Whose got the WMD's then

[TheTio]

These are approximates off this thing, have a go

https://www.greenpeace.com/forms/cards/

America - 10000 WMD
United Kingdom - 200 WMD
Jacquee Chirac - 350 WMD
Russia - 18000 WMD
Israel - 200 WMD
China - 400 WMD

and finally (prove me wrong)

Iraq - 0 WMD

and hell, thats actually nukes not WMD, what about that gas Russia used in that hostage situation, had that been found in Iraq it would have been all on...had it not been all on already

[TheTio]

Jacque Chirac?

....oops

France - 350 WMD

[D2Kvirus]

Great, now I have to find the site that includes where they got them from, if I can find it. And, surprise surprise, which Western nation do you think gave Israel theirs? And Pakistan, come to think of it.

[nitroxide]

At 6/25/03 12:00 PM, D2KVirus wrote: Great, now I have to find the site that includes where they got them from, if I can find it. And, surprise surprise, which Western nation do you think gave Israel theirs? And Pakistan, come to think of it.

Well ofcourse,look how many we have to spare.

"Free WMD for all!!!"-America

[D2Kvirus]

At 6/25/03 12:18 PM, nitroxide wrote:
"Free WMD for all!!!"-America

"Offer only available if you're Israeli,otherwise you have to pay...and you'll definitly pay if you have the gall to manufacture your own, just you wait and see!!!"

Small print sucks...

[karasz]

To answer the topic question... SYRIA...

i mean Iran... no wait Libya...

ok ok seriously its cuba...

probably canada...

[Commander-K25]

At 6/24/03 07:10 AM, TheTio wrote: Russia - 18000 WMD

18,000 and moving fast! Prices are low, no money down! Supplies limited so get your genuine Soviet nuke today!

[Jimsween]

This is way off, we have about 12,000 but in about 7 years we will have 4000 and russia has 28,000 that they are desperately trying to get rid of. And china has 3,000.

[Jimsween]

At 6/25/03 12:00 PM, D2KVirus wrote: Great, now I have to find the site that includes where they got them from, if I can find it. And, surprise surprise, which Western nation do you think gave Israel theirs? And Pakistan, come to think of it.

Most likely Russia seeing as how America would never want someone else to have nukes. It reduces our power.

[Jimsween]

At 6/25/03 12:18 PM, nitroxide wrote:

At 6/25/03 12:00 PM, D2KVirus wrote: Great, now I have to find the site that includes where they got them from, if I can find it. And, surprise surprise, which Western nation do you think gave Israel theirs? And Pakistan, come to think of it.

Well ofcourse,look how many we have to spare.

"Free WMD for all!!!"-America

Yeah you made so much sense, of course we would want to give people WMD when doing so would only screw us over. Unlike Russia who has a long track record of reckless selling of surplus weapons and needs to ditch 26,000 nukes in 10 years or they will go bankrupt again.

[Jimsween]

And isreal 200? No way, they dont even have processing plants. Greenpeace is just making things up now it seems.

[AbstractVagabond]

You forgot who has over 100,000 WMD.

eBay.

Honestly, I have no serious comment for this thread. Yet.

At 6/26/03 02:45 AM, Jimsween wrote: And isreal 200? No way, they dont even have processing plants. Greenpeace is just making things up now it seems.

Of course, Jimsween is a much more respected and internationally-recognized source than greenpeace when it comes to international socio-political and environmental issues.

YOU FORGOT IRAQ'S SEMI-DEADLY CONTAINERS OF PESTICIDES!! PESTICIDES!!!
What? Pesticides are sprayed on crops? Nevermnd then.

[Jimsween]

At 6/26/03 04:18 AM, nailbomb wrote:

At 6/26/03 02:45 AM, Jimsween wrote: And isreal 200? No way, they dont even have processing plants. Greenpeace is just making things up now it seems.

Of course, Jimsween is a much more respected and internationally-recognized source than greenpeace when it comes to international socio-political and environmental issues.

Greenpeace is the one who was tring to buy a nuclear weapon from russia. And for my sources, http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/

At 6/26/03 04:24 AM, Jimsween wrote:

Greenpeace is the one who was tring to buy a nuclear weapon from russia. And for my sources, http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/

It doesn't say that anywhere...

[Jimsween]

At 6/26/03 04:32 AM, nailbomb wrote:

At 6/26/03 04:24 AM, Jimsween wrote:

Greenpeace is the one who was tring to buy a nuclear weapon from russia. And for my sources, http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/

It doesn't say that anywhere...

Oddly enough that linked changed completely over time, I'm too lazy to go search for it but I will admit I was trying to fool you. Greenpeace was just doing it to see if Russia would actually do something like that.

[D2Kvirus]

Who's got the nukes? FUCKING EVERYBODY:
www.ceip.org/files/projects/npp/resources/ballisticmissilechart.htm

Better hope South Korea doesn't get Anti-American vibes, and launch the most ironic assault in military history, eh?

[bumcheekcity]

I think it would be nice to see the ranges we get from all of our scources, because there are a hundred sites that will tell you different numbers.

Please don't give numbers from the source http://www.geocities.com/ihatetheyanks, because that might be a little bit biased.

[TheTio]

At 6/25/03 04:16 PM, BaKsHi wrote: Since Greenpeace is allied with Canada, I have come to tell you the real amounts.

Canada - 38,862 WMD/BIO w Syrup Torpedoes, Mad Cow delight speed missiles, SARS converters w/ fins
America - 2000 WMD [Shocking!]
United Kingdom - 200 WMD
France - 350 WMD
Russia - 18000 WMD
Israel - 200 WMD
China - 400 WMD

It seems Canada has outdone us again! Liars!

Wow, the REAL amounts, so credible because its Underlined

I think your full of shit

Could at least give us a link to your REAL sources

Oh yeah, Jimsween, this site here http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/ looks so professional it burns my entire amatuer being just go see the address, so it must be credible

DK2Virus, that site is about Ballistic missiles, you know, the kind that have been around since about world war II

If you hadnt noticed this is about nuclear weapons, and who defines the line where a weapon of destruction, becomes a weapon of MASS destruction, is there a certain amount of MASS it must destroy before it recieves this title of infamy???

Or is it just whatever weapons the people the media are trying to villify at the moment becomes the cutoff mark

The only mention in that list of ballistic missiles of nukes are under, China, France, Russia, United Kingdom and United States

So yeah, thats whose got WMDs according to your own sources

[D2Kvirus]

At 6/27/03 03:54 AM, TheTio wrote:
DK2Virus, that site is about Ballistic missiles, you know, the kind that have been around since about world war II

Nuclear missiles, not mere ballistic - learn your brand names.

If you hadnt noticed this is about nuclear weapons, and who defines the line where a weapon of destruction, becomes a weapon of MASS destruction, is there a certain amount of MASS it must destroy before it recieves this title of infamy???

Obviously, nukes aren't mass destructive enough? Hello???

[nitroxide]

World special weapons guide.

LIST ALL SYSTEMS...
Missile
Nuclear
Aircraft
Submarine

But i cant find the USA...hmmm...

"The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything,except our mode of thinking." -Albert Einstein

[Commander-K25]

At 6/27/03 03:54 AM, TheTio wrote: Oh yeah, Jimsween, this site here http://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/ looks so professional it burns my entire amatuer being just go see the address, so it must be credible

Great. You evaluate sources based on their layout and color scheme.

FAS happens to be a quite credible and comprehensive source on everything from conventional weapons to WMDs, to conflicts in every part of the globe. Check out their main page and browse around a bit.

Go read hat website people, nowhere does it say that Greenpeace tried to buy Nukes.

[Jimsween]

At 6/27/03 10:47 PM, nailbomb wrote: Go read hat website people, nowhere does it say that Greenpeace tried to buy Nukes.

Obviously you didnt even read what I wrote, I though posting without reading the topic was a bannable offense.

My message was directed to all those who wrote "why would greenpeace buy weapons?" and "I thought greenpeace was peacefull" and anything else related to that false link.

[Jimsween]

At 6/27/03 11:53 PM, nailbomb wrote: My message was directed to all those who wrote "why would greenpeace buy weapons?" and "I thought greenpeace was peacefull" and anything else related to that false link.

One person wrote that.

At 6/27/03 11:55 PM, Jimsween wrote:

One person wrote that.

Well woop-dee-doo, I guess my post was for him then.

[PsychoDoughboy]

The more the merrier! </sarcasm>

At 6/28/03 12:38 AM, BaKsHi wrote: it was only me. was that a flame? flammaged = me?

No-no, a flame is an insult. I thought 2 or 3 people wrote stuff like that. No worries.