The George Bush Show 3 controversy

[Joe-Kidd]

About 30 minutes ago I posted a review on the George Bush Show 3 that in short stated that if there was a political message condemning the republican party and the Bush Administration conveyed by the auther then I would urge him to reconsider his views and think independantly.

First of all I did not mean to offend anyone with the bit about viruses and propaganda.

Second of all anyone who flamed me saying that I was a redneck, bad speller, or fanatic I say that this: I am sorry if I rubbed you the wrong way all I meant to say was to think independantly and let your choice be your choice.

Thirdly: I did not blam this submission, I didn't even vote one it I realize now that it was just a joke even though I found it a bit disturbing.

I hope that covers everything feel free to post your opinion of the controversial topic on this board and sorry if I pissed you off, but please don't flame me

[BWS]

All I have to say is this:
Im a Republican, but I dont like Bush; hows that for independant thinking? The sad thing is that his staff really does that shit; well, not as exagarated as the movie. Its sad but true; thats where all the short slogans come from. Maybe this isnt helpful at all, oh well, I said it anyways:)

[Joe-Kidd]

I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

[BWS]

At 7/24/03 02:17 AM, sinistercat wrote: I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

Just a heads up to a fellow conservative; I assume im right about saying you are. This forum is the most liberal forum that could ever be made! Well, not really, but I imagine people are gonna latch on to that comment and chew at it for days. I assume your new, due to your post count. Just a heads up...theres liberals galore in this forum! :)

[Joe-Kidd]

I'm trying not ro piss anyone off anymore and yes I am new, but thank you for your concern. George Bush is a good president I mean come on not just anyone can get to be the president you have to be extremely intellegent and have years of experience in politics. All I said was he needed to work on his image so he won't be so vulnerable to criticism.

[takeit2themax]

Fuck that sinistercat don't ever appologize to a liberal uh um im sorry I mean a communist :) Just shoot them in the back of the head and call it a day.

[JMHX]

At 7/24/03 09:19 AM, AmericanBADASS wrote: Fuck that sinistercat don't ever appologize to a liberal uh um im sorry I mean a communist :) Just shoot them in the back of the head and call it a day.

There goes taking this moron seriously.

[Slizor]

I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

You tell people to think independently yet you can't even think straight. You have directly contradicted yourself here, unless there is some kind of ex-President get out clause. According to your first bit (president and therefore should be respected) Clinton should also be respected.

Another thing, you define not liking Bush as not thinking independetly, which is just plain stupid. In fact it boggles the mind.

[JMHX]

Ah ah ah, in the words of Lewis Black, it staggers the mind.

[TheTio]

In the words of me, what the fuck is this shit...damn im drunk

[Kenney333]

At 7/24/03 02:17 AM, sinistercat wrote: I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

I dont exactly understand why i should not respect clinton, he did a good job in my mind. but i really think that bush is being used as a pawn by people who want to establish a secret oligarchy, i dont blame them because that much power could corrupt anyone, but there needs to be an opposition that is accepted by the ones in power.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/24/03 02:22 AM, BWS wrote:

At 7/24/03 02:17 AM, sinistercat wrote: I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

.....Um. I don't like Clinton, either, but he didn't do nearly as bad stuff in his past as Bush did. @_o'

Also, my best friend is also Republican, and she hates Bush, too. ^_^
------------

All in all, sense we understand the messages behind the videos by a man who also understands the past of Bush, then we can laugh at the inside jokes without "losing our individual thinking." lol.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/24/03 02:29 AM, sinistercat wrote: I'm trying not ro piss anyone off anymore and yes I am new, but thank you for your concern. George Bush is a good president I mean come on not just anyone can get to be the president you have to be extremely intellegent and have years of experience in politics....

Or be an actor or have a rich father or be in big business. Sound like any previous presidents, you know? lol.

Also, if that was the case, then you'd have to agree that ALL presidents were good, intelligent men.....but, history wishes to prove otherwise.

No one has to be intelligent to be president. Unfortunately. Read my quote.
-----------------
Also, and I'm not saying this cause I'm "liberal" (note, I said I didn't like Clinton, either), but Gore actually WAS really intelligent (you should read some of that guy's books. @_o' Few.).....but unfortunately, that actually led to his downfall.

While he was very smart, he didn't act like a "people person" or "average joe" in the process. He was more of a "nerd." That's why there were so many jokes about him being a "robot." While he was up there talking about his "lock box" theories and his business theories and such, Bush was just sitting there acting like a dope and asking his staff for help. If I can say so. lol.

However, Bush had the "average joe from Texas" thing down to a T. So, people related to him more than Gore and thought that he would protect the "average citizens" more so than Gore.

However, few of them seemed to realize that Bush was far from the "average" citizen, he was a billionare with a rich political/big business family. @_o'

So, you can see what he's been protecting recently with all his new "big business protection" and "upper class protection" laws.....not to mention all these suspicious wars revolving around oil. @_o'

None of this is surprising, however. You can usually see how a presidential term will turn out due to the president's past. Almost every time. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and it's father was a duck.....then it's going to wind up being a duck and favoring other ducks. What can I say?

[Ninja-Scientist]

PS. I forgot to add this. But it is absolutely not true that you need any qualifications to be president other than being born in the USA and being at least 25 years old. @_o' It even says so in the Constitution. lol.

And a good example of someone not needing intelligence or a history in politics to get a governmental position is happening in my state right now (CA). Guess who might be running for governor on the Republican's side?

Arnold Swartzenagger (forgive me, but I just can't spell that @_o').

OK. I like him as an actor and all, but that guy didn't even finish school. And has no history in politics other than marrying Maria Kennedy. @_o' Not to mention that he can barely speak English.

So, yeah. All it matters is who you know, each time.

I'd love to hear that guy's speeches.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/24/03 05:37 PM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

OK. I like him as an actor and all, but that guy didn't even finish school. And has no history in politics other than marrying Maria Kennedy. @_o' Not to mention that he can barely speak English.

Not to mention that actors are allowed certain "liberties" that politicians aren't. Afterall, punching a camera man is fine for an actor, but if Arnold goes and does that when he's the governor, people might take it the wrong way. ^_-

[karasz]

At 7/24/03 09:19 AM, AmericanBADASS wrote: Fuck that sinistercat don't ever appologize to a liberal uh um im sorry I mean a communist :) Just shoot them in the back of the head and call it a day.

good thing this is a liberal site...

[Explodapop]

I read throug all yor posts here Ninja, and what I find the most intresting is the fact that AL GORE was too smart for president. I agree, who would like someone they did not understand a shit outa to run their country? While GEORGE WALKER BUSH had the average stupidety, and I would suppose he was more a "ppl person". Not really.

But AL GORE was not too smart. If he had got a slighter bigger grasp of reality he would have understood that he needs to be at the average man's level. And rather put those theories to action later, and let the glory shine. And I think you need a huge grasp of reallity to get anywhere big. If not you are not going to be liked or trusted.

[JMHX]

Didn't you understand? To be president you need to be a human born in America at least 35 years old. Al Gore is and always will be a robot and/or dishwasher combo.

[Ted-Easton]

Just because a person's the president doesn't mean he should be respected. A person has to earn respect, regardless of how big your pretzels are.

[dudeitsallama]

At 7/24/03 04:51 PM, Kenney333 wrote:

At 7/24/03 02:17 AM, sinistercat wrote: I can understand your dislike for president Bush he does need to work on his public image...alot, but he is the president and therefore should be respected. Now a president that didn't deserve respect is Clinton

I dont exactly understand why i should not respect clinton, he did a good job in my mind. but i really think that bush is being used as a pawn by people who want to establish a secret oligarchy, i dont blame them because that much power could corrupt anyone, but there needs to be an opposition that is accepted by the ones in power.

It's obvious why you shouldn't respect Clinton. He got a blow job. In the White House. From a woman who wasn't his wife. And, then, *gasp* he lied about it. And lying to us about his sex life is the most horrible crime that he could commit because it's our business...somehow. Anyway, the feminazis said it was bad and we have to listen to them since they represent all women, who are an oppressed minority...that just happens to have the same rights and population as the majority. Yeah. Hate Clinton!

Phew! I feel so much better now that I got that off my chest. For anyone who can't tell: everything above is sarcasm including the part about feminists representing all women and women being an oppressed minority. Seriously, I know Clinton wasn't a perfect president, but you can't please everyone and people are allowed to make a few mistakes here and there as long as they don't do too much harm. The bottom line is that when Clinton was in office, the economy was up (I know he wasn't solely responsible but the president does have some control over the economy), and our biggest problem with him had nothing to do with politics. When life is so good that all you can complain about is who the president is fucking, then he's doing a good job.

[Kenney333]

At 7/24/03 10:50 PM, dudeitsallama wrote:

Seriously, I know Clinton wasn't a perfect president

thats the thing, he was a good president, so he gets my respect, so he couldnt turn down a blowjob, i cant say im pure in that way either, and he told a lie, im certainly not pure there either. i mean, he was making some peaceful progress in the middle east, which is incredible to be honest.

so i still dont know why i shouldnt respect him, i respect him as a president, and its not my place to judge his personal life.

[Explodapop]

At 7/24/03 11:11 PM, Kenney333 wrote: stuff about Clintion

There is one thing I wonder. Why did not the 9/11 attacks come during Bill Clinton's president period?
Was it only a coicidence?
---
...

[Explodapop]

At 7/25/03 08:17 AM, -PZY- wrote: a spelling mistake

That was supposed to coinsidence (or better, just random).

[dudeitsallama]

At 7/25/03 08:17 AM, -PZY- wrote: There is one thing I wonder. Why did not the 9/11 attacks come during Bill Clinton's president period?
Was it only a coinsidence?

I don't think it was a coinsidence. I have nothing to back that up, it's just my theory. Clinton was a strong president. He was a smart guy and he had a good idea of what he was doing. They were waiting for a weaker president to come along because that would increase the chances of the country falling apart from the panic caused by the attacks. Also, it didn't help that Al Queda had a personal grudge against the Bush family because of daddy Bush's work in Afghanistan.

[JMHX]

Point made. Bin Laden struck when America didn't have a lot of support for a president they viewed as having stolen the White House, and as more of a child than anything. However, when the attacks came, they actually increased his worldwide support. Now we've got the arrogant Mr. Bush thinking it'll work the other way around, in Iraq.

[Kenney333]

At 7/25/03 08:17 AM, -PZY- wrote:

There is one thing I wonder. Why did not the 9/11 attacks come during Bill Clinton's president period?
Was it only a coicidence?
---
...

i guess it was only a coincidence as i cannot think of how to prove otherwise.

But 9/11 happened because the US army has been deployed deployed in Saudi Arabia for a fairly long time now, to the US aremy its just a forward base, to the Saudi Government its a way to get friends in the west, but to the Saudi people, its an occupation. So Osama is angry his home country is being occupied and creates a "terrorist" group whose purpose is to end that occupation. They blow up some buildings in New York, everyone is told its a crazy religious thing, thus dehumanizing the attacks, and told that we arnt safe,and allowing the US military to do whatever they want.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/25/03 04:55 PM, Kenney333 wrote:

At 7/25/03 08:17 AM, -PZY- wrote:

But 9/11 happened because the US army has been deployed deployed in Saudi Arabia for a fairly long time now, to the US aremy its just a forward base, to the Saudi Government its a way to get friends in the west, but to the Saudi people, its an occupation. So Osama is angry his home country is being occupied and creates a "terrorist" group whose purpose is to end that occupation. They blow up some buildings in New York, everyone is told its a crazy religious thing, thus dehumanizing the attacks, and told that we arnt safe,and allowing the US military to do whatever they want.

That'll all true except for one thing. The terrorist group, Al Queda, and the Taliban were already in existance (though I don't know about their names)....AND, believe it or not, they were originally pro-American. @_o' In fact, they were put in power by America (and Saudi Arabia, and one other country) to fight the Zuraki government (anti-American) in Afgahnistan at that time. In fact, Bush Sr. as head of the CIA funded them with money and weapons to train Al Queada (and what not) to do so.

They wanted a pro-American Afgahnistan at that time partially so they would be more open to negotiations for that oil pipeline into Russian controlled oil in Central Asia (Bush W. also tried to continue those negotiations even after 9/11, when they became our enemy. @_o' So much for his, "we will not negotiate with terrorists speech.").

However, once the US began screwing with Saudia Arabia (and Palenstine) as you said (where most of the Taliban members are from) this ticked them off big time (and the pro-Americanism went down the hole almost as soon as it began, unfortunately). Osama took advantage of this, and decided it was a good time to take power......And it worked.

Well, once he was settled at the head of the Taliban, we had one attempted attack on the US by them, which didn't work (but no one did anything about it) and then we had 9/11, which succeeded, unfortunately.

I don't know if the first attempted attack happened when Clinton was in office.

------

All in all, though. The US needs to stop funding, creating, and ticking off our own terrorists. Then maybe stuff like this wouldn't happen.

No more nationalism. We need isolationism for once. Afterall, we gotta start working on our own problems from the inside. If we started the "war on terror" there, we would have been more prepared for a terrorist attack in the first place.

[Ninja-Scientist]

Ladies and Gentlemen, I now present to you the funnies review for the George Bush Show ever written. My friends and I saw this while they were over today, and we've been laughing our heads off ever since. From now on, our catch phrase is saying that we are "smarter than 90% of the world" everytime we make a mistake. LOL ^_^ The guy's from Texas, too.
------------
"you mother f!$@#$ yankee"

Presented by "Rekrak"

"I hate yankees and this is one reason why. Just because you can't pay for 3 hot dogs doesn't mean that the economy is bad and ya'll think that bush is an idiot because he's from Texas. Well f you because he saved your ass from people like Sadam Houssein and don't go thinking i'm just a minupulated trailor trash illiterate for taking up for him because I'm smarter than 90% of the world."
--------------
Hope you got as much of a kick out of this as we did. ^_-

If you ever see this Rekrak, let me tell you that if you are smarter than 90% of the world, then it just so happens that I've met exactly 10%. ^_-

I also don't get that hot dog thing. @_o' Not to mention that a "yankee" was what someone was called "way back when" when they were for America's freedom. lol. Don't get how that's an insult. Unless I'm missing something, of course.

I've seen the rest of this guy's reviews, and they're just as good. I wanna get on his waiting list. ^_-

[JMHX]

Come on, though, you have to admit GBS III is a great flash animation, though. I like #2, though, where they say "I thought we blocked all his news channels." "We didn't block FOX - We own it."

[luckoftheirish]

my god, some of you people, is the art of making people laugh just passed you up? its a joke, intended to be funny, many disclaimers in his shit, as sort of satire , but no the big bad people who are repressed by the "man" take all the shit and try to make it serious, it takes many things that are so true and puts an idiotic spin on them, i assume spit on any of you that took offense to that movie