Audio Portal "best Tracks Ever"

[Anth0n]

How are the "Best Tracks Ever" selected? What criteria is used, anyone know?

[Seriana]

Scores.

[TheCrazyPianist]

At 9/22/07 10:20 PM, DragonsGrief wrote: Scores.

OF COURSE! Not like the scoring system is abused at all!

[0con]

At 9/23/07 12:04 AM, TheCrazyPianist wrote:

At 9/22/07 10:20 PM, DragonsGrief wrote: Scores.

OF COURSE! Not like the scoring system is abused at all!

It's not abused.

[Anth0n]

Yes but then why are many of them not very highly scored?

[jrayteam6]

Because as soon as you go up there, it's like headshots for zero bombers.

[PaulStetich]

At 9/23/07 12:05 AM, 0con wrote:

At 9/23/07 12:04 AM, TheCrazyPianist wrote:

At 9/22/07 10:20 PM, DragonsGrief wrote: Scores.

OF COURSE! Not like the scoring system is abused at all!

It's not abused.

OK, if the score system wasnt abused then whats with the 0-voters? The newbies that post in here and whine about them? What about the fact that some tracks deserve to be in the all time top scoring, and there are some that were in the all time top scoring (like mine was at #19 last week) that didnt deserve it.

No, no, NO! NO! NO!!!! It's all about the downloads, my friend, its all about being used in the flash portal!

[DJ-Ravecore]

It's all about review score!

[Buoy]

At 9/23/07 05:41 AM, DJ-Ravecore wrote: It's all about review score!

No, review score sure doesn't count for it to be in the top 50 alltime list

[Para-Noid]

It should be overall. As in Reviews, Score, Review Average, Listens, Votes, Downloads, all of those on a average

[0con]

At 9/23/07 03:55 AM, PaulStetich wrote:

At 9/23/07 12:05 AM, 0con wrote:

It's not abused.

OK, if the score system wasnt abused then whats with the 0-voters?

I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Momo-the-Monkey]

Ok, it's definitely not a score for anything, because nothing changes for a week, and the scores/views/downloads/whatever goes up and down between each one.

If you notice, you can find the answer here

[Momo-the-Monkey]

Bah, nevermind that last link. I just noticed that's only for the side panel.

I think it's either the mods or A-Bot

[VegetarianMeat]

Kind of unrelated I guess, but has anyone noticed that the #1 song at the moment is really... mediocre?

[Buoy]

At 9/23/07 03:32 PM, VegetarianMeat wrote: Kind of unrelated I guess, but has anyone noticed that the #1 song at the moment is really... mediocre?

Ya I agree- but I guess people like the concept

[DJ-Ravecore]

At 9/23/07 06:09 AM, SBB wrote:

At 9/23/07 05:41 AM, DJ-Ravecore wrote: It's all about review score!

No, review score sure doesn't count for it to be in the top 50 alltime list

I KNOW, but it would be a great idea!

[PaulStetich]

At 9/23/07 03:57 PM, DJ-Ravecore wrote:

At 9/23/07 06:09 AM, SBB wrote:

At 9/23/07 05:41 AM, DJ-Ravecore wrote: It's all about review score!

No, review score sure doesn't count for it to be in the top 50 alltime list

I KNOW, but it would be a great idea!

Yeah. I personally think that download count would be a better idea.

Cause apparently, you dont hear much about ParagonX9 anymore thnx to the scores.

[Buoy]

Reason why I think popularity and downloads shouldn't count too much is that it gives unknown artists some exposure too

[Chronamut]

hey sbb you've almost reviewed every sinngle one of my songs!

however you are still missing some ;)

[Dj-Immune]

At 9/23/07 12:05 AM, 0con wrote:

At 9/23/07 12:04 AM, TheCrazyPianist wrote:

At 9/22/07 10:20 PM, DragonsGrief wrote: Scores.

OF COURSE! Not like the scoring system is abused at all!

It's not abused.

Just to end the topic at hand, it is abused.

You really think it's fair now that people can 5 a song every day now, or 0 a song every day? It's the only thing I have a problem with, now that the size limit has been pushed up to 8 mb.