At 7/24/07 08:23 AM, Kisuke wrote:
At 7/24/07 12:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
When I was in the top 100 b/p, aiming for the top 50, you could hit #50 with around 3000 b/p.
Yep. Elite Guard Sergeant under the old system. #;-}>
By the time I got there, I think I had just hit EG Staff Sergeant, though.
When I first joined I believe there were only about 8 or so EGSCs or so. Very few of them anyways, envy.
When I did... there were... exactly... 0. #;-}>
I was #6. So I guess you never knew a time when I wasn't EGSC, eh? Weirdness.
At 7/28/07 07:54 PM, AfroUnderscoreStud wrote:
UPDATE 28th Jul 2007
Thanks for the update-age, man.
001) 100008 0000 000.0 Denvish 1
002) 100000 0000 000.0 ramagi -1
003) 96533 0463 066.1 Wylo
004) 90200 0274 039.1 Molotov
005) 84041 0193 027.6 ReconRebel
006) 83358 0551 078.7 AfroUnderscoreStud
007) 82317 0000 000.0 MPA
008) 82104 0253 036.1 Punisher
009) 78340 0501 071.6 schneelocke
010) 75671 0015 002.1 bila
011) 68131 0013 001.9 Qwoxyl
012) 64998 0303 043.3 DrJam
013) 64197 0045 006.4 BonusStage
014) 60913 0028 004.0 leeboy105
015) 60824 0430 061.4 harryjarry 1
016) 60619 0060 008.6 DonDoli -1
017) 60189 0016 002.3 gfoxcook
018) 59676 0176 025.1 Rabindarath
019) 58570 0183 026.1 Toocool100
020) 54249 0156 022.3 X-Naut
I got 16 saves that week? Weird, don't remember b/ping in late July, but I guess I did. O_o
At 7/31/07 03:31 AM, Frostbreath wrote:
At 7/24/07 12:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
Oy... I'm gonna have nightmares about the job ahead of me for just ONE update I'm planning on my own for teh pentalist...
As long as it's worth it, i'd hate it for a list of such epic proportions to just die :-/
Well, I may end up making it a very long-term update. You know, try to first of all find all the old listmembers.... try to find their usernames since profile user id#s won't work anymore....
THEN... comes the fun task of seeing if I can find out the names of all the people who used to be NEAR the list.
Then's the actual update. Hell, that part'll be easy compared to all the pre-update work I need to do. #;-}>
At 7/31/07 05:05 AM, Auz wrote:
At 7/24/07 12:35 AM, gfoxcook wrote:
Why can't they let both tags work? That's how HTML codes work, dagnabit... nice duplicationings.
The old ones still work. At least, they worked for me when I updated the reviewers list yesterday.
test (no error).
Wheee.
Well, then.... I was misinformed. Just seemed like peoples were talking about boldfaces not working with the old classic HTML tags and all.
Nothing wrong with STRONG, mind you. Just wayyyyy more wasted bytes than B. #;-}>
At 8/4/07 08:03 PM, AfroUnderscoreStud wrote:
It seems that only bolded hyperlinks don't work. Underlined ones might not work either, but what with no-one getting star pace I'm not sure (I could test it out, but I can't be bothered).
Ah, I see.
UPDATE 4th Aug 2007
Thanks for teh updates ONCE MORE with feeling.
001) 100008 0000 000.0 Denvish
002) 100000 0000 000.0 ramagi
Finally, all is still atop the b/p worlds.
003) 96809 0276 039.4 Wylo
... but for... HOW LONG?
004) 90356 0156 022.3 Molotov
005) 84152 0111 015.9 ReconRebel
006) 83893 0535 076.4 AfroUnderscoreStud
007) 82378 0274 039.1 Punisher 1
008) 82317 0000 000.0 MPA -1
You know, I'm not one to question anyone's retirement... but why did MPA just set down on such an ugly number? 82317... egad.
009) 78687 0347 049.6 schneelocke
010) 75692 0021 003.0 bila
011) 68131 0000 000.0 Qwoxyl
012) 65197 0199 028.4 DrJam
013) 64215 0018 002.6 BonusStage
014) 60978 0154 022.0 harryjarry 1
015) 60933 0020 002.9 leeboy105 -1
016) 60660 0041 005.9 DonDoli
017) 60189 0000 000.0 gfoxcook
018) 59726 0050 007.1 Rabindarath
019) 58711 0141 020.1 Toocool100
020) 54359 0110 015.7 X-Naut
Toocool is coming FOR TEH ME.