Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Totally agreed! He's posting the full versions - which if you read Zone's blog here on NG, are NOT allowed to be posted at all!! STOLEN and not allowed! Blow your whistles everyone!

Spam. Easy one to find, newest review.

At 5/2/08 08:49 AM, Tovi-Noname wrote: Spam. Easy one to find, newest review.

Is easy to find, but just so people know not to click a review abusive when this one is deleted, it was made by chubbymonkey67.

At 5/2/08 08:50 AM, Corky52 wrote:

At 5/2/08 08:49 AM, Tovi-Noname wrote: Spam. Easy one to find, newest review.

Is easy to find, but just so people know not to click a review abusive when this one is deleted, it was made by chubbymonkey67.

Haha, sorry, I'm really tired. I thought I had made sure to name the guy off but I didn't. Sorry again!

No constructive critisism. Just plain rude.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/42 1945

At 5/2/08 02:22 PM, Grammer wrote: I've been on this site for nearly 4 years, and I still don't have a deity whistle. I guess seeing MindChamber's garbage whistle motivated me to come to this thread~

I've been here for four years and still have a garbage whistle.

More to be found.

Reviews for It's Freakin' Luigi , Newgrounds Rumble (Spam)

Review for Cemetary 2 (Spam)

Review for Make Up Trouble (blam this comment)

Barbai ("Why is this on frontpage" comment)

Review for South Park vs. Duke Nukem (Spam)

Review for TANKMEN 1.5 (Spam)

I'm conflicted with the following link as he breaks a guideline but also provides constructive criticism. Could I get a handle on this one?

SpeakerOfTheGames ("How did this get frontpage!" comment)

At 5/2/08 02:22 PM, Grammer wrote: I've been on this site for nearly 4 years, and I still don't have a deity whistle. I guess seeing MindChamber's garbage whistle motivated me to come to this thread~

Welcome aboard. Hopefully with enough rightful placed flags, you'll gain one. ;-)

From a mod, or a regular here on the abusive review thread. How much of lolololololol or hahahahaha etc. would you consider spam?

At 5/2/08 03:06 PM, Corky52 wrote: From a mod, or a regular here on the abusive review thread. How much of lolololololol or hahahahaha etc. would you consider spam?

If it makes up 90%+ of the review/if the review is totally useless I'd call it spam...I suppose if a review is decent and has some sort of opinion and/or praise for the author's work than a little lololol wouldn't make it spam.
Though I don't think I'VE ever seen a good review that contains something like lololololol or hahahahaha ;) That's my opinion anyways.

Sorry bout the double post, but would these two reviews be considered abusive? I feel like they attack the author directly, but I'm not 100% sure... I'm trying not just to flag everything I think is abuse. (My whistle level being demoted tells me I have some things to learn) I'm trying to get an idea for what the threshold is. :P

http://xdark-hazex.newgrounds.com/review s/flash The one for "Random Rock Show & Galactic Battle

OH PENIS

That really long one

http://utan.newgrounds.com/reviews/

At 5/2/08 04:05 PM, shadowchaotailsevil3 wrote:

At 5/2/08 03:59 PM, Sniper-rifle-clock wrote: OH PENIS

check it out

they are all abusive and reveiws that all say miniclip.com..advertising websites in reveiws is against rules

http://sniper-rifle-clock.newgrounds.com /reviews/flash

Around 15+ blatant spam-abusive review in that one.
Pure goldmine.

http://inti-creater.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash check pages

At 5/2/08 04:56 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://inti-creater.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash check pages

I checked all the pages. I couldn't really find any abusive ones. Just useless mainly.

At 5/2/08 04:59 PM, ShadowWest2k7 wrote:

At 5/2/08 04:56 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://inti-creater.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash check pages

I checked all the pages. I couldn't really find any abusive ones. Just useless mainly.

I have to concur; nothing abusive there.

At 5/2/08 03:38 PM, Metal-Therapy wrote: Sorry bout the double post, but would these two reviews be considered abusive? I feel like they attack the author directly, but I'm not 100% sure... I'm trying not just to flag everything I think is abuse. (My whistle level being demoted tells me I have some things to learn) I'm trying to get an idea for what the threshold is. :P

http://xdark-hazex.newgrounds.com/review s/flash The one for "Random Rock Show & Galactic Battle

From reading those reviews, yeah I would conclude them as abusive. Both reviews just downright belittle/insult the author. It's completely abusive to tell someone to "give up on flash" and "You are shit at flash", where's the compassion?

At 5/2/08 04:59 PM, ShadowWest2k7 wrote:

At 5/2/08 04:56 PM, phantomlassuk wrote: http://inti-creater.newgrounds.com/revie ws/flash check pages

I checked all the pages. I couldn't really find any abusive ones. Just useless mainly.

Sorry but i saw the odd abusive review, on each page have you seen the low scoring ones on page 1.

TTA Episode 063.

At 5/2/08 05:06 PM, KIRBYLINK wrote: TTA Episode 063.

What about the review on Awesome Combat?

Sorry for the double post, but I found another In searhing the audio portal. bloodyface907.

At 5/2/08 05:10 PM, KIRBYLINK wrote: Sorry for the double post, but I found another In searhing the audio portal. bloodyface907.

sorry, but there's absolutely nothing abusive about his review or his other reviews.

At first, I thought this was a spam submission.... well, there's plenty to see here, I marked the most obvious ones. Judge Accordingly.

AceKnight (abusive)

Pichu8 (abusive)

I.. can't believe this.. my whistle status actually dropped... I honestly believed I marked all correct abusive review and now this.

Sorry guys, I guess I made far more mistakes then I thought to be believed...

At 5/2/08 06:28 PM, BR wrote: I.. can't believe this.. my whistle status actually dropped... I honestly believed I marked all correct abusive review and now this.

Sorry guys, I guess I made far more mistakes then I thought to be believed...

You too? Well, I flagged all the reviews that adversited miniclip.com and I ended with a garbage whistle...

At 5/2/08 06:30 PM, pigeonmaster88 wrote:

At 5/2/08 06:28 PM, BR wrote: Sorry guys, I guess I made far more mistakes then I thought to be believed...

You too? Well, I flagged all the reviews that adversited miniclip.com and I ended with a garbage whistle...

Me too. I wonder what the hell's going on.

At 5/2/08 06:36 PM, BuddhaGeo wrote:

At 5/2/08 06:30 PM, pigeonmaster88 wrote:

At 5/2/08 06:28 PM, BR wrote: Sorry guys, I guess I made far more mistakes then I thought to be believed...

You too? Well, I flagged all the reviews that adversited miniclip.com and I ended with a garbage whistle...

Me too. I wonder what the hell's going on.

I PM'ed to a review mod that helps me a lot.
But I don't know what the heck is going on! Malachy says flagging reviews from spam reviews (well, I think those were from spam flash), we weon't earn or lose points.
That could be the only explanation because those reviews were 100% abusive! You can't adversite a site! It's against the rules!

I hope for an explanation...

At 5/2/08 06:41 PM, pigeonmaster88 wrote: I PM'ed to a review mod that helps me a lot.
But I don't know what the heck is going on! Malachy says flagging reviews from spam reviews (well, I think those were from spam flash), we weon't earn or lose points.
That could be the only explanation because those reviews were 100% abusive! You can't adversite a site! It's against the rules!

I hope for an explanation...

My best shot would be that a mod inadvertently deducted our whistle points instead of prescribing.

I see no other logical explanation here.

At 5/2/08 06:28 PM, BR wrote: I.. can't believe this.. my whistle status actually dropped... I honestly believed I marked all correct abusive review and now this.

Sorry guys, I guess I made far more mistakes then I thought to be believed...

Wow, I don't believe it either, sorry to hear that. As I've been saying I really don't understand this flagging system entirely...It really shouldn't be this hard to pinpoint an abusive review. Don't be sorry BR, I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks you do a shit load for this thread. You're always here helping people with their questions and you post a lot of quality stuff. I've really narrowed what I flag to reviews that are dicrectly abusive to the author. Maybe I just don't understand how the system works, but hopefully that'll show some results...

At 5/2/08 06:44 PM, BuddhaGeo wrote: My best shot would be that a mod inadvertently deducted our whistle points instead of prescribing.

I see no other logical explanation here.

What!?!? The mods decide if we gain or lose!? I've always thought that the server do that automaticly...
I hope the mod that deleted those reviews comes here and explains to us what happended, sir BuddaGeo!