Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 10/27/07 03:55 PM, Widerstand wrote: Question: This guy posts nothing but post numerous short reviews...Are they abusive?

Quite a few could well be.

At 10/27/07 03:58 PM, 3vi1 wrote:

At 10/27/07 03:55 PM, Widerstand wrote: Question: This guy posts nothing but post numerous short reviews...Are they abusive?

Quite a few could well be.

did you flag them ppl?

At 10/27/07 03:55 PM, Widerstand wrote: Question: This guy posts nothing but post numerous short reviews...Are they abusive?

they are not.. but.. maybe a mod will tell something to him... so much not-useful reviews should be a crime...
or something like that... XD

At 10/27/07 03:59 PM, yoshi77777 wrote:

At 10/27/07 03:58 PM, 3vi1 wrote:

At 10/27/07 03:55 PM, Widerstand wrote: Question: This guy posts nothing but post numerous short reviews...Are they abusive?

Quite a few could well be.

did you flag them ppl?

I did.

At 10/27/07 04:00 PM, aldlv wrote:

At 10/27/07 03:55 PM, Widerstand wrote: Question: This guy posts nothing but post numerous short reviews...Are they abusive?

they are not.. but.. maybe a mod will tell something to him... so much not-useful reviews should be a crime...
or something like that... XD

i flagged him

At 10/27/07 04:00 PM, aldlv wrote: so much not-useful reviews should be a crime...

I think it is. You two are right, it might well be worth waiting for a review mod to find him if you want them removed.

I am assuming that when a review is flagged and it is short/crap, then the mod will check the reviewer's account to see if his other reviews are also.

Sternman fights communism, Mother Russia, Sniper Scope Demo; possibly The Red Faction and What happened to RCC-HQ

Political rants and general unhelpfulness.

At 10/27/07 02:21 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: I have a tip: when someone writes an abusive review, check that person's profile. It might have a lot more in the movies that the person's reviewed.

been there said that

At 10/27/07 04:41 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: been there said that

Thanks, you really do make useful, helpful posts that allow you to be welcomed as an exceptionable member of the community.

also forgot second part:

Lets start. I havent posted many abusive reviews since... page 500 i guess...

by the way.... you'll have to GO ON THE LINKS THEMSELVES AND LOOK FOR THEM because I:

1) cant be bothered to type usernames
2) it makes a link look more then it has...

i'm a WYSIWYG person

I also do this weirdo numbering system... the first number shows how many...

1= Goldmine
2= Lots
3= Some

The second number is how abusive they are=

1= Very abusive
3= Abusive but only just- if you are a beginner, and aren't sure... dont flag!

So, here I goes!

just one spamming
2.2 Song lyrics...
2.1
1.2 EPIC goldmine
3.2 One or two here... shame theres no rating button
3.2
1.2 epic goldmine
3.1
3.2
3.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
killa90
1.1 Goldmine
3.2
2.1
2.2
3.2
1.1 I ALWAYS FINISH ON A GOLDMINE...

for a reason

i love you cheecky! omg theres so many!

At 10/27/07 04:44 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: I'M SO SEXY WITH MY SEXY SEXY LIST! >=(

Thank fuck you posted that! I love ya. ^_^

At 10/27/07 04:44 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: 1) cant be bothered to type usernames
2) it makes a link look more then it has...

I also do this weirdo numbering system... the first number shows how many...
1= Goldmine
2= Lots
3= Some

The second number is how abusive they are=
1= Very abusive
3= Abusive but only just- if you are a beginner, and aren't sure... dont flag!

So, here I goes!

I can't believe i didn't got a deity whistle after that.. :'(
nice post... man... very good..
You may spent a ot of time on it.. didn't you?
I think i'm going to copy your style... it you allow me...
2.1 XD...
it's a nice idea... BTW
1.blam... <_< well a gold mine... XD... enjoy...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407474 weeweespider
http://knightslayrx.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash/1 super mario broz z ep 7, finding emo spams the review, p2 marioo vs. sonic s.e, spams the review again
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /406449 totw monkayboo called him talentless and knightslayrx, eroticshaving cream
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /406540/12/score seto-blade

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /300488/24/score biggcaz calls the author a f*ucking loser and wallatscum says you suck at the end of review,
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /271419 toonpimp, drago-the -mage, aurahack

M1SSINGNO Refering to another person or w.e it's said.

http://silverwingedseraph.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash relationship revenge say i hope you die at the end of review
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407489 ludakot
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /7577/1 cheesyballs?, raptor86 says you suck at the end of review, girgogos68, candiangurl,

I know someone else posted this but this guy has them all throughout his pages..I counted about 24 of them, that poor guy..oh well..he should have been nicer about things.

GroovyMan for spamming
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407533

http://g-virus.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/1

Gold-Mine. make sure you go through every page. He reviews like hes wants his messages to get deleted. (also, i think he got high with the reviews)

At 10/27/07 08:19 PM, SimCorder wrote: GroovyMan for spamming
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407533

I'd say his review wasn't abusive. It didn't really break the review rules in the FAQ. Review mods only delete high rated reviews if they're really abusive.

At 10/27/07 08:41 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:19 PM, SimCorder wrote: GroovyMan for spamming
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407533

I'd say his review wasn't abusive. It didn't really break the review rules in the FAQ. Review mods only delete high rated reviews if they're really abusive.

Did you not see this rule?

- Cube 2 : Hypercube

At 10/27/07 08:49 PM, zoke wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:41 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:19 PM, SimCorder wrote: GroovyMan for spamming
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407533

I'd say his review wasn't abusive. It didn't really break the review rules in the FAQ. Review mods only delete high rated reviews if they're really abusive.

Did you not see this rule?

Of course I did!

Then I ask you: why hasn't this review been deleted and this guy's review has been deleted, considering that the last one has been posted AFTER the other one?

At 10/27/07 09:43 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:49 PM, zoke wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:41 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote:

At 10/27/07 08:19 PM, SimCorder wrote: GroovyMan for spamming
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407533

I'd say his review wasn't abusive. It didn't really break the review rules in the FAQ. Review mods only delete high rated reviews if they're really abusive.

Did you not see this rule?

Of course I did!

Then I ask you: why hasn't this review been deleted and this guy's review has been deleted, considering that the last one has been posted AFTER the other one?

Because the review hasn't yet racked up enough "Abusive" marks to be flagged, and which post are you talking about in the second dude?

one here

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /407557 < machinabass

How goes the hunting tonite..

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /368873/2 < lookoutspiderpig

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /368873/1 < frande nsc007

- JHaxxor
- psylent-pstalker
- some here
- lot here
- more... pay atention to cmaster and his blamtastic review..

- tedweird, Blampirate-lexuz & billybobjoebob13
- The Final Revenge
- Luski14
- Chicken-Nuggets & MCEGG
- UrbanNinja06
- SmartAleck
- The-Prophet

- first 3..