Inactive Moderators

[Evan]

I was just noticing, there's a bunch of inactive mods. Mods that were modded years and years ago have seemed to just leave NG, and they aren't too active. So... why are they still mods?

[simon]

At 7/21/07 05:06 PM, Evan wrote: I was just noticing, there's a bunch of inactive mods. Mods that were modded years and years ago have seemed to just leave NG, and they aren't too active. So... why are they still mods?

Because they're going to make an unexpected return.

[STEM]

They're still good people.

[Evark]

Everybody who's on the moderators list is around and moderating on a basis that's often enough to warrant keeping them aboard the team.

Inactive moderators were dealt with months ago.

[Dark-Phire]

At 7/21/07 05:07 PM, STEM wrote: They're still good people.

I'm a good person.

DO YOU SEE MODSHIP ON ME?

[HailFire]

At 7/21/07 05:07 PM, STEM wrote: They're still good people.

If a moderator hasn't been online for 6 moths - a year or more, they really shouldn't be moderators anymore.

Sure there could be such cases as joining the military or other such complicated internal affairs, but the could always have their moderatorship re-instated once they become active again.

[jjrmet]

just imagine if tomfulp became inactive

[STEM]

At 7/21/07 05:09 PM, HailFire wrote: If a moderator hasn't been online for 6 moths - a year or more, they really shouldn't be moderators anymore.

If they're not going to come back, then what's the fear in keeping them on the list?

[fuzzies]

they should just replace inactive mods with new and active people.

[Loki]

At 7/21/07 05:09 PM, Evark wrote: Everybody who's on the moderators list is around and moderating on a basis that's often enough to warrant keeping them aboard the team.

Inactive moderators were dealt with months ago.

You're such an inactive mod Evark... If you were more active you'd join us to the Montreal meet-ups >:)

[HeartbreakHoldout]

At 7/21/07 05:06 PM, Evan wrote: So... why are they still mods?

Because 0 days of activity makes them more qualified to moderate these forums than you.

[Evark]

At 7/21/07 05:13 PM, FBIpolux wrote: You're such an inactive mod Evark... If you were more active you'd join us to the Montreal meet-ups >:)

I've been done with the job that prohibited me from doing so for five weeks now. And now that I am, there's no Montreal Meetup planned (that I've seen).

[Loki]

At 7/21/07 05:18 PM, Evark wrote: I've been done with the job that prohibited me from doing so for five weeks now. And now that I am, there's no Montreal Meetup planned (that I've seen).

To the Montreal-Meetup-Planning mobile!

Calling Dez... let's start something up ;)

[The-Omnipresence]

At 7/21/07 05:09 PM, Evark wrote:
Inactive moderators were dealt with months ago.

Y-You killed them all?

[TurtleJuice]

To fill up space to make our mod force look more intimidating

GRAAAHH!

[IdiotClown]

Speakin of mods, I bet no one remembers SOAS

[simon]

At 7/21/07 05:22 PM, IdiotClown wrote: Speakin of mods, I bet no one remembers SOAS

You're kidding, right?

[IdiotClown]

At 7/21/07 05:23 PM, Simon wrote:

At 7/21/07 05:22 PM, IdiotClown wrote: Speakin of mods, I bet no one remembers SOAS

You're kidding, right?

yes I am kidding..

[zyzy]

Why bother taking them off the list. just a Waste of time...hmm ironic, I see what you did there.

[n0ir]

Bond can take a long, thoroughly enjoyable vacation from MI6, escape their all-encompassing watch, get wasted off of shaken martinis with random bitches, and then return to HQ at his lesiure. Is his double 0 status stripped from him? I don't think so.

And considering the fact that being a moderator isn't an actual job - it's just an authoritative power with an extended responsiblity - the ability to moderate shouldn't expire with time or inactivity.

[CryptosPainbringer]

At 7/21/07 05:19 PM, Akatsuki321 wrote: Because even though there inactive there still considered superior to us people.

Like the Pope.