Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

Because then there'll be no more republics that claim they're a democracy.

At 3/22/07 06:56 AM, Svoboda wrote:

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

Because the whole world doesn't hate the US.

And we don't hate the world. We'd rather do business.

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

There not worth it.

It'd trigger a world nuclear war, this thread lacks humour and intelligence. Read up on your Cuban Missile crisis, judging from a 1K + post count I trust your dependant on american technology with computers and the net.

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

Because they don't want to hurt me!!

I'm so Self-centered!!!

At 3/22/07 07:04 AM, whogivesadamnit wrote: those who think so are media influenced retards, usa does MANY more good things than bad. Lets face it. USA is a big country and has come up with many good things in e.g. technology, music and movie industry.

Yes, yes. Nirvana, Die Hard 2 and the iPod really are a good return for decades of unjustifiable violence.

At 3/22/07 07:09 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:52 AM, No-oneSpecial wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:40 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Stuff

I admit, I am a patriotic person and an American idealist, I believe in what we are doing right now in Iraq and Afghanistan so I have no problem with our troops killing for our country. And like this thread talks about, if the US was attacked by the rest of the world, I take great pride knowing that we have the military power to win.

I am a european-australian. I like america..being an ally country and all, however last year i visited my mate who lives in serbia (which america bombed for awhile not too long ago) and i saw a several destroyed buildings that they keep as memorials including several hotels, hospitals and a chinese embassy. I also held some pieces of the famed american stealth bombers that had been shot down.

My point is..the american army and america itself, whilst being a great country like england, france, germany and even mongolia and italy were before it, is not invincible or righteous as all great powers seem to think they are when on top.

At 3/21/07 08:07 PM, CleansingFlame wrote: Because we kick too much ass

A crude way of putting it, yes.

At 3/21/07 08:08 PM, IdiotClown wrote: Simple question. We are the top economy country.

True. Although from what I've heard, we may be facing another depression. Don't take my word for it though.

We have one of the best military forces in the world, as well as the best nuclear program. Attacking the US would result in your country becoming a post-WWI Germany.

At 3/21/07 08:16 PM, FrozenSheep wrote:

At 3/21/07 08:08 PM, IdiotClown wrote: Simple question. We are the top economy country.

no, actually your in debt, i think about billions in debt.

All money is debt, debt is wealth, look at all the richest developed countries, they all have the most debt USA is first, England 2nd etc... All that means is that we have such good endowments that the whole world will extend assets monies to us. Not to mention, most money exists in the form of credit, which is money that doesn't exist, the banks just say it does, and it does, that's how they make their fortunes, lending money that they create out of thin air (The Federal Reserve does).

You should read up and study a bit...

To all of the people that say the world would be destroyed:

You forgot Iceland, you see, Iceland is directly between America and Asia (and Europe)
Far enough from all major cities for there to be NO effect on the counrty at all,Sure, there might be nuclear winter, but it's not like we aren't used to the cold..
Therefore, the entire nation of iceland would survive and rebuild the world, which would be better than the current one, because of the icelandic people's racial superiority.
And Icelandic law would be in effect EVERYWHERE, and the world would be a paradise.

So.. Nuke the US.

At 3/21/07 08:05 PM, FrozenSheep wrote: If the whole world does hate the US, why don't they just bomb them ?

Because some people are rational enough to avoid people they hate. + attacking the US would probably end in a massive nuke war where the earth gets blown to shreds.

Why do you think [we] hate the US? [We] just don't understand you, that's all.

No see, that's the thing about the rest of the world. We don't just nuke the countries we don't like. Well some of us would.

At 3/22/07 07:09 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:52 AM, No-oneSpecial wrote:

At 3/22/07 06:40 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Stuff

I'm not really boasting, I'm just telling the truth. It's a simple fact that the US military, both our nuclear power and conventional military power is unrivaled. Yeah I'm proud of it, but its just a simple truth that one of your compatriots was unaware of, so I had to correct him.

It's true. You are the big guys,
...BUT! I think if someone with the power to do so would go ahead and attack the US, they must have done something really offensive. Other countries would join in and it would've been america vs. just about anybody, Not a very healthy situation for anyone.

Well first of all, I make a distinction between killing for your own gain (murder) and killing for your country which I consider to be a heroic and selfless act for most circumstances.

I admit, I am a patriotic person and an American idealist, I believe in what we are doing right now in Iraq and Afghanistan so I have no problem with our troops killing for our country. And like this thread talks about, if the US was attacked by the rest of the world, I take great pride knowing that we have the military power to win.

Now I believe this is what makes most of the hateful people hate you. Most americans have such a strong sence of national pride that they don't have any qualms about "killing for their country", even if they were the ones who started the war.
I still don't get the full picture of what you're actually doing in Iraq. Yeah, I know soliders get killed, people get killed and so on. It doesn't look like it's helping and that's what puzzles me. (Good thing you got Saddam though.)
Yeah, and: "If the US was attacked by THE REST OF THE WORLD?" Shit, you're big, but you ain't that big. If the whole world were to jump on the US, it would either lead to the end of the world or the end of the US.

Well, you know. The people who actually think its a good idea to nuke eachother are just the 13 year old morons. Everyone who has posted in this thread so far pretty much belongs to a country that is allied with the US and probably will never go to war with the US any time soon, so it's all hypothetical really.

You're absolutely right. I do not doubt the least that an attack on america would result in nuclear missiles flying about like rockets on New Year's Eve. I think the US is gonna tear itself apart before anyone else does.

The military competance of the british army and the technological advance of the US army.

Well, I still think the US military is more competent than the British military. It's a myth that the US has poor training, and so forth, it's just that since the US military is bigger, its slightly less efficient than the British military in some areas.

I know nothing about the competance of the british army, but I'm pretty shure that the americans outclass you in almost every aspect of technology.
HEADS UP: If anyone feels like arguing who has the most disciplined and competent army, don't even bother. After a global researching survey it became clear that Israel has an army of such discipline and skill that it outclassed everyone.
I'm norwegian, we came 5th (weeee).

But then again, since WWII, it's actually been the British who have adopted American tactics and military doctrine. The current British military is actually intentionally modelled after the US military in order to merge into the US military in times of war. The Gulf War and the Invasion of Iraq are examples, the British use the same communications systems and unit organization/ tactics to be able to work seamlessly when under US command. In the Invasion of Iraq in 03, the UK military units were under command of the US Marines.

And not to rag on the British military, but I don't see where the idea that their military is superior comes from.

Yeah, you're pretty much self contradictory here.

Simple. Everybody knows that we have 2600 more nukes than ne1 else. They all know if they bomb us, we send them into orbit and make them suffer. :D

Bomb U.S.A? what a fucking brilliant idea!

Dr. Strangelove