Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 7/10/07 10:01 PM, beta7 wrote: =( And I"m also going to need a lesson on posting links, apparently.

above the boc you type your post in, there's a line of html aids. click the one that says 'Link', paste in the web address, and you're away.

At 7/10/07 09:59 PM, beta7 wrote: <A>javascript:OpenReadReviewsWin(1864607);Dev il's Dog

The review for Beast Boi Pt3 (first one)

Didn't work.

At 7/10/07 11:35 PM, Nimhster wrote:

At 7/10/07 09:59 PM, beta7 wrote: <A>javascript:OpenReadReviewsWin(1864607);Dev il's Dog

The review for Beast Boi Pt3 (first one)

Didn't work.

Thanks. I believe I already pointed that out.

I'm sure this has been addressed already, but since this post is 500 pages long, could someone please answer this question:

Can you mark a review abusive if the author's response is the abusive item being flagged?

At 7/11/07 12:00 AM, beta7 wrote: I'm sure this has been addressed already, but since this post is 500 pages long, could someone please answer this question:

Can you mark a review abusive if the author's response is the abusive item being flagged?

No. That would be an abusive review response, and for the time being cannot be marked as abusive.

Man, I hate this topic/thread! No offense, that's just because I got a garbage whistle for reporting the reviews you guys linked to...

I want to give some links too, but I'm afraid I'll "give" some others a garbage whistle, just like I got mine.

If anyone knows some REAL abusive reviews... post them please. (And not reviews that will give you negative whistle points.)

At 7/11/07 09:52 AM, Deadring2 wrote: Man, I hate this topic/thread! No offense, that's just because I got a garbage whistle for reporting the reviews you guys linked to...

Just because someone posts a link to the reviews. doesn't mean that all or even one of them is legitmately abusive and needs of deletion. Mods aren't uptight buttholes who if you say one cuss word, it will be deleted.

Read the review guidelines, and then read the reviews to see if they are indeed abusive.

terrible is terrible

At 7/11/07 12:12 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: terrible is terrible

Grats on your diety whistle.

1 out of 90 isn't bad.

Especially given:

1) That review was made about a week after you signed up - 2 years ago. Welcome to NG, Cheeky.

2) If we are going to get personal, you have a couple gems yourself. My favorite is "if that took u 3 months uve been doing something wrong. I LOVE POKEMON (jks)." However, using a little ettiquette, I won't punk you out and link it.

3) 19 of your 49 reviews are 2 sentences or less. Half of those are one sentence. So, although not abusive, roughly 40% of your reviews are pointless. Thanks for playing.

Oh, even better. That post was made almost a year before you signed up, Cheeky!

1) dont complain here do it to a review mod
2) although ur account is older than mine, i am more experienced then u
3) reviews are suppose to have more than 2 words especially if they are the same words
4) none of my reviews are abusive coz people that hate me try to find a single fault with me, they'll have put it here

At 7/11/07 12:42 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: 1) dont complain here do it to a review mod
2) although ur account is older than mine, i am more experienced then u
3) reviews are suppose to have more than 2 words especially if they are the same words
4) none of my reviews are abusive coz people that hate me try to find a single fault with me, they'll have put it here

1) I'm not complaining. Since you wanted to point out my pitfall, I'll point out yours.

2) You have more experience points, yes. But that only means that you make a point to deposit your experience every day. Yay for you! I'm glad you found this site 8 months ago.

3) I can't imagine anyone hating you, seeing how clearly likeable you are.

Back to topic:

dotcombasterd's review is abusive

A couple here
At least one here
Tomatomaster's review
Not sure about these, be careful

probably the first time i've heard someone say the word ballcrap so many times...

At 7/11/07 04:11 PM, DewclawedstormV1 wrote: I just have question about abusive reviews, if the review is somthing like "OMFG FIVENED" and tens all across the board wouldent that be abusive? It seems stupid just because its ten that it isnt abusive.

Depends on the entry and reviewer. If the review has a habit of doing that, then that is spamming +1 reviews.

If it is a legit submission, and there is no habit of doing that, then It's not abusive and just a compliement.

MIRRORED
in an attempt to hrry up to page 500, heres more
n00b calling people n00bs AGAIN
last one for now as every little helps...

Nearly all of these.

last one and maybe kaneman's review... not sure

At 7/11/07 09:52 AM, Deadring2 wrote: Man, I hate this topic/thread! No offense, that's just because I got a garbage whistle for reporting the reviews you guys linked to...

Unfortunately like most things on this website there is no handout, you actually have to put forth some effort to achieve higher levels. Users post reviews they believe are abusive, you give them a once over and flag the ones you are certain of. If a link says "last one on this page" dont just blindly mark it as abuse. Also you may want to look out for certain users and their posts, people like myself, 1337, Cheekyvincent, and k-fox post alot of reliable abuse. [sorry to any one i missed].

Ps. i normally post a long list every Monday and Wednesday so if you are in dire need for whistle points look out for them. The list is usually up sometime after 7:00 [eastern].

Dragon-Fable... took me awhile to remember it was abusive but i assure you, it is.

WOWMONSTERR and maybe a few others.

I think all 3 of these reviews are abusive, or at least just useless.

At 7/11/07 07:02 PM, Wretched-Raygun wrote: WOWMONSTERR and maybe a few others.

That link got a whole of abuse since I posted the link.

At 7/11/07 07:02 PM, Wretched-Raygun wrote: WOWMONSTERR and maybe a few others.

I think all 3 of these reviews are abusive, or at least just useless.

teh abusive user is: infallable squirl. to people who have troubles liek alot of people.

Flatline202
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387668

Quickaluminum [debatable violation to rule #2]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387660

alireza90 & Kitzunez & toehead & WOWMONSTERR & thiron & frokopop
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?sort=rating&id=387652&page=2

InfallibleSquirrel & bewareofdawg1 & GoldenSphinx
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387649

kaneman & mryunky
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387641

GoldenSphinx
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387629

fuck-u-now
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387626

DaRk-BLooD69 & Deeyay(debatable) [others in this link appear abusive but can be deemed useful to the author]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387624&page=1&sort=rating

Evilbottom1
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387604

wickedfreak [not useful for the production of future productions]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387603

Gcan & Funkylikamonkey
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387596

LickitySplit [debatable]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387590

JackflashProductions
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?sort=rating&id=387588&page=2

redtoothe
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387587&page=1&sort=rating

DarkInfluence [calls author a dumb fuck]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387572

Kylethedood
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387568

shippo1010
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387566

Sneep29 [irrelevant + LOLOLOLOL = spam in the body of the review]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=387560

kaneman
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=386667

f0d [rant where 95% is irrelivent to the flash. Does not benefit author, attacks other authors]
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=386988

rune-hunter
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=348171

HalfHumanHalfZombie [spam in the body] & tymoo22 [~warning not sure if this is abusive~]. I would assume so because it is not useful and short. Although it offers praise in the form of 4 words it gave all 0's.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?id=345978

WARNING: use your discresion with links above, some are abusive but some arnt, read the suggested abusers review before u flag and ONLY flag if the review is against all comon sence.

At 7/11/07 09:41 PM, Iron-Hampster wrote: WARNING: use your discresion with links above, some are abusive but some arnt, read the suggested abusers review before u flag and ONLY flag if the review is against all comon sence.

They are all abusive [besides where i indicated]. If not i would love for you to point out which ones are not. If you want people to take your warning seriously try spelling common sense correctly next time.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/readreview.p hp?pagea=88&pageb=-1&sort=rating&id=386773
A couple there.

Link

Got some rule breakers here. I find it ironic that they complain about flash that breaks the rules, but they do it over the review which is against review rules.

I was just reviewing this game when I saw this!
It's the one made by goneo.

I still need a lesson on linking. Everytime I copy a shortcut to a link its a javascript:something link and not an actual link link.....anyone?

Anyway, the user Ivanovitch reviewed the movie "Error Lives" on July 12, 2007. Its abusive. One of those "Go kill yourself" reviews.

But more importantly, how do I find the link properly?