Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Got a little more here...

redstar13.

Firestorm65 and ChaseO14.

Get them!

people, dont just click on anything that says its bad. i mean yes most things that say its bad are abusive because they're one likne "it sucked" or "it was gay" pretty much duh its abusive, but i saw a few reveiws that while sure they might hv told the person that it was shit and such, they did lay out all of their points. it isnt saying bad things thats bad, its not saying bad or good things, like simply bleeping out the guy. just watch out for non abusive worthy reviews that have some abusive's building up. cuz as soon as they get like 5-6 they just rack up real quick, but if u stop and think wait it isnt bad and vote yes then the next person will also be like wait one person thought it wasnt, let me spend 10 sec glancing to see if it actualy is bad.

At 7/26/07 01:42 AM, dabboy wrote:

I read every review unless it says "fuck you,you suck,go die,and ect" that's the only time i don't read all of it.

At 7/26/07 01:45 AM, craigalan wrote:

At 7/26/07 01:42 AM, dabboy wrote:

I read every review unless it says "fuck you,you suck,go die,and ect" that's the only time i don't read all of it.

and thats why ur whistle is gold. *pats on head and gives high five*

At 7/26/07 01:45 AM, craigalan wrote:

At 7/26/07 01:42 AM, dabboy wrote:

I read every review unless it says "fuck you,you suck,go die,and ect" that's the only time i don't read all of it.

I also look for "blammed", "crap" and the phrase "piece of shit". :D

Thank you to all who have put so much work into finding all of these links. Some of the bad reviews go on for pages! (It also helps me keep in mind what not to write in my own reviews!)

At 7/26/07 02:23 AM, galatea1 wrote:

At 7/26/07 01:45 AM, craigalan wrote:

At 7/26/07 01:42 AM, dabboy wrote:

Yeah i never understood why people wrote bad reviews they're really basic.You can say it isn't good easily without cussing the author out.That's something i'll never understand well besides the whole them getting mad at spammers but anger doesn't mean you should cuss at them.

At 7/25/07 06:39 PM, Famas wrote:

X is for Xena Warrior Princess
Y is for Yomitoe Cannon
Z is a wierd letter

Just thought I'd stop by to contribute. Sorry if I screwed up any of the HTML, but it looks fine from here. Have fun, and keep striving for Deity!

Lol, I have to say that was pretty funny. A lot of work on that, nicely done.

Quite a few in the first two

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /3692
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2705
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2638
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /1651
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2648
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /1850
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /1884
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /2003

last one on the page
ä is a german letter

sorry i haven't done much on this thread in the last few days

Another one http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /390043

At 7/25/07 02:33 PM, NickScott wrote:

At 7/25/07 02:25 PM, Dragonman855 wrote: Hey, ifwe don't stop fighting on this thread, it'll get locked.

lolomfg

It definately won't get locked... I may be banned though.

Only admins can lock a thread after it gets this old, but mods can still delete posts.

lets target people that post scripting
"" ""
check pages 2 AND 3
some here
second from bottom
3 on last page
read through all, including page 1
bout 5
YOU RULZ
check page 1 & 2

3.2megal-product
1.2 which means goldmine
3.2 the odd high rated scipting one
1.2 goldmine edition
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA no... just no xenolord...2.1 check more than just one page you lazy <insert words describing lazy people here>
3.2 theres lots of scripting here... (which is against the rules...)
here ALL of them are coz they're probably alts that are made to do SHIT reviews for high rating, look, its 10.00 and its all clocks..
2.2
rastaclock
these reviews are random
3.2 again (the script)
note toreview mods: it seems basically all of rastaclocks reviews are the same thing or atleast for clock submissions and all have this (from what i've seen: "You gave this entry a 5!
If this movie is protected you will get a PROTECTION point"
scripting pandemic
ANOTHER scripting outbreak
if u can't see the abusive review (scripting again), then you're a retard
scripting AGAIN
wow these are bad reviews
1.2 which is the same as goldmine
2.2 here
suk a nut?
thats it for now

sorry i haven't been using numbers all the way along

and in the works of john12346, WORSHIP ME or "CELEBRATE MY GREATNESS or some shit like that...

seriously doesnt that sound gay?

At 7/26/07 04:01 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:
note toreview mods: it seems basically all of rastaclocks reviews are the same thing or atleast for clock submissions and all have this (from what i've seen: "You gave this entry a 5!
If this movie is protected you will get a PROTECTION point"

When the review link buttons come again in profiles, I'll look into that. Copying and pasting a script over and over again constitutes as spam sometimes.

Only one here.
Alot more in here.

Sorry if these have been posted already.

At 7/26/07 04:23 PM, kidray76 wrote:
When the review link buttons come again in profiles, I'll look into that. Copying and pasting a script over and over again constitutes as spam sometimes.

Sometimes? Almost 90% of reviews like that are simply a script followed by "lol good job". Is there any way they can be considered non-abusive?

heres a simple one with a few of abusive ones, fairly obvious
pacman on crack? oh noes

At 7/26/07 04:01 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: 2.2
rastaclock
these reviews are random

Cheeky, the one above rastaclock is copy and paste too. You forgot to put that.

Got some from the factory of abusive reviews (aka: The Flash Portal)

Sugary-Cupcakes.

adamq.

Warchamp7, Regor1396, wilbme, someguy789 and Nin10do.

Greko, Shadow186, Deso, BearClock and cobrakiller87.

ghost-factory.

Jacotto.

badassbosnian.

WingsOfBacon and SpumoniClock.

Adio92, WazabiClock and Polymeron.

Revan19.

Get them all!

this ones been attracting a.reviews since yestarday

the flash is quite disturbing though

these are crazy times...

At 7/26/07 07:45 PM, Famas wrote:

At 7/26/07 04:23 PM, kidray76 wrote:
When the review link buttons come again in profiles, I'll look into that. Copying and pasting a script over and over again constitutes as spam sometimes.

Sometimes? Almost 90% of reviews like that are simply a script followed by "lol good job". Is there any way they can be considered non-abusive?

Some things we let slide. If they actually said something along with that, I might be persuaded to let it stay. Just, if they justcopy and paste the script, it's gone. No need for that really whenyou can just vote accordingly and have the same affect.

i blew the whistle on this because its basically a porn slide show.

At 7/27/07 10:06 AM, thomtomw wrote: i blew the whistle on this because its basically a porn slide show.

LOL. Furry porn at that. Awww, another free blam point.

i remember that kidray told me that one deity whistle can delete a review but how many for a submission?

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /14706/31/score/n

At 7/27/07 10:15 AM, kidray76 wrote:

At 7/27/07 10:06 AM, thomtomw wrote:

LOL. Furry porn at that. Awww, another free blam point.

That's what i need right now like 14 or so last i checked.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /99317/18/score/n

Atleast the first two... although im sure there is more.

At 7/27/07 04:53 PM, LokLokLok wrote: Atleast the first two... although im sure there is more.

Polyhedronclock's is abusive too.

this is stolen from this guy i think