Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 4/13/08 03:19 PM, DP36 wrote: The new whistle system is gay. I used to have a gold whistle. But now if its spam movie with abusive reviews it makes your whistle go down. If its a spam alt it makes you go down. Its stupid. Are whistles are meant to clean up the place but if we can't clean up spam alts reviews and abusive reviews that are on a spam movie then whats the point of having whistle ranks.

HAHAHAHAHAHA BOB ACTUALLY MADE THAT INTO LAW?!?!
Im going to write a few hundred reviews for spam flashes now just for fun. Honestly what an idiot.

http://jonah-cook.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash the review for blockhead ghostmas is it abusive?http://www.newgrounds.com/portal /reviews/433201/14/score
and page 12
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434241/17/score crypto137a
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /351142/17/score some here
http://bcc-lw.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh/1 up to page 4 after that reviews are 2004
http://amonkeynamedsam.newgrounds.com/re views/flash/1 and page 2
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /363854/42/score some here

At 4/13/08 03:19 PM, DP36 wrote: The new whistle system is gay. I used to have a gold whistle. But now if its spam movie with abusive reviews it makes your whistle go down. If its a spam alt it makes you go down. Its stupid. Are whistles are meant to clean up the place but if we can't clean up spam alts reviews and abusive reviews that are on a spam movie then whats the point of having whistle ranks.

When the fuck did this happen? I got a perma ban for leaving abusive reviews on spam! If the rule has changed to where you can leave abusive reviews on spam then my ban should be lifted.

This is stolen, know where from?

At 4/14/08 08:30 AM, Corky52 wrote: When the fuck did this happen? I got a perma ban for leaving abusive reviews on spam! If the rule has changed to where you can leave abusive reviews on spam then my ban should be lifted.

you were banned permanently for flooding the review space and leaving links to meatspin, you dolt.

And bob dind't sign it into law. your friend there has this amazing inability to read. It's quite interesting really.

Truly abusive reviews will be deleted, but venting and calling the author out for spamming the portal will be left. But keep in mind here, if I catch somebody trying to use that as a way to just make abusive reviews, they'll receive a hefty ban for trolling the authors and for trying to use spam flash as a cop out to make abusive reviews.

Reposted because you morons can't read:

WHY DON'T YOU IDIOTS EVER READ ANYTHING ANY OF THE REVIEW MODERATORS SAY IN HERE?!

YOUR WHISTLES ARE IN NO WAY BEING AFFECTED BY SPAM FLASH REVIEWS. YOU AREN'T LOSING ANY POINTS OR GAINING POINTS.

SO IF YOU AREN'T GAINING ANY POINTS, THEN THE SHIT YOU FLAG WRONG ELSEWHERE IS WHAT IS MAKING YOUR WHISTLE GO DOWN.

STOP BLAMING SHIT THAT'S NOT HAPPENING FOR YOUR INABILITY TO JUST FLAG ABUSIVE THINGS.

AGAIN, YOUR WHISTLES AREN'T GOING DOWN BECAUSE OF SOME "NEW RULE" THEY ARE GOING DOWN BECAUSE YOU FLAGGED SOMETHING TOTALLY UNRELATED THAT WASN'T ABUSIVE.

seriously though, you're a moron if you think your whistle went down because of flagging reviews in spam flash.

and even if it had....why the hell are you still flagging that shit?! If you think you're going to lose whistle points from it, why bother?

Yoshison
tristian820

To Melachy: Yeah, I've been thinking too. I have helped delete more 50 abusive reviews from spam flashes, and I don't think any of them did any good, so from now, I'm going to find some in non spam flashes.

84 Beautiful abusive reviews.
http://chrenic.newgrounds.com/reviews/

At 4/14/08 10:37 AM, Malachy wrote:

At 4/14/08 08:30 AM, Corky52 wrote: When the fuck did this happen? I got a perma ban for leaving abusive reviews on spam! If the rule has changed to where you can leave abusive reviews on spam then my ban should be lifted.

I didn't think it was against the rules to mention meatspin.com when that was what the movie was a parody of.

At 4/14/08 11:40 AM, Tea wrote: 84 Beautiful abusive reviews.
http://chrenic.newgrounds.com/reviews/

Hardly any are abusive..

Guess what this is? (FLAG)

The last review says it is not made by the author, therefore he is saying its stolen, also the rant above it might be a busive but i was to lazy to read it.

The author is not the real one. It has the website info IN THE FLASH.

At 4/14/08 02:39 PM, Corky52 wrote:

At 4/14/08 11:40 AM, Tea wrote: 84 Beautiful abusive reviews.
http://chrenic.newgrounds.com/reviews/

Hardly any are abusive..

But most don't make any sense and are just badly written.

That makes them unhelpful, but not abusive.

At 4/14/08 02:29 PM, Corky52 wrote: I didn't think it was against the rules to mention meatspin.com when that was what the movie was a parody of.

which is exactly why you are banned permanently from reviewing.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434979 joelasticot. Off-topic, unhelpful, and he gave me a bad score without watching it.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4861 stormpax
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432484/56/score some here
http://malike15.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash be careful this may be an alt
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /371781/63/score check back to page 60
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /410923/21/score check back to page 19 but this is a spammy submisson but some of the reviews are abusive
http://jundark.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash/1 although they from 2006

At 4/14/08 05:05 PM, Malachy wrote:

which is exactly why you are banned permanently from reviewing.

Oh boy.

At 4/14/08 05:05 PM, Malachy wrote:

At 4/14/08 02:29 PM, Corky52 wrote: I didn't think it was against the rules to mention meatspin.com when that was what the movie was a parody of.

which is exactly why you are banned permanently from reviewing.

Wow, I actually am right. I can link to the website because it was related. Read the rules again.

Do not use the review space for the purpose of promoting things. Stick to reviewing the movies - we don't want to hear about how great your website is. Also, posting links to websites that reward you for sending hits is prohibited; we will delete your account for the first offense with no warning. Posting unrelated links is also prohibited and will result in a ban.

Mine was related to the movie and I think this was a mistake that someone saw me linking to a website and automatically thought it wasn't related to the movie.

At 4/14/08 06:25 PM, Corky52 wrote: Mine was related to the movie and I think this was a mistake that someone saw me linking to a website and automatically thought it wasn't related to the movie.

Just a suggestion dude, but if you want to contest your review ban, it would probably be a much better idea to write out your case in a polite and carefully considered PM to the review mod who banned you, rather than trying to have it out on the BBS.

I'm sure the mod in question (Malachy, I assume?) would be much more willing to hear you out if you took this away from the public eyes of the BBS.

I'm sure the mod in question (Malachy, I assume?) would be much more willing to hear you out if you took this away from the public eyes of the BBS.

Yeah also it gives us more space here to link to abusive reviews.

At 4/14/08 07:03 PM, DP36 wrote:

I'm sure the mod in question (Malachy, I assume?) would be much more willing to hear you out if you took this away from the public eyes of the BBS.

Yeah also it gives us more space here to link to abusive reviews.

Yeah, sorry guys. That's my bad. I am actually talking to BlueHippo about it right now. I won't take up more room here anymore.

Ngmastah

http://stormpax.newgrounds.com/reviews/f lash - The first one

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /435034/3/score - Right now the last one

Check review for "badly drawn dawg series".

Reason for flagging: repeated text over and over...

Look at Bstime's review

Reason for flagging: Suggestion that submission is stolen (if you look in the review rules you will find this is not allowed).

At 4/14/08 06:58 PM, NEVR wrote: I'm sure the mod in question (Malachy, I assume?) would be much more willing to hear you out if you took this away from the public eyes of the BBS.

I totally agree. if you guys are annoyed about a ban, don't come in here and bitching about it. and I wasn't the one to ban him, it was somebody else.

I just float around in here to make sure you guys don't flag the wrong things, which also gives me more time to delete abusive things you do flag correctly.

At 4/14/08 08:19 PM, Malachy wrote: and I wasn't the one to ban him, it was somebody else.

Ah, my bad, I just saw you talking about his ban earlier and made a guess.

I just float around in here to make sure you guys don't flag the wrong things, which also gives me more time to delete abusive things you do flag correctly.

I don't even flag reviews anymore, unless I stumble across one on my daily portal wanderings. I do check in here occasionally though, just to see what's going on, and to help out if I can.

death2301 <-- says that it's the worst game he's ever played.

nisch <-- says that the game is a piece of shit

happy reviewing.