Be a Supporter!

Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL

  • 168,396 Views
  • 148 Replies
New Topic
Magna
Magna
  • Member since: Jan. 18, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:40 PM

Look at this! God, ok, this site is legit. I saw something about it on Oprah and today i actually visited the site. I nearly puked. This site is for pedophiles, plain and simple, and it's LEGAL. I'm going to post a link and some of the extreme pictures but i really don't reccomend going there.

http://www.childsupermodels.com/

And the extreme ones---

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.megan-model.com/series/37.jpg

http://www.karen-model.com/

What the hell... modeling my ass... this is a legal loop-hole. The Parents should be shot, the webmaster should be castrated.

Magna
Magna
  • Member since: Jan. 18, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:44 PM

At 6/10/03 02:41 PM, Newgrundling wrote:
It's not porn, it's "modeling" (thus the loophole), and yes, this is despicable.

Like i said: "Modeling" my ass.

In my book, its like erotica... and with kids, its porn... so, you can't see a nipple, is that where law-makers draw the line?

SpeedyPac
SpeedyPac
  • Member since: May. 25, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 33
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:45 PM

Do these families realize that when they let their children model, it's going to be just old men looking at them. Oprah had some of these children and family's of the children on. Oprah being god got the children to stop. Come on, 11 year old sex symbols, that's sick!

Joxa
Joxa
  • Member since: Jan. 3, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:45 PM

thats terrible the models look pretty unhappy doing that.

Toocool100
Toocool100
  • Member since: Oct. 5, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 60
Melancholy
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:48 PM

At 6/10/03 02:40 PM, Magna wrote: Look at this! God, ok, this site is legit. I saw something about it on Oprah and today i actually visited the site. I nearly puked. This site is for pedophiles, plain and simple, and it's LEGAL. I'm going to post a link and some of the extreme pictures but i really don't reccomend going there.

ok first of all.. why should this be illegal? its not porn, i dont see anybody naked, everyone is clothed. i cant see anything. true, it is perverted, so dont look at it jeez. they can do whatever the hell they want.


Every once in very great while comes a ridiculously funny thread. So funny in fact i must put it into my sig http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic /1049194/1

allpro
allpro
  • Member since: Feb. 17, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 21
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:48 PM

At 6/10/03 02:45 PM, Joxa wrote: thats terrible the models look pretty unhappy doing that.

im sure they make moeny... noones ever that inocent...

im sure somone will compalne and somting will be done...

INfact...

the fbi hird three 13 year old girls to teach them how to go online and pretend to be 13 pritty cleaver huh?


ever mistake a spoon for a straw and try and sip it ?

BBS Signature
Magna
Magna
  • Member since: Jan. 18, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:49 PM

At 6/10/03 02:45 PM, Joxa wrote: thats terrible the models look pretty unhappy doing that.

Camera man: "Ok, look at the camera, look sexy....... there you go.... ok, now spread your legs wider... theres the money shot... ok... now put that angsty depressed look on your face, and lower your bra strap... good job................... whats that smell? Oh, ok, yeah, get the Mom; Ashley needs a diaper change"

Sick. This is like Victoria Secret: They aren't trying to sell the clothes, just the girls.

Child Erotica: Kid tested, Mother approved.

klownboydotnet
klownboydotnet
  • Member since: Jun. 4, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:49 PM

I need to inform THL..

It's not that "extreme".. you see that much walking around a mall and seeing kids in shirts that have half their tits hanging out..

Linemaster
Linemaster
  • Member since: Jun. 8, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 03
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:49 PM

That is sick. I hope they get 50 denial of service attacks a day after being given all of that publicity.

SpeedyPac
SpeedyPac
  • Member since: May. 25, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 33
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:50 PM

the kids on the site are 7-16 year olds... Where do i go to find they 2-6 year olds?

ChronoBasher
ChronoBasher
  • Member since: Jun. 30, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:56 PM

Damn thats horrible! There has to be some way that they can be charged with somthing. Explotation.

Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL

klownboydotnet
klownboydotnet
  • Member since: Jun. 4, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 02:58 PM

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/010.jpg

Now that one is horrible.. it actually shows the lining of the.. ugh..

Hope I don't get banned for that.. after all.. it is LEGAL.

wismty
wismty
  • Member since: Dec. 6, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 60
Movie Buff
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:00 PM

If its legal, then it's ok, and its just for modeling, only perves look at it like child porn, besides, there is nothing we can do about it.


Need help on beating Alkie Kong 2, brutal mode? click here.

allpro
allpro
  • Member since: Feb. 17, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 21
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:01 PM

At 6/10/03 02:58 PM, Jiggle_Nutz wrote: Hope I don't get banned for that.. after all.. it is LEGAL.

WTFFFFAHCK
ahg jesus christ

http://www.asacp.org/reportsite.html

im reporting....


ever mistake a spoon for a straw and try and sip it ?

BBS Signature
Mooey
Mooey
  • Member since: Apr. 30, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:05 PM

At 6/10/03 02:40 PM, Magna wrote: Look at this! God, ok, this site is legit. I saw something about it on Oprah and today i actually visited the site. I nearly puked. This site is for pedophiles, plain and simple, and it's LEGAL. I'm going to post a link and some of the extreme pictures but i really don't reccomend going there.

http://www.childsupermodels.com/

And the extreme ones---

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.megan-model.com/series/37.jpg

http://www.karen-model.com/

What the hell... modeling my ass... this is a legal loop-hole. The Parents should be shot, the webmaster should be castrated.

Thats very disturbing, if i had a daughter no fuckin WAY would i let her do this, and the worse of it is, is that its published on the net were all the freaks can download and toss of to it.

ChronoBasher
ChronoBasher
  • Member since: Jun. 30, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:06 PM

At 6/10/03 03:01 PM, allpro wrote:
At 6/10/03 02:58 PM, Jiggle_Nutz wrote: Hope I don't get banned for that.. after all.. it is LEGAL.
WTFFFFAHCK
ahg jesus christ

http://www.asacp.org/reportsite.html

im reporting....

I just did as well. This is horrible.

JJAGoodfella
JJAGoodfella
  • Member since: May. 14, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:12 PM

Its just another excuse for hairy dirty old men to look at pictures of young girls.

Think about it, what person thinks.."Oh dear, I must go look at the models of childmodels.com and gaze only at their beauty, with no intentions of having sex with them whatsoever, with no dirty thoughs of them whatsoever, yup, Im only looking at them because of the artistic value of it all, yes oh my."

Seriously people, its fairly obvious that the website appeals to older men who wanna whack it and keep pics of little girls in a nice "legal" fashion.

Unfortunately yes, it is legal, in order for it to qualify as pornography the girls must be involved in some type of sexual intercourse if anything less, its the law made by the idiots up in the office who say, "Oh yes the girls arent having sex so its innocent and not dirty at all"

But when you think about it, it's the dirtiest thing you can ever find. The models probably dont know whats going on, the parents are probably getting paid a pretty dollar because you'd have to be stupid to put up your child online for the world to see, artistic value my ass. THE PEOPLE RUNNING THOSE WEBSITES KNOW WHO ITS AIMED FOR AND WHAT ITS TRUE PURPOSE IS. The parents should be ashamed for being so stupid, If I had an 11 year old and some dickface asked to put my little girl on the internet I would kick his ass, shove his camera up his ass, and then KICK his ass again and tell him to go back to the cave he crawled out of with the rest of his sick, disgusting little buddies. I hope they burn in hell.

JJAGoodfella
JJAGoodfella
  • Member since: May. 14, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:18 PM

One more thing, why the fuck isnt someone in a higher position of law doing something about this? Those morons who decide whether or not this is child pornography or not need to die, they LACK COMMON SENSE AND ALL MORALS. Its always us, the working class and lazy asses who notice this shit.

Magna
Magna
  • Member since: Jan. 18, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:38 PM

At 6/10/03 03:18 PM, JJAGoodfella wrote: A lot of stuff that made sense and was true and stuff but i'm rambling so read below what Magna said.

Yes, very true JJA... whats worst is that on the Homepage it links to other 'teen sites' where they have teen girls in poses and it has the text: Karen 12 year old...
SICK.

RegisCartoons
RegisCartoons
  • Member since: Feb. 14, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 24
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 03:57 PM

God i hate paedophile. It's...just sick. Wish they all burn in hell

Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL

fourchinnigan
fourchinnigan
  • Member since: Aug. 18, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 34
Filmmaker
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:03 PM

The sad thing isn't that the site exists.
It's the fact that these parents have no qualms about subjecting their children to this.

blondedamaged
blondedamaged
  • Member since: May. 19, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:05 PM

At 6/10/03 02:40 PM, Magna wrote: Look at this! God, ok, this site is legit. I saw something about it on Oprah and today i actually visited the site. I nearly puked. This site is for pedophiles, plain and simple, and it's LEGAL. I'm going to post a link and some of the extreme pictures but i really don't reccomend going there.

http://www.childsupermodels.com/

And the extreme ones---

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.lindsey-model.com/series/03.jpg

http://www.megan-model.com/series/37.jpg

http://www.karen-model.com/

What the hell... modeling my ass... this is a legal loop-hole. The Parents should be shot, the webmaster should be castrated.

ok i guess im the only one here with this opinion...but personally i dont think its that big of a deal...i mean lindsey and megan...id do those shots if i was getting paid!! that does not mean i want to be a playboy centerfold though...now karen...shes younger and has a few shots that are a bit more...ya know...but i mean id still do them! you dont see anything...and you get paid!!! but thats just me...

therazorsedge555
therazorsedge555
  • Member since: Oct. 5, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 26
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:11 PM

well look at the careers of the average female model. they start when they are in their teens. and to keep their jobs, they must continue to look like they did as teenagers, with virtually no bodyfat to speak of.

let's face it, they are a product of our sick society. kids are having sex now. there are girls as young as 11 becoming sexually aware and active. i just wonder what it is that makes them so attractive to adult males. someone with a psych background should post here.

it's not illegal, but it is questionable. questionable on the the part of the parents ( who are usually living out their own fantasies through their daughters or trying to score money the easy way ) and questionable on the part of viewers of the site. perhaps men with low self-esteem try to hook up with girls this age because they are too fucked up to meet a real woman. the victims are the children.

Legend-Killa
Legend-Killa
  • Member since: Sep. 6, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:18 PM

3 words What The Fuck!


Release the doves

BBS Signature
allpro
allpro
  • Member since: Feb. 17, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 21
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:25 PM

At 6/10/03 04:11 PM, therazorsedge555 wrote: well look at the careers of the average female model. they start when they are in their teens. and to keep their jobs, they must continue to look like they did as teenagers, with virtually no bodyfat to speak of.

well depdns fasion runay modls are usaly rather skinny... adult modles have the fat usualy... teen girls DO have fat thats the thing your suposta a wons body is suppost to be much mroe fat then a mans for baby realted stuf

let's face it, they are a product of our sick society. kids are having sex now. there are girls as young as 11 becoming sexually aware and active. i just wonder what it is that makes them so attractive to adult males. someone with a psych background should post here.

hum well see thers thing thing iwas reading about sex and child porn and whanto the idea is taht young kids even can look beautful and to some people sexy its not a horrable thing disring youth... but vraious things affect peolex jusmet or its jsut ming in them or osming theve been in away forced to like oh you could always blme scocity but really ... this lead sto htis crap iwas htinking about how scocitys fucekld and wer realyl so prmitve and selfish

it's not illegal,

nope its illegal in various conuntrys thanks

but it is questionable. questionable on the the part of the parents ( who are usually living out their own fantasies through their daughters or trying to score money the easy way ) and questionable on the part of viewers of the site. perhaps men with low self-esteem try to hook up with girls this age because they are too fucked up to meet a real woman. the victims are the children.

no thers perfcitrly "nomal" people that have sexual fantsy about young boys and girls
perhaps you could watch the film lolta to explane it better but you may jsut go blah blah sick blah blah

but the thing is some people...

AHG... im writing somting up about all my belifs ill post it somtime

look nomatter what that sight is worng...


ever mistake a spoon for a straw and try and sip it ?

BBS Signature
Bungled
Bungled
  • Member since: Jan. 7, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 22
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:27 PM

that's really sick, what's wrong with these kid's parents??

cylon
cylon
  • Member since: Oct. 26, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 16
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 04:51 PM

The parents may just not know.

Like the photographer/place could be all like, "yeah your child can be a model! a famous child star!" - there are plenty of legitimate child models and stuff, and maybe these parents are blinded by stars and think that yes, their child can do it too.

So the photographers get their shots - maybe show the parents some clean ones, to make them not question it, meanwhile peddle the dirty ones to the pervs or something.

---------------

Who knows? If the parents were in full knowledge, then they are nasty; what kind of parents are they? If the parents were just pulled into a scam, well then that's pretty dumb but they're not as nasty as if they knew what was going on.

In all cases, those taking the pictures SUCK!

(I dunno)

Gonzo456
Gonzo456
  • Member since: Jan. 20, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 08
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 05:06 PM

At 6/10/03 04:27 PM, Bungled_SharQ wrote: that's really sick, what's wrong with these kid's parents??

Everything, worst case scenario is they want the money.

darkside907
darkside907
  • Member since: Oct. 14, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 05:07 PM

At 6/10/03 04:18 PM, JackAsk wrote: 3 words What The Fuck!

I agree

fourchinnigan
fourchinnigan
  • Member since: Aug. 18, 2000
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 34
Filmmaker
Response to Child 'Porn'... and it's LEGAL Jun. 10th, 2003 @ 05:09 PM

At 6/10/03 04:51 PM, benu wrote: The parents may just not know.
So the photographers get their shots - maybe show the parents some clean ones, to make them not question it...

Parents should be present at any photo shoot featuring underage youth. If they aren't, they are entirely to blame for their children being exploited. We aren't talking high-school teenagers with cars and jobs here. This is pre to recently pubescent girls (elementary through middle school).

As for the comments by whomever about our "sick society:"
That is a bit of a cop-out. Look at history and you will see the age for sexual debauchery of women is much higher now as a norm than a few hundred years ago. 11-13 was the common age of marriage for many girls only a handful of centuries ago. Their husbands were usually in their late twenties/early thirties. This is actually still in practice in some Muslim countries. Sexuality in teens is a natural process of growth...it is the intrusion of adults into this process that warps the sexual development of children.

Young developing girls are attractive to men because they represent a ripening sexuality unencumbered by the effects of aging mixed with a sliver of innocence and the ever-enticing concept of youth. The difference is most adults repress these urges or lose them as their mental development begins to clash with the naive conceptions of kids. All-in-all, most men attracted to young girls are attracted to post pubescent teens around the age of 16 whom are practically women physically. Men attracted to exceptionally young girls as found on the website are usually experiencing a mental abberration resulting from abuse, incomplete social development, or any number of factors which contributes to uncommon mental maturity.