Proof Of Life After Death!!!

[poxpower]

I finaly have it!
YES
After all this time!
http://www.allaboutspirituality.org/proof-of-
life-after-death-faq.htm
!!!

but the SCIENTISTS are blocking the truth! Damn them!
....

Now please, someone, tell me what the FUCK would ANY scientist have to gain from knowing there is life after death, but blocking the information?????????????
??????????

god damn you religious people, why do you ruin everything for everyone all the time >: (
AAAAAA

[bluedemonspeedracer]

At 3/12/07 10:37 PM, poxpower wrote: I finaly have it!
YES
After all this time!
http://www.allaboutspirituality.org/proof-of-
life-after-death-faq.htm
!!!

but the SCIENTISTS are blocking the truth! Damn them!
....

Now please, someone, tell me what the FUCK would ANY scientist have to gain from knowing there is life after death, but blocking the information?????????????
??????????

god damn you religious people, why do you ruin everything for everyone all the time >: (
AAAAAA

Scientists can't block proof of any outcome because the outcome resulted from scientists are only based off of experimental result. Therefore scientists are not blocking the evidence, they critiquing the way the research is conducted and if result can't be peer reveiwed or reproduced then it is faulty research. I am currently a science major myself and I would be open to the proof of life after death if the research follows the scientific method and the results have been reproduced and peer reveiwed.

[bluedemonspeedracer]

This description on the websights falls under semiotics and philosophy of nature and is not intended for literal and logistic interpretation. It only describes how nature returns to its original states through natural cycles (Yes its already proven by science that nature runs in cycles) however it does not prove the existance of an afterlife. Your interpretations fall under what is known as "literalism" and "fundimentalism" by intrepting mythos into logos when the intended text for mythos interpretation. (How I know, I minor in religion).

[bluedemonspeedracer]

So if you can create a controlled experiment that can prove that there is life after death and be able to reproduce the results and get it peer reveiwed then yes then scientists will buy into the fact that life after death exists. However this only a poetic semiotic representation of life and falls completly in a seperate realem of mysticism and philosophy.

[stafffighter]

At 3/12/07 11:15 PM, bluedemonspeedracer wrote:

2 posts and then

So if you can create a controlled experiment that can prove that there is life after death and be able to reproduce the results and get it peer reveiwed then yes then scientists will buy into the fact that life after death exists. However this only a poetic semiotic representation of life and falls completly in a seperate realem of mysticism and philosophy.

We get it. You like weed.
Harry Houdini said he's unlock the cuffs from beyond the grave if he could. that's the closest science is getting to this

[bluedemonspeedracer]

At 3/12/07 11:29 PM, stafffighter wrote:

At 3/12/07 11:15 PM, bluedemonspeedracer wrote:

2 posts and then

So if you can create a controlled experiment that can prove that there is life after death and be able to reproduce the results and get it peer reveiwed then yes then scientists will buy into the fact that life after death exists. However this only a poetic semiotic representation of life and falls completly in a seperate realem of mysticism and philosophy.

We get it. You like weed.
Harry Houdini said he's unlock the cuffs from beyond the grave if he could. that's the closest science is getting to this

My exact point. I am only speaking that way because religious fundimentalists only understand statements that speak within language of religious fundimentalism. ( I am just saying such statement only to open the persons mind to scientific fact for someone whom only can understand superstition by translating it into superstition) I know damn well that there is no scientific evidence of an afterlife. Just think of this last post simply as a comparison to explaining complex topics to a nieve child.

P.S.
The statement about marijuana is completly irrelevent in this post.

[bluedemonspeedracer]

Because you would understand that telling strait out science has no proof of an an afterlife would be like telling a little kid that santa clause does not exist. I am trying to convince her to accept science by opening the possibility of it being translated in mythos. Do you catch my drift?

[Boltrig]

Is ... Is that article implying that the progression of the seasons constitutes proof of an afterlife?

Is the writer in an institution? With rubber walls?

Trees and vegetation do not die in the winter. Annual plants die, but they only have a lifespan of one season cycle. Trees and perrenials go dormant in winter. Dormant is not dead.

And evergreens dont even go dormant

[AapoJoki]

At 3/12/07 10:37 PM, poxpower wrote: Now please, someone, tell me what the FUCK would ANY scientist have to gain from knowing there is life after death, but blocking the information?????????????
??????????

The obvious answer is that all the scientists in the world are actually minions of Satan from Hell, and want to make as many people stray from the path of God as possible.

[poxpower]

At 3/13/07 05:56 AM, Boltrig wrote: Is ... Is that article implying that the progression of the seasons constitutes proof of an afterlife?

Can you believe these people?
They say that, and then, like if it made any sense at all, they sit back on their asses and go "well I have the answer now, too bad for everyone else if they can't accept the REAL TRUE ANSWER that I got when I was mowing the grass and noticed it grows back"

At 3/13/07 07:40 AM, AapoJoki wrote:

The obvious answer is that all the scientists in the world are actually minions of Satan from Hell, and want to make as many people stray from the path of God as possible.

It's all so clear now!
If I can think of an explanation, then, IT MUST BE THE ONE!
Religion rocks! You don't need to make any efforts to be right all the time! Weeee

[Peter-II]

I wonder how they account for the fact that trees do, in fact, eventually die.

I don't get it, how the FUCK can they possibly compare natural cycles to do with the earth tilting on its axis to people going to eternity to either experience bliss or damnation in a place apparently not inside the physical universe after they die? And why would they draw the conclusion that the Bible is the correct word of god from that?

[Brick-top]

religion is a funny thing.

I find it even more funny how all the scientific discoveries that question religion were done by religious people. Talk about stabbing you're belief in the back.

[ReiperX]

Umm where on your source does it show there is proof of life after death? On the part asking about proof of life after death they admit there is no proof.

[AIDSextravaganza]

because of fear that there is nothingness after death and that they will never see any of their loved ones again
even scares the shit out of me but ive excepted it
live your life the way you want and dont bind yourself to religion
itll only restrict the time you have
actually fuck it do whatever u want im in no place to say whats right and whats wrong

[SteveGuzzi]

At 3/12/07 10:37 PM, poxpower wrote: god damn you

werd.

[xineph]

At 3/12/07 10:37 PM, poxpower wrote: I finaly have it!
YES
After all this time!
http://www.allaboutspirituality.org/proof-of-
life-after-death-faq.htm
!!!

but the SCIENTISTS are blocking the truth! Damn them!
....

Now please, someone, tell me what the FUCK would ANY scientist have to gain from knowing there is life after death, but blocking the information?????????????
??????????

god damn you religious people, why do you ruin everything for everyone all the time >: (
AAAAAA

I'll make this simple for you:

1. Your findings are based on the Bible.

2. The Bible is a dubious source at best, and many would go so far as to consider it a work of fiction.

3. Scientists would not consider such a book as any kind of source of fact.

There is a wide, wide difference from what is easy/comfortable to believe and what is actually rational.

[Togukawa]

Life after death? This is definite proof of reincarnation! The grass does not disappear into an afterlife, it grows back in this world!

Praise be to whichever religions preach reincarnation!

[SolInvictus]

"There can be no more glorious and obvious manifestation and indication of the phenomenon of life after death than what is thus witnessed every year after the dead of winter." and if that doesn't convince you well theres the Bible too!

[xineph]

At 3/16/07 08:46 PM, SolInvictus wrote: "There can be no more glorious and obvious manifestation and indication of the phenomenon of life after death than what is thus witnessed every year after the dead of winter." and if that doesn't convince you well theres the Bible too!

In the immortal words of Austin Powers:
Riiiiiiight.

[JackPhantasm]

The bible was created by man to destroy him.

[morefngdbs]

O-boy , how can you possibly believe that proof of life after death can be found in a book, that is a work of fiction.
If you believe that then you must believe the sci-fi fantasy character Conan existed.
Now Pox I'm not trying to say that there isn't life after death.
Or there is no reincarnation, or any of that.

I'm just trying to figure out how a work of fiction can be considered proof.

[Istentelen]

There is really life after death and I have the ultimate proof! It's qute simple: the people lieing in the graveyards are all dead, but we are alive! So, we live after their deaths.

[Nagneto]

At 3/12/07 10:37 PM, poxpower wrote: I finaly have it!
YES
After all this time!
http://www.allaboutspirituality.org/proof-of-
life-after-death-faq.htm
!!!

but the SCIENTISTS are blocking the truth! Damn them!
....

Now please, someone, tell me what the FUCK would ANY scientist have to gain from knowing there is life after death, but blocking the information?????????????
??????????

god damn you religious people, why do you ruin everything for everyone all the time >: (
AAAAAA

People fear what they do not understand (as in life after death)
Fear turns to anger, anger to hate, yadda yadda yadda, you get the point

Also you're "god damn relgious people" comment makes me laugh. Puns Ahoy!

[Texsk8er56]

u are dumb if u belive this

[poxpower]

At 3/18/07 10:22 AM, mofomojo wrote: But people don't get it, prayer is always an experiment.

If that means "it succeeds as much as random chance" then yes, it's "always an experiment".

[iamawakening]

Its possible.
From http://www.iamawakening.org/free_article s/c1.htm :

The Sanskrit word karma, which usually refers to the effects of our
actions through various lives, originally meant "ritual." Action or
karma is always a ritual; that is, whatever action we do sets in
motion certain forces, not only of a personal but of a collective and
cosmic nature.

All action, we could say, is like jumping into a stream. We can
choose the stream to jump into, but once in the stream we come under
the stream's forces, which are no longer a matter of choice. Whatever
we do places us in a stream of action which has a momentum that will
carry us in a particular direction. Conscious actions reinforce the
energy of consciousness, which causes us to grow in awareness.
Unconscious actions reinforce habit, inertia, and the energy of
ignorance, which places us under the domination of the external world.

Once we recognize that action is karma, we will approach our
actions with an awareness that makes them sacred. We will then give
even simple and everyday actions an attention so that we do not let
ourselves drift in the stream of unconscious action into greater
darkness and sorrow.

However, most of us seldom recognize the karmic or ritualistic
nature of our actions. This is because effects of our action manifest
only through time. Some of our actions do not bear fruit at all in the
present incarnation. Unless we look at the really long-term
consequences of what we do, it is difficult to take control of our
actions. For example, if we could put our hands in a fire and not get
burned until some months or years later, we might carelessly throw our
whole body into a fire. Yet this is the type of delay that often
exists between destructive mental actions and their outer
consequences.

[SadisticMonkey]

Typical arrogant, asshole bigoted atheist bullshit.

[Masterzakk]

At 11/28/08 03:07 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Typical arrogant, asshole bigoted atheist bullshit.

Typical arrogant, asshole bigoted ZOG bullshit

[SadisticMonkey]

At 11/28/08 03:13 AM, Masterzakk wrote:

At 11/28/08 03:07 AM, SadisticMonkey wrote: Typical arrogant, asshole bigoted atheist bullshit.

Typical arrogant, asshole bigoted ZOG bullshit

OH HAI LOL LOOK AT LINK IN MAI SIG ROFL

[KidneyThief]

It's wrong to critcize someone for what they believe in, but you can sure criticize their close mindedness.