Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/28 2136

Mark the review made by Moorganas

"Crap it sucks!"
by: Moorganas
date: July 25, 2008

Crap it sucks!

Review rated.
Flagged abusive.

People think this is a useless review.

At 8/6/08 03:39 AM, Solraczeravla wrote:

yes it is since it says at the top of his review how this passed the submission.

Cool but, what's with the huge pic??

thats was only a bonus. i feel really good today. that pic was just for the beuty.

Hey guys. One question: What are the best ways to find abusive reviews? Cuz I barely find any myself.
Thx in advance!

xx Martin xx

At 8/6/08 07:55 AM, vaifan90 wrote: Hey guys. One question: What are the best ways to find abusive reviews? Cuz I barely find any myself.
Thx in advance!

xx Martin xx

If someone, A: insults the author, B: Spam the review, C: says BLAM THIS. Those are really the basicsm I would refer to the review guidelines.

Blam Review for the sequel of
Newgrounds' favorite submission, WadeFulp's Wife Is Fat.

At 8/6/08 07:59 AM, TehSlapHappy wrote:

At 8/6/08 07:55 AM, vaifan90 wrote: Hey guys. One question: What are the best ways to find abusive reviews? Cuz I barely find any myself.
Thx in advance!

xx Martin xx

If someone, A: insults the author, B: Spam the review, C: says BLAM THIS. Those are really the basicsm I would refer to the review guidelines.

I know that. I meant: Do you guys have some kind of formula to find those reviews? Or do you just stumble across them?

Behold the newly crowned Turd of the Week!

This submission already has a few abusive reviews (I definitely saw at least 1 blam review) but as time goes on it is destined to attract much more abuse, especially if the original "Wade Fulp's Wife is Fat" is anything to go by.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/45 1274 - A couple here insulting the author.

At 8/6/08 08:07 AM, vaifan90 wrote:

At 8/6/08 07:59 AM, TehSlapHappy wrote:

At 8/6/08 07:55 AM, vaifan90 wrote: Hey guys. One question: What are the best ways to find abusive reviews? Cuz I barely find any myself.
Thx in advance!

xx Martin xx

If someone, A: insults the author, B: Spam the review, C: says BLAM THIS. Those are really the basicsm I would refer to the review guidelines.

I know that. I meant: Do you guys have some kind of formula to find those reviews? Or do you just stumble across them?

Go to Google then click "Advanced Search" on the main page (It's to the right of the search bar) On this page, go down to the last text box called: "Search within a site or domain" and type in: www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews.
Next type in some abusive words ;p into the "All These Words," "This Exact Wording Or Phrase" and "One Or More Of These Words". Now click search, and start lookin'. :P

Also you can type in swear words in the flash search that is on top of the page of any newgrounds page and find the low scoring flash. These flashes usually have abusive reviews that state blam or attack the author personally.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /177059/4 - Deadwanderer, flame950
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /1032/3 - killerinstinct2r, llamaclock
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /66911 - thejuggla22 (spams)
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /289363 - steven-buskirk
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /19909 - SnakeV, HyuugaRose, MetalPsycho

At 8/6/08 08:51 AM, Franklin-Moore wrote: heaps of stuff

thanks

At 8/6/08 09:17 AM, dooseyboy wrote:

At 8/6/08 08:51 AM, Franklin-Moore wrote: heaps of stuff

thanks

You should really be thanking corky. I used his formula and got all that in about 5 minutes.

We can flag 2003 Reviews, am I right?

Well then, I found some here.

@ Corky:
Thanks, man! I will do that from now on. =)

At 8/6/08 09:31 AM, youngblood26 wrote: We can flag 2003 Reviews, am I right?

Absent said it was alright, so go ahead.

Well then, I found some here.

kthx.

Excuse me for the double post, but ahem...
Thanks to you guys I got a Silver whistle now.
Kudos.

The second one tells the author to "go to hell" and the third one says the word "blam" 4 times.

PolishTwat suuuuuuuuucks!

Flag the last reviews of page 2 and page 3. (suuuuuuuuuuuuucks)

Polishtwat sucks even moar!

Flag a couple of reviews from page 22 and 23. Basicly where he insults the author/flash etc., you get the drift. ;)

The one by Tyrant1419

Calls the Numa Numa guy a "fat fag".

Kaos444 calls the author a "fag". There's also a dude called eric-swanson at the bottom of the page saying "I just want blam, blam, blam".

maxi911 says "I'MA BLAM IT".

Crash-Calvin also says "BLAM" twice.

Commanderkai tells the author that he "sucks", calls him a "dumb ass" and says he should "go to hell".

SirNightOwl says: "Got to hell and burn" and LilGoosemcSHNICK (the guy above him) calls that user an "idiot" and a "fag".

That's all I found just now.^^

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /113393 || anarchywolf666 || Says the movie should be taken down. I think.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /77806 || Whoomen || Says teh author should die. D:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /142545 || Grizzly || Pointless review.

Enjoyzzz...

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /381115/14

Wouldn't smallman9's review be considered flooding?

-----------------

"FUN"
by: smallman9
date: July 27, 2008

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!

Woot finally pulled from a garbage back to a normal! Thanks a lot!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /450357/8 - Kagg8893

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /450357

Sebine is verbally abusing the author by saying "Fuck you"

At 8/6/08 11:48 AM, InsaniMaster471 wrote: Woot finally pulled from a garbage back to a normal! Thanks a lot!

Congrats. :)

Sorry for the double post, but i got a silver whistle!!! :D

Thanks everyone!!!

Woo, my whistle actually changed. :D

Bronzzzze.

Yeah i recently brought my normal whistle up to silver, in like 3 days because of the goldmine submissions.

MAY I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION PLZ

thanks, now...
I'm getting REALLY tired of people saying it's ok to flag 2003 reviews, and other people then saying you shouldnt flag before 2005, and then other people contradicting THAT.

so...
i looked up a 2003 review that is obviously abusive, flagged it, favorited the page, and checked it out a week later. that should be plenty of time for it to get deleted right?
Well, it's still there, and whats more, the yellow "abusive" cross is no longer selected, enabling me to vote again whether it is helpful or not.

just to make things clear: this indicates that i did not wage in on it yet (so i guess my abusiveness-flag was cancelled?)

If you are not convinced yet, my whistle status dropped to silver right after that flag (and i'm a really careful flagger, if i'm even remotely in doubt of a reviews abusiveness i won't flag).

SO DONT FLAG 2003's!!!!!!!

additional info:
1. i did the same with a 2004 review, which DID get removed. conclusion: 2004's are safe to flag.

2. this is the 2003 review i was talking about.
(Summary: "BLAM!" Score: 0
submission: The Ball
date: August 12, 2003
review: I could shit a better movie.)

3. My whistle status is now back to gold again, so thanks to all you people here :P
now for deity :D

Thank you guys for getting me my bronze whistle. You guys rcok. Now i'm going for the gold!

i like shiny