Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4209 all reviews that say stolen :)

A few of my reviews have been deleted in the past week, yet I received no message from M-bot.

Why? I want to know which ones were deleted.

Here is one by tutis170.

At 4/10/08 08:09 PM, pigeonmaster88 wrote:

At 4/10/08 08:05 PM, whatty wrote:

At 4/10/08 07:46 PM, DBlach wrote: this movie if it doesn't get blammed is malicious it spawns multiple pop ups

Damn. I missed it.

Me too! >:(

pooey

I forgot popups existed at one point until I went to fix someones computer again and they had them. Text Based OS FTW j/k

Here's a nice little golden shower porn vid for some big whistle points!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4471

lol.... somebody needs to read the rules.

check all the pages there are quite a few pointless reviews that need to go in this one.

Smooches ^_^

At 4/11/08 05:29 AM, LittleWashu wrote: check all the pages there are quite a few pointless reviews that need to go in this one.

Smooches ^_^

Thanks but is that a spam submisson ,are you not meant to mark those?

At 4/11/08 01:19 AM, FodeyOz wrote: Here's a nice little golden shower porn vid for some big whistle points!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4471

I'm sure the admins will LOVE reviewing that.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430020/8/score - Kastorr,SchezarCold
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430020/9/score - monkeyroboninja,Darkmanau (both nothing constructive)

At 4/10/08 10:34 PM, Purpin wrote: A few of my reviews have been deleted in the past week, yet I received no message from M-bot.

Why? I want to know which ones were deleted.

If you didn't get a message from M-Bot they were deleted, because they were useless.

Sorry to post three times in a row, but I forgot some:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /7121/4/score - shermonator,HypnoAssassin

I don't know how many times I need to tell you,

YOU ARE NOT LOSING WHISTLE POINTS FOR SPAM FLASH REVIEWS none. nada. zip.

you won't gain any, but you also won't lose any.

so don't blame me because you're fucking retarded and flagged totally unrelated reviews which happened to not be abusive.

You're garbage whistle isn't because of some new rule. it's because you don't even bother flagging abusive reviews.

the way the system works is that if you flag a non abusive review, you LOSE MORE POINTS than you would if you didn't flag it and instead flagged a real abusive review.

it's not a 1 for 1 ratio

the reason for this is because of people who think having a shinier whistle is important and so they try and see how close they can get to the blurred line of abusive/unhelpful.

Go for the painfully obvious reviews. if it doesn't stick out of the screen as something that's really abusing our review system, DON'T FUCKING FLAG IT!

A few on all these pages

At 4/11/08 10:24 AM, Suaron wrote:

At 4/11/08 09:33 AM, peT-the-dead wrote: Sorry to post three times in a row, but I forgot some:
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /7121/4/score - shermonator,HypnoAssassin

both of those are from '01 and would result in the loss of whistle points

Again your inability to read astounds me.

You don't lose whistle points for old reviews.

You just don't gain any, so why even bother? How hard is it to look at the date of a review?

At 4/11/08 01:05 PM, Suaron wrote: tigerkitty said earlier in the thread that, as a general concensus, review mods have agreed to penalize flaggers of older reviews. If you don't do it, then awesome, because that rule sucks arse. But, at a minimum, it seems to me that flaggers of those reviews run a high risk of losing points.

if I recall she, a few posts later, mentioned she misspoke.

the consensus was to not penalize for it.

Even if we did do that, how hard is it to just avoid old reviews? You just don't flag them, simple. There's no reason to be trolling through turd of the weeks from 2002 hoping to find abusive reviews, there's plenty of abuse going on right now. the system of review moderating was created so that we can help keep people from abusing the system later on, thats why we ban people and why you have to click that check box under writing a new review and why M-bot sends you messages.

and if you actually cared to read the reasoning (which it's obvious that you haven't) it's also because the review guidelines weren't around back then. Can't really punish people retroactively for shit that didn't have rules when they wrote their review.

HOLY CRAP A FREAKING GOLD MINE!!!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /431290/19/score

iT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE LAST PAGE! :D

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434451 - wam-bo - ha ha = a review?

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434503 - el-nino66 - really bad review, not helpful at all.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4510 - TrundleBocks - Spam.

At 4/11/08 01:48 PM, FatKidWitAJetPak wrote: HOLY CRAP A FREAKING GOLD MINE!!!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /431290/19/score

iT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE LAST PAGE! :D

Spam submission, you won't gain any whistle points.

I know this is stolen i just don't know from where.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4541

Party!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433984/49/score

lol wut?

DonDavis123
Reason: Unconstructive review...

http://rcamerica.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash

At 4/11/08 06:35 PM, Goat-Man wrote: http://rcamerica.newgrounds.com/reviews/
flash

Not every review is abusive so be careful!

SloopDoGG
Reason: The review is very useless and it doesn't explain the low score. And also he insulted the artist's work without explaining why.

Gergaloth, FUCK-OFF, MadCow and NickDaPwner.

http://zukoeld.newgrounds.com/reviews/fl ash

The obvious one.

Sorry, heres one more:

http://oldlyshapedchris.newgrounds.com/r eviews/flash/7

It's the last one.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4588

'Free flash 9 download'

Whistle as unsuitable (illegal) immediately.