Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/1/07 11:37 AM, xXCostelloXx wrote: no actually i dont,i have no need to becuse i realize if i do get an errection that 16 isnt the right time to have a kid so no reason to go fuck and why masturbate and just get a habbit going and killing my future kids.

wtf... Seriously, it's only one (or if you're lucky) two of those million (wait, let me re-phrase that... MILLIONs) of sperm cells that actually ever get to become kids, and just letting them lie there hightens the risk of prostate cancer. And as according to dr. Kinseys research, about 99% of people masturbate. Either you lie, or impose a mental dictatorship over yourself.

And dosen tbeing gay highten your risk of getting STD's?!

Being gay, per se, doesn't heighten the risk of STD's. Promiscuity within the homosexual community is just more widespread, because pressure from society (and at time, from the law) prevents long-term same-sex relationships. And compare a gay bar and a hetero bar. People going to a gay bar all know why they are there, they're not just there for the pint. And since guys usually have a more active sex drive than girls, somethings allways bound to happen. Lack of education back in the day left gay men unprotected against STD's, since they figured the only reason to wear a condom would be to prevent pregnancy (understandably, not a real hot issue). Lesbians, however, are mostly pretty immune to STD's, since few of them spread in cunnilingus or tribadism (look them up).

no it dose not,i think most homosexuals are born gay,yes some gradually become gay.

Well, I personally believe in psychological reasons, but yes, hormones have their part in it all. But we're not 100% mechanic or 100% mental.

and it dosent spred like a virius becuse you cannot catch homosexuallity.

Yes, but that's the impression got from your post. And if you admit it's not a realistic threat, why even mention it?

At 8/1/07 11:50 AM, xXCostelloXx wrote:

im not athiest but not republican (i hate polotics) im not homphobic and i live in a brick house so where do i fit in?
(no sereously!)

The Audience with 99.999% of the population of the world.

At 8/1/07 11:50 AM, xXCostelloXx wrote: im not athiest but not republican (i hate polotics) im not homphobic and i live in a brick house so where do i fit in?
(no sereously!)

Log-cabin republicans=Gay republicans.

I know some atheist neo-nazis that are also homophobes. But Atheism isn't the counterpart of conservatism, as stated in the previous sentance. You'd mean homobhobic liberals? Well, I don't know if they exist, but sexual rights are only one issue in my agenda, and it's easier to argue about gay rights with someone who otherwise shares my views, that argue about everything else with someone who shares my views on gay rights (and probably not even that).

At 8/1/07 11:48 AM, Vousielle wrote: I propose a debate, no cover charge, a grand spectacle.

Log Cabin Republicans vs. Athiestic Homophobes.

We will see how many people show up lol.

How about Conservative Agnostic Homophobes?

At 8/1/07 02:26 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Ok let's try this one more time, it doesn't matter who tells me what it is, as long as it's logical. So saying that a guy can screw another guy isn't logical because it isn't how SEX works. Basically, sex is where you produce a baby

Its called hetro Oral sex doesn't produce a baby

At 8/1/07 06:49 PM, KillerClam wrote:

At 8/1/07 02:26 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Ok let's try this one more time, it doesn't matter who tells me what it is, as long as it's logical. So saying that a guy can screw another guy isn't logical because it isn't how SEX works. Basically, sex is where you produce a baby

hetro Oral sex doesn't produce a baby

fixed

At 8/1/07 10:59 AM, KemCab wrote:

At 8/1/07 02:16 AM, TheBeagle wrote: Some people are medically born gay. Now argue that.

You mean genetically, right?

Enter eugenics.

Pure eugenics wouldn't solve it, it's anomalous not something we can "breed out". You'd have to follow the Mengele model and destroy the embryos that showed the abberation.

At 8/1/07 05:49 AM, fli wrote:

At 8/1/07 03:28 AM, troubles1 wrote:

At 8/1/07 02:16 AM, TheBeagle wrote: Some people are medically born gay. Now argue that.

so you are saying it is a disease?

Yes... just like sight, taste, smelling, hearing and feeling are diseases too...

*eye rollie*

I hope you realise I was joking because he said Medically, , it Just struck my funny.

At 8/1/07 02:14 AM, Phsyco-Mantis wrote: Seriously.. just the thought of it bothers me.

I'm not a homo-phobe as most idiots like to call it, I was just raised to understand that homosexuality isn't right. Besides, women are prettier and both genders have limits. Women are limited to acting like a guy, actually, come to think of it, that is ok if a woman can act like a guy. Jesus, there has to be some limits to freedom, oh wait there is, you can't talk about 9/11 but what is wrong with that? Am I being told that 9/11 is more important than cross dressing in terms of limitations?

The world is messed up.....

Wow, I don't even know where to begin.

For someone who hates queers, you sure do spend an awful lot of time thinking about homosexuality. There is a little saying "Thou doth protest too much..."

You...have issues, and need to deal with them in a constructive manner. I'm an atheist, but if you believe in God, more power to you. I am not going to try to push my beliefs on you, and you should not try and push your beliefs on others.

What two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home is none of your fucking business. I don't care if my neighbors are blowing goats, as long as they don't do it in front of me. Again, this goes back to your strange interest in homosexuality. You seem to WANT to know what is going on behind that door.

Now comes the fun part. This is why every heterosexual man should like gay people. Picture yourself in a bar having a drink. There are 3 girls and 3 guys. Suddenly, those other 2 guys take an interest in each other and leave. Now, instead of having to compete for which guy gets which girl, you now have your choice, seeing as you are the only breeder left in the room. Every homosexual male couple frees up 2 females which dramatically increases your chances of getting laid. It's statistical, it makes sense.

If you think homosexuality is a problem your an idiot. It's not going anywhere, so stop trying to hold back the human race, accept it or just deal with it.

Thats right, I loooooove dicks.

i should sooo go back to my Fab aura.

there's always been gay people, and there always will be, its set at birth, so get used to it. We rulez.

At 8/2/07 03:32 AM, Frankafus-Studios wrote: i should sooo go back to my Fab aura.

there's always been gay people, and there always will be, its set at birth, so get used to it. We rulez.

Woo! Thank you. Thats my biggest point. If you don't like it, that doesn't mean it's ever going to go away. Does the fab aura mean your gay? Cause I just have it because it's pink...

A gay is a gay what you gonna do about it?
(not that im a gay)

I'll talk about 9/11 all I want, pussy.

I know a couple gay dudes, and they're awesome! They're no different than you or I, except I go home to my girlfriend and they go to their boyfriend. Some times they even say things like "That guy is so gay." or "You're such a fag.". The only time I have a problem with homosexuals is when they flaunt it to the point of annoyance and bash being straight. Thats when I want to cram their rainbow banner down their throat (mind you, they may enjoy it.).

One mans junk is another mans treasure.
Wait...

I don't support homosexuality, but it's a free country so... eh.

At 8/2/07 03:34 AM, kitty-and-meander wrote: Does the fab aura mean your gay? Cause I just have it because it's pink...

o....o mehbeh.

I'm gay. Not a sterotypical one however. I'm not feminine, I don't talk with a lisp, I'm just a normal guy. The only difference is I like boys, more than girls. So whats the big problem?

Point is- Deal with it.

You can kidnap a gay man, tie him to a pole, and beat the living shit out of him until hes dead. What does that solve? Think about where YOUR morals are coming from before you judge other because of a goddamn preference.

At 8/2/07 03:38 AM, superratso wrote: One mans junk is another mans treasure.
Wait...

I don't support homosexuality, but it's a free country so... eh.

yeh im prety much with this guy

I disagree with you. homosexuality isn't a problem, it's, just as written, a hormonal defect that has been created though the sharp manipulations of our genes through-out the years. basically, humen kind is too smart, and we fuck outselves up in that manner.

At 8/2/07 12:41 AM, troubles1 wrote:

At 8/1/07 05:49 AM, fli wrote:

At 8/1/07 03:28 AM, troubles1 wrote:

At 8/1/07 02:16 AM, TheBeagle wrote: Some people are medically born gay. Now argue that.

so you are saying it is a disease?

Yes... just like sight, taste, smelling, hearing and feeling are diseases too...

*eye rollie*

I hope you realise I was joking because he said Medically, , it Just struck my funny.

Don't mind me... just touchy.
How would you feel if a bunch of people equivicate your identity with, basically, retardation or even a disease?

Folks... this isn't a horomones thing. This isn't a think about disease, or retardation.
Being gay... just happens.

I seriously don't know why there's a need to explain homosexuality, and not heteroseuxality. Do heterosexuals go one day, "Oh my, I feel the urge to perpetuate my genes and reproduce." Nooooo....

Sex happens. Lust happens... attraction... love... and all that human stuff.

Just like for gays.
Except, only for the same gender.

I don't see how homosexuality could be wrong. I am no expert on the subject, who cares of a guys likes a guy or a girl likes a girl. It's who they want to be, who they were born as. And if the bible says that ppl shouldn't be gay, then god wouldn't have made gay ppl in the first place. It's pretty simple.

I don't understand how anyone could have a problem with gay ppl. They are just normal ppl, some are more flamboyant than others, but that shouldn't change your opinon on them. They are still human, not some inferior species. They have feelings, they live, and they love, and who they chose to love should NEVER change your opinion on them.

What if you were to meet an awesome guy, and you became really close, in a non-sexual manner, he was just like your best friend, and he decided to tell you he was gay. Why would that make him any less of a person, and any less of your friend? If it does, you are just a messed up person.

At 8/2/07 03:27 AM, bluntedboy wrote:

Every homosexual male couple frees up 2 females which dramatically increases your chances of getting laid. It's statistical, it makes sense.

I like the part when you don't consider girls can be gay too.

At 8/2/07 06:55 AM, Invaderchris wrote:

At 8/2/07 03:27 AM, bluntedboy wrote:

Every homosexual male couple frees up 2 females which dramatically increases your chances of getting laid. It's statistical, it makes sense.

I like the part when you don't consider girls can be gay too.

Not related to the topic, but studies show that in the future, there will be less males than female...to the point where we only have females in this world (think chromosomes)