At 6/17/07 11:38 AM, CaptainBob wrote:
The author has the ability to reply or rebut any review. This allows them to get in the last word and show if they think the review was helpful or not. If an author has the ability to delete reviews, then many (SS, KK, ect) would simply delete all of the reviews that were not 10s, in order to drive their average review score up and to make it seem as their flash is the best thing ever. Deleting a review that may not be glowing but is constructive is not fair to the user who took the time to review the submission. The review system encourages people to review because they know that their review will not be deleted if it doesn't break the rules. I know you argued that the rules are too confining, but they are there for a reason.
I think you made some good points and I see where you're coming from, but that brings me to my next argument, review scores. All the review scores seem to provide is a second score for the entry that doesn't make sense. Also, if NG decides what features they make based on how the SS and KK will abuse it, in general, that is just pathetic. I think I can speak for almost everyone when I say NG features should be catered to the people who actually want to use them and develop their Flash skills, get publicity, and not the people who just like to spam.
Relating back to the topic of this thread, why NG doesn't receive much press, maybe it has to do with the lack of web 2.0 features. I know the re-design will bring many more, but the whole thing on the web now is being able to discuss content. Newgrounds doesn't provide an ally for that as of now. Like it was said before, the review system doesn't provide and avenue to actually discuss the content. And the BBS isn't a valid avenue as I very rarely see threads for lesser known Flashes. So here's the point I'm making: What does the current review system offer that a comment system wouldn't? I only see pros to making it a content-creator modable comment system. First, a comment system actually allows the Flash author to get valid feedback. I don't know how many times I've seen someone leave a review stating a bug they found in the Flash. As a Flash developer, I'm well aware that fixing any bug involves some back and forth. A comment system would allow for that and improve the avenue for user feedback.
I just feel the NG review system as is is stuck in the middle. It doesn't allow for true user feedback, and it doesn't allow for conversation on the entry. All the current review system offers is a one way, 1998ish method for "feedback", and an easily riggable award to go with it. To put it blunt, the Youtube comment system kills the NG review system because it gives the content creator the power (the person who SHOULD have it), allows for more advanced feedback, and overall is very effective. Even more depressing is that the copycat portals also provide comment systems which are more effective than the current NG review system, and their comment systems aren't even that well made. If NG built a state-of-the-art comment system it would be great. It would finally allow actual discussion AND feedback on the all-important content.
Again, I'm not saying this to try to be very critical, I'm saying it simply because I firmly believe this is a major area NG is lacking in and other alternative sites are doing better.