Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 6/13/07 11:04 PM, Dr-Worm wrote:

At 6/13/07 06:18 PM, TheBasics wrote: And I'm not trying to say he didn't kill many people, he did even more than hitler but no more than Stalin if your talking about just exterminations by execution, destruction of entire towns a villages merely of the fear that the people there do not support the government.

Gather round kiddies, let's settle this thing once and for all. The top three bloodiest dictators of the 20th century are as follows

I agree, but Russia's population isn't exactly massive. Today the population is only 143 million as opposed to China's 1.3 billion.

At 6/14/07 12:43 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: who's puntin?

You and the poster above you need to learn about world history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin#F oreign_policy

And for the guy above you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion

What was done fits the description of an invasion perfectly, but you should denote how unspecific the term invasion is.

At 6/14/07 12:43 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote: who's puntin?

You and the poster above you need to learn about world history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin#F oreign_policy

And for the guy above you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion

What was done fits the description of an invasion perfectly, but you should denote how unspecific the term invasion is.

- Andrew Jackson invaded Indian Territory in north america
- Julias Caesar Invaded Europe
- T. Roosavelt Invaded Spanish Colonies
- Kind Ferdinad II invaded Southern iberia
- Abraham Lincoln invaded Southern north america
- Alexander the Great invaded Persia
- George bush invaded iraq

What's the link? All of these men with the exception of one are / were considered hero's.

At 6/14/07 03:08 PM, SmilezRoyale wrote: What's the link? All of these men with the exception of one are / were considered hero's.

King Ferdinand (if you're talking about Inquisition Ferdinand) and Andrew Jackson were violent, supremicist assholes. So...still, most of those people are considered heros. I was just giving my two cents.

Jackson was a bigot, and certainly was a bigot in a time where bigotry was very, very common. That doesn't excuse him, but he was certainly one hell of a character.

At 6/14/07 06:38 PM, HighlyIllogical wrote: Jackson was a bigot, and certainly was a bigot in a time where bigotry was very, very common. That doesn't excuse him, but he was certainly one hell of a character.

Oh no no, now. He was a super-bigot, even moreso than the normal ones. Trail of Tears, anyone? Also, he completely exploited his power of appointment. He was a big fan of the Spoils System, giving all his friends or anyone who bribed him important government positions. The only good thing about him is that when he was 13 years old he killed 2 or 3 Redcoats with his bare hands.

At 6/14/07 06:54 PM, Dr-Worm wrote: Oh no no, now. He was a super-bigot, even moreso than the normal ones. Trail of Tears, anyone?

Do you honestly believe that no one wanted that to happen? The thing that started all that was because we in Georgia wanted more Cherokee lands.