This game, hm.
Well lets look at the things related to the game.
First is the concept. You are that Seung guy and you go around killing people. You do it through various levels with different objectives. You kill people, you talk to people, you kill yourself. That is the game, and that is that.
The author. Promotes free speech. Says you shouldn't be offended and if you are, tough luck.
The author said he would take it down if everyone gave him money.
Now the incident.
A whacked out asian kid went around and killed people. Largest one man shooting in American history.
Took place at VA. Tech, a university in Virginia. Just a flat out dramatic event.
Now we have a person who made a game. We all knew it was inevitable that a game would be made about iteven though the world would be better without it.
But as far as terms of him trying to promote free speech he is just a liar. He said he would take it down for money. If he really supported that he would never have offered that. He is just being a greedy little kid. A true activist for freedom of speech would never do that so he is just being an attention whore and greedy using the emotions of others to make a name for themselves. Honestly if you knew anyone who was in that shooting, a family member, a friend, would you still make a game like that. would you want to reenact the killing of your loved one. If so you are definitely an asshole who should rethink their existence.
However this is not the first time a game came out like this. There was one made about the calumbign shooting a time back when for a video game contest. But it was disqualified in later rounds since things like that cause to much trouble.