Bush's Racist Past

[Ninja-Scientist]

You know. I thought about posting this a while back, but forgot.

This issue was in the newspapers a LONG time ago, when Bush was governor of Texas. However, the strange thing was that once he began running for president, no one even brought it up anymore.

When Bush was governor of Texas, there was this big "accident" at his office. Apparently, a small tour group was checking out the governor's building and went by Bush's office to check it out and maybe see their governor in action.

Well, Bush was in the middle of signing some waivers for capital punishment to be carried out on some convicted Texas criminals (the governor's job). Well, after Mr. Bush got the papers, he turned to his secretary and said, "There are no White people or women on these, right?" His secretary said no. And then Bush said, "Good. The last time I put a woman to death, I got hell from the public." And then he signed the papers without even looking at them. Well, obviously Bush didn't realize that there was a tour group outside his office who heard the whole thing.

Afterwards, the majority of them complained about the innocent, and the mannor of their governor. And a few of them even took their complaints to the media. The issue was published widely in Texas and abroad. However, nothing was ever done about it. And once Bush began running for president, it was never brought up again.

I just wonder why that is, and if anyone else here remembers reading about that incident a while back as well.

[JMHX]

That's the miracle of having ties capable of covering up situations like this. Of course, the republicans never allowed Bill Clinton to forget the women who he supposedly had...relations with on the way to the White House, and impeached him for receiving oral sex from an intern. That's the joy of having the Congress in your party's favor -- you can remain in power after engaging in a war that...so it seems...is based on quite faulty intelligence.

[FullTimeJerk]

Both parties are idiots you can't say otherwise. It's good to be in the anticapitalist party. DOWN WITH CAPITALISM!!!

I'm sure that the people who voted for Bush were well aware of this...

(Sarcasm or not? Even I can't decide)

[RoboTripper]

I've heard that claim many times before, but since I've never seen it verified by any news service, I just mark it down as rumour/urban myth.

What is not rumour however, is that the Bush family made much of their fortune (which was eventually used to get GW to the White House) by funding the rise of the Third Reich in Germany. Even after WWII had begun, their dealings with Germany continued and GW's granddad Prescott and his father-in-law George Herbert Walker had assetts seized under the trading-with-the-enemy act.

[aviewaskewed]

At 7/12/03 03:35 PM, Crack_Smoker wrote: I've heard that claim many times before, but since I've never seen it verified by any news service, I just mark it down as rumour/urban myth.

A good way to deal with things.

But yeah, if it is true, than it just shows you what money and influence can do for you...I mean, W is one of the worst speakers I've ever heard ("There are some folks out there who wanna rewrite history...revisonist historians I call them" So does everybody else W). But because he had the money, and the name, and the backing, he got himself into the White House. Sad how much power money truly has.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/12/03 01:09 PM, BinLadenmustdie wrote: I read it on an anonymous internet message board. It must be true!

Heh heh. Well get off your butt and look up some old newspapers at your library. Or, better yet, Harpers recently republished the article after Bush was in office. You can try to check out Harpers if you like (they always usually list their sources and others you can view for more information as well). ^_-

[Ted-Easton]

People are getting a lot more vocal about the "misleading" information the Bush administration gave out prior to the Iraq war.
I hope this blows up with some big conspiracy.
"Baghdadgate"...no, that just doesn't have the ring to it.

[JMHX]

At 7/12/03 04:47 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: People are getting a lot more vocal about the "misleading" information the Bush administration gave out prior to the Iraq war.
I hope this blows up with some big conspiracy.
"Baghdadgate"...no, that just doesn't have the ring to it.

Bushgate. That works. I'd like to see a nice conspiracy we'll talk about for decades come from this as well. Oh Ted, you're my favorite Canadian.

[Commander-K25]

At 7/12/03 04:47 PM, Ted_Easton wrote: People are getting a lot more vocal about the "misleading" information the Bush administration gave out prior to the Iraq war.
I hope this blows up with some big conspiracy.
"Baghdadgate"...no, that just doesn't have the ring to it.

They're usually pretty quick to put a -gate on the end so they can have their nice, neat, pre-written scandal. It seems, though, that the CIA told the administration that the Africa information was real. Bush probably didn't know that it was false.

What a lot of the left is trying to do with this though is use the falseness of a single minor statement in one speech to eclipse all the more solid and important things.

[TheTio]

At 7/13/03 01:00 AM, Commander-K25 wrote: What a lot of the left is trying to do with this though is use the falseness of a single minor statement in one speech to eclipse all the more solid and important things.

What solid things?

[Ninja-Scientist]

All in all, Bush lied about WMD. And even worse, he went to war with a country without finding out if there was really need to to begin with. In addition to that, Mr. "anti-terrorism/WMD" and Mr. "Pro-UN resolutions" completely dropped those same concerns for a more dangerous country who we already KNOW is making WMD against US resolutions. Korea (note that Korea suspiciously has no oil, while Iraq has the second largest in the world).

All in all, if you can't excuse Clinton's lying (which I don't) then you can't excuse what Bush did, which was even worse.

You should at least be able to say that he "was wrong." It shouldn't hurt you. lol. After all, if you can't do that, then you would have to deem his actions "perfect," and they were far from that.

Actually, at this point, I'd be pleased if some of these obsessive "Bushies" would just admit that Bush isn't perfect himself (no one is), and then ask themselves why he's not. I say this considering that they defend everything he's done, which is just inhuman. @_o'

That's that.
-------------

PS. There were a lot of people responding to "my posts" without actually reading any of them first. @_o' I really suggest anyone here, who is still in favor of the Bush administration, to read all the information I put down. Not because I hate Bush, but because I would like you all to be aware about the doings of the US administration, both past and present, before you are so quick to judge. Also, it wouldn't be fair to respond to my points, if you didn't truly listen to them to begin with.

Also, I think it's ironic that there were people here saying simply "you're wrong about Bush" and outrightly denying all accusations made against him.....without any proof of their own. Mostly, I was just listening to people go "You're wrong and stupid. It just never happened. And that's that." @_o'

So, all in all, if you are prepared to go against the accusations made by Bush, then I look foward to it. ^_^ However, at least prepare to back your retorical information so that I will have something more logical to grasp onto other than "I just said so." I'd appreciate that.

But, in any case, I think it is just silly of someone to criticise someone elses information, when they list none themselves. ^_-

[Commander-K25]

At 7/13/03 08:47 PM, Ninja_Scientist wrote: All in all, Bush lied about WMD.

Bush mentioned a report that turned out to be untrue. Did he lie or was he deceived? You don't really know so don't jump to conclusions.

And even worse, he went to war with a country without finding out if there was really need to to begin with.

Check your history. It was confirmed during and after the Gulf War that Iraq had WMDs. Where did they go if Saddam didn't destroy them?

In addition to that, Mr. "anti-terrorism/WMD" and Mr. "Pro-UN resolutions" completely dropped those same concerns for a more dangerous country who we already KNOW is making WMD against US resolutions.

Korea is not the same situation in any way. It is exactly because they have nuclear weapons that we're avoiding war with them. Iraq called for preventative disarmament; North Korea calls for containment and political pressure.

Korea (note that Korea suspiciously has no oil, while Iraq has the second largest in the world).

And that's exactly what that argument is, mere suspicion.

You should at least be able to say that he "was wrong." It shouldn't hurt you. lol. After all, if you can't do that, then you would have to deem his actions "perfect," and they were far from that.

What if some doesn't happen to agree with you? *gasp* The shock! The horror!

Actually, at this point, I'd be pleased if some of these obsessive "Bushies" would just admit that Bush isn't perfect himself (no one is),

Bushies? Where are all these blind Bush supporters?

At 7/14/03 01:24 AM, Commander-K25 wrote:

Bush mentioned a report that turned out to be untrue. Did he lie or was he deceived? You don't really know so don't jump to conclusions.

Well if he didn't lie it was very irresponsible to endanger human lives on false basis. If he doesn't know what's real and what isn't when it comes to making such important decisions, he isn't fit to be president.

Check your history. It was confirmed during and after the Gulf War that Iraq had WMDs. Where did they go if Saddam didn't destroy them?

You don't have any proof that he didn't destroy them.

Korea is not the same situation in any way. It is exactly because they have nuclear weapons that we're avoiding war with them. Iraq called for preventative disarmament; North Korea calls for containment and political pressure.

Ok, you can't claim that Iraq has WMDs and then on the next paragrpah claim that they don't.

And that's exactly what that argument is, mere suspicion.

Well then.
FACT: Of all the countries with dictators and terrorists, America choose to liberate the one with oil.

What if some doesn't happen to agree with you? *gasp* The shock! The horror!

So you don't think he was wrong?

Bushies? Where are all these blind Bush supporters?

...Take a look around, or in the mirror.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 01:24 AM, Commander-K25 wrote:

At 7/13/03 08:47 PM, Ninja_Scientist wrote: All in all, Bush lied about WMD.

Bush mentioned a report that turned out to be untrue. Did he lie or was he deceived? You don't really know so don't jump to conclusions.

Oh, yeah. I forgot about the big conspiracy theory that's just come out from all the pro-Bushies. Sorry, I'll add that in here.

It's funny that Bush was the one who first wanted the war with Iraq, brought it to Congress and the UN (who both first refused), kept pressuring them for it, and then only got them to go for it because of the "WMD" idea....and then HE was the one who was lied to just so the country would go to war, by the ones who were unsure about it to begin with. Ironic. Afterall, we all know how much it would benefit the UN investigators over Bush's interest.

Damn investigators. They framed OJ, too.

And even worse, he went to war with a country without finding out if there was really need to to begin with.

Check your history. It was confirmed during and after the Gulf War that Iraq had WMDs. Where did they go if Saddam didn't destroy them?

Ah. That's a good point. Firstly, I'd like to say once again the Iraq first got ALL it's weapons building technology from the US (again, including WMD and biological and chemical warfare). After Iraq helped "beat up" Iran for us, we then forced Iraq to destroy the weapons or even went over there to destroy them ourselves or make sure they were destroyed.

In fact, Bush semi-admitted this by saying that the US had a hand in making sure that Suddam "dismantled his weapons" after the Iranian Conflict and such, but then he said that "they weren't sure if he had done so completely."

However, we didn't get all of the weapons or machinary, so we just forbid that Iraq should continue using the materials and weapons we gave them. When the UN investigators covered Iraq, they DID find these old weapons and machinery. This was one of the only interesting issues that Fox ever covered, also. lol. ^_-

However, they were all too old and delapidated from age to use. Know what this means? That Iraq actually listened to us, believe it or not, and didn't use the stuff we gave them after Iran was put into shambles.

In addition to that, Mr. "anti-terrorism/WMD" and Mr. "Pro-UN resolutions" completely dropped those same concerns for a more dangerous country who we already KNOW is making WMD against US resolutions.

Korea is not the same situation in any way. It is exactly because they have nuclear weapons that we're avoiding war with them. Iraq called for preventative disarmament; North Korea calls for containment and political pressure.

Um. Firstly, a nuclear weapon is a WMD. Therefore, we went to war because a country was A) disobeying UN resolutions, and B) had nukes (supposedly).

Yet, Korea is A) disobeing UN resolutions, and B) has nukes (really).

But that's entirely different, of course.

So, why didn't we try containment and political pressure on Iraq before we bombed them?

So we're avoiding a war with a country "because they have nuclear weapons." Then why didn't we "avoid a war" with Iraq if Bush was really so sure that they had nuclear weapons? Perhaps could it be that he knew they didn't?.....and that he lied?

Korea (note that Korea suspiciously has no oil, while Iraq has the second largest in the world).

And that's exactly what that argument is, mere suspicion.

Actually, what's not suspicion is that Bush was set to gain something from the war with Iraq, but not in a war with Korea. So, your ideas about Bush's ever so famous morals is the only thing that is debatable on that subject (both for and against).

You should at least be able to say that he "was wrong." It shouldn't hurt you. lol. After all, if you can't do that, then you would have to deem his actions "perfect," and they were far from that.

What if some doesn't happen to agree with you? *gasp* The shock! The horror!

So.......you do think he's perfect?

@_o' Wow.

"Perfect" is a term used for Christ and the bratty kids of parents in denyal. Not Bush.

Actually, at this point, I'd be pleased if some of these obsessive "Bushies" would just admit that Bush isn't perfect himself (no one is),

Bushies? Where are all these blind Bush supporters?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

[DrxFeelgood]

At 7/12/03 03:59 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

Well, Bush was in the middle of signing some waivers for capital punishment to be carried out on some convicted Texas criminals (the governor's job). Well, after Mr. Bush got the papers, he turned to his secretary and said, "There are no White people or women on these, right?" His secretary said no. And then Bush said, "Good. The last time I put a woman to death, I got hell from the public." And then he signed the papers without even looking at them. Well, obviously Bush didn't realize that there was a tour group outside his office who heard the whole thing. Afterwards, the majority of them complained about the innocent, and the manner of their governor. And a few of them even took their complaints to the media.

It figures that a blabbermouth would bitch to the media to be an attention whore and try and tear Bush down, only because they're all pissy about him getting higher in the political spectrum.

The issue was published widely in Texas and abroad. However, nothing was ever done about it. And once Bush began running for president, it was never brought up again.

Aw, that's too bad.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 01:43 AM, _crossbreed_ wrote:

At 7/14/03 01:24 AM, Commander-K25 wrote:

Well then.
FACT: Of all the countries with dictators and terrorists, America choose to liberate the one with oil.

ROFLMAO!!! Oh man, cross! That is the funniest quote I've ever heard. That sums up America's involvement in world relations to date. It's funny cause it's true. *whipes away tear*

I am so putting that on a T-Shirt. No joke. ^_^

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 02:02 AM, 70TA wrote:

At 7/12/03 03:59 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

It figures that a blabbermouth would bitch to the media to be an attention whore and try and tear Bush down, only because they're all pissy about him getting higher in the political spectrum.

Um. Try about 10 "blabbermouth attention whores." Also, smarty pants, Bush admitted to the inncident when he "appologized" for it in the papers.

The issue was published widely in Texas and abroad. However, nothing was ever done about it. And once Bush began running for president, it was never brought up again.

Aw, that's too bad.

You know. I would have thought better of a guy who calls people bitches, hippies, boners, pissy, and whores whenever they say something to upset him. But look at that. There you go saying a sentence without a single curse word or a fragment acknowledging your love of guns and hitting people in cars. I'm disappointed 70AT.

That quote on your profile really mislead me.

At 7/14/03 02:03 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

ROFLMAO!!! Oh man, cross! That is the funniest quote I've ever heard. That sums up America's involvement in world relations to date. It's funny cause it's true. *whipes away tear*

I am so putting that on a T-Shirt. No joke. ^_^

lol, I'm glad I made you laugh.

By the way, although there is no oil in Afghanistan, there is a multi-billion dollar plan for a pipeline. @_@

http://www.rense.com/general15/whywerereally.htm

[DrxFeelgood]

At 7/14/03 02:11 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

Um. Try about 10 "blabbermouth attention whores." Also, smarty pants, Bush admitted to the inncident when he "appologized" for it in the papers.

Well then, that's good. I'm gald to hear that Bush appologized. See, he isn't a bad guy.

You know. I would have thought better of a guy who calls people bitches, hippies, boners, pissy, and whores whenever they say something to upset him. But look at that. There you go saying a sentence without a single curse word or a fragment acknowledging your love of guns and hitting people in cars. I'm disappointed 70AT. That quote on your profile really mislead me.

What? "At least I know my car will blow yours off the road!"? You have mis interpreted what it means. What that is saying is that my car, a 1970 Pontiac Trans Am, which now has 470 horsepower, will beat your car in a race. Now, I know what you're thinking, how cocky, etc. Well Christ, I'm sorry, but my car is a bad ass, Detroit street machine that has kicked ass all it's life. It doesn't mean that I hit people or things with my car. I never have, and hopefully never will, no accidents to date so far *knocks on wood*. Did you think I hit people and things?! Well I don't. Watch Joe Dirt, near the very end, Kid Rock pulls up in his T/A and says that line to David Spade. So they race and Kid Rock loses. He lost because David Spade is a Mopar fan, and he was in charge of most of that movie, meaning he could put whatever he wanted in it, so he, being a Mopar fan wanted to win in a race no matter what. If you see it, you'll know what I mean.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 02:25 AM, _crossbreed_ wrote:

At 7/14/03 02:03 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

By the way, although there is no oil in Afghanistan, there is a multi-billion dollar plan for a pipeline. @_@

I know!!! I'm assuming you're talking about the one into Central Asian oil, right? Guess who started that plan? As if you didn't already know? Bush Sr. That's actually why he was the one who helped put the Taliban in power and funded them, etc. And his son tried to carry out the oil pipeline plan.

In fact! What makes me so angry about that is that Bush temporarily halted the FBI investigations surrounding the attacks on 9/11 to attempt to continue negotiations with the Talbian for that same pipeline. @_o'

At the same time he was giving his famous, "we will not negotiate with terrorists" speech. lol.

If he didn't do this, then Osama might not have gotten away.

Here. Here are some on-line sources I have on that, too. ^_^ I had more but I forgot some of them. Most of my sources on this come from magazines, like Harpers, which I can't show you over the internet, unfortunately. But you can try the Progressive website, too, if you're interested. They sometimes post their articles there, too, for free. ^_^

http://www.gwbush.com/archive/index2-5-02.shtml

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0201/08/ltm.05.html

http://www.rense.com/general15/whywerereally.htm

Oh! Also, you should check out some of the earlier posts I made for the "Questions for Pro-Bush people" topic. I have a lot of information on that there as well. ^_- I figure you might be interested.

[JMHX]

Somewhere along the line, it always comes down to Ninja or Commander outclassing every else. I'm not even going to throw an arm out there -- it's just going to be ripped off.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 02:44 AM, 70TA wrote:

At 7/14/03 02:11 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

Um. Try about 10 "blabbermouth attention whores." Also, smarty pants, Bush admitted to the inncident when he "appologized" for it in the papers.

Well then, that's good. I'm gald to hear that Bush appologized. See, he isn't a bad guy.

"Citizens of America. I'm sorry I allowed the killing of a group of Black men simply because they were Black."

.....don't you think it's more likely he appologized simply because he was caught? I think that's why he was sorry. lol.

"Tonight on Fox, a bunch of KKK members were caught for the murder of a Black man and then appologized for their crimes. See? They're not bad guys."

Um. A group of men DIED!! And more importantly, they might not have if they weren't Black!!! "Ooops. Sorry," doesn't cut it.

You know. I would have thought better of a guy who calls people bitches, hippies, boners, pissy, and whores whenever they say something to upset him. But look at that. There you go saying a sentence without a single curse word or a fragment acknowledging your love of guns and hitting people in cars. I'm disappointed 70AT. That quote on your profile really mislead me.

What? "At least I know my car will blow yours off the road!"? You have mis interpreted what it means. What that is saying is that my car, a 1970 Pontiac Trans Am, which now has 470 horsepower, will beat your car in a race. Now, I know what you're thinking, how cocky, etc. Well Christ, I'm sorry, but my car is a bad ass, Detroit street machine that has kicked ass all it's life. It doesn't mean that I hit people or things with my car. I never have, and hopefully never will, no accidents to date so far *knocks on wood*. Did you think I hit people and things?! Well I don't. Watch Joe Dirt, near the very end, Kid Rock pulls up in his T/A and says that line to David Spade. So they race and Kid Rock loses. He lost because David Spade is a Mopar fan, and he was in charge of most of that movie, meaning he could put whatever he wanted in it, so he, being a Mopar fan wanted to win in a race no matter what. If you see it, you'll know what I mean.

Um. God, I hope you realize that I was joking about that. @_o' And I wasn't linking the "hitting people in cars" to your quote in that way. *sigh* The quotes annoying enough, but it was roadkill joke. As in, I don't want to see you behind the wheel of ANY car. Especially with your attitude towards killing things and speeding down the freeway.

In anycase, I think it's funny that the only thing you'd defend yourself against is that particular line. lol.

Of course, I guess there's not much to defend about the other stuff, sense I was linking to things you did a few posts up. Heh heh.

.......and where the heck did that "Joe Dirt" thing come from?

Thanks for the info, Ninja. ^_^ I find it odd that Bush is waging a war on drugs when he spent most of his teens powdering his nose with coke and then spending his adulthood denying it.

Here's a thought!
Maybe he could liberate South America from its dictators and, which is America's main source of drug imports and fix what they screwed up in Afghanistan, leaving opium production levels at an all-time high. War on drugs indeed.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 02:54 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: Somewhere along the line, it always comes down to Ninja or Commander outclassing every else. I'm not even going to throw an arm out there -- it's just going to be ripped off.

lol. Well, don't look at me. If someone talks about an issue I'm interested in, then I'll talk to them about it. And if someone responds to me, I respond to them. ^_- Works for me.

Although the one you mentioned doesn't like it when I respond at all. lol.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 02:59 AM, _crossbreed_ wrote: Thanks for the info, Ninja. ^_^ I find it odd that Bush is waging a war on drugs when he spent most of his teens powdering his nose with coke and then spending his adulthood denying it.

I don't think it's that odd. Afterall, he's the perfect example of what drugs do to you.

[DrxFeelgood]

At 7/14/03 02:57 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

"Tonight on Fox, a bunch of KKK members were caught for the murder of a Black man and then appologized for their crimes. See? They're not bad guys."

Are you serious? They got off?!?!?!? If they did, then there is a problem. If they did the crime, appology or no appology, they will be sentenced harshly in court, I'm sure of it. I do know that here, a couple days ago or something, they found a former Gestopo type guy from the Holocaust and now he's being tried. There are still some of those guys left, but few, and they just found one, like I said.

...As in, I don't want to see you behind the wheel of ANY car. Especially with your attitude towards killing things and speeding down the freeway.

Lol! That's not nice. I'm responsible, believe it or not. My "speeding" is on the dl. I do those things responsibly at tracks.

In anycase, I think it's funny that the only thing you'd defend yourself against is that particular line. lol.

Well, I love that line, it fits me, and backs me up when I race, lol!

.......and where the heck did that "Joe Dirt" thing come from?

What do you mean? Now I'm confused.

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 03:28 AM, 70TA wrote:

At 7/14/03 02:57 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

"Tonight on Fox, a bunch of KKK members were caught for the murder of a Black man and then appologized for their crimes. See? They're not bad guys."

Are you serious? They got off?!?!?!? If they did, then there is a problem. If they did the crime, appology or no appology, they will be sentenced harshly in court, I'm sure of it. I do know that here, a couple days ago or something, they found a former Gestopo type guy from the Holocaust and now he's being tried. There are still some of those guys left, but few, and they just found one, like I said.

.....I'm glad you agree with me. But now that you agree with me, you should know that I was kidding. It was a Bush reference. My point was that if you do something wrong like that, "appology or no appology" you should be punished for it.

Bush okayed the death penalty to be used on a few people just because they were Black. That means that these people were all put to death, when they perhaps shouldn't have been. Sometimes the court rulings don't work out that well. That's why the governor has to OK these sorts of things.

And even those who should have been put to death, should have been for their crimes. Not because of the color of their skin. More importantly, if they were White or women, then Bush might not have put them to death, simply because of the fact (that's why he asked before he signed the papers without reading them).

All in all. Bush was racist. And, to make things worse, he was racist involving an issue with the lives of minorities on the line. The fact that he "appologized" once he was caught is meaningless.

And appologizing for being racists with people's lives on the line, once he was caught, doesn't make him an "OK guy" afterwards. That's why I used the KKK metaphor joke.

...As in, I don't want to see you behind the wheel of ANY car. Especially with your attitude towards killing things and speeding down the freeway.

Lol! That's not nice. I'm responsible, believe it or not. My "speeding" is on the dl. I do those things responsibly at tracks.

In anycase, I think it's funny that the only thing you'd defend yourself against is that particular line. lol.

Well, I love that line, it fits me, and backs me up when I race, lol!

.......I meant that I think it's funny that you'd only defend yourself against that one line of mine, instead of the other gags about you cussing whenever you got upset, etc.

.......and where the heck did that "Joe Dirt" thing come from?

What do you mean? Now I'm confused.

I know, 70AT, I know.

I was refering to your sudden expedition into why you love your car and into the movie "Joe Dirt."

[Ninja-Scientist]

At 7/14/03 03:14 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

At 7/14/03 02:59 AM, _crossbreed_ wrote: Thanks for the info, Ninja. ^_^ I find it odd that Bush is waging a war on drugs when he spent most of his teens powdering his nose with coke and then spending his adulthood denying it.

Oh. Just for fun, I found this on the internet, recently. Now, it was from a site that obviously hated Bush a lot. So, to be fair, I don't know how reliable it is. I just thought you'd get a kick out of it anyway.
----------------
A researcher called G. W. Bush house in Austin. G. W was sleeping in late and was awaken by the call. He was half-asleep when he answered the phone.
----------
Researcher: "Excuse me, sir. I'm conducting a survey."

GW Bush: "Questions? No political questions."

Reseacher: "Political, sir?"

GW Bush: "Do you know who you are calling?"

Researcher: "We call numbers at random, sir. May I ask --"

GW Bush: "What is this about?"

Researcher: "We are asking people do they think COKE beats PEPSI."

GW BUSH: "I've never tried pepsi. Is that a new thing?"

[DrxFeelgood]

At 7/14/03 03:58 AM, Ninja_Scientist wrote:

I was refering to your sudden expedition into why you love your car and into the movie "Joe Dirt."

That quote, "At least I know my car will blow yours off the road!" came from a scene in Joe Dirt. It was at the end of the movie, where Kid Rock says it to David Spade before they race. You'd have to see the movie. It's a classic line, that's why I use it and like it. Because when some ass clown thinks he can beat me on the street, I just use it and my ride does the rest. Anyways, it's a hilarious movie, watch it.