im a new pollack(thats wat friends call me) and i want to sell some of them, heres 1 painting
called happiness

i dont think people would want to buy that, but its looks cool.

yea, its more of the "sophisticated" kind of art that only like stupid snotty museum owners get.....that kinda sucks, but moneys money

It looks like ketchup and mustard squirted on a pile of green shit.

I like it.

hey fuck u
its called abstract expressionism and before you mock something u dnt no about, maybe u should try to understand it

It looks ok but it just looks like you splashed paint around.

I'm sorry, did I say I liked it?

I really meant:

IT LOOKS LIKE FUCKING SHIT OUT OF MY ASSHOLE.

Get some talent, kid.

It's not abstract enough, it's still obvious what it's intended to be. The way I see it, art like this is more about the technique, and the explanation of the piece, rather than the piece itself.
I don't like your color choices, it seems very dull and disgusting. If you're going to work in this style, definitely try using some much more viabrant colors.

At 9/20/07 08:12 PM, compl33tbull wrote: im a new pollack

HAhahah... humble much?

no, your more like the new ballsack.

Sorry ... dont sell that, just dont.

I mean, would u hang it on ur living room's wall?

At 9/20/07 08:12 PM, compl33tbull wrote: im a new pollack(thats wat friends call me) and i want to sell some of them, heres 1 painting
called happiness

Let Jackson Pollack be Jackson Pollack.

At 9/20/07 11:40 PM, Frolikyn wrote: Sorry ... dont sell that, just dont.

I mean, would u hang it on ur living room's wall?

If the yellow was pale green, the pink an even lighter pale green and the green in the back was white.
Yeah, I'd probably replace the tiger painting =\

At 9/20/07 08:42 PM, compl33tbull wrote: hey fuck u
its called abstract expressionism and before you mock something u dnt no about, maybe u should try to understand it

i understand that any person in their right mind would go only as high as 5 cents with free shipping and handling to get this, just to use it for prop comedy.

At 9/20/07 11:30 PM, MindChamber wrote: no, your more like the new ballsack.

Wasn't he a writer?

I'd recommend sending this atrocious representation of a movement that died with Pollack here:
http://www.museumofbadart.org/

At least that way you might be able to get a museum credit for your portfolio. Your work still looks like the inside of the toilet after I've had way too much to drink.

At 9/20/07 08:12 PM, compl33tbull wrote: im a new pollack

Pollock?

At 9/20/07 08:52 PM, ElementalSoldier wrote:

At 9/20/07 08:42 PM, compl33tbull wrote: hey fuck u
its called abstract expressionism and before you mock something u dnt no about, maybe u should try to understand it

I took art class I know about this gay shit, and before you bitch at people about knowledge that they don't know about,first know that they don't know about it,I have an opinion to think your thick glob of paint sux3rz.

elemental go fuckyourself so what if you went to art if you went to art class? i went also and i would like to see you do it , you fucking maggot , i agree learn everything before you talk if not dont post anything

Pollock was a hack artist and so are you. Piss off.

I drew something like that in kindengarten.

At 9/21/07 12:53 AM, Coaly wrote:

At 9/20/07 08:12 PM, compl33tbull wrote: im a new pollack

Pollock?

Pollock?

At 9/20/07 08:14 PM, compl33tbull wrote: yea, its more of the "sophisticated" kind of art that only like stupid snotty museum owners get.....that kinda sucks, but moneys money

Riiight.. the only reason that crap gets into museums is because the artist is top-notch. It's the signature, not the picture. I heard of a canvas, painted green. That's it. The signature made that, not the picture.

At 9/20/07 08:42 PM, compl33tbull wrote: hey fuck u
its called abstract expressionism and before you mock something u dnt no about, maybe u should try to understand it

Okay.. you're expressing that art is fine as long as you call it 'abstract expressionism', eh? That makes total sense. Listen buddy, abstract expressionism doesn't work if you're a bad artist, I'm afraid.

At 9/21/07 01:02 AM, 1sparrow wrote: elemental go fuckyourself so what if you went to art if you went to art class? i went also and i would like to see you do it , you fucking maggot , i agree learn everything before you talk if not dont post anything

Art class? What the hell does art class have to do with anything? 'Art Class' is crap IMO, but that doesn't mean that makes you a better artist. It takes talent to draw.

And stop saying fuck. It doesn't make you look hardcore, it makes you look pathetic. Extend your vocabulary.

But anyway, can you draw anything that isn't 3rd grade material? 'cause I'd like to see it.

Oh boy... another gay "What is art?" thread. People, stop arguing into the shit of nowhere >_>

At 9/20/07 11:30 PM, MindChamber wrote: no, your more like the new ballsack.

Balzac?

lol, wannabe

At 9/21/07 10:05 AM, McJesus wrote: stuff

in the art buisness, we call that a "burn"

i really dont think you could make a living off these

At 9/20/07 08:36 PM, wiid wrote: It looks like ketchup and mustard squirted on a pile of green shit.

I have to agree dude....i look like ketchup and mustard..
i don't really like it at all...

It looks like you took a nice runny dump all over the canvas, then rubbed it around a little and called it art.

this is how you paint this is an oil paint i finished last around the begging of june. so face.

i forgot the name in the prvious post. its called "baby tentacle montser" wich started out as a glass of absinthe and a dagger but i dont know what happened and and it turned into a tentacle monster.

but then again what are the dimensions saind paint becausse if my geuss is right then this is actaully
extraordinary.