At 6/15/07 08:43 PM, Dr-Worm wrote:
There's a huge difference between "using your head" and what you're suggesting.
Using your head = Not engaging in sexual activity with someone you've barely met.
Or maybe you just can't get any...
I'm 17. Why would I want any? And what would make you think that, especially with the way my writing towards the subject is?
People make mistakes. Many many mistakes, some bigger than others. That's life, and we should deal with it accordingly and realistically.
Well, since we're going by your version of "accordingly" and "realistically", it seems to only be getting worse every year.
You clearly know nothing about how most of these accidental pregnancies happen. And yet again, you're an insignificant, arrogant prick who has no right to say how "worth living" anyone is.
Accidental Pregnancies huh?
Oh right. The condumn could break. Taking pre-cautions. Ect ect..
You want to know the 100% gurantee not to have kids? Simple: Do not engage in sexual activity. If you are not ready to have a child, then you should not have sexual intercourse. Because the reality of it is, there is always a chance of a pregnancy.
Letting someone unfit to be a parent to sleep with every person he/she can find and then letting 'her' have an abortion once or more than once, isn't solving a single thing.
The world can never have it your way. It's impossible, it'll never happen. Ever.
There's a difference between how I would run the world and how I think it should be run.
Instead, we should try helping people, instead of demanding that they be perfect.
I refuse to help those who do not help themselves.
When the fuck did this happen? I'm gonna need a little more context to believe this.
Spreading aids = Life Sentence
Did he tell them he had AIDS?
He claims he did.
Did he even know at the time that he had AIDS?
Apparently.
If the answer to just the first question is no, it's not the womens' faults.
It all depends on which woman he was with. There was another man who did the same thing. Only, he didn't have a relationship with a single one of the women he slept with.
So because none of them, in that case, had a relationship, then it is the woman's fault for having sex with someone she didn't or hardly knew.
You are just one sick, angry motherfucker, aren't you? How can you not only not feel sympathy, but feel glad that people are terminally ill?
Angry? No.
Terminally ill? Those people brought upon themselves to be terminally ill.
If a man knows he has aids, engages in a relationship with someone (for more than 2 weeks, at least... c'mon, you have to go more than that), and infects that other with aids, then it is his fault, not the partner's.
But, for example, if a woman has sex with a man after the 1st day she met him and she gets aids because of it, then it is equally her fault. And i'm not going to feel sorry for her.
Of course, women really do have it extremely easy in the Justice system.
I'm sure you're just a saint, Memorize, what with how peoples' deaths fill you with glee and all.
I'm not happy over their deaths. I'm happy for the microscopic advancement to a bette future.
This may be foreign to you, but giant outburst of rage isn't the only emotion people have in response to something bad.
It is also up to a person to control that response.
You're going on about how happy you are that people are dying, and sitting up there on your high-horse telling everyone that if they're not perfect, they "aren't even worth dirt" and should die. You're the disgusting lunatic.
If you say so.
No one is perfect. But things like Murder, rape, child molesting makes that person less of a human being and should therefore be treated as less of a human being.
Yup, you sure are :)
Oh?
A play on words.
Then I guess you have no compassion for WWII veterans who were involved with the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
War is different.
You're doing exactly what the other guy was doing.
You know exactly what i'm talking about. Stop trying to insert irrelevant subjects into it.
HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU, COULD YOU, EVER EXPECT THAT TO HAPPEN? IF THERE'S NO REALISTIC MEANS FOR YOUR TOTALITARIAN SHITHOLE TO EXIST, YOUR ARGUMENT HAS NO CREDIBILITY!!!!!!!!!!!! (now here comes no rebuttal besides "and if you type in all caps, then your argument has no credibility")
But was there really a reason to type in all caps?
You bet your ass it's up to the woman. And since it's up to the woman, if she says "it's not alive, suck it out, Doc," then so be it.
So all this other stuff. Like "it can't feel pain", and "it's not aware of its existence" is all thrown out of the window now?
Man, you really like it when people die, don't you?
No.
Though to be honest, if I saw a hardcore enviornmentalist get killed by a tractor because he/she jumped in front of it, i'd say "that's sad", but i'd also feel a slight joy deep inside me.
Just why that is should be blatantly obvious. I may have already said it in caps, but this goes way beyond that.
But are you going to deny that these problems would still exist to this magnitude if everyone were like me?
I mean, there are people a lot better than me, but i'm better than most people in a sense that I believe people should realize what they do and/or did and accept responsibility for it instead of trying to hide from it or make up excuses.
Do I, like Ravarial, judge based upon religion?
Do I, like him, believe someone has to have a certain belief in order to run for any kind of office?
Not true. In my book, it's really just you and the terrorists.
Haha, at least my opinion on the war comes directly from the troops instead of telling them to "piss off" as if their opinions are worthless.
But, am I the one trying to protect insurgents?
Do I complain when a terrorist claims to be tortured?
Do I blame the president for an isolated incident of torture that he had no part of?
The people who do those, are the people I hate.
haha, and they claim to be "supporting the troops".
See, you're still arguing thinking that, if I ever came into power, that this is how I would run the world. No. There's a difference between how I think it should be, and how I would run it.
Why do you think I have this personality? I'd watch on tv and see people desperately trying to defend murderers. People trying to defend rapists and child molestors because they sentences were "too harsh". A baby sitter killed an infant and what was her punishment? "You cannot baby sit in this state again". People protesting the death penalty over a man who's fighting to end his appeals so he CAN be put to death. Female teachers getting off the hook for having sex with an underage male student because "it was male, therefore unhurt, therefore no need for punishment".
Every year people complain that the way we conduct the death penalty is too inhumane. And every time we find an alternative way to do it, the same people still complain even if it causes 0 pain at all.
People more worthy to live than death row inmates die all of time. So why is all of the attention wasted on them?
It's not that you, me or anyone else is really a bad person that I hate and despise. It's that there are people who have the same attitude as you, who sit by and let it happen and even defend them.