Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

thanks

Looks like this alt was made purely to gain whistle points.

At 1/22/09 03:20 PM, Kaytee wrote: Looks like this alt was made purely to gain whistle points.

OHSHI-

At 1/22/09 03:24 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: FLAG THIS AS MALICIOUS, he submitted it again without putting any effort. Here's the blammed one, but it had more co-authors, and due to the Blam threshold it got Blammed.

Please, don't let this one pass. Flag it!

I voted 0 and blew my whistle.

At 1/22/09 03:30 PM, Franklin-Moore wrote:

At 1/22/09 03:24 PM, Sir-Nuts wrote: FLAG THIS AS MALICIOUS, he submitted it again without putting any effort. Here's the blammed one, but it had more co-authors, and due to the Blam threshold it got Blammed.

Please, don't let this one pass. Flag it!

I voted 0 and blew my whistle.

same

At 1/22/09 01:37 PM, Crim wrote:

At 1/22/09 01:27 PM, Shakyjake wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756

This just made it onto front page. Expect abuse.

Yup there a few on there, everyone flag them.

Yep, http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756 is definitely generating quite a few "Why is this on frontpage?" reviews, and very few of them have any constructive criticism. Be careful when flagging, not all the low (0-3) scores are necessarily abusive, but quite a few of them are. If all it says is "Why did this get frontpage?" then it's safe to flag...otherwise use your own discretion.

This has been posted twice

Here is the blammed one.

At 1/22/09 03:48 PM, Crim wrote: This has been posted twice

Here is the blammed one.

And one of the guys that reviewed that blammed flash has about 9 blam comments

http://niccomaraa.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash

At 1/22/09 03:46 PM, walrusgod wrote: Yep, http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756 is definitely generating quite a few "Why is this on frontpage?" reviews, and very few of them have any constructive criticism. Be careful when flagging, not all the low (0-3) scores are necessarily abusive, but quite a few of them are. If all it says is "Why did this get frontpage?" then it's safe to flag...otherwise use your own discretion.

There's a couple of "This should be blammed" ones as well, I think. I recommend keeping a browser window open on it and just hitting refresh every now and then.

I'll re-post link since yours failed...
=p

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756

At 1/22/09 03:53 PM, Shakyjake wrote:

At 1/22/09 03:46 PM, walrusgod wrote: Yep, http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756 is definitely generating quite a few "Why is this on frontpage?" reviews, and very few of them have any constructive criticism. Be careful when flagging, not all the low (0-3) scores are necessarily abusive, but quite a few of them are. If all it says is "Why did this get frontpage?" then it's safe to flag...otherwise use your own discretion.

There's a couple of "This should be blammed" ones as well, I think. I recommend keeping a browser window open on it and just hitting refresh every now and then.

I'll re-post link since yours failed...
=p

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /479756

Thanks for the reposting...damn html failing me once again! Yeah, I find that any time a new flash hits the frontpage, check to see if the majority of people agree...if they don't, then you should have that flash bookmarked until it gets off the frontpage, as the abusive reviews will flow like water.

At 1/22/09 04:00 PM, ArykSB wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 4311
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 4311

I only flagged the bottom one for external links. The 2 top ones were just useless looking to me.

Butt Fight: Raw

Few here

Dick Fight: WAR!!!, by SirBeretofClock Type: Movie Rating: Adults Only

Butt fight: Raw

The guy second from the top adresses another user in his post.

At 1/22/09 04:56 PM, Headshot777 wrote: The guy second from the top adresses another user in his post.

I'm not sure of this review, but check out in the bottom of the page, someone says it's stolen.

At 1/20/09 12:22 AM, WadeFulp wrote: This topic is close to being locked. Everyone needs to be more careful when linking to reviews. Just because someone links to a review, or reviews, it does not mean they are abusive. If you blindly mark reviews as abusive, don't be surprised if you find yourself with a garbage whistle.

its because the already got deleted...

I think...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 9530 http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 8397

At 1/22/09 05:12 PM, ectoplasmer3 wrote:

At 1/20/09 12:22 AM, WadeFulp wrote: This topic is close to being locked. Everyone needs to be more careful when linking to reviews. Just because someone links to a review, or reviews, it does not mean they are abusive. If you blindly mark reviews as abusive, don't be surprised if you find yourself with a garbage whistle.

its because the already got deleted...

Do you even realise who Wade is? He's Tom Fulp's brother, and one of the admins of this site. He's warning us that the topic is close to being locked by him personally, as people aren't paying attention to the rules for reviews, when they look at them and blindly mark them as abusive, before whining when they are inevitably penalised for misinforming the review mods about reviews which are believed to be abusive.

A little more time spent considering if these are abusive would save the review mods a hell of a lot of time and effort to keep this place clean.

At 1/22/09 05:31 PM, ectoplasmer3 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 9530 http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 8397

I really don't see any abusive comments. There might be on the second submission, but that's how I got a garbage whistle. I just randomly flagged reviews that I saw posted here.

Also:

http://ampman.newgrounds.com/reviews/ (blam comment)
http://nakedrat.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash (One word Dino run review)
http://musiccrazy.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash (stolen Jailbreak!)

"Blam this piece of crap"
Tells the author to go die
First audio review
All he said was FAIL.
I hope these are actually abusive. I don't want to contribute to getting this closed.

At 1/22/09 05:31 PM, ectoplasmer3 wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/47 9530

I don't see anything abusive about any of those reviews. I saw the keyword blammed in the other one, but not in this one.

Thanks Headshot and Purplevision.

At 1/22/09 05:39 PM, Headshot777 wrote: "Blam this piece of crap"
Tells the author to go die

These two are

First audio review
All he said was FAIL.

These two aren't.

I hope these are actually abusive. I don't want to contribute to getting this closed.

50%

E

See me after class.

Few here

At 1/22/09 07:15 PM, Emby wrote: Few here

There's a good 4 there, get flagging.

oh hey nic hair bud!!!!!!oh hey nic hair bud!!!!!! review insults the author.

This guy has at least two.

His only review-Insults the author.

Lazytown Hentai Quiz-Insult to author.

Numa Numa Hentai II-Insults author.

OMFG Hentai Game 2-Insult to author

Hentai Girl Dressup-Insults author

Naruto & Sakura Hentai-Insult to author

Teen Titans Hentai Tut-Insults author

Quite a find here, abusive reviews on the first and second pages.

Nurse Jenny Hentai-Asks why it passed.

Furry Porn Movie-Blam

Brawl is a shit game-Insults author

By the way, I'm not a hentai faggot, it's just that a good method to find abusive reviews is to search for the keyword "hentai" and check the reviews on all of the flashes that have a low score. Guaranteed to find some.