Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/20/07 07:03 PM, K-Fox wrote:

You're welcome.

Wow! Thanks for finding these! I had as much fun reading them as flagging them. People sure were passionate about their favorite bands! LOL

Question:
If I mark it as abusive one day, then mark it abusive the next day, do I get two whistle points or just 1?

At 7/20/07 10:47 PM, Koeberto190 wrote:

At 7/20/07 10:42 PM, sixflab wrote:

At 7/20/07 10:24 PM, deus-ex-machina wrote: Question, how many people have to mark a review as abusive for a review mod to view and delete it?
Because I see reviews with 60+ abusive marks and they are still there.

It gets deleted when a review mod sees it and decides that it is abusive too.

Yep, and Kidray is that mod, he's deleting all the abusive reviews right now. Just wait.

But the first reviews I posted here on page 506 are still standing. Why? I must know!
I posted 250 abusive reviews! I want my non-garbage whistle!

I'm going to look for more abusive reviews.

my posts are not abusive LIAR wat is bad about them

i mean chris-092 s posts are not abusive work

Links Seperate Each Page of Reviews.

This Flash is The Many Deaths of Luigi.
zeldahero, thedarksideofpeach2, TyLacksGirls, skyler182001, Super-Fizzoly, wiidude, themariofan2007
mr-sweden
Hondelijk, ogdeepssuorcidul

This Flash is MarioandLuigi2! Preparody
22KB, Los-Illuminados
nyiddle
Nothing on Page 3.

At 7/21/07 01:59 AM, John12346 wrote:

At 7/20/07 10:47 PM, Koeberto190 wrote:

At 7/20/07 10:42 PM, sixflab wrote:

At 7/20/07 10:24 PM, deus-ex-machina wrote: Question, how many people have to mark a review as abusive for a review mod to view and delete it?
Because I see reviews with 60+ abusive marks and they are still there.

It gets deleted when a review mod sees it and decides that it is abusive too.

Yep, and Kidray is that mod, he's deleting all the abusive reviews right now. Just wait.

But the first reviews I posted here on page 506 are still standing. Why? I must know!
I posted 250 abusive reviews! I want my non-garbage whistle!

I think the bigger picture is that the abusive reviewing thing is one of the following:

1) Broken, and in the process of being fixed, or:

2) Revamped to work differently.

I say this, because you can vote on the same abusive review once per day.

Anyone else have a comment or thought on this?

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /384309

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /101762/6/score/n

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /118538/22/score/n

Homophobia=abusive reviews=my penis is happy :D

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /342647 most recent review

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /355243

Most 2 recent reviews.

At 7/21/07 02:02 AM, 2acnt wrote: my posts are not abusive LIAR wat is bad about them

I hate when I post with the wrong account trying to defend myself so that it doesn't look like I"m defending myself but that someone else is defending myself but then speaking in the wrong person and blowing the whole thing.

Here you go, my daily tribute of an abusive idiot!

It's kind of obvious, ya know?

At 7/21/07 02:01 AM, John12346 wrote: I'm going to look for more abusive reviews.

stop spamming this topic with stupid comments that no one cares about!!! i really dont care if u have a garbage forever. i posted tonnes as well. anyway, lets get started...

my sig is correct

using the number system. the reason why i put the abusive rating is to make certain ons more obvious so if the second number is 1, then it must be obvious like "FUCK YOU!!!" (first is for number of reviews)so, if u are very n00bish, then go for the ones that have the second number as 1 or 2...

3.2 look around
3.2 yeah, no
1 or 2.3 what could come from "Crucify me!!! Jesus"?
3.3 by wonderrabbit
3.2 anulas is a michael jackson fan lol
3.2 wtf is charlie?
3.2 the-nitrous kid
3.2 wildfirehedgehog says it "shud be blammed"
3.2 deathisnear3's review is nearly dead...
3.2 just 2 @ bottom
2.2 check page 18,17,16, etc.
3.2 Title: Cool Flash Body: Cool Flash Analysis: ABUSIVE- SPAM
3.2 bottom 2
1 WHOLE PAGE...
3.1 here
1.1 GOLDMINE GOLDMINE GOLDMINE
2.2 NOTE: to n00bs like beta7 this was the awesome one... this use to have 51 pages before it was reduced to the mid-20s
3.2 genowing
2.2
1.2
3.2 TERRIBLE TERRIBLE TERRIBLE TERRIBLE REVIEW TOO(look at second from bottom)
3.2 last one
1.3
2.2 look @ bottom...
THATS IT FOR NOW COZ U WILL MISS TONNES OUT OTHERWISE

More fresh ones from the portal! Get them!

techieman and dansleciel.

XdemondaysX, Jim-bot, GOTRYCE, muff-Diving, pie300 and felldian.

SnataSReapeR and Rinogas.

KoLdBLooD.

jdo007334, ShadowJase4280 and cheapcheat.

LostProphet32, MrWootWoot and ZombieArmy.

MrWootWoot and Kronkus.

Shaggytheclown17.

k9unit.

EvilEgg.

Have fun flagging them!

note: there are some on last page but u might not notice since there IS a new page...

Found some:
moviedude007
the only one on this page...
Bandit-Cloud4eva (bottom)
Juv
EvilEgg
milla (bottom) I think
Crap Crap Crap
Tarantulady

Britain vs America has many abusive reviews:
daboss25, shorty10
gunman124, jangofettish, Rehm is replying to some other review
The-Shockmaster, The-17th-Angel, lostphoenix, djshep, z-man-goku, zlatko
MartyMcFly, Chaosbeam
GOODmorningAUSTRALIA

There are a lot more abusive ones not directly pointed towards the author, but to other reviewers, americans, british people etc. (political opinions).

I always wondered why people even bother to write reviews if they are just "Blam this piece of shit1!!!!11" I found out if you look at the abusive reviewer's profile 99% of the time they don't have any BBS posts, WELL THANK GOD.

Imagine if we had every angry, immature 9 year old posting on here, this place would become a wreck instantly! There are over 1,000,000 users on NG, and only about 1500 of those users post. If every one of those people post, chances are, the BBS would be filled with responses like " fuk all u faggots" on a daily basis.

A little off topic, but I just had to share that.

At 7/21/07 02:23 PM, Koeberto190 wrote: I always wondered why people even bother to write reviews if they are just "Blam this piece of shit1!!!!11" I found out if you look at the abusive reviewer's profile 99% of the time they don't have any BBS posts, WELL THANK GOD.

They're the guys who are on Newgrounds just to give us whistle points. But you're damn right, most of them don't post here on the forums... As you said, thank God!

It would be nice if we had the flagging system on the forums...
Like, 0/0 people found this post helpfull. Did you? Yes/No/Abusive... We would win hundreads of whistle points every day!

At 7/21/07 02:35 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote:

At 7/21/07 02:23 PM, Koeberto190 wrote:

It would be nice if we had the flagging system on the forums...
Like, 0/0 people found this post helpfull. Did you? Yes/No/Abusive... We would win hundreads of whistle points every day!

People would abuse it they'd flag everything they didn't agree with the mods are here to undestand and judge based on rules not opinions

A quick one:

pistolfan21.

Theres a few on pages 1 and 2 saying it's stolen, which it isn't and just a few plain stupid reviews.

At 7/21/07 05:13 PM, TimFilp wrote: Theres a few on pages 1 and 2 saying it's stolen, which it isn't and just a few plain stupid reviews.

Just go on rating and oage 3.....no consructive reviews

There's quite a few on piconjo

I've found some more in the new submissions:

ThreeDdemon.

joeyhimself, DaRkBLooD69 and ThreeDdemon.

Waywaylatino, 51M3ON and firewolf7.

ofestion1.

Get them!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /376243

It's Pico Roulette, it doesn't work and everybody is saying something like "omg blam it it doesnt even work i dont think tom would be happy bout this low score 0".

When I flag a review and press the back button and then go back to the review it shows as if it didn't accept my abusive mark. Should I worry about this? Please let me know. Btw how long does it take usually to get a bronze whistle?

Here you go, 2 idiots!

The 2 at the top, KR3W59 , and seth1134!