Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Ok guys just another reminder. it seems more and more people have been complaining and saying their whistle level is now garbage. Remember.

1) READ the review, no matter who reccommends it be flagged. Read it for youself.
2) Not all useless reviews are abusive.
3) DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT FLAG reviews from before 2005.
4) DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT FLAG reviews of 'spam flashes' or the usual useless crap collabs.
5) Try not to flag turd of the weeks either. Its suicidal.

This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/

This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

At 4/8/08 05:26 AM, Vorlek wrote: This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/


This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

It was VERY obvious- they even tried blotting out the logos and stuff, but didn't do a very good job. You can even see the original graphics for the One Player and Two Player modes underneath the new text they put in front.

At 4/8/08 05:37 AM, ParadoxVoid wrote:

At 4/8/08 05:26 AM, Vorlek wrote: This game is stolen http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4056

it is a game called ladbrokes miniball.

http://www.ladbrokes.com/games/miniball/


This one was pretty obvious i dont see how it got this far through the judging stage.

It was VERY obvious- they even tried blotting out the logos and stuff, but didn't do a very good job. You can even see the original graphics for the One Player and Two Player modes underneath the new text they put in front.

yer, that was why i was wondering why it has got this far without anyone blowing their whistle on it. Its even got miniball still written in the middle of the pitch. Also all the fonts are arial because that is what happens with a decompiler when you dont have the correct font needed.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4057 - 1 here

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4057 - Jackblackflo - very very pointless, bit like his review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434050 - lol1083 - CAPS LOCK + shit review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4042 - dungeons0 - Typing doesn't load after 3 other people have stated it doesn't constitute a review.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434026 - Lessermore, basketballa12 - Abusive, calls author a fag.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4024 - inti-creater - just agree's with another reviewer.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434018 - JmdMagic - I mean srsly.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4009 - ILoveMyAttitude - abusive

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 3993 - dooomsDave, - 1 worder.

Blam comment:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 2633

Lots of hatred of haters here.

This on spam. Please don't post links to abusive reviews on spam.

Mission complete

Target: garbage whistle

Thank you so much for making these new (bullshit/unessacery) rules, Bob. I'm sure we all appriciate the garbage whistles you gave us.

Whew...hi guys. :D

http://retnuheilliw.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash Review for nymph in love with tree

http://doogleflip.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash/4 Review for Torture The Emo

http://ariano.newgrounds.com/reviews/fla sh Reviews for Sonic'sQuestForPower3End, Pico's School Remake, Sonic VS Super Sonic 3, Tails XXX Cosmo Hentai #1, Sonic Shorts Collection, Sonic Vs. Ryu (TOAI3)

I'm unsure about ariano's reviews. They seem to be spamming the review body, and are generally useless, but he did award high scores for them. I have flagged them, however. FLAG AT YOUR OWN RISK. =O

And now, our feature presentation. *fanfare*

He's "19", and comes from "aremica". XD

Please, enjoy.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash Reviews for SHOOT ASH!, shoot out III, and How Long is your Poo?

This kid loves his poo. >;)

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/2 Endless War 3, Bubble Trouble, Platform Game Maker (?)

Question for mods: if you put code from a level editor into your review, is it considered as spam? Thanks.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/3 Mardek RPG: Chapter 2, Magus RPG

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/4 the Kill Kar

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/5 Sonic RPG eps5, Pico's School, Stab, Megaman Dead? pt. 1

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/6 Amitoune Internet Client, Multiplayer Snake V1.03

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/7 Naruto Fighting Game, Snow Fight 3.0.

http://runescape45.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/8 A Unicorn Giggle, TSUNAMI, lev. 1, Postal, Fellowship of Kings RPG

I've checked, and these don't link to spam submissions, but double check in case I've missed any. And they're all after 2005, so you should be safe.

"its useless like a pig" lol

Happy flagging, everyone. >;D

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 3963 - ShotToFace, leg666
both saying it should get blammed.
btw: before you ask this is no spam. It may be crap, but it's not spam.

Just found some more:
http://cristisrisen.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash - Olympus Burger: Hades, Super-Duper Friends, Ann Coulter: Brainless,Messed-Up Bible Stories 2
There might be some more. Flag at your own risk.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434083 - Ace75 - Blam comment

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /434076 - bart95 - Blam comment

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /395555/6/score - giant selection here =D

At 4/8/08 01:55 PM, ZombiePhil wrote: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /395555/6/score - giant selection here =D

giant selection - on a spam submission
oh I hate those new rules

At 4/8/08 02:17 PM, peT-the-dead wrote: giant selection - on a spam submission
oh I hate those new rules

The review mods have a point, but the submission in my eyes, should be deleted if it is that bad, that so many people post abusive posts.

Hello. :)

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/3 Link's Problem, Legend Of Link 3,

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/4 Zelda Short: Ganondorf,

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/5 Zelda3: FreeLoading Link, Link Strikes Back 2, Link Strikes Back 3, Link Strikes Back 4

http://diminsonsam.newgrounds.com/review s/flash/6 Family Guy: Fighting Game

http://kainthedragooner.newgrounds.com/r eviews/flash/2 Legend Of Zelda: Forgotten Soul (?), True Zelda Sing Along

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /308690/138/score Indigo Extreme

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /411504/30/score Loads here!

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /430020/8/score Goes back a number of pages.

For the last two links, don't flag everything blindly! There are some acceptable reviews in there, so use your own judgement as always.

Anything with a (?) are reviews that I'm unsure about.

Thanks to Mechabloby for giving me the last two links. <3

Happy Flagging. :D

So many idiot Zelda fans. Fucking posers. I like one of the first.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /417320/5/score

Last one. I'm currently checking out any anti-Zelda flashes for more of these abusive ones, looks like I'll get at least 10 today.

Heres many by a game that is'nt a spam flash

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /338882/8 seelkadoom1

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /338882/7 dragonnate96

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /338882/5 azelo

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /338882/4 Four on this page - scimm4, jgog, ryytgg, ironman1179

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /338882 Buthead437

http://buthead437.newgrounds.com/reviews /flash This guy has three but one is a kk submission so stay clear of that

I'm 99% sure that these are all abusive exept the kk submission for buthead437's reviews.

Hope this helps, i know beacuse of that new rule alot of peoples whistles have broken so i hope this will help bring them back up for ya.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4117Zeelack
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/43 4119Nezzadar,AnimeAlex
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433998/5/scoreAntieMaki
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433935/10/scoreNersop,7t4o,KageOni,w33n ,DementedRock,sldghmmr
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /433984/23/score(last 2 pages)Madden-Man,Nazi-Barney,MeatShake,o SKARSmhiP,LatinoHawk,chaosknight514,TheC atsLeotards,skarptandad
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /431937/142/scoreCrazyPerson101,Bantrina tious(page 141)Lucario64,
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /432427/122/scoreMeatShake

btw none of thies are spammy flahes

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/reviews /228814/55/score

From there to the end.

Junk from 2005.

At 4/8/08 04:55 PM, Searfirehawk wrote: Junk from 2005.

thats acceptable, 2004 and earlyer are not ;)

yeah i'm a normal whistle again!!
so by the way guys everything you post you click abusive right? not unhelpful (the minus) is there anytime i do click the minus?

no, because it's just saying that you think it's unhelpful. we flag abbusive reviews here.

k so everything should be flagged abusive posted here gotcha ^^
thank u

At 4/8/08 05:17 PM, SonicFoxStrk wrote: k so everything should be flagged abusive posted here gotcha ^^
thank u

but,dont flag evey thing you see here. i find some of them are not abbusive at all

Yeah,that's true.So be careful...

Submission: Defend

http://lookoutitsabob.newgrounds.com/rev iews/flash

This guy in general leaves some overall negative reviews. Check out his pages.