Yea, I farm Anal Penguins. Do something about it.
Yea, I farm Anal Penguins. Do something about it.
At 3/17/08 07:06 PM, Rational-Delirium wrote: I found alot of reviews that insulted the author and said it shouldn't have been on the front page
DON'T FLAG.
2003 material.
At 3/17/08 07:17 PM, LunarTwilight wrote:At 3/17/08 07:06 PM, Rational-Delirium wrote: I found alot of reviews that insulted the author and said it shouldn't have been on the front pageDON'T FLAG.
2003 material.
well.
I would say goldmine lol.
But,umm,I thought it didnt matter?
I thought it was 2005 and down=not as easy to flag.
Not impossible to flag...
Because,since it gets sent to a mod.
unflagging it would be a bad thing.
because just because it wastes their time,it was still abusive wasnt it?
I think lol.
At 3/17/08 07:20 PM, killslasher wrote:At 3/17/08 07:17 PM, LunarTwilight wrote:well.At 3/17/08 07:06 PM, Rational-Delirium wrote: I found alot of reviews that insulted the author and said it shouldn't have been on the front pageDON'T FLAG.
2003 material.
I would say goldmine lol.
But,umm,I thought it didnt matter?
I thought it was 2005 and down=not as easy to flag.
Not impossible to flag...
Because,since it gets sent to a mod.
unflagging it would be a bad thing.
because just because it wastes their time,it was still abusive wasnt it?
I think lol.
old reviews=No point in flagging because it doesn't help the mods filter the newer reviews.
*Old* being 2005 and back. You lose whistles point(i think) and you certainly don't gain any.
At 3/17/08 07:32 PM, LunarTwilight wrote:At 3/17/08 07:20 PM, killslasher wrote:old reviews=No point in flagging because it doesn't help the mods filter the newer reviews.At 3/17/08 07:17 PM, LunarTwilight wrote:well.At 3/17/08 07:06 PM, Rational-Delirium wrote: I found alot of reviews that insulted the author and said it shouldn't have been on the front pageDON'T FLAG.
2003 material.
I would say goldmine lol.
But,umm,I thought it didnt matter?
I thought it was 2005 and down=not as easy to flag.
Not impossible to flag...
Because,since it gets sent to a mod.
unflagging it would be a bad thing.
because just because it wastes their time,it was still abusive wasnt it?
I think lol.
*Old* being 2005 and back. You lose whistles point(i think) and you certainly don't gain any.
I'm kinda new to this, so if anyone has a link that can teach me what to flag and what not to flag, that would be much appreciated :) I already looked though alot of stuff but none said anything about submitions that were submitted 2005 and before.
And for anyone who's interested, there's more abusive reviews on the other pages.
If I ever became a ganster, I wouldnt go anywhere without Spartan Armour and a freakin Mini-Gun, man! I gotta protect myself!
NG 4ever!
The Lack of content here, Is suprising.
At 3/17/08 07:39 PM, Rational-Delirium wrote:
I'm kinda new to this, so if anyone has a link that can teach me what to flag and what not to flag, that would be much appreciated :)
They say its not right on the dot, however I still think this game will help you understand some.
Also after that read the FAQ in the lit section for some rules that are not mentioned in the game.
The Lack of content here, Is suprising.
At 3/17/08 10:12 PM, liquidfire666 wrote:
oh comon thats a really helpfull review and he hardley mentions another review overall its really helpfull one of the better reviews on there
Thus why it pains me so...
The Lack of content here, Is suprising.
If a review is even remotely boarderline, I say leave it.
Here are some fresh ones:
http://edtoro.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh
4 abusive ones right here.
im not sure about the ones that he rated high...
Do single word reviews count as abusive? And also if they're all caps does that count, because the link above me aka this one has a fair few of those.
I dont get how you all make a new post for every abusive review, its pretty simple too collect a whole list, i did this one within 15 minutes, and some are really full with abuse.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /81645/2/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /24443/8/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /24443/7/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /8549/5/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /8549/4/score
http://joehoytally.newgrounds.com/review s/ (only 2)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /68987/1/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /185237/4/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /46300/4/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /155639/32/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /40228/10/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /40228/9/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /40228/8/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /40228/7/score
I'll post allot more.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430476
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /95818/2/score
http://thedon2000.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/3
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /321942/26/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /70150/3/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /70150/2/score (every review on this page is abusive)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /70150/1/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/reviews/
3531/1/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /157971/6/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /33118/7/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /33118/6/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /21725/29/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /21725/28/score
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2340/5/score
...
I really appreciate all your help =D
I would just like to remind everyone that flagging old reviews will do nothing for you but annoy the mods and decrease your whistle level.
You need to look at the date of submissions and their subsequent reviews before you go all gangbusters flagging things. Today, I have cleared more '01 reviews than I care to count and it irks me.
I don't know if it was a posted link or what since reading through this thread does my head in, but I just wanted to write a little reminder.
Why are old reviews unflaggable?
must...flag...review!
At 3/18/08 06:02 AM, tigerkitty wrote: I would just like to remind everyone that flagging old reviews will do nothing for you but annoy the mods and decrease your whistle level.
Posting those lists got me from normal to deity within three days, who cares if they are old or not, abusive is abusive.
If not you, another review mod should clear the last 4 lists on the previous page aswell, perhaps some are from '03, but there's also abuse from '07/'08 in it.
Oh yeah....shit, that's probably how I'm garbage Whistle now -_-
I think you also wasted your whistle.
At 3/18/08 06:41 AM, TeeTeeJay wrote: I think you also wasted your whistle.
Heh, yeah that sucks, im glad i didnt marked any of them due to my deity whistle, but they should be deleted anyway..
http://combineadvisor.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash
three 0s, the 10s are just unhelpful
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430247/5/score
robertoxx
http://blaalb.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh/2
I'd say two
That's it.
Not actually reviewing the flash but keeps saying check out my profile.