Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 8/16/08 05:05 PM, RKThrilla wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/1 43213

touretts

He says go die in a fire TO ME!!

lol

he is just telling you what he voted. I don't think he was abusive, just didn't like your track, like the rest of the reviewers. He gave you some costructive criticism, to use a better microphone, and you even admitted you used a phone. I would not flag this folks.

At 8/16/08 05:05 PM, RKThrilla wrote: (...) He says go die in a fire (...)

That's kinda like the Audio version of "Blam this piece of crap!" =P

I ain't flaggin' shit until i get a satisfactory answer... Excuse me while i just sit on my deity whistle forever, 'cause we probably won't get an answer ever. Wade is about as active as a braindead rock, Tom doesn't give a shit, and review mods will probably consider every possibility before admiting that there might be a jackass excuse for a review mod out there fucking it up for everyone.

At 8/16/08 05:11 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote:

At 8/16/08 04:05 PM, Solraczeravla wrote: the question is why?

I told you why:
Chances are its not an abusive review if its not deleted by then.

No, man... A review that links to an outside site? Or to the reviewer's submissions? 24 times in a row? Those were abusive. It can't be argued against.

At 8/16/08 05:10 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: If there were a couple more review mods then they wouldnt be so cluster bombed by users like us flagging them

So how many review mods are there? How many should there be? Why don't they tell us themselves? Are they too busy deleting reviews and passing out garbage whistles? I am sure the UI for deleting these reviews is simple and efficient. I find it hard to believe that they are so overwhelmed that they can't explain. They have time to post some crap comment letting us "children"
know we are just being petty. Hell, she didn't even read the thread enough to grasp what was being said here, just skimmed, wasted page space, and moved on.

At 8/16/08 05:36 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: Ok. (...) The end.

S'all good. Hey, you're deity. Join me in boycotting the system! =P

At 8/16/08 05:11 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: Reviews

Very Nice finds dude. Very helpful : ).

At 8/16/08 05:10 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: A lot of true stuff

You're right, if you notice, we haven't had any response from a mod, except that crappy excuse of it doesn't have enough flags, which by the way makes all of us feel really angry >=(

Really, being a mod may not be what we can call the best thing in the world, but seriously, if you take the responsibility of it, then do it right, don't you think?

Anyway, as it has been said before, I'm starting to feel that my effort on searching for abusive reviews this whole year has become nothing in 5 minutes, it was all worthless, and I know that a lot of people don't take this too seriously, but I also know that a lot of guys really cherish a deity whistle, and that they've spent here a lot of time (I know I had) to get it, so mods, please, take this more seriously.

And nobody answered T_T

At 8/16/08 05:42 PM, Solraczeravla wrote:

At 8/16/08 05:10 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote:

stuff

This whole whistle system has been shitty to me to. I spent at least 5 months finding abusive reviews to get up to gold and than I flagged a stolen movie, which it was. Than the fucker changes it to an original movie. That in addition to the supposed "goldmine" posted a few pages back with 30+ reviews put me deep in to garbage.

My time was wasted. Flat and simple. No matter how many times I PM review mods I NEVER get answers.. they need a new system or get a LOT more mods..

And nobody answered T_T

I just did

Well then mister wiki, explain how abusive or flaggable reviews that do get deleted, give people negative whistle points causing ( this has been asked how many times )? You have yet to even touch the subject that is at the heart of all this. They have been deleted, after receiving hundreds of flags, and yet we all lost whistle points shortly after the deletion. If you can pull that answer out of your butt, then do share. We would like an answer from an actual mod. I can understand why they won't address this issue, because it is a mistake and they dread admitting such. If you would actually say something useful i would listen to you, but you just keep belching out the same rhetoric. We know there were alot of abusive reviews, and we know they have to ban those they think are deserving, but why are they punishing those that are helping them do their job.
Do you suggest we stop flagging for a while, or maybe just Monday to Friday, and then let them have the week end off? WTF.
You were not even online when this happened, i suggest you read this thread from 4 pages back again to grasp what is actually going on right now.

At 8/16/08 06:08 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: They don't need a new system. Its working just fine. Review mods have a life just like us. They dont have time to stay and check marked reviews and movies all day.

That's why we need more, so at least one review mod can be online 24/7.

At 8/16/08 06:11 AM, fish1892 wrote: Every single one of them They're just advertising some other site.

This is where the link went, 24 abusive reviews, all deleted. Anyone that flagged them got negative whistle points. This, my mod-ass-kissing friends, is the point in question, and none other. Read what happened instead of just thinking "statwhores lost points, call a whaaaaambulance". I have deity and wasn't affected, and I'm pissed the fuck off.

At 8/16/08 06:12 PM, Popsoap wrote: That's why we need more, so at least one review mod can be online 24/7.

Signed.

Hey shadowchaotailsevil3, could you read my last post and tell me what you think? Thanks.

At 8/16/08 06:22 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: They arent punishing the people who are helping. People who go to garbage for flagging the incorrect matieral are punishing themselves. If the person has their whistle power go up then they are helping and not truly being punished

Your opinion on that doesn't matter since you have a diety whistle.

Get a garbage whistle then we'll talk!

At 8/16/08 06:15 PM, C-Hawk wrote:

At 8/16/08 06:11 AM, fish1892 wrote: Every single one of them They're just advertising some other site.

This is where the link went, 24 abusive reviews, all deleted. Anyone that flagged them got negative whistle points.

This, my mod-ass-kissing friends, is the point in question, and none other. Read what happened

shadowchaotails3 PAY ATTENTION

just thinking "statwhores lost points, call a whaaaaambulance".

This could possibly be what the MODS were thinking. The fact that they have yet to address us here in the thread dedicated to their "expertise", says volumes.

At 8/16/08 05:10 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote:

your first problem is you went to the goldmine a few pages ago. Im going to asume you went today and flagged. That was not the right thing to do. You need to stick to the most recent page and most recently posted abuuse rather than go thru the pages and flag matierial that is no longer there. Thats how come you never gained much whistle power.

Okay mister smart ass. I flagged the reviews the day they got on, because about an hour after they were posted they got deleted. Everyone knows not to flag old shit.

My time was wasted. Flat and simple. No matter how many times I PM review mods I NEVER get answers.. they need a new system or get a LOT more mods..

They don't need a new system. Its working just fine. Review mods have a life just like us. They dont have time to stay and check marked reviews and movies all day.

Well than there life is what's screwing up the system. They can have a life all they want, that just means we need more of them. Flat and simple, there is not enough.

At 8/16/08 06:22 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: They are not always cleared. If the review mod sees a review or movie as unabusive then all people who marked it get negative whistle points and the flags for it are instantly cleared and the movie or flash is left and untouched.

You simply don't understand, the submissions are abusive, excessively and obviously abusive, we flag them, they aren't deleted and we lose points, just as if it wasn't abusive.

Then we yell a huge WTF on this thread.

And still you don't give a f*ck -_-

At 8/16/08 06:30 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: I assume the reason why you shouldn't flag it is because those reviews are not legit, and are cheat reviews. The main goal of that spam account would be achieved if anyone got whistle points. In order to discourage this, you are rewarded negative whistle points instead.

What happened to clearing flags with no reward, positive or negative?

At 8/16/08 06:30 PM, X-TERRORIST-X wrote: Well than there life is what's screwing up the system. They can have a life all they want, that just means we need more of them. Flat and simple, there is not enough.

And if they can't meet those expectations, they simply just ask to be demodded.

Yep, that simple!

I bet that a mod, probably one who is both review and forum moderator, will come along and lock this thread because about 10 actual abusive reviews have been posted in the last 4 pages...all the rest has been commotion....

It might even be RageVI himself...Oh, the irony! And somewhat cliched ending really...A ruler's (mod's) brainchild (Rage's Gift) destroyed (locked) by his minions (Rage's Gift regs) who turn against him (and the other review mods)..

Anyway, I'll stop muttering...

At 8/16/08 06:30 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: I assume the reason why you shouldn't flag it is because those reviews are not legit, and are cheat reviews. The main goal of that spam account would be achieved if anyone got whistle points. In order to discourage this, you are rewarded negative whistle points instead.

It's possible, but i must say that if it is, then it's stupid, since we're making our jobs as normally as possible, we don't start to investigate if it's an alt account, for us, abusive reviews are abusive reviews; just imagine a newbie, he spots a user with 10 or more abusive reviews (and i mean ABUSIVE reviews), and flags them all, just to find out 10 minutes later that he has just been buried forever in Garbage.

I don't assume it's a true rule, but if is, then seriously, wtf... -__-

At 8/16/08 06:30 PM, CuteAndFuzzy wrote: I assume the reason why you shouldn't flag it is because those reviews are not legit, and are cheat reviews. The main goal of that spam account would be achieved if anyone got whistle points. In order to discourage this, you are rewarded negative whistle points instead.

That would be unfair, besides the alt. NOBODY else knows those are cheat reviews.

At 8/16/08 06:37 PM, Solraczeravla wrote: (...) abusive reviews are abusive reviews; just imagine a newbie, he spots a user with 10 or more abusive reviews (and i mean ABUSIVE reviews) (...)

A by-line on that hypothesis: what, we're supposed to just look at the 24 abusive reviews and do nothing? Like... leave them there and scratch ourselves going "meh, alt"?

At 8/16/08 06:37 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote: you cant lock a thread thats over 7 months old and look at this thread...its over 5 years old

Well, earlier today, Luis locked the Flash 'Reg' Lounge, which had been running for 2 years, so....