Strom Thurmond dead at 100
<deleted>
At 7/11/03 12:44 AM, Commander-K25 wrote: What I'm saying is that what they think doesn't matter as long as they don't act on anything (such as racism).
*points his finger at Andrew Jackson*
Gandhi may have been the most violent militant ever, but it wouldn't have mattered since he didn't act on it.
I thought he was non-violent because he was non-violent...
- JMHX
-
JMHX
- Member since: Oct. 18, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
Gandhi was non-violent. What the hell are we talking about? I don't want to think of Gandhi with AK-47's strapped to his back.
- Commander-K25
-
Commander-K25
- Member since: Dec. 4, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Blank Slate
What I meant was that theoretically, strictly theoretically, a person could think one thing but do something else entirely.
<deleted>
At 7/13/03 12:31 AM, Commander-K25 wrote: What I meant was that theoretically, strictly theoretically, a person could think one thing but do something else entirely.
No.
The people who do that end up doing what they were doing but only a lot more worse.
- JMHX
-
JMHX
- Member since: Oct. 18, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
At 7/14/03 01:51 AM, _crossbreed_ wrote:At 7/13/03 12:31 AM, Commander-K25 wrote: What I meant was that theoretically, strictly theoretically, a person could think one thing but do something else entirely.No.
The people who do that end up doing what they were doing but only a lot more worse.
So what was Gandhi's personal agenda? Free blow for all Indians? Maybe.


