threads (unless it was your inactivity's fault) for months, I'd feel ashamed of myself.

Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Looks like you and Coop might have to fight over it!

Nah, no need to fight over it. Coop already made plans to revive the Blammers update before I did, so it's only fair that he does the updates, unless he gives it up or asks me to cover for him when he's busy. That is what we agreed on.

General forum? Yuck!

Ewwwww.

Now we understand. All traces of General forum must be eliminated.
Infection. Infection. Delete, delete...

BTW, I was just editing the last lines of Magica Reprise on Dio's Magica album there.

Yeah, 75k/75k would be cooler, but do you know what would be even better? 100k/100k. :)

25k more blams, though. Surely that's impossible nowadays.

ALMOST impossible, yes. :(

I really wish they would knock out that 50 vote for blam rule.

Would be swell. gfoxclock is almost up to 50:50 parity on blams and saves, though. Less than 10 away now.

Without that rule, Toohot100 or my main could get more blams again. I think if they did that, the blam to save ratios for most users could be balanced.

It doesn't seem to do much much trapping to me. :P Heh, especially Encyclopedia Dramatica, because their humour gets too tiring after a while and leads me to moving away.

Yeah, but I always see their lame links that are to something different than the text that's a link, if you catch my meaning. i.e. text in one article will say "also known as *being a loser*..." Where *being a loser* is a hyperlink to.... OMGFAIL article or something. #;-}>

I sometimes wonder if someone has made an article about me there. Why? Because I sometimes feel I'd be someone they'd pick on.

At 5/15/08 08:16 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Read the PM for "Teh grandiose planzorz"

Done and done. :) I'm fine with everything.

Coop's Big Blams Update
Ah, the Blams list. Once a vibrant hive of activity, with the artists of the portal fearing the wrath of Denvish and ramagi,to name but two of the esteemed members found within. Of course with the changing nature of the portal and the shift in the balance of power toward Protection, we find this list has fallen into disrepair.

*wipes off hands on a greasy rag for effect*

Well no more!

I've knocked up a rudimentary spreadsheet over the last few days, and performed stat pull between 1300 and 1500 this afternoon. What can I say, but I got caught up with actually working, for a change :P Having only LockClock's last update to really get my teeth into, I've reduced the list to 150 users for the time being, as when I can be bitehred to, I'll be trawling through data courteously supplied by gfoxcook from his pentalist update and who knows, this might become a top 200 again.

"Technically" we welcome pwroftheseagoat and Auz to the top 150, since they've never been there before. They displaced Hemlok and jujmcint.

Top 15 Gainers:
+3,526 DrJam
+3,375 AfroUnderscoreStud
+2,796 harryjarry
+2,753 azteca89
+2,615 Basspro55
+2,484 Crolpa
+2,183 Punisher
+2,127 Bahamut
+1,860 TheDepthsofHell
+1,649 pwroftheseagoat
+1,552 Seamonky
+1,543 shunshuu
+1,533 Wylo
+1,389 Auz
+1,333 Coop83

The List
Rank) Blams|| Gain || Username
001) 70006 || + 0,000 || Denvish
002) 64000 || + 0,000 || ramagi
003) 60388 || + 1,533 || Wylo 1
004) 59535 || + 0,000 || MPA -1
005) 58360 || + 0,848 || Molotov
006) 55461 || + 3,375 || AfroUnderscoreStud 1
007) 53450 || + 0,809 || ReconRebel -1
008) 51259 || + 2,183 || Punisher 1
009) 49720 || + 0,045 || schneelocke -1
010) 49369 || + 3,526 || DrJam 1
011) 47895 || + 0,016 || bila -1
012) 43665 || + 0,041 || Qwoxyl
013) 40433 || + 0,123 || leeboy105
014) 39282 || + 2,796 || harryjarry 4
015) 39156 || + 0,169 || BonusStage -1
016) 37992 || + 0,000 || ADT -1
017) 37703 || + 0,236 || Sakurazukamori -1
018) 37336 || + 0,000 || LittleMissVixen -1
019) 36822 || + 2,127 || Bahamut 3
020) 36576 || + 0,136 || DonDoli -1
021) 36000 || + 0,000 || gfoxcook -1
022) 35216 || + 0,207 || Phantom -1
023) 35181 || + 0,507 || X-Naut
024) 34462 || + 0,443 || Rabindarath
025) 33946 || + 2,753 || azteca89 6
026) 33531 || + 1,162 || Ehwaz003 2
027) 33402 || + 0,000 || fixit -2
028) 33263 || + 0,000 || yaya12 -2
029) 32759 || + 1,075 || Aksumka 1
030) 32373 || + 0,001 || ScottTowels -3
031) 31980 || + 0,000 || RoweNuts -2
032) 30682 || + 0,196 || M-A-R-C-U-S
033) 30585 || + 0,325 || Andersson
034) 29381 || + 0,438 || Gooch 1
035) 29349 || + 0,119 || Kolohe -1
036) 28609 || + 1,007 || remrulzz 1
037) 28570 || + 0,013 || alexsmolik -1
038) 28050 || + 2,615 || Basspro55 10
039) 27925 || + 0,340 || BlueHippo -1
040) 27507 || + 0,004 || Mazza -1
041) 26692 || + 0,335 || RenegadeGirl -1
042) 26296 || + 0,494 || Voidist 4
043) 26211 || + 0,001 || Joe -2
044) 26121 || + 0,021 || D0GMA -2
045) 26002 || + 0,001 || iscrulz -2
046) 25983 || + 0,037 || YoinK -2
047) 25922 || + 0,100 || Foxphere -2
048) 25684 || + 0,045 || R3dF0x -1
049) 25380 || + 0,290 || Major-punk 1
050) 25181 || + 0,360 || LatinoRalf 1

051) 25140 || + 0,000 || Syme -2
052) 25066 || + 0,891 || LockClock 3
053) 24771 || + 0,000 || Kronno -1
054) 24666 || + 0,018 || pepeatumi -1
055) 24274 || + 0,120 || iWalker 1
056) 24214 || + 0,000 || Nijsse -2
057) 24138 || + 0,137 || the-puppet 1
058) 24115 || + 0,031 || IM-KOOL-R-U -1
059) 24000 || + 0,000 || iamnone
060) 23967 || + 1,111 || courtday 5
061) 23518 || + 0,210 || ouandyoi
062) 23336 || + 0,000 || j00bie -2
063) 23153 || + 0,001 || thisisasignin -1
064) 23085 || + 0,008 || KWAS71KCK -1
065) 23001 || + 0,000 || Thobbe -1
066) 22578 || + 1,552 || Seamonky 4
067) 22430 || + 0,000 || goodguyO -1
068) 21806 || + 0,002 || moongod -1
069) 21590 || + 0,000 || Xiivi -1
070) 21404 || + 0,001 || XwaynecoltX -1
071) 21092 || + 0,608 || Rule 4
072) 21026 || + 0,212 || EagleRock
073) 20960 || + 1,327 || Sentio 16
074) 20944 || + 0,002 || chaotic1 -3
075) 20759 || + 0,188 || pieoncar -1
076) 20727 || + 0,000 || altr -3
077) 20682 || + 1,860 || TheDepthsofHell 18
078) 20657 || + 0,347 || ornery-scotsman -1
079) 20407 || + 0,108 || SlashFirestorm -1
080) 20388 || + 0,000 || lightning -4
081) 20100 || + 0,001 || wismty -2
082) 20005 || + 0,005 || Stormwarden -1
083) 20000 || + 0,000 || biteme2514 -3
084) 19998 || + 0,001 || Newgrundling -2
085) 19984 || + 0,005 || AnzRage -2
086) 19952 || + 0,017 || sharpie097 -2
087) 19850 || + 0,217 || CaptainBob 1
088) 19746 || + 0,000 || QuikFox -3
089) 19665 || + 0,000 || artificial -3
090) 19657 || + 0,004 || BeFell -3
091) 19630 || + 0,174 || ThreeStar -1
092) 19454 || + 0,000 || NeMeSiSM66 -1
093) 19320 || + 0,007 || staphita -1
094) 19279 || + 0,068 || ThePunisher52 -1
095) 18985 || + 0,000 || PimpMasterKDOG -1
096) 18872 || + 0,257 || FIGMENTUM 2
097) 18775 || + 0,145 || mentalis
098) 18725 || + 0,000 || DuMa-RyoHahn -2
099) 18260 || + 2,484 || Crolpa 23
100) 18238 || + 0,669 || Dream-of-Duke 5
101) 18228 || + 1,543 || shunshuu 14
102) 18084 || + 0,000 || ac-dc007 -3
103) 18017 || + 0,233 || Now-n-Again -1
104) 17959 || + 0,028 || Minion777 -4
105) 17920 || + 0,001 || XkwiziTOnE -4
106) 17881 || + 0,146 || Mr-Snrub -3
107) 17659 || + 0,028 || IvanTuroc -3
108) 17519 || + 0,269 || sunhawk818 1
109) 17449 || + 0,037 || TimScheff -1
110) 17431 || + 0,000 || Tommy -4
111) 17426 || + 0,007 || ArtDanVal -4
112) 17181 || + 0,001 || Parasoul -2
113) 17158 || + 0,100 || stafffighter -1
114) 17067 || + 0,002 || TITROTU -3
115) 16820 || + 0,000 || ZIGZAG4EVER -2
116) 16767 || + 0,000 || swive -2
117) 16573 || + 0,153 || ThunderboltLegion
118) 16572 || + 0,007 || Kisuke -2
119) 16507 || + 1,333 || Coop83 13
120) 16505 || + 0,237 || bmxgamer -1
121) 16453 || + 0,053 || Heinrich -3
122) 16290 || + 0,324 || Rarebreed -1
123) 16057 || + 0,011 || Punk-Noodles -3
124) 15866 || + 1,140 || IvanTuroc 16
125) 15824 || + 0,152 || HaroFreak -2

126) 15797 || + 0,137 || Myst -2
127) 15751 || + 0,110 || Seraphius -2
128) 15673 || + 0,625 || Kirk-Cocaine 5
129) 15644 || + 0,165 || Ventar
130) 15586 || + 0,002 || Rabid-Echidna -4
131) 15526 || + 0,000 || phileeguy -4
132) 15524 || + 0,889 || OneUp 11
133) 15522 || + 0,097 || alhill -3
134) 15497 || + 0,007 || RupeeClock -6
135) 15408 || + 0,007 || TremcladClock -4
136) 15151 || + 1,649 || pwroftheseagoat NEW!
137) 15008 || + 0,006 || carmelhadinosaur -3
138) 15000 || + 0,000 || life -3
139) 14956 || + 0,000 || Orcmors -3
140) 14954 || + 0,299 || Wingman26 2
141) 14894 || + 0,043 || LittleWashu -4
142) 14856 || + 1,389 || Auz NEW!
143) 14846 || + 0,156 || RageVI -2
144) 14843 || + 1,038 || Cyberdevil 5
145) 14746 || + 0,002 || gamejunkie -6
146) 14746 || + 0,000 || The-Nameless-0ne -8
147) 14623 || + 0,083 || Claudia-C18 -3
148) 14394 || + 0,791 || Omgee 2
149) 14376 || + 0,139 || Kenneth-Knows-All -4
150) 14336 || + 0,148 || Glamdrung -4

Most Blams Gained: DrJam (+3,526)
Most Ranks Gained: Crolpa (+23)
Most Ranks Lost: The-Nameless-0ne (-8)

This is not a quick fix. I am looking to take this project onwards over the next few months. Stay tuned for further updates.

This post was added as an afterthought. I'll put a better effort into the next one, I swear!

Looks like the calculation was right by the way, gfox! I cracked the top 20, so long as no-one passed me :P

That's a very pretty update you made there! I'd wondered where the blam list had been when at once, I see you updated it! Awesome...

Also, 'stat pull'. Is that what I think it is? ;]

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update

Great update, Coop! Shame I'm not going to be on this list for a long, long time. :(

At 5/17/08 09:35 AM, Casualty wrote: Also, 'stat pull'. Is that what I think it is? ;]

No - had it been what you were talking about, it would have taken me far less time, I'm sure :P

I don't have the stuff I need on the office computer at work, but the opportunity was there. I might try it for the responses update next week, however :)

At 5/17/08 10:47 AM, NEVR wrote:

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update

Great update, Coop! Shame I'm not going to be on this list for a long, long time. :(

If I get enough members of the list to make it worthwhile putting 200 on there, I will certainly consider upping the users displayed, as is also being considered for the Saves list. I think that 150 is a good number to start with and if anyone knows of any 10,000+ Blams people who may or may not be being tracks, feel free to advise me.

At 5/15/08 08:16 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Read the PM for "Teh grandiose planzorz"

!!!!

At 5/15/08 04:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Coolios. So top 100 is not out of the question, even if you feel top 50 is too far off to shoot for right now. GROOVEH.

Top 50 is within reach - it will just take me some time to get there. Patience ;)

WELL, that's a new attitude you got there. That's more like it.

!!!

Sorry, didn't mean to make you choke on your Reese's bar then :P

BAR?!?!.... BAR!!!... silly Coop, bars are for Mars, Snickers, and their ilk.

CUPS (and eggs and trees and hearts and pumpkins, seasonally) is for Reese's. #;-}>

It was there, he noticed again and thought "Oh yeah,. I'd better reply to it."

That's what I was getting at. That he wouldn't have remembered (at that time, at least) without your bump. #;-}>

Part of the plan, that may or may not be divulged at a later date.

MWAHAHAAH.

<suspense>Increased</suspense>

DEVIOUS BASTICHES!

At 5/16/08 04:01 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 5/15/08 04:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: So what, it's just a coincidence that Coop happened to bump the same 2-months-dead topic a few hours earlier THE SAME DAY you decided to "finally" reply to it later? #;-}>

Nah, Coop's bump was just a reminder to reply to your post THEN.

And had he not posted... THEN? That was my point. Your post made it look like YOU were the one bumping the topic, when of course he already had. #;-}>

Of course, if I somehow didn't reply to your posts in those threads (unless it was your inactivity's fault) for months, I'd feel ashamed of myself.

:::nodnods:::

Nah, no need to fight over it. Coop already made plans to revive the Blammers update before I did, so it's only fair that he does the updates, unless he gives it up or asks me to cover for him when he's busy. That is what we agreed on.

AWWWWWWLLLLRIGHTY then.

Now we understand. All traces of General forum must be eliminated.
Infection. Infection. Delete, delete...

BTW, I was just editing the last lines of Magica Reprise on Dio's Magica album there.

I didn't know. But I heartily agreed, nonetheless. #;-}>

25k more blams, though. Surely that's impossible nowadays.

ALMOST impossible, yes. :(

Yes. So no 100k/100k, then. TIS AGREED.

Without that rule, Toohot100 or my main could get more blams again. I think if they did that, the blam to save ratios for most users could be balanced.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...... suggest it to liljim!

I sometimes wonder if someone has made an article about me there. Why? Because I sometimes feel I'd be someone they'd pick on.

Then go search for it.

At 5/15/08 08:16 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Read the PM for "Teh grandiose planzorz"

Done and done. :) I'm fine with everything.

SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEKRITS. </Conan O'Brien>

At 5/17/08 04:40 PM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/17/08 09:35 AM, Casualty wrote: Also, 'stat pull'. Is that what I think it is? ;]

No - had it been what you were talking about, it would have taken me far less time, I'm sure :P

I don't have the stuff I need on the office computer at work, but the opportunity was there. I might try it for the responses update next week, however :)

Whoooooaaaaaaaaaaa... you did this oldstyle?

HARDCORE, man. HARDCORE manual man.

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update
Ah, the Blams list. Once a vibrant hive of activity, with the artists of the portal fearing the wrath of Denvish and ramagi,to name but two of the esteemed members found within. Of course with the changing nature of the portal and the shift in the balance of power toward Protection, we find this list has fallen into disrepair.

.... yeah. ;_;

*wipes off hands on a greasy rag for effect*

Well no more!

!!!!!!!! WHOA!

I've knocked up a rudimentary spreadsheet over the last few days, and performed stat pull between 1300 and 1500 this afternoon. What can I say, but I got caught up with actually working, for a change :P Having only LockClock's last update to really get my teeth into, I've reduced the list to 150 users for the time being, as when I can be bitehred to, I'll be trawling through data courteously supplied by gfoxcook from his pentalist update and who knows, this might become a top 200 again.

WOOT!

"Technically" we welcome pwroftheseagoat and Auz to the top 150, since they've never been there before. They displaced Hemlok and jujmcint.

Why the technicality-mentioning? If they joined the top 150 in time for your update, then.... they joined the list in time for your update, and a welcome would be standard procedure, yes. #;-}>

+3,526 DrJam
+3,375 AfroUnderscoreStud
+2,796 harryjarry
+2,753 azteca89
+2,615 Basspro55
+2,484 Crolpa
+2,183 Punisher
+2,127 Bahamut
+1,860 TheDepthsofHell
+1,649 pwroftheseagoat
+1,552 Seamonky
+1,543 shunshuu
+1,533 Wylo
+1,389 Auz
+1,333 Coop83

I know it's been a long time since the last update, but.... that's quite a lot of blams, folks.

001) 70006 || + 0,000 || Denvish
002) 64000 || + 0,000 || ramagi
003) 60388 || + 1,533 || Wylo 1
004) 59535 || + 0,000 || MPA -1
005) 58360 || + 0,848 || Molotov
006) 55461 || + 3,375 || AfroUnderscoreStud 1
007) 53450 || + 0,809 || ReconRebel -1
008) 51259 || + 2,183 || Punisher 1
009) 49720 || + 0,045 || schneelocke -1
010) 49369 || + 3,526 || DrJam 1
011) 47895 || + 0,016 || bila -1
012) 43665 || + 0,041 || Qwoxyl
013) 40433 || + 0,123 || leeboy105
014) 39282 || + 2,796 || harryjarry 4
015) 39156 || + 0,169 || BonusStage -1
016) 37992 || + 0,000 || ADT -1
017) 37703 || + 0,236 || Sakurazukamori -1
018) 37336 || + 0,000 || LittleMissVixen -1
019) 36822 || + 2,127 || Bahamut 3
020) 36576 || + 0,136 || DonDoli -1
021) 36000 || + 0,000 || gfoxcook -1
022) 35216 || + 0,207 || Phantom -1
023) 35181 || + 0,507 || X-Naut
024) 34462 || + 0,443 || Rabindarath
025) 33946 || + 2,753 || azteca89 6
026) 33531 || + 1,162 || Ehwaz003 2

HANGIN' TOUGH.

But looks like azteca and Ehwaz will pass me before anyone else gets to me, most likely. Ehhhh... maybe neo-X-Naut will hit me first.

027) 33402 || + 0,000 || fixit -2

IT CERTAINLY WON'T, THOUGH! #;-}>

028) 33263 || + 0,000 || yaya12 -2

NOR IT! HAHAHA, TWO SHUT-DOWN ROBUTS! </Zoidberg>

At 5/16/08 06:06 PM, Coop83 wrote: Most Blams Gained: DrJam (+3,526)
Most Ranks Gained: Crolpa (+23)
Most Ranks Lost: The-Nameless-0ne (-8)

Most lost is right near the bottom of the top 150, so that makes sense.

DAYUM, Crolpa.... that's some RANKSWAPPIN' goin' on there...

This is not a quick fix. I am looking to take this project onwards over the next few months. Stay tuned for further updates.

WE WILL STAY TUNED.</Robut </Zoidberg> >

This post was added as an afterthought. I'll put a better effort into the next one, I swear!

WE WILL HOLD YOU TO THAT.

Looks like the calculation was right by the way, gfox! I cracked the top 20, so long as no-one passed me :P

DOES.... NOT.... COMPUTE.... DO YOU MEAN THE TOP 120?

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update

Thanks for the very first Blammers update by you, Coop. :)

Top 15 Gainers:
+2,127 Bahamut

Yay! :)

The List
Rank) Blams|| Gain || Username
018) 37336 || + 0,000 || LittleMissVixen -1
019) 36822 || + 2,127 || Bahamut 3

Good, I've entered the top 20. :) 2000 blams since the last update is good. Also, I wonder if I can pass LittleMissVixen soon. Heh, I remember when she was a very active B/P'er.

At 5/16/08 06:06 PM, Coop83 wrote: Most Ranks Lost: The-Nameless-0ne (-8)

Heh heh.

At 5/18/08 02:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/16/08 04:01 PM, Bahamut wrote: Nah, Coop's bump was just a reminder to reply to your post THEN.

And had he not posted... THEN? That was my point. Your post made it look like YOU were the one bumping the topic, when of course he already had. #;-}>

Oh. It didn't to me, though. I just saw those posts unreplied and I was like "Damn, I need to reply to these posts now!"

Now we understand. All traces of General forum must be eliminated.
Infection. Infection. Delete, delete...

BTW, I was just editing the last lines of Magica Reprise on Dio's Magica album there.

I didn't know. But I heartily agreed, nonetheless. #;-}>

Good thing I mentioned what I was referring to then. You'd have been confused about what I was talking about. :P

ALMOST impossible, yes. :(

Yes. So no 100k/100k, then. TIS AGREED.

THAT I agree with. However, at least Denvish is only 30k away from it. Perhaps not close enough, but it's the closest out of 'em all.

Without that rule, Toohot100 or my main could get more blams again. I think if they did that, the blam to save ratios for most users could be balanced.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...... suggest it to liljim!

It depends what the other admins think.

I sometimes wonder if someone has made an article about me there. Why? Because I sometimes feel I'd be someone they'd pick on.

Then go search for it.

Done that several times, and there's nothing.

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update

Ah thanks, it´s great to finally see another update of this list =)

"Technically" we welcome pwroftheseagoat and Auz to the top 150, since they've never been there before. They displaced Hemlok and jujmcint.

Alright =)

Top 15 Gainers:
+1,389 Auz

Awesome!

The List
139) 14956 || + 0,000 || Orcmors -3
140) 14954 || + 0,299 || Wingman26 2
141) 14894 || + 0,043 || LittleWashu -4
142) 14856 || + 1,389 || Auz NEW!

Hmm, it looks like I can gain many ranks on the next update as well. Seems like this list is much more.. compact than the saviours and B/P lists.

Most Blams Gained: DrJam (+3,526)
Most Ranks Gained: Crolpa (+23)

Congrats!

This is not a quick fix. I am looking to take this project onwards over the next few months. Stay tuned for further updates.

Ah, that´s great. Thanks man.

At 5/18/08 02:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/15/08 08:16 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/14/08 04:15 PM, Bahamut wrote: Also, I'm guessing LockClock won't come back for another Blammers update. I wonder if I should take over.

Read the PM for "Teh grandiose planzorz"

!!!!

Steady on the suspense, Greg. Don't want you to go and prolapse over it :P

At 5/15/08 04:43 AM, gfoxcook wrote: Coolios. So top 100 is not out of the question, even if you feel top 50 is too far off to shoot for right now. GROOVEH.

Top 50 is within reach - it will just take me some time to get there. Patience ;)

WELL, that's a new attitude you got there. That's more like it.

That's not new, it's always been my attitude. When I signed up on the 28th of April 2004, I looked at the FAQ and said "Some day, I'll be an EGSC!" When the redesign made it only an SC, I wasn't disheartened, I just plugged away and still got past the 30k mark :)

<suspense>Increased</suspense>

DEVIOUS BASTICHES!

*giggles maniacally*

At 5/17/08 04:40 PM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/17/08 09:35 AM, Casualty wrote: Also, 'stat pull'. Is that what I think it is? ;]

No - had it been what you were talking about, it would have taken me far less time, I'm sure :P

I don't have the stuff I need on the office computer at work, but the opportunity was there. I might try it for the responses update next week, however :)

Whoooooaaaaaaaaaaa... you did this oldstyle?

HARDCORE, man. HARDCORE manual man.

*Flexes* I could have tried the new system, but downloading that kind of software might have caused fatal errors with the works computer. I can fix them at home - it's a more powerful machine, for a start.

At 5/18/08 03:24 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Looks like the calculation was right by the way, gfox! I cracked the top 20, so long as no-one passed me :P

DOES.... NOT.... COMPUTE.... DO YOU MEAN THE TOP 120?

Shh, you'll give away my plan for an April Fool's Joke :P

At 5/16/08 06:03 PM, Coop83 wrote: 115) 16820 || + 0,000 || ZIGZAG4EVER -2
116) 16767 || + 0,000 || swive -2
117) 16573 || + 0,153 || ThunderboltLegion
118) 16572 || + 0,007 || Kisuke -2
119) 16507 || + 1,333 || Coop83 13

A decent enough average of 10.75 over the 124 days since LockClock's intermediate update. Looks like I could gain another 4 positions before the next update as well :)

Just got to keep up the pace. It's all I can do in these circumstances, really.

At 5/18/08 10:58 AM, Bahamut wrote:

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Coop's Big Blams Update

Thanks for the very first Blammers update by you, Coop. :)

Woot, woot!

Oh. It didn't to me, though. I just saw those posts unreplied and I was like "Damn, I need to reply to these posts now!"

Fair enough. Just didn't look that way when you replied. But I'm just giving you a hard time to give you a hard time, so. #;-}>

Yes. So no 100k/100k, then. TIS AGREED.

THAT I agree with. However, at least Denvish is only 30k away from it. Perhaps not close enough, but it's the closest out of 'em all.

Yes, but I specifically meant no 100k/100k for Denvish. #;-}>

Even being the closest to it isn't close enough.

5 years ago, you never could have convinced me that 100k saves was going to happen before 100k blams, but today it seems quite clear that Toocool will hit 100k saves long before anyone hits 100k blams.

At 5/19/08 09:03 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/18/08 02:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote: !!!!

Steady on the suspense, Greg. Don't want you to go and prolapse over it :P

Just acting in mock surprise over you and Bahamut insinuating SECRET SUSPENSEFUL PM CONVOS ABOUT LIST-PLANNINGS. #;-}>

Top 50 is within reach - it will just take me some time to get there. Patience ;)

WELL, that's a new attitude you got there. That's more like it.

That's not new, it's always been my attitude. When I signed up on the 28th of April 2004, I looked at the FAQ and said "Some day, I'll be an EGSC!" When the redesign made it only an SC, I wasn't disheartened, I just plugged away and still got past the 30k mark :)

Perhaps it always has been, but the past few posts before that one where I reacted as above you sounded like some of the top 50s you are headed for but years away from... that you didn't care too much to set your sights on them, and that didn't sound like the Coop I know. Clearly you were just talking about them in less... excited a manner than you talk about the top 50s you've just hit or are about to hit, and I suppose that's natural. After all, I'm gonna hit level 55 someday, and it's my fave level I've yet to get to... but I'm not going to act super excited about it day after day when it's years away... I'm more likely to sound excited about an achievement I'll attain long before then, even if it's not as valuable to me. #;-}>

<suspense>Increased</suspense>

DEVIOUS BASTICHES!

*giggles maniacally*

SEE!! YOU'RE AT IT AGAIN!

Whoooooaaaaaaaaaaa... you did this oldstyle?

HARDCORE, man. HARDCORE manual man.

*Flexes* I could have tried the new system, but downloading that kind of software might have caused fatal errors with the works computer. I can fix them at home - it's a more powerful machine, for a start.

Yep. Well, when are you first gonna try the new system? Which update of which list, I mean?

At 5/18/08 03:24 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Looks like the calculation was right by the way, gfox! I cracked the top 20, so long as no-one passed me :P

DOES.... NOT.... COMPUTE.... DO YOU MEAN THE TOP 120?

Shh, you'll give away my plan for an April Fool's Joke :P

.... 10 months in advance?

Just in case you're planning on pulling an extremely late/early AFD prank... remember what Bahamut and I talked about in reference to AFD 08... there IS such a thing as TOO far from the actual day. #;-}>

At 5/22/08 07:15 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/18/08 10:58 AM, Bahamut wrote: Oh. It didn't to me, though. I just saw those posts unreplied and I was like "Damn, I need to reply to these posts now!"

Fair enough. Just didn't look that way when you replied. But I'm just giving you a hard time to give you a hard time, so. #;-}>

Meh.

I'm giving myself a hard time by replying to these posts at 2 in the morning. Good thing us Brits have bank holiday Monday. Otherwise, I'd be asleep now for work placement the next day. I do have some things to do on bank holiday such as seeing relatives. Some I've either not seen in ages or haven't seen once in my life.

THAT I agree with. However, at least Denvish is only 30k away from it. Perhaps not close enough, but it's the closest out of 'em all.

Yes, but I specifically meant no 100k/100k for Denvish. #;-}>

Oh, oh well.

Speaking of big milestones, I'm happy standing at exactly 70k B/P. :) When will I resume B/P'ing? Not just yet.

Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

5 years ago, you never could have convinced me that 100k saves was going to happen before 100k blams, but today it seems quite clear that Toocool will hit 100k saves long before anyone hits 100k blams.

Damn, times really do change.

At 5/22/08 07:15 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

*Flexes* I could have tried the new system, but downloading that kind of software might have caused fatal errors with the works computer. I can fix them at home - it's a more powerful machine, for a start.

Yep. Well, when are you first gonna try the new system? Which update of which list, I mean?

I believe that would be the Saves update, planned for this Friday / Saturday. Bahamut has tested the system for the B/Pers update. How many lists does that mean that we're running between us now, Big B?

At 5/18/08 03:24 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/16/08 06:02 PM, Coop83 wrote: Looks like the calculation was right by the way, gfox! I cracked the top 20, so long as no-one passed me :P

DOES.... NOT.... COMPUTE.... DO YOU MEAN THE TOP 120?

Shh, you'll give away my plan for an April Fool's Joke :P

.... 10 months in advance?

Just in case you're planning on pulling an extremely late/early AFD prank... remember what Bahamut and I talked about in reference to AFD 08... there IS such a thing as TOO far from the actual day. #;-}>

Well, it doesn't hurt to be slightly prepared :P

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

I'm sure that was ramagi

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Meh.

Heh.

I'm giving myself a hard time by replying to these posts at 2 in the morning. Good thing us Brits have bank holiday Monday. Otherwise, I'd be asleep now for work placement the next day. I do have some things to do on bank holiday such as seeing relatives. Some I've either not seen in ages or haven't seen once in my life.

Nothing wrong with staying up till 2 (if not later) on a weekend night, man.

Hope you're enjoying the relatives-meeting today.

Me, I'm spending my Memorial Day exercising the freedom to do SHIT ALL all day long.

My gf's got the day off, surprisingly, so perhaps I can talk her into watching teh Futurama movie with me.

Speaking of big milestones, I'm happy standing at exactly 70k B/P. :) When will I resume B/P'ing? Not just yet.

Congrats. Found yourself a nice and cozy temp retirement spot, eh? Enjoy.

Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

70k blams + 30k saves, yes. Don't remember anyone stopping at 70k combined.

5 years ago, you never could have convinced me that 100k saves was going to happen before 100k blams, but today it seems quite clear that Toocool will hit 100k saves long before anyone hits 100k blams.

Damn, times really do change.

Ayup.

At 5/26/08 05:26 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/22/08 07:15 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Yep. Well, when are you first gonna try the new system? Which update of which list, I mean?

I believe that would be the Saves update, planned for this Friday / Saturday. Bahamut has tested the system for the B/Pers update. How many lists does that mean that we're running between us now, Big B?

Awesome.

.... 10 months in advance?

Just in case you're planning on pulling an extremely late/early AFD prank... remember what Bahamut and I talked about in reference to AFD 08... there IS such a thing as TOO far from the actual day. #;-}>

Well, it doesn't hurt to be slightly prepared :P

I suppose... you're some kinda boy scout, aintcha.

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

I'm sure that was ramagi

Huh? I thought she stopped at 72,000 for awhile, not 70,000. I was just thinking of that while replying to Bahamut.

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/26/08 05:26 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/22/08 07:15 PM, gfoxcook wrote: .... 10 months in advance?

Just in case you're planning on pulling an extremely late/early AFD prank... remember what Bahamut and I talked about in reference to AFD 08... there IS such a thing as TOO far from the actual day. #;-}>

Well, it doesn't hurt to be slightly prepared :P

I suppose... you're some kinda boy scout, aintcha.

Well, I was... however, that was about 16-17 years ago. How can I possibly go camping and miss out on Newgrounds and cricket for a whole weekend?!

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

I'm sure that was ramagi

Huh? I thought she stopped at 72,000 for awhile, not 70,000. I was just thinking of that while replying to Bahamut.

It just seemed logical, as accoring to the B/P ranks 51+ list, she was the first to 70k B/P, followed by MPA, I think. Seems silly to remember someone else stopping at 70k B/P for any reason.

Oh, hi Bahamut :P

At 5/26/08 04:55 PM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/26/08 05:26 AM, Coop83 wrote: Well, it doesn't hurt to be slightly prepared :P

I suppose... you're some kinda boy scout, aintcha.

Well, I was... however, that was about 16-17 years ago. How can I possibly go camping and miss out on Newgrounds and cricket for a whole weekend?!

I was, very briefly, as well. BUT I HATE PREPAREDNESS, so... hence my suspicions.

I'm sure that was ramagi

Huh? I thought she stopped at 72,000 for awhile, not 70,000. I was just thinking of that while replying to Bahamut.

It just seemed logical, as accoring to the B/P ranks 51+ list, she was the first to 70k B/P, followed by MPA, I think. Seems silly to remember someone else stopping at 70k B/P for any reason.

Oh, hi Bahamut :P

Heh. Well, his love of teh 7 certainly explains it, to some extent.

Meanwhile, I'm planning on parking my ass for all eternity on 72,000, which while not as cool a number as 60,000 was... is 36k times two, and that's the whole point, so... my preference for 72k over 70k... is probably as strong as Bahamut's preference for 70k over 72k. O_O

I'd look up the historical record on teh ramagi and MPA and 70k and all, but... I TOO LAZY.

At 5/27/08 02:32 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/26/08 04:55 PM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote: I suppose... you're some kinda boy scout, aintcha.

Well, I was... however, that was about 16-17 years ago. How can I possibly go camping and miss out on Newgrounds and cricket for a whole weekend?!

I was, very briefly, as well. BUT I HATE PREPAREDNESS, so... hence my suspicions.

Perfectionists ahve to plan ahead. Otherwise we'd never get anything done. A lot of planning has gone into the first day of me riding my bike to work today, for example.

I'd look up the historical record on teh ramagi and MPA and 70k and all, but... I TOO LAZY.

Well, the B/P ranks 51+ has a major issue - it doesn't document the top 50 until both ramagi and MPA have passed 70,000 B/P Inconvenient, to say the least.

It's a lack of forward planning, I tell you!

wow wish i had one! ^_^
lol

At 5/27/08 03:05 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/27/08 02:32 AM, gfoxcook wrote: I was, very briefly, as well. BUT I HATE PREPAREDNESS, so... hence my suspicions.

Perfectionists ahve to plan ahead. Otherwise we'd never get anything done. A lot of planning has gone into the first day of me riding my bike to work today, for example.

How much planning do you need to do to ride a bike somewhere? You mean you'd previously biked it to see how long it took, or something? Or tried different routes to find the best one for whatever reason or reasons?

I'd look up the historical record on teh ramagi and MPA and 70k and all, but... I TOO LAZY.

Well, the B/P ranks 51+ has a major issue - it doesn't document the top 50 until both ramagi and MPA have passed 70,000 B/P Inconvenient, to say the least.

It's a lack of forward planning, I tell you!

You're such a silly, I wasn't referring to using the EGRL for info.

I was referring to going through my old top 50 b/p list saves, but they're on the other hard drive.

Oh wait, though... I do have that backup CD-ROM right near me here that I pulled all those pics to post in NEVR's screenshot archive thread... lemme check now.

At 5/27/08 03:11 AM, Sunnybird001 wrote: wow wish i had one! ^_^
lol

Had one what? A blam? #;-}>

Or an account with blams?

HOW CONFUSING.

...

ANYWHO... Here we go, Coopster, let's take a look for who retired where... when...

Argh... teh most recent top 50 b/p update from my CD is 20041029.... and it shows:

1. 49,503 fixit
2. 47,612 ramagi
3. 45,200 gfoxcook

Some good that is, aside from showing us where fixit retired. #;-}> Now, of course, it bears mentioning that ramagi did originally retire at 36,000, long before I had my 36k save or blam retirement ideas, of course. From 20031204:

1. 36,000 ramagi
2. 35,765 fixit

And then a few days later, that robot usurped her crown (on 20031207).

Okay, so lemme go back to my old desktop and find teh info since then, to find ramagi's 2nd (of 3 total now, of course) retirement point.... or to see if anyone else maybe stopped at 70k if it wasn't her:

GOT IT.

10 days after I stopped at 60k, ramagi stopped at 75,000 exactly, on 10/20/2005.

She then unretired on 11/13, less than a month later.... and on 11/27 MPA passed her for #1 shortly after she had passed 76k.

And of course, later on, in 2006, Denvish passed MPA for #1.

Now, I didn't check every damned top 50 b/p list, but I think it's safe to assume that no one retired at 70k more than "momentarily."

ramagi's stop at 75k was nowhere near as long as her stop at 36k or at 100k, but it was a stop nonetheless.

So anyway, we were all wrong. It wasn't 70k OR 72k, it was 75k, like Buster wants to stop at. Heh.

At 5/27/08 05:31 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/27/08 03:05 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/27/08 02:32 AM, gfoxcook wrote: I was, very briefly, as well. BUT I HATE PREPAREDNESS, so... hence my suspicions.

Perfectionists ahve to plan ahead. Otherwise we'd never get anything done. A lot of planning has gone into the first day of me riding my bike to work today, for example.

How much planning do you need to do to ride a bike somewhere? You mean you'd previously biked it to see how long it took, or something? Or tried different routes to find the best one for whatever reason or reasons?

Nah, I already had that route, as it's practically the same route that I used to take to get to school all those years ago :P The Planning element was sorting out those bastards at Halfords. I made a long post about it in the LUL.

I'd look up the historical record on teh ramagi and MPA and 70k and all, but... I TOO LAZY.

Well, the B/P ranks 51+ has a major issue - it doesn't document the top 50 until both ramagi and MPA have passed 70,000 B/P Inconvenient, to say the least.

It's a lack of forward planning, I tell you!

You're such a silly, I wasn't referring to using the EGRL for info.

I was referring to going through my old top 50 b/p list saves, but they're on the other hard drive.

Oh wait, though... I do have that backup CD-ROM right near me here that I pulled all those pics to post in NEVR's screenshot archive thread... lemme check now.

Well, this is suspenseful in me just sitting here reading it.

Stats

So anyway, we were all wrong. It wasn't 70k OR 72k, it was 75k, like Buster wants to stop at. Heh.

So, the longest retiree on 70,000 B/P to date has been Bahamut? That's what we wanted to know, so we can say that it's safe for him to start again :P

At 5/27/08 08:25 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/27/08 05:31 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/27/08 03:05 AM, Coop83 wrote: Perfectionists ahve to plan ahead. Otherwise we'd never get anything done. A lot of planning has gone into the first day of me riding my bike to work today, for example.

How much planning do you need to do to ride a bike somewhere? You mean you'd previously biked it to see how long it took, or something? Or tried different routes to find the best one for whatever reason or reasons?

Nah, I already had that route, as it's practically the same route that I used to take to get to school all those years ago :P The Planning element was sorting out those bastards at Halfords. I made a long post about it in the LUL.

Yeah, I read that. Doesn't seem like planning so much as.... apparently needing a new bike. #;-}>

Oh wait, though... I do have that backup CD-ROM right near me here that I pulled all those pics to post in NEVR's screenshot archive thread... lemme check now.

Well, this is suspenseful in me just sitting here reading it.

Heh.

So anyway, we were all wrong. It wasn't 70k OR 72k, it was 75k, like Buster wants to stop at. Heh.

So, the longest retiree on 70,000 B/P to date has been Bahamut? That's what we wanted to know, so we can say that it's safe for him to start again :P

If he isn't already the longest sitting there, he will be soon.

ramagi's got the longest at 36k and 75k records wrapped up (for now), and I'm already soooooo far ahead in the 60k category that no one will ever pass me, likely.... now, on to 72k for a new record time!

At 5/27/08 09:13 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/27/08 08:25 AM, Coop83 wrote: Nah, I already had that route, as it's practically the same route that I used to take to get to school all those years ago :P The Planning element was sorting out those bastards at Halfords. I made a long post about it in the LUL.

Yeah, I read that. Doesn't seem like planning so much as.... apparently needing a new bike. #;-}>

Having Diesel bills going up past £1.25 per litre, so around £5.50 per gallon is ridiculous. If I bought the bike and used it regularly, I can save about £350 - £400 per year, which can be better employed on other activities.

So, the longest retiree on 70,000 B/P to date has been Bahamut? That's what we wanted to know, so we can say that it's safe for him to start again :P

If he isn't already the longest sitting there, he will be soon.

Hooray :)

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Meh.

Heh.

Beh.

I'm giving myself a hard time by replying to these posts at 2 in the morning. Good thing us Brits have bank holiday Monday. Otherwise, I'd be asleep now for work placement the next day. I do have some things to do on bank holiday such as seeing relatives. Some I've either not seen in ages or haven't seen once in my life.

Nothing wrong with staying up till 2 (if not later) on a weekend night, man.

Well, there is to me, because then it'll be harder to get up in the morning and then I wake up later. I don't ever want to go back to the days when I slept 'till 1PM. Phew, good thing work placement stops that from happening.

Hope you're enjoying the relatives-meeting today.

There wasn't as many relatives there as I thought there would be. I thought there'd be 20, but there was only 6. Oh well, the day still went out great.

Speaking of big milestones, I'm happy standing at exactly 70k B/P. :) When will I resume B/P'ing? Not just yet.

Congrats. Found yourself a nice and cozy temp retirement spot, eh? Enjoy.

Indeed, but sadly, I'm no longer at exactly 70k now.

At 5/26/08 05:26 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Say, didn't someone else temporary stop at exactly 70k B/P when they reached it? I can't remember who did it now.

I'm sure that was ramagi

Huh? I thought she stopped at 72,000 for awhile, not 70,000. I was just thinking of that while replying to Bahamut.

I think I remember her stopping somewhere before 100k, but wasn't sure if it was 70k.

At 5/26/08 04:55 PM, Coop83 wrote: It just seemed logical, as accoring to the B/P ranks 51+ list, she was the first to 70k B/P, followed by MPA, I think. Seems silly to remember someone else stopping at 70k B/P for any reason.

Oh, hi Bahamut :P

YOU BASTARD!!!

At 5/27/08 08:25 AM, Coop83 wrote: So, the longest retiree on 70,000 B/P to date has been Bahamut? That's what we wanted to know, so we can say that it's safe for him to start again :P

Seems like it, yeah. Dammit, now I wish I didn't collect two more saves. Damn my flashes!

At 5/28/08 04:21 AM, Coop83 wrote:

At 5/27/08 09:13 PM, gfoxcook wrote: Yeah, I read that. Doesn't seem like planning so much as.... apparently needing a new bike. #;-}>

Having Diesel bills going up past £1.25 per litre, so around £5.50 per gallon is ridiculous. If I bought the bike and used it regularly, I can save about £350 - £400 per year, which can be better employed on other activities.

So wait, if it's the same route, did you mean a route you used to drive... you now will bike?

Cause see, I figured you already had a bike, and just wanted/needed a new one. If you didn't have a bike before, then... clearly I misinterpreted. #;-}>

At 5/30/08 07:09 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Meh.

Heh.

Beh.

Feh.

Nothing wrong with staying up till 2 (if not later) on a weekend night, man.

Well, there is to me, because then it'll be harder to get up in the morning and then I wake up later. I don't ever want to go back to the days when I slept 'till 1PM. Phew, good thing work placement stops that from happening.

NOTHING. EVER. WRONG.

There wasn't as many relatives there as I thought there would be. I thought there'd be 20, but there was only 6. Oh well, the day still went out great.

Coolies.

Congrats. Found yourself a nice and cozy temp retirement spot, eh? Enjoy.

Indeed, but sadly, I'm no longer at exactly 70k now.

70k2, eh?

Well, at least you went in knowing it was just a temp spot, anyway, so it's not like a permanent roost was ruined.

If you cared that much, I'm sure you'd get those 2 deleted. But you don't want to -2 from your eventual upwards climb resumption, I'd wager. #;-}>

I think I remember her stopping somewhere before 100k, but wasn't sure if it was 70k.

I take it you replied to me and Coop's convo right there before reading my latest addition to it, in which I mentioned that ramagi stopped at 75k. #;-}>

At 5/26/08 04:55 PM, Coop83 wrote: It just seemed logical, as accoring to the B/P ranks 51+ list, she was the first to 70k B/P, followed by MPA, I think. Seems silly to remember someone else stopping at 70k B/P for any reason.

Oh, hi Bahamut :P

YOU BASTARD!!!

Heh.

Also, Coop... why is it silly to think of any user besides the 1st or 2nd users to a landmark number... retiring, either temporarily OR permanently... at said number?

I was far from the first person to 60,000, and I'll be WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY far from the first person to 72,000, but that didn't stop me from retiring at the former for 1.5 years, and it won't stop me from retiring at the latter for an indefinite period of time! (I won't say forever, because forever's kinda like never... both are hard to guarantee with much certainty).

At 6/1/08 02:13 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/30/08 07:09 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Meh.

Heh.

Beh.

Feh.

Deh.

Well, there is to me, because then it'll be harder to get up in the morning and then I wake up later. I don't ever want to go back to the days when I slept 'till 1PM. Phew, good thing work placement stops that from happening.

NOTHING. EVER. WRONG.

No, it is wrong for me. I'd hate to wake up ridiculously late again like I did back in November. However, at least I got some rest that night rather than pulling an all-nighter.

I've done an all-nighter once and I kinda regretted it. I just felt depressed as fuck and wanted to rest. I even went to Liverpool that day and was falling asleep on the bus.

Congrats. Found yourself a nice and cozy temp retirement spot, eh? Enjoy.

Indeed, but sadly, I'm no longer at exactly 70k now.

70k2, eh?

At that time, yes, but now, it's 70k7.

Well, at least you went in knowing it was just a temp spot, anyway, so it's not like a permanent roost was ruined.

Haha, good thing it wasn't my permanent stop. I'm still aiming for 77777. So to avoid sudden B/P gains again, I'd have to stop at around 77600 incase of more sudden gains.

If you cared that much, I'm sure you'd get those 2 deleted. But you don't want to -2 from your eventual upwards climb resumption, I'd wager. #;-}>

Meh, it's not bothering me that much.

I think I remember her stopping somewhere before 100k, but wasn't sure if it was 70k.

I take it you replied to me and Coop's convo right there before reading my latest addition to it, in which I mentioned that ramagi stopped at 75k. #;-}>

Ah yes, 75k it was.

YOU BASTARD!!!

Heh.

Also, Coop... why is it silly to think of any user besides the 1st or 2nd users to a landmark number... retiring, either temporarily OR permanently... at said number?

Maybe he thinks everyone should continue no matter what? :P

At 6/7/08 03:16 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 6/1/08 02:13 AM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/30/08 07:09 PM, Bahamut wrote:

At 5/26/08 03:06 PM, gfoxcook wrote:

At 5/25/08 09:29 PM, Bahamut wrote: Meh.

Heh.

Beh.

Feh.

Deh.

Peh.

NOTHING. EVER. WRONG.

No, it is wrong for me. I'd hate to wake up ridiculously late again like I did back in November. However, at least I got some rest that night rather than pulling an all-nighter.

... okay.

I've done an all-nighter once and I kinda regretted it. I just felt depressed as fuck and wanted to rest. I even went to Liverpool that day and was falling asleep on the bus.

I've done 'em... dozens of times. Unless you make it a requirement that no sleep happens until normal bedtime the next day, of course. But I don't require that to happen for an allnighter to be called an allnighter.

At that time, yes, but now, it's 70k7.

Well, that's actually much cooler than 70k2, then, eh?

Did you really get 5 more saves from voting to save yer own flashes? IIRC that's what you blamed those first 2 extra saves on...

or was it from whistled stuff you voted to save getting unwhistled and save credits finally cashing in?

That's what initially screwed up my 36k/24k moment. #;-}>

Haha, good thing it wasn't my permanent stop. I'm still aiming for 77777. So to avoid sudden B/P gains again, I'd have to stop at around 77600 incase of more sudden gains.

77700 should be sufficient. Wait a few weeks while going slow, save by save, refreshing teh profile constantly. #;-}>

Also, Coop... why is it silly to think of any user besides the 1st or 2nd users to a landmark number... retiring, either temporarily OR permanently... at said number?

Maybe he thinks everyone should continue no matter what? :P

That's a likely story, but then he shouldn't even call it a landmark if the #1 person gets to it. Since to him, stopping on landmarks is so antithetical to b/ping spirit and all. #;-}>