What needs to be done
- Evanauto
-
Evanauto
- Member since: Dec. 20, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Blank Slate
ok A number 1 im back i dont know for how long but its good to be back in the ol' stomping grounds
anyway...back to the topic
Well ladies and gents at best well have been mislead...and at very worst the American people have been lied to. This administation told us that Saddam could have a nuclear weapon in "less than a year." but with every passing day in Iraq, less and less is turning up. American millitary inspectors after checking 200 of 900 "suspect sites" the inspectors have given up and have gone into chasing paper trails that are seemingly endless. Saddam's weapons if they exist... need to be found and found soon. If not, the cries of "impeachment" may get louder.
Worse still is the fact that the congressmen and women that stood so strong against this war have now decieded that they would now rather wait for the problem to set itself straight than to ask the tough questions.
So what can we do? To inact change with the congress, write your local congressmen or congresswoman. Secondly, if you dont like the way the president or congress person has represented you. Vote and give them the boot!
That is all. We now return you to your regularly scheduled lives
- bumcheekcity
-
bumcheekcity
- Member since: Jan. 19, 2003
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 27
- Blank Slate
I've given up on Tony Blair. If I find out he has lied to the British Public then I hope he resigns. I can't stand a Prime Minister who would openly lie to his people.
- mysecondstar
-
mysecondstar
- Member since: Feb. 16, 2003
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 12
- Blank Slate
first i'd like to say welcome back Evanauto! glad to have you back.
now as for what you said 200/900 sites have been inspected. that leaves us with about 78% of those suspected sites that have yet to be looked at. it is hard to pass any kind of educated judgement without first having all our cards laid out in front of us.
- wdfcverfgtghm
-
wdfcverfgtghm
- Member since: Apr. 22, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 19
- Blank Slate
Weather or not America had vested intrests in Iraq, or if Iraq was developing nuclear or biological weapons, Sadaams regime should have been disabled.
- poxpower
-
poxpower
- Member since: Dec. 2, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Send Private Message
- Browse All Posts (30,855)
- Block
-
- Forum Stats
- Moderator
- Level 60
- Blank Slate
The worst in all of this is I bet Bush would be ready to pay some people big money som they planted a nuke or two in Irak.
- wdfcverfgtghm
-
wdfcverfgtghm
- Member since: Apr. 22, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 19
- Blank Slate
At 6/8/03 07:19 AM, poxpower wrote: The worst in all of this is I bet Bush would be ready to pay some people big money som they planted a nuke or two in Irak.
Are you a native speaker of english?
Regardless, No he wouldn't, that's retarded. No one would believe that there were nuclear weapons in Iraq, and Bush is a whole lot more politcal saavy then some dumb yokles on the internet.
- Taxman2A
-
Taxman2A
- Member since: May. 8, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 17
- Blank Slate
At 6/8/03 07:26 AM, AnRkeyPenguin wrote:
Regardless, No he wouldn't, that's retarded. No one would believe that there were nuclear weapons in Iraq, and Bush is a whole lot more politcal saavy then some dumb yokles on the internet.
lol... that was great. It may not be popular opinion, but it is the truth.


