Guide to Gramar!

[yesaspoon]

I love how almost everyone on this message board generalizes and uses really bad descriptions for almost everything. I think people should proofread and reread any, if at all, evidence they use to point something out. This guide is to help all of you become real debaters and sound really good. For example:

"The palestinians dont deserve a country they are killing the Jews with bombs attached to their backs."

Now whats wrong with this statement? Hmm, its a bit of a run on? Well, any english teacher can tell you that. But, whats most important is that large stereotype right in the midst of it all.

"The palestinians ... killing jews ... attached to their backs."

Now whats wrong with this, ill ask again? Well for starters what it sounds like, is that every single palestinian in existence is killing, has killed, or will kill a jew, but thats wrong too.

"...killing jews..."

That statement is incorrect because it isolates a religion. So, your saying that the only important victims of the suicide attacks are the jews? No, BUT, you CAN say that they are israeli, because in fact they are in israel.

Now, how do we fix this statement? Lets first change the palestinian noun. Lets change it to:

"The Palestinian terrorist organizations...

There, now dont you seem smart. Now lets change the whole jew part.

"...are killing Israeli citizens..."

Ahh that is beautiful. Now lets finish the whole sentance:

"The Palestinian terrorist groups do not deserve a country of their own, because they are killing Israeli citizens thru terrorist attacks and unconventional warfare."

Now, that is beautiful...now what does this new statement mean? It means that your first statement isnt worth a dog doodoo on a saturday morning. Of course terrorist groups dont deserve their own country, but maybe the PALESTINIANS do. Hope this helps.

Arbalest ;)

[yesaspoon]

Oh yeah, i spelled grammar wrong on person.

*cough* *cough* :) lol

[mrpopenfresh]

On person? Now whos the one making mistakes(again)?

[yesaspoon]

Im sorry, but i do think its an effective guide.

[bumcheekcity]

At 5/2/03 05:38 PM, Arbalest wrote: Im sorry, but i do think its an effective guide.

Why did you post it? People are free to express their opinions. If you see someone with a biades view, tear their argumant apart.

[FreidanX]

I don't understand the surprisingly hostile responses Arbalest's post has been getting...
Isn't eloquency and consideration of all factors in an issue in expression of an opinion something advocated by forum members like the PC crew?

I though we all got sick of the "all gayz must DiE!!!" posts that seem to plaugue politics message boards these days...

All this guy is trying to say is some people here should learn to post like the educated adults they would like to represent themselves as./

[FUNKbrs]

At 5/2/03 06:16 PM, FreidanX wrote: I don't understand the surprisingly hostile responses Arbalest's post has been getting...
Isn't eloquency and consideration of all factors in an issue in expression of an opinion something advocated by forum members like the PC crew?

I though we all got sick of the "all gayz must DiE!!!" posts that seem to plaugue politics message boards these days...

All this guy is trying to say is some people here should learn to post like the educated adults they would like to represent themselves as./

we find the retards go away faster if you just ignore them. Anyway, this guy is acting like a prick to make a whole thread based on one badly misinformed sentence. I mean, hes actually AMPLIFYING idiocy by an order of magnitude, while at the same time whining about how stupid people are. He took one retarded post, and from it, he made an entire retarded thread.

[TheShrike]

I are not liking post¿

[PreacherJ]

At 5/2/03 09:14 PM, TheShrike wrote: I are not liking post¿

*lOOKS AROUND, CONFUSED*

[FUNKbrs]

At 5/2/03 10:29 PM, PreacherJ wrote:

At 5/2/03 09:14 PM, TheShrike wrote: I are not liking post¿

*lOOKS AROUND, CONFUSED*

see, when you buy your weed from the DAG, you buy the best. Now pass that shiznit, biatch.

[NEMESiSZ]

Or grammar, whatever.

[BullRat]

At 5/2/03 05:29 PM, Arbalest wrote: I want to make a political point, not a freakin' english lesson. :)

And just how are you making a political point by correcting everyone's grammar (or lack thereof)? This just shows you have a wee bit of too much time of you hands... and in your mind as well. Just FYI, no one really cares about grammar... otherwise they probably wouldn't bemaking those dumb mistakes in the first place.

[yesaspoon]

RE: "Guide to Gramar"

The post i made earlier "Guide to Gramer" was only supposed to help people if they want to make credible debates effective and clear, im only doing this because i was the captain of the debate team in my school. Im sorry if by correcting simple political correctness and grammar i upset some people. For all of you who are retarded and manipulated my words, i hope you rot in hell, or whatever you believe in.

Oh btw, thanks freiden, you know what your talking about, most of the poeople here are like 12...

And if this wasnt important to you, dont fucking post or reply back, that means you read it lol, you damn hipocrit.

Note; Some people pissed me off, so i got mad. THis original post wasnt making fun of anyone or anything, some people are just too dumb to read the long words :p

Arbalest ;)

[PreacherJ]

At 5/2/03 10:38 PM, FUNKbrs wrote:

At 5/2/03 10:29 PM, PreacherJ wrote:

At 5/2/03 09:14 PM, TheShrike wrote: I are not liking post¿

*lOOKS AROUND, CONFUSED*

see, when you buy your weed from the DAG, you buy the best. Now pass that shiznit, biatch.

*Looks down at blunt in hand*

Where did that come from??

Damn... I guess you're right... I thought I would have remembered buying it. Are you sure I didn't just steal it?

Eh, oh well.

*hands blunt to FUNKbrs*

[Slizor]

I think you were too subtle, I mean, it's not like you actually write your point out! Clearly people only looked at the title.

[FUNKbrs]

At 5/3/03 01:36 AM, PreacherJ wrote:

At 5/2/03 10:38 PM, FUNKbrs wrote:

At 5/2/03 10:29 PM, PreacherJ wrote:

At 5/2/03 09:14 PM, TheShrike wrote: I are not liking post¿

*lOOKS AROUND, CONFUSED*

see, when you buy your weed from the DAG, you buy the best. Now pass that shiznit, biatch.

*Looks down at blunt in hand*

Where did that come from??

Damn... I guess you're right... I thought I would have remembered buying it. Are you sure I didn't just steal it?

Eh, oh well.

*hands blunt to FUNKbrs*

*hits blunt*

*blows giant smoke ring*

I think arbalest should have the next hit, it seems he has a seriously large bug inserted in his rectum. He obviously thinks we put lots of emotion and care into what we post.

*puffs*

*passes*

[RUDE]

At 5/2/03 05:38 PM, Arbalest wrote: Im sorry, but i do think its an effective guide.

And that "I" of yours is supposed to be uppercased.

[JMHX]

I still don't see the point that the entire thread serves...yeah.

[Nirvana13666]

If you can’t spell or have bad grammar use a damn spell check program. Why would we need a whole topic about it especially under politics?