Be a Supporter!

The Us Vs China

  • 2,437 Views
  • 50 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
Karzand
Karzand
  • Member since: Feb. 24, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 03
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-01-23 18:19:23 Reply

At 1/23/07 01:55 PM, goodfella13 wrote: ok well first of all hekler&koch (HK) does not make the ak47. now wjile the ak 47 is a very reliable firearm it is weak compared to an HK do your research before posting stuff that makes you look retarted

dude he's making a Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic reference. HK 47 the assasin droid

:and secondly america woukd win hands down I mean we already defeated the worlds strongest millitary force (england) so the chinese would be nothing

The British empire was a major world power until the end of WW2 and we beat them over 200 years ago so you can't compare beating the British 200 years ago to fighting an emrging superpower. Anyway the only advantage the Chinese have is a larger number of troops than the US does. Fortunately for the US our superiority in pretty much every aspect of modern warfare would win us the war.

DJ-Jerakai
DJ-Jerakai
  • Member since: Dec. 19, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-01-23 23:44:15 Reply

At 1/23/07 01:55 PM, goodfella13 wrote: ok well first of all hekler&koch (HK) does not make the ak47.

LMAO!

Awww no. Can't be good.

You poor man...

Clownshock
Clownshock
  • Member since: Apr. 6, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-21 21:22:14 Reply

Everyone knows that the chinese can never stand up to us and our abnormally large penises. POSSE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I won't ever cheat on my bitch but I'll still sleep with a luger

Snerd
Snerd
  • Member since: Dec. 19, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-21 22:34:46 Reply

I think that the United States should seek foreign labor elsewhere. We have an enormous trade deficit with China. If the Soviet Union were still around and not trying to kill us, we could open the door to trade and turn a blind eye to their human rights violations just like we do with China. I don't think our trade deficit will start a war with China. If tensions between the two were to escalate, it certainly would be one of the justifications for war, but it wouldn't be the sole answer.

MortifiedPenguins
MortifiedPenguins
  • Member since: Apr. 21, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-21 23:20:52 Reply

At 1/23/07 09:40 AM, Lastin wrote: US will never attack China. If it does the world economy would hit rock bottom.

And you lost all seriousness after that.

Seriously though, If a war ever really occured and American foot would never set food in China.

There would be no need.

If you look at any demographic map of China. Since the far majority of the population lives on the seacoast, Ground troops would be unneeded to put down any attack.

Naval ships would be able to stay of the coast due to China's laughable Navy and bombers and other strike planes would have the freedom of the skies and the ground, mainly due to China using outdated russain plane models(mainly Mig 22's.)

Past that, the US could just conduct bombing raids untill the people's will is felt by the Chinese government and the attacks stop.


Between the idea And the reality
Between the motion And the act, Falls the Shadow
An argument in Logic

BBS Signature
liger-1
liger-1
  • Member since: Feb. 19, 2007
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Animator
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-22 19:15:29 Reply

At 2/21/07 11:20 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:
At 1/23/07 09:40 AM, Lastin wrote: US will never attack China. If it does the world economy would hit rock bottom.
And you lost all seriousness after that.

Seriously though, If a war ever really occured and American foot would never set food in China.

There would be no need.

If you look at any demographic map of China. Since the far majority of the population lives on the seacoast, Ground troops would be unneeded to put down any attack.

Naval ships would be able to stay of the coast due to China's laughable Navy and bombers and other strike planes would have the freedom of the skies and the ground, mainly due to China using outdated russain plane models(mainly Mig 22's.)

Past that, the US could just conduct bombing raids untill the people's will is felt by the Chinese government and the attacks stop

Now you did your research, It could end much easier with a Nuke but we can never use it and we also have other good weapons that we could never use. also we dont need china for cheap labor my friends we have the Mexicans, they work for pennies on a dollar so china is not that important also think about it whoo has more allies.

djmrules
djmrules
  • Member since: May. 5, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-22 20:42:54 Reply

U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.


"Earth is defenseless but one chosen dolphin can save us all." - Ecco the Dolphin

BBS Signature
JakeHero
JakeHero
  • Member since: May. 30, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 09
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-22 20:50:10 Reply

At 2/22/07 08:42 PM, djmrules wrote: U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.

You're a dumbshit. The Chinese military is inferior to our own in so many different ways it's mind boggling. So there would be no need for any sort of nuke.

P.S. Did I mention you're a dumbshit?


BBS Signature
Karzand
Karzand
  • Member since: Feb. 24, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 03
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-23 00:51:43 Reply

At 2/22/07 08:42 PM, djmrules wrote: U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.

Me thinks he's inflating his age by 6-7 years.

I do wanna see the Chinese try to invade the US. Think of it 100,000s of sampans transporting the 2 million strong PLA across the Pacific, while our superior navy destroys every last one of them while being brodcast live on CNN. Unfortunately the negativess to that would be all those sissy groups that would protest the wholesale slaughter of PLA forces.

psycho-squirrel
psycho-squirrel
  • Member since: Apr. 30, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 19
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-23 02:35:56 Reply

military wise, if we used all our weapons......america hands down.

and even if we didnt use our nukes, we still would win.

even if and when china becomes the next super power, it will only be economically wise. with the military the us is far supirior.


BBS Signature
LegendaryLukus
LegendaryLukus
  • Member since: Apr. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 07:12:03 Reply

Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being fired


Up the Clarets!

Cheekyvincent
Cheekyvincent
  • Member since: Nov. 16, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 16:39:14 Reply

it would be:

china
russia
iran
north korea
Venezuela
Bolivia
(Countries that hate US)
Pakistan (definitely if India joined) after all China did make Pakistan nuclear

versus

US
UK (coz tony blairs a dumbass)
canada
japan
india (maybe)
some european countries

millions (literally) of terrorist attacks would happen in the US- blowing up of NYC etc.

notes- all the countries would go against the US if it werent the cumcatching presidents/ prime minesters

Cheekyvincent
Cheekyvincent
  • Member since: Nov. 16, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 16:40:57 Reply

in 10-20 years definitely china hands down

Der-Lowe
Der-Lowe
  • Member since: Apr. 30, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 19
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 16:47:58 Reply

At 2/24/07 07:12 AM, LegendaryLukus wrote: Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being fired

I think that's what is going to happen, and what Amercian and Chinese leaders expect.
Simple GDP Growth.


The outstanding faults of the economic society in which we live are its failure to provide for full employment and its arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth -- JMK

BBS Signature
Dash-Underscore-Dash
Dash-Underscore-Dash
  • Member since: Jan. 22, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 21:04:10 Reply

At 2/24/07 04:39 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:
notes- all the countries would go against the US if it werent the cumcatching presidents/ prime minesters

You're an idiot. Anything people hate about the US, China does the same, but worse.

muffinlord1
muffinlord1
  • Member since: Feb. 13, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 04
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 21:13:04 Reply

The U.S would never come close to China and vice versa. Economically the U.S relys on China and if China goes the U.S might collapse or have a good series of revolts. China though can't attack American because of the N.A.T.O allies and surrounding countries will feel threatened by the agression and maybe declare war.

LegendaryLukus
LegendaryLukus
  • Member since: Apr. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 22:09:03 Reply

At 2/24/07 04:47 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:
At 2/24/07 07:12 AM, LegendaryLukus wrote: Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being fired
I think that's what is going to happen, and what Amercian and Chinese leaders expect.
Simple GDP Growth.

Exactly, I don't see why everyone thinks there has to be a war just because China is on the rise. Unless the US initiates hostilities, the switchover of power should be relatively peaceful


Up the Clarets!

Durin413
Durin413
  • Member since: Jul. 26, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-24 23:15:23 Reply

Somehow i doubt China will surpass the US as superpower (though it may be a equals thing, similar to US and UUSR situation).

Also, the people wh say China will be caught uop in 10-20 years in military, guess what? The US would also advance, and while China would be where US was, US would once again be on top.

troubles1
troubles1
  • Member since: Apr. 3, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 21
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-25 01:15:54 Reply

At 1/22/07 05:36 AM, Minty-Hippo wrote: IT would probally play out like the iraq and afghanistan "wars ". We would first intrude in a small section of there land, attack show the world what were capable of, then slowly as in the Iraw and Afghani wars, pander out and slowly begin to lose, as we are faced with conditions we are not conditioned for, nor good at facing. Also, Much like Japan, China has a large basis of pride and respect for the republic, so if we were to invade we would be outnumbered shearly by patriotism, not to mention the dizzying numbers and the required military service that every young boy has. It would pan out like the vietnam war totally overwealmed in circumstances we couldn't begin to comprehend. In china you dont hate the wars your country has,even if youd like to.

IT would be completely different the main reason we are having a problem in Iraq is because we are trying to keep the government going we are playing big brother protecting the people wile they fight amongst each other. in Iraq there are lots of different tribes and even amongst the same tribes they are killing each other for more control Sunni-vs Sunni, shiite-vs shiite, the freaking al-quida, Taliban, and bathist party, all fighting instead of creating a place to raise their family's.

in China however it would be Air force time, bombing the shit out of them , and us USMC boys would do what we do , and get to play with lots of new toys. HURA!

ALSO Vietnam was another example were we were not able to do what we needed to do to win, other than some unofficial bombing in the north we were not allowed to invade we were supposed to stay on our side of the DMZ, and protect The south. We could have one if we did not have the freaking Democrat's in the government tying our hands.


BBS Signature
cellardoor6
cellardoor6
  • Member since: Apr. 4, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-25 04:03:31 Reply

At 2/24/07 09:13 PM, muffinlord1 wrote: The U.S would never come close to China and vice versa. Economically the U.S relys on China and if China goes the U.S might collapse or have a good series of revolts.

Actually, China is more reliant on the US than the US is on China. I'm sick of hearing that crap, I'm sure you just heard some big number that represented the amount of money worth of goods the US gets from China, but you probably were never given context to understand the actual issue.

The US does get very large amount of products from China, but this is just because the US is huge and consumes alot. Meanwhile, the portion of our economy that depends on China in absolute terms is small compared to both our domestic economy and our trade relationship with other nations.

Almost all of China's economy revolves directly or indirectly around the US. They need America's permission to access stock markets, banking systems, and trade organizations that pretty much are all controlled by the US.

Meanwhile, in actual terms, Canada and Mexico individually are both more important to the US economically than China is.

Right now, in the current scheme of things, if the US wanted to, it could completely destroy China economically (and militarily I must add). China could hurt the US in the process, but the US would survive, and China would collapse.


Yay, Obama won. Let's thank his supporters:
-The compliant mainstream media for their pro-Obama propaganda.
-Black Panthers for their intimidation of voters.

BBS Signature
yeahha
yeahha
  • Member since: Sep. 22, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Supporter
Level 55
Movie Buff
Response to The Us Vs China 2007-02-26 08:38:18 Reply

well america could not take vietnam so why the hell would they win over china? + china has allso vietnam, laos and north korea on there side ... and... why the hell must usa allways take a part of any war today? they are allways helping someone even if its nothing about them at all