Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 9/4/07 09:54 PM, animehater wrote: Sorry, not used to a laptop. What I'm saying is if we try to get rid of race we might get minorities as enemies ironically. Ya know because we would eventually have to target the racial organisations that try to represent them.

I would think those organizations would generally be ignored, rather than targeted, and then they slowly dissolve (or something like that).

Which leads to another thing, why does the NAACP still have the CP?

Better question. After all these years, why does the NAACP still exist?

At 9/5/07 08:36 AM, Pheidippides wrote:

At 9/4/07 09:54 PM, animehater wrote:

Better question. After all these years, why does the NAACP still exist?

Because you can't legally destory an organisation that hasn't broken any laws.

At 9/5/07 08:09 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Because you can't legally destory an organisation that hasn't broken any laws.

I didn't mean it like that. I just meant they have all of the same rights as whites now, so there's really no reason for them to continue on. I mean come on, what else do they want?

At 9/6/07 08:36 AM, Pheidippides wrote: I didn't mean it like that. I just meant they have all of the same rights as whites now, so there's really no reason for them to continue on. I mean come on, what else do they want?

I would agree. A racially based organisation should not exist. Rrepresenting the underprivleged and so on is fine but you shouldn'y do it by race only. But as I was saying, Why do they still have the CP? That's not even close to politically correct.

At 9/6/07 08:36 AM, Pheidippides wrote:

At 9/5/07 08:09 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:

I didn't mean it like that. I just meant they have all of the same rights as whites now, so there's really no reason for them to continue on. I mean come on, what else do they want?

There a special interest group, what does any special interest group want?

At 9/6/07 09:54 PM, animehater wrote: But as I was saying, Why do they still have the CP? That's not even close to politically correct.

I agree. lol colored people. I always thought that was such a silly term.

At 9/6/07 10:02 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: There a special interest group, what does any special interest group want?

Good point. You have grown very wise, young padawan.

At 9/7/07 05:05 PM, Pheidippides wrote:

At 9/6/07 10:02 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: There a special interest group, what does any special interest group want?

Good point. You have grown very wise, young padawan.

Excuse me level one, 158 posts Jedi Youngling.

At 9/7/07 08:59 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote: Excuse me level one, 158 posts Jedi Youngling.

He knows beyond others of his status if ya know what I mean.

LOL colored people.

hai im new here u guyz seem cool lol

But seriously, I would like to join this club.

At 9/8/07 08:25 AM, K-RadPie wrote: But seriously, I would like to join this club.

Nice to see you're off your ban man. Of course.

Also, while we may have a problem in the racial department in the end the self gratification of modern society is gonna be the biggest problem by far. As proven by people asking "Why?" when we are against drugs, alchohol, an overly sexual society, and so on.

At 9/8/07 03:22 PM, animehater wrote: Also, while we may have a problem in the racial department in the end the self gratification of modern society is gonna be the biggest problem by far. As proven by people asking "Why?" when we are against drugs, alchohol, an overly sexual society, and so on.

Yeah, but those same people are also questioning everything else we believe as well. It may be a big problem, but I don't think it's the biggest (although it's ind of hard to tell at this point).

The races will never be equal, Aryans Are Superior.

At 9/11/07 04:58 PM, Kiddmeizter wrote: The races will never be equal, Aryans Are Superior.

I thought you committed suicide over 60 years ago.

At 9/11/07 05:00 PM, K-RadPie wrote:

At 9/11/07 04:58 PM, Kiddmeizter wrote: The races will never be equal, Aryans Are Superior.

I thought you committed suicide over 60 years ago.

Haha, :P

At 9/11/07 04:58 PM, Kiddmeizter wrote: The races will never be equal, Aryans Are Superior.

Them silly Aryans. I feel like LOLing now.

At 9/11/07 04:55 PM, K-RadPie wrote: Yeah, but those same people are also questioning everything else we believe as well. It may be a big problem, but I don't think it's the biggest (although it's kind of hard to tell at this point).

I see what you mean. I suppose the biggest issues we would face would be in line with the current imporant issues nowadays.

Where do I sign up? I'd love to join.

At 9/12/07 05:50 PM, AwesomeSauce wrote: Where do I sign up? I'd love to join.

Welcome to the Human Nationalist movement.

Now I know this might be a bit early but I always thought that be best way to get something done and get some real change should statrt at the local level. Gets results quicker, makes an example, and it lets you know you have the support of the folks around you. But that shouldn't halt the spead of ideas now.

Great idea, but i might have a few problems with some criteria...

9. Members of all religions welcome (except those that are considered cults) including those who don't even go by a religion

I fancy myself a hybrid wicca/christianity adherent. wicca is considered a cult, but i gotta disagree with that. (it's not devil worship or anything, just a unique way of praying and a couple of nice beliefs.)

12. No god forsaken bush basher please

Is it okay to respect the office and disagree with the person? i won't be too overt about it, but his actions are still... questionable at best.

this organization is almost the PRECISE model for what the founding fathers wanted! LOVE IT!

At 9/17/07 09:27 PM, The-Unseen wrote: Is it okay to respect the office and disagree with the person? i won't be too overt about it, but his actions are still... questionable at best.

General definition of bush-basher = 12 year old who knows nothing of politics and insults bush every chance he gets with no clue about what he's talking about. This, obviously, would probably exclude anyone with an ounce of intelligence.

As for the wicca thing, I don't know if that would be considered a cult, but w/e.

At 9/17/07 09:27 PM, The-Unseen wrote: Great idea, but i might have a few problems with some criteria...

As stated, any questions you have about the original criteria you have were probrably aswered in the first few pages.

On another note. I think we should finally get around to defining a cult. Anyone has a specific definition they would like to present to the group?

At 9/18/07 09:23 PM, animehater wrote: On another note. I think we should finally get around to defining a cult. Anyone has a specific definition they would like to present to the group?

Okay, I'll throw out a few, and you can decide which one makes the most sense.

1. A cohesive group of people devoted to beliefs or practices that the surrounding culture or society considers to be outside the mainstream. (wikipedia)

2. A religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader. (dictionary.com)

3. http://la.essortment.com/whatisdefiniti_
rjli.htm

However, I personally would not consider any religion outside the mainstream to be a cult, so here's my own shitty definition:

4. Very small religion of extremism and crazy practices.

At 9/18/07 09:52 PM, K-RadPie wrote: 3. http://la.essortment.com/whatisdefiniti_
rjli.htm
However, I personally would not consider any religion outside the mainstream to be a cult, so here's my own shitty definition:

4. Very small religion of extremism and crazy practices.

I would agree with three and four. Would it be too controversial to discuss the status of Scientology?

At 9/18/07 09:58 PM, animehater wrote: I would agree with three and four. Would it be too controversial to discuss the status of Scientology?

Controversial is my middle name.

At 9/18/07 10:02 PM, K-RadPie wrote: Controversial is my middle name.

Then what do you think? They seem a bit extreme in terms of not beleiving in most medications and the whole progressive control factor from number three is said to be present.

At 9/18/07 10:05 PM, animehater wrote: Then what do you think? They seem a bit extreme in terms of not beleiving in most medications and the whole progressive control factor from number three is said to be present.

Meh. I think they fit the definition of cult, but are not nearly as extreme as many others.

So yeah, I'm thinkin' borderline cult.

And do they really not believe in most medications? I mean, come on, medication just kicks too much ass to be "not believed in." I'd probably kill myself if it weren't for allergy medicine.

so, by that definition, i take it that wicca is not considered a cult, as we dont have a leader. in fact, another wiccan friend of mine and i even believe in two different gods. you can just read up on that if you want. whatev.

And Scientology, from what i've heard, allows medication prescribed by a physician, So i wouldn't label it as a cult for that reason.
However, they hold regular anti-psychiatry rallies... so i'd call it borderline cult too.