Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 5/10/07 12:54 AM, Kalibur wrote: -__-

I need to start reading topics more fully. Wouldn't it also be a violation of rights or something? But as you said, he was the bigger man.

Not necessarily. The owner does have the right to refusal of service. Whether O.J. believes it was a racial bias or not, then he might be able to sue the owner, which I highly doubt he will.

At 5/10/07 12:54 AM, Kalibur wrote: [OJ] was the bigger man.

If he were the bigger man, he'd have volunteered to serve two life sentences or accepted the death penalty.

OJ is anything but the bigger fucking man. You already knew about his book deal.

At 5/10/07 12:23 AM, O-p-i-n-i-o-n wrote: People can do whatever the fuck they want.
He had every right to kick OJ out of his restaurant

"Lets limit people's freedom because we don't agree wit their views"
-NG retards

He kicked OJ out of the resaurante for no other reason than he was charged and acquitted for murder years ago. We're not talking about whether or not the manager had the right to do what he did but rather whether what he did was ethically right.

At 5/10/07 12:59 AM, LazyDrunk wrote:

At 5/10/07 12:54 AM, Kalibur wrote: [OJ] was the bigger man.

OJ is anything but the bigger fucking man. You already knew about his book deal.

I agree with this, but he was the bigger man in this situation, at least.

At 5/10/07 01:00 AM, IdentityTheft wrote: We're not talking about whether or not the manager had the right to do what he did but rather whether what he did was ethically right.

The owner believes OJ murdered two people.

How wouldn't refusal of service be ethically right for the owner?

At 5/10/07 01:02 AM, Kalibur wrote: I agree with this, but he was the bigger man in this situation, at least.

Yes, which was surprising to me, too . . . until I read that his lawyer planned on suing the owner.

At 5/10/07 01:02 AM, Kalibur wrote: I agree with this, but he was the bigger man in this situation, at least.

Yes, which was surprising to me, too . . . until I read that his lawyer planned on suing the owner.

Another prime example of me not clicking the links I saw. I'll go cry in the corner now.

what a suprise

isnt that grounds for a libel lawsuit and public embarrasment, with some emotional trauma added in? i hear he's hard for money... he should look into it...

i think OJ was guilty btw

Killing his wife , thats one thing, but writing a book about it..thats where i draw the line.

At 5/10/07 01:26 AM, MissingNYC wrote: isnt that grounds for a libel lawsuit and public embarrasment,

Two things:

He didn't say anything other than "please leave", which isn't libel.

OJ wasn't in public. He was inside a private establishment.

with some emotional trauma added in?

He'd probably go for it, or at least he'd have publicity-starved lawyers salivating over his potential court time, on the prosecuting side this time.

That's heinous, I know.

At 5/10/07 12:03 AM, Gooch wrote: I mean come on, O.J. was acquitted of everything he was tried for. You can't hold a personal bias against him. You shouldn't be making an issue about O.J. anymore. Let him sit in your restaurant and eat.

Stupid people.

Damn...... I honestly can't tell if you're joking or not. But I'm leaning towards, not.

O.J. did it! We all know it. He got away with it in the criminaltrial. (Mostly because the Prosecution team F-ed up). But he was found to be responsible, in the civil trial.

There was also that book he was promoting recently...... The one about how he would have killed his wife, IF he was the murderer. A nice little, sick, twisted, and obscene joke on his part.

O.J. is the one continuing to make an issue out of it. But maybe there was a more practical reason why he was asked to leave........ Some restaurants don't have a Smoking section. Perhaps this one didn't have a Murderers section.

At 5/10/07 12:20 AM, pepeatumi wrote:

Its pretty pathetic to hold a grudge against someone who hasn't done a damn thing to you.

can i apply that logic to hitler then?

At 5/10/07 12:06 AM, 36Holla wrote: There was a topic about this in politics which I reponded to, but basically, its been over 10 years since the OJ case. You would think people would have just stopped caring.

People never stop caring about celebrities.

OJ can't talk about this right now.. or ever..

He was found innocent. If i was OJ, I'd sue that resturant owner too.

fucking scum

Hmm sounds to me the manager is a prick, OJ may not have been innocent and he may have been innocent, either way, he had a great lawyer and he didn't get imprisoned because of that. Luckily he didn't make a scene, he was the bigger man and walked away with the orange juice.

shows that the justice systome sucks either way, you go to prison and you server your time and get out and their are virtually no options for jobs etc available to you.(though for murderers their shouldn't be but that's my view, i draw the line somewhere from fraud/theft to rape etc)

you go on trial for a crime you did not commit(even if 100% eveidence shows you didnt) you still get the suspicious eye.

though in O.J's case they never found the killer.

At 5/10/07 06:25 AM, HAcoreRD wrote: He was found innocent. If i was OJ, I'd sue that resturant owner too.

fucking scum

1 - He wasn't found innocent, he was found not guilty. But that wasn't the case in the civil trial.

2 - Despite being open to the Public, restaurants are Privately owned establishments. The Manager or Owner can refuse service to anyone they don't want in their place..... for any reason. Some states require the establishment to put up a sign that says so. Other state don't require a sign.

If you walk into a restaurant, buck naked, with a twenty dollar bill sticking out of your ass; you better believe they can tell you to leave!

At 5/10/07 10:54 AM, Monocrom wrote: If you walk into a restaurant, buck naked, with a twenty dollar bill sticking out of your ass; you better believe they can tell you to leave!

What if it's a fifty?

At 5/10/07 11:02 AM, HAcoreRD wrote:

At 5/10/07 10:54 AM, Monocrom wrote: If you walk into a restaurant, buck naked, with a twenty dollar bill sticking out of your ass; you better believe they can tell you to leave!

What if it's a fifty?

Would you make change for him??

At 5/10/07 11:03 AM, Monocrom wrote:

At 5/10/07 11:02 AM, HAcoreRD wrote:

At 5/10/07 10:54 AM, Monocrom wrote: If you walk into a restaurant, buck naked, with a twenty dollar bill sticking out of your ass; you better believe they can tell you to leave!

What if it's a fifty?

Would you make change for him??

I would.

At 5/10/07 11:03 AM, Monocrom wrote:

Would you make change for him??

No, but I'd have one of my "loyal" waiters try and snatch it away from him secretly, and then boot him out. He'll never know what hit him.

At 5/10/07 11:10 AM, Gooch wrote:

At 5/10/07 11:03 AM, Monocrom wrote:

Would you make change for him??

No, but I'd have one of my "loyal" waiters try and snatch it away from him secretly, and then boot him out. He'll never know what hit him.

Then your only problem is getting rid of it. I would suggest you wait for a group of people who are very annoying/demanding of their waiters time for stupid reasons etc, etc. Then at the end of the meal, present them with said 50 dollar bill, and watch them get all excited over it.

At 5/10/07 12:04 AM, Cabbster wrote: Have you heard the other side of the story?

Totally!!

not

As long as he pays the bill.

I thought this topic was going to be about orange juice.

I am not amused

At 5/10/07 02:02 PM, El-Duego wrote: I thought this topic was going to be about orange juice.

I am not amused

My intentions were not to amuse anyone anyways. Sorry to disappoint you there.

Well, not really.

Normally, I'd be on OJ's side; him being acquitted and all. However, he tried to publish a book on how he would've killed his wife had he killed her.

The man is an idiot. He doesn't deserve food.

At 5/10/07 02:09 PM, Unimportant wrote: The man is an idiot. He doesn't deserve food.

That is so great..... It deserves to be quoted!
Well done, good Sir!