TRUCKS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

HOORAH! THE WORLD IS NOW A SAFER PLACE! BUSH HAS DECLARED THAT HE HAS FOUND ONE MOBILE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PRODUCTION FACILITY!

But hold on....

There is NO production facility or no traces of biological weapons whatsoever.

Which raises 2 important questions:

1.How can he claim it's a mobile biological weapons production facility if there's no production facility or biological weapons.

2.Am I the only one who is fed up with this idiot son of an asshole?

Here are my sources:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne.../bush&cid=544&ncid=716
http://www.cbc.ca/storyview/MSN/2003/06/05/bush_qatar030605

That's odd, usually I get a lot of patriots calling me a hippie when I post something like this.

[nitroxide]

At 6/5/03 01:52 PM, nailbomb wrote: That's odd, usually I get a lot of patriots calling me a hippie when I post something like this.

Woo Hoo!!!Hippies!!!

Noone is calling you a hippie*Looks at commander*

Hey its the truth there were no WMD,people will use the argument that we are liberating the people,but the fact of the matter is that this war was supposed to be for our protection for american safety...if it was to liberate why wasnt it done sooner.

At 6/5/03 03:14 PM, nitroxide wrote: Woo Hoo!!!Hippies!!!

Noone is calling you a hippie*Looks at commander*

Damn, even Jimsween has nothing to say. I guess calling a truck "a mobile biological weapons production facility" is pretty stupid, at least everyone agrees on that.

[TheShrike]

I'll call you a hippy, but that's only because you assume that any American patriot must like Bush.

And I don't like Bush, you damn hippy.

Meh. Everyone knows about the trucks, and everyone as read the article.

Yeah, Bush is an idiot.

Well, that's about all.

Hippy

I miss that, being called a hippy for exposing the truth. OH COMMANDER-K25 WHERE ART THOU?

[Thank you.]

[Kenney333]

Yeah i saw that one coming, its pretty clear there wernt any WMDs, but just as missing as the WMDs is COMMANDER-K25

[mrpopenfresh]

It still dosent beat what colin powell showed the UN.

Somehow he didnt win me over with his pictures of rooftops and artist renderings of trucks.

[Commander-K25]

Here's a fact for you:

I NEVER called you a "hippie".

You did however pretend that I did and have distributed that lie so much that people seem to believe it. The fact that you complain about someone calling you a name is highly ironic since you love to slap labels on people as a matter of course.

You might get more respect if you didn't spend your time lying, spreading propaganda and being a hypocrite.

Here's a suggestion:

[TheShrike]

At 6/5/03 07:08 PM, mrpopenfresh wrote: It still dosent beat what colin powell showed the UN.

Ah!! I knew I'd find a reason (excuse) to use this sooner or later...

Colin Powell & His UN Speech

Oh, and Nailbomb, CommanderK-25 does have a good point. I, for one never bought into your act.

Hippy.

At 6/5/03 07:29 PM, TheShrike wrote:

::

Ah!! I knew I'd find a reason (excuse) to use this sooner or later...

Colin Powell & His UN Speech

Oh, and Nailbomb, CommanderK-25 does have a good point. I, for one never bought into your act.

Hippy.

What act?

By the way that article is a goldmine, thanks for sharing with us.

Commander-K25, did I finally get your attention? :) we both know you never called me a hippie but I figured if you're able to dish it out you should be able to take it in. What am I talking about? Everyone once in a while you'll call someone communist, ignorant, that their facts are irrelevant or something along the lines of personal insult.

Answer me this, did you even ever read a book by Noam Chomsky? Did you ever see a movie by Mihcael Moore? [by the way he is not an actor]. My point is simple, Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky weren't the leaders of the USSR [for a lack of a better example] and they are not communists. Michael Moore takes great pride in being American, had you read his books or seen his movies or anything at all you would've seen that. But no you propagate lies against the very agents of propaganda that you abbhor.

Guess what?

Don't spread lies about people you don't know and I'll do the same. deal? :)

[Commander-K25]

At 6/5/03 08:29 PM, nailbomb wrote: Don't spread lies about people you don't know and I'll do the same. deal? :)

Let me tell you something. I state opinions on topics and back them up. This is not the same as telling everyone that I called you "hippie". What you're trying to tell me is that I shouldn't say anything because all that say is a "lie". I'm telling you, that you have your opinions and I have mine. We can both state them and refute each other's, but don't say that I can't hold and state my own opinion because you don't like it.

[bumcheekcity]

Jeez, what is it with you guys and Hippys? Hippys are cool.

[Jimsween]

Commander dont waste your time with nailbomb, he's just a flamer who can't debate without insulting people.

At 6/5/03 09:11 PM, Commander-K25 wrote:
Let me tell you something. I state opinions on topics and back them up. This is not the same as telling everyone that I called you "hippie". What you're trying to tell me is that I shouldn't say anything because all that say is a "lie". I'm telling you, that you have your opinions and I have mine. We can both state them and refute each other's, but don't say that I can't hold and state my own opinion because you don't like it.

Did Michael Moore pee in your cornflakes? Then what do you have against him? Everytime his name pops up in a topic you pull out your "master of propaganda" card and flash it to everyone within a 50-mile radius. You don't like the fact that he is the complete opposite of what you stand for?

[Jimsween]

And on another note, I read your two sources nail. And niether of them say much about the trucks, all the one said was that there were no traces of biological agent in there which is easily explained away by the fact that they found very powerfull cleaning agents in there. When you post links as sources they have to deal with what you just said not some speaches by bush.

Well isn't that odd...

You didn't post your sources backing up your "very powerful cleaning agent" claim.

Perhaps I should scream bloddy murder.

[Jimsween]

At 6/7/03 02:08 PM, nailbomb wrote: Well isn't that odd...

You didn't post your sources backing up your "very powerful cleaning agent" claim.

Perhaps I should scream bloddy murder.

First of all: http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne...y/20030508/ts_usatoday/5139766 and another one that rebuts the things said about the tanks http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne...stsofiraqtrailersrejectgermuse

Second, your really getting annoying nail. You dont have to post sources unless someone asks and my whole point was that niether of those sources proved you point, It's obviouis that your just trying to start a flame war and your not fooling anyone.

Jim, those were the only sources available at the time. One of your sources is fresh off the press of today and the other one if from a month ago, I couldn't have used today's news report two days ago and the one dated Thu May 8, 6:46 AM ET, was exactly what my sources proved wrong.

[Jimsween]

At 6/7/03 02:43 PM, nailbomb wrote: Jim, those were the only sources available at the time. One of your sources is fresh off the press of today and the other one if from a month ago, I couldn't have used today's news report two days ago and the one dated Thu May 8, 6:46 AM ET, was exactly what my sources proved wrong.

But if the sources do not prove your point than do not post them, and if you have no sources that means that what you are saying is not backed up until you can get some sources. And I seriously question why anybody would trsut you to tell the truth when you just admitted at the tim you posted this you were not basing it on any evidence and you just made it up.

No complete production system has been found. Neither trailer had any biological agent inside, nor showed any signs that they had been used to produce biological weapons.

Taken from http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne.../bush&cid=544&ncid=716 my first link.

I made that up?

[Jimsween]

At 6/7/03 02:57 PM, nailbomb wrote: No complete production system has been found. Neither trailer had any biological agent inside, nor showed any signs that they had been used to produce biological weapons.

Taken from http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne.../bush&cid=544&ncid=716 my first link.

I made that up?

No, you made up the part about them not being production facilities because you had no real evidence of that.

No complete production system has been found. Neither trailer had any biological agent inside, nor showed any signs that they had been used to produce biological weapons.

NO COMPLETE PRODUCTION SYSTEM HAS BEEN FOUND.

Would you also like a drawing? sheesh

[Commander-K25]

At 6/7/03 01:49 PM, nailbomb wrote: Everytime his name pops up in a topic you pull out your "master of propaganda" card and flash it to everyone within a 50-mile radius.

I called him that once, and once again you attack me for holding an opinion, hypocrite.

You don't like the fact that he is the complete opposite of what you stand for?

I don't like the fact that he produces one-sided propaganda and calls them "documentaries".

At 6/7/03 10:28 PM, Commander-K25 wrote:

At 6/7/03 01:49 PM, nailbomb wrote: Everytime his name pops up in a topic you pull out your "master of propaganda" card and flash it to everyone within a 50-mile radius.

I called him that once, and once again you attack me for holding an opinion, hypocrite.

Criticize ideas, not people.

You don't like the fact that he is the complete opposite of what you stand for?

I don't like the fact that he produces one-sided propaganda and calls them "documentaries".

How is it propaganda? You always dodged that question when calling Michael Moore a master of propaganda or whatever term you used to put him down.

[Jimsween]

At 6/7/03 10:25 PM, nailbomb wrote: No complete production system has been found. Neither trailer had any biological agent inside, nor showed any signs that they had been used to produce biological weapons.

NO COMPLETE PRODUCTION SYSTEM HAS BEEN FOUND.

Would you also like a drawing? sheesh

If your going to flame there is no point in talking to you, and if you read that article I posted in full you would see where they explain the part about it not being able to produce biological weapons. It goes inot great detial when rebutting the skeptics.

[Jiperly]

but if Mr.President says theres WMD, then he must be right, reguardless of any proof whatsoever! I mean, he knows alot more than me, with his great C Average at an Ivy League School......</sarcasm>

but seriously folks, can anyone tell me they believed these trucks existed when they couldn't even find them and had to use cartoons to demostrate to the UN......seriously, i think the UN should take anything the US says with a grain of salt after this bullshit- if they cannot prove that these existed, that means they lied to the international community, and lost the sense of trust that the US -they'll have to regain that trust......

[Jiperly]

At 6/7/03 10:25 PM, nailbomb wrote: Would you also like a drawing? sheesh

well, if the UN gets a drawing of what the non-existant trucks look like, why can't we?

[Jimsween]

At 6/7/03 10:33 PM, nailbomb wrote:

You don't like the fact that he is the complete opposite of what you stand for?

I don't like the fact that he produces one-sided propaganda and calls them "documentaries".

How is it propaganda? You always dodged that question when calling Michael Moore a master of propaganda or whatever term you used to put him down.

propaganda

n : information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

Sounds like propaganda to me.