Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Despotism, seems worse then communism and facism to me. It is some of the earliest and most crude forms of government thus less developed and unbalanced socially and econmically.

At 6/19/07 07:26 PM, Cole wrote: I always thought it was that spraypaint-y red A with a circle around it. Anarchists annoy me.

And in addition to the color red, Communists use the hammer and cicle. You should never forget the backround of a symbol.

Worst government system? Feudalism. End of Thread.

At 6/19/07 08:33 PM, K-RadPie wrote: Worst government system? Feudalism. End of Thread.

Feudalism led to the renasaunce.

Tard nagget...

Social Demcoracy is best,

Consequeces very high tax rates and subsequently that means a very large govenment sector and small service industry.
Benifits are good education system, good public transport good hospitals... you get the idea.

Look at Scandanavia. Specifically Denmark

At 6/19/07 07:34 PM, animehater wrote:

At 6/19/07 07:26 PM, Cole wrote: I always thought it was that spraypaint-y red A with a circle around it. Anarchists annoy me.

And in addition to the color red, Communists use the hammer and cicle. You should never forget the backround of a symbol.

Symbols are powerful maaaaaan.

Therocracy would have to be, because the citizens live with fear of being attacked by illogical fanatics who will excuse ANY act of violence, to justify an imaginary God's will. Including stoning to death their own teenaged daughters if they chose to marry someone else of another religion or caste.

At 6/19/07 07:16 PM, Cole wrote:

At 6/19/07 07:15 PM, 5uicideX wrote: obviously the worst is anarchy; i mean, technically it is a government system, just non-existant. Even communism has some points over anarchy

Anarchy is like the color black: Technically, it's the absence of all color. It is, however visible itsself.

its funny when dumb people try to act smart

Dictatorship.
I think that if a country is ran by on one person and that person owns everybody's lives that lives there, then that would be a bad example of a country.

At 6/20/07 12:04 AM, TheSnakeSkull wrote: Dictatorship.
I think that if a country is ran by on one person and that person owns everybody's lives that lives there, then that would be a bad example of a country.

this would include monarchy, would you say the same about monarchy?

i dont like the whole King concept btw

At 6/20/07 12:36 AM, MissingNYC wrote:

At 6/20/07 12:04 AM, TheSnakeSkull wrote: Dictatorship.
I think that if a country is ran by on one person and that person owns everybody's lives that lives there, then that would be a bad example of a country.

this would include monarchy, would you say the same about monarchy?

i dont like the whole King concept btw

Yes at times because nowadays most kings or Queens don't own shit in a country.(Note the word most.)

At 6/19/07 06:59 PM, Cuppa-LettuceNog wrote: Plumbers get promoted for being good plumbers, lawyers get promoted for being good lawyers, and soldiers get promoted for being good soldiers.

Or for having rich and influential parents.

worst system is in poland - "kaczyzm" (kaczka [pl] - duck )
twins are controling the whole country - lech (president) i jaroslaw (Prime Minister) kaczynscy
and i must to live in this country

At 6/20/07 02:19 AM, Xtesh wrote: As a devout Catholic, I would see nothing wrong with a theocracy as long as it was based off of Christianity and wasn't ruled by corrupt people.

Just looking at the medieval age Paple state, I say you have think about this some more.

Democracy isn't the best, really, since most people are too stupid to make proper decisions.

Basically, we have the uninformed majority making decisions for the informed minority.

I know... just look at you!

soz, that was a reply to physicsman09's comment

I'd have to say facism

At 6/20/07 03:50 PM, scorchin-hot wrote: I'd have to say facism

It depends on the person running it.
Even if the first person is good doesnt mean the next one will be so I see your point.

Gotta go with Theo/ facisim (they always go together)

At 6/20/07 08:15 PM, SlithVampir wrote: Gotta go with Theo/ facisim (they always go together)

SOMEONE has never heard of Atlantis.

Theocracy, facism, despotism and the like are probably the worst few systems.

Of course, any system that restricts essential classical liberal liberties has problems.

At 6/19/07 07:20 PM, animehater wrote:

At 6/19/07 07:16 PM, Cole wrote: Anarchy is like the color black: Technically, it's the absence of all color. It is, however visible itsself.

I think that color is their symbol actually. Ironically I think it's used by fascists as well

Black is an anarchist symbol of solidarity. Of course, this was before the time of the Black Shirts.

At 6/19/07 04:25 PM, MissingNYC wrote: we all know the basics:
Democracy - Capitalism
Socialism - Communism
Theocracies - and if i missed one feel free to post
which one do you think its the worst?
i think socialism, Venezuela for example, people get so used to govt. hand outs that they dont bother to work, which makes more poverty and eventually breaks the govt. money (budget)

...Capitalism and socialism aren't even kinds of governments. They are economic systems. Theres Theocracy, Monarchy, Democracy, Dictatorship, Commonwealth, Grand Duchy, Confederation, Principality, and Totalitarianism. I forget the rest

At 6/19/07 11:50 PM, physicsman09 wrote: its funny when dumb people try to act smart

Your username is "physicsman09"

Explain yourself.

All government systems have ups and downs, some work others do not. So there is no perfect government that is the worst or the best.