The Us Vs China
- Karzand
-
Karzand
- Member since: Feb. 24, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
At 1/23/07 01:55 PM, goodfella13 wrote: ok well first of all hekler&koch (HK) does not make the ak47. now wjile the ak 47 is a very reliable firearm it is weak compared to an HK do your research before posting stuff that makes you look retarted
dude he's making a Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic reference. HK 47 the assasin droid
:and secondly america woukd win hands down I mean we already defeated the worlds strongest millitary force (england) so the chinese would be nothing
The British empire was a major world power until the end of WW2 and we beat them over 200 years ago so you can't compare beating the British 200 years ago to fighting an emrging superpower. Anyway the only advantage the Chinese have is a larger number of troops than the US does. Fortunately for the US our superiority in pretty much every aspect of modern warfare would win us the war.
- DJ-Jerakai
-
DJ-Jerakai
- Member since: Dec. 19, 2004
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
At 1/23/07 01:55 PM, goodfella13 wrote: ok well first of all hekler&koch (HK) does not make the ak47.
LMAO!
Awww no. Can't be good.
You poor man...
- Clownshock
-
Clownshock
- Member since: Apr. 6, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Blank Slate
Everyone knows that the chinese can never stand up to us and our abnormally large penises. POSSE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I won't ever cheat on my bitch but I'll still sleep with a luger
- Snerd
-
Snerd
- Member since: Dec. 19, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 13
- Blank Slate
I think that the United States should seek foreign labor elsewhere. We have an enormous trade deficit with China. If the Soviet Union were still around and not trying to kill us, we could open the door to trade and turn a blind eye to their human rights violations just like we do with China. I don't think our trade deficit will start a war with China. If tensions between the two were to escalate, it certainly would be one of the justifications for war, but it wouldn't be the sole answer.
- MortifiedPenguins
-
MortifiedPenguins
- Member since: Apr. 21, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Send Private Message
- Browse All Posts (11,660)
- Block
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 18
- Blank Slate
At 1/23/07 09:40 AM, Lastin wrote: US will never attack China. If it does the world economy would hit rock bottom.
And you lost all seriousness after that.
Seriously though, If a war ever really occured and American foot would never set food in China.
There would be no need.
If you look at any demographic map of China. Since the far majority of the population lives on the seacoast, Ground troops would be unneeded to put down any attack.
Naval ships would be able to stay of the coast due to China's laughable Navy and bombers and other strike planes would have the freedom of the skies and the ground, mainly due to China using outdated russain plane models(mainly Mig 22's.)
Past that, the US could just conduct bombing raids untill the people's will is felt by the Chinese government and the attacks stop.
Between the idea And the reality
Between the motion And the act, Falls the Shadow
An argument in Logic
- liger-1
-
liger-1
- Member since: Feb. 19, 2007
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 11
- Animator
At 2/21/07 11:20 PM, MortifiedPenguins wrote:At 1/23/07 09:40 AM, Lastin wrote: US will never attack China. If it does the world economy would hit rock bottom.And you lost all seriousness after that.
Seriously though, If a war ever really occured and American foot would never set food in China.
There would be no need.
If you look at any demographic map of China. Since the far majority of the population lives on the seacoast, Ground troops would be unneeded to put down any attack.
Naval ships would be able to stay of the coast due to China's laughable Navy and bombers and other strike planes would have the freedom of the skies and the ground, mainly due to China using outdated russain plane models(mainly Mig 22's.)
Past that, the US could just conduct bombing raids untill the people's will is felt by the Chinese government and the attacks stop
Now you did your research, It could end much easier with a Nuke but we can never use it and we also have other good weapons that we could never use. also we dont need china for cheap labor my friends we have the Mexicans, they work for pennies on a dollar so china is not that important also think about it whoo has more allies.
- djmrules
-
djmrules
- Member since: May. 5, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 18
- Blank Slate
U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.
- JakeHero
-
JakeHero
- Member since: May. 30, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 09
- Blank Slate
At 2/22/07 08:42 PM, djmrules wrote: U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.
You're a dumbshit. The Chinese military is inferior to our own in so many different ways it's mind boggling. So there would be no need for any sort of nuke.
P.S. Did I mention you're a dumbshit?
- Karzand
-
Karzand
- Member since: Feb. 24, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
At 2/22/07 08:42 PM, djmrules wrote: U.S. isn't stupid we know we'd get our asses handed to us thats why our nukes are most likely getting launched at them as soon as we start fighting.
Me thinks he's inflating his age by 6-7 years.
I do wanna see the Chinese try to invade the US. Think of it 100,000s of sampans transporting the 2 million strong PLA across the Pacific, while our superior navy destroys every last one of them while being brodcast live on CNN. Unfortunately the negativess to that would be all those sissy groups that would protest the wholesale slaughter of PLA forces.
- psycho-squirrel
-
psycho-squirrel
- Member since: Apr. 30, 2004
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 19
- Blank Slate
military wise, if we used all our weapons......america hands down.
and even if we didnt use our nukes, we still would win.
even if and when china becomes the next super power, it will only be economically wise. with the military the us is far supirior.
- LegendaryLukus
-
LegendaryLukus
- Member since: Apr. 16, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being fired
Up the Clarets!
- Cheekyvincent
-
Cheekyvincent
- Member since: Nov. 16, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 18
- Blank Slate
it would be:
china
russia
iran
north korea
Venezuela
Bolivia
(Countries that hate US)
Pakistan (definitely if India joined) after all China did make Pakistan nuclear
versus
US
UK (coz tony blairs a dumbass)
canada
japan
india (maybe)
some european countries
millions (literally) of terrorist attacks would happen in the US- blowing up of NYC etc.
notes- all the countries would go against the US if it werent the cumcatching presidents/ prime minesters
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! I FOUND THE LIST OF WI/HT SPAMMERS ITS HERE- if you are angry, PM me! (:
"The Wi/Ht forum is now a post count +1 shit hole. Do you agree?"- Join the Debate
- Cheekyvincent
-
Cheekyvincent
- Member since: Nov. 16, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 18
- Blank Slate
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! I FOUND THE LIST OF WI/HT SPAMMERS ITS HERE- if you are angry, PM me! (:
"The Wi/Ht forum is now a post count +1 shit hole. Do you agree?"- Join the Debate
- Der-Lowe
-
Der-Lowe
- Member since: Apr. 30, 2004
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 19
- Blank Slate
At 2/24/07 07:12 AM, LegendaryLukus wrote: Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being fired
I think that's what is going to happen, and what Amercian and Chinese leaders expect.
Simple GDP Growth.
The outstanding faults of the economic society in which we live are its failure to provide for full employment and its arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth -- JMK
- Dash-Underscore-Dash
-
Dash-Underscore-Dash
- Member since: Jan. 22, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 02
- Blank Slate
At 2/24/07 04:39 PM, Cheekyvincent wrote:
notes- all the countries would go against the US if it werent the cumcatching presidents/ prime minesters
You're an idiot. Anything people hate about the US, China does the same, but worse.
- muffinlord1
-
muffinlord1
- Member since: Feb. 13, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 04
- Blank Slate
The U.S would never come close to China and vice versa. Economically the U.S relys on China and if China goes the U.S might collapse or have a good series of revolts. China though can't attack American because of the N.A.T.O allies and surrounding countries will feel threatened by the agression and maybe declare war.
- LegendaryLukus
-
LegendaryLukus
- Member since: Apr. 16, 2005
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
At 2/24/07 04:47 PM, Der-Lowe wrote:At 2/24/07 07:12 AM, LegendaryLukus wrote: Maybe the US will lose its rank as world superpower to China without a shot ever being firedI think that's what is going to happen, and what Amercian and Chinese leaders expect.
Simple GDP Growth.
Exactly, I don't see why everyone thinks there has to be a war just because China is on the rise. Unless the US initiates hostilities, the switchover of power should be relatively peaceful
Up the Clarets!
- Durin413
-
Durin413
- Member since: Jul. 26, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 10
- Blank Slate
Somehow i doubt China will surpass the US as superpower (though it may be a equals thing, similar to US and UUSR situation).
Also, the people wh say China will be caught uop in 10-20 years in military, guess what? The US would also advance, and while China would be where US was, US would once again be on top.
- troubles1
-
troubles1
- Member since: Apr. 3, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 21
- Blank Slate
At 1/22/07 05:36 AM, Minty-Hippo wrote: IT would probally play out like the iraq and afghanistan "wars ". We would first intrude in a small section of there land, attack show the world what were capable of, then slowly as in the Iraw and Afghani wars, pander out and slowly begin to lose, as we are faced with conditions we are not conditioned for, nor good at facing. Also, Much like Japan, China has a large basis of pride and respect for the republic, so if we were to invade we would be outnumbered shearly by patriotism, not to mention the dizzying numbers and the required military service that every young boy has. It would pan out like the vietnam war totally overwealmed in circumstances we couldn't begin to comprehend. In china you dont hate the wars your country has,even if youd like to.
IT would be completely different the main reason we are having a problem in Iraq is because we are trying to keep the government going we are playing big brother protecting the people wile they fight amongst each other. in Iraq there are lots of different tribes and even amongst the same tribes they are killing each other for more control Sunni-vs Sunni, shiite-vs shiite, the freaking al-quida, Taliban, and bathist party, all fighting instead of creating a place to raise their family's.
in China however it would be Air force time, bombing the shit out of them , and us USMC boys would do what we do , and get to play with lots of new toys. HURA!
ALSO Vietnam was another example were we were not able to do what we needed to do to win, other than some unofficial bombing in the north we were not allowed to invade we were supposed to stay on our side of the DMZ, and protect The south. We could have one if we did not have the freaking Democrat's in the government tying our hands.
- cellardoor6
-
cellardoor6
- Member since: Apr. 4, 2006
- Offline.
-
- Send Private Message
- Browse All Posts (11,422)
- Block
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 20
- Blank Slate
At 2/24/07 09:13 PM, muffinlord1 wrote: The U.S would never come close to China and vice versa. Economically the U.S relys on China and if China goes the U.S might collapse or have a good series of revolts.
Actually, China is more reliant on the US than the US is on China. I'm sick of hearing that crap, I'm sure you just heard some big number that represented the amount of money worth of goods the US gets from China, but you probably were never given context to understand the actual issue.
The US does get very large amount of products from China, but this is just because the US is huge and consumes alot. Meanwhile, the portion of our economy that depends on China in absolute terms is small compared to both our domestic economy and our trade relationship with other nations.
Almost all of China's economy revolves directly or indirectly around the US. They need America's permission to access stock markets, banking systems, and trade organizations that pretty much are all controlled by the US.
Meanwhile, in actual terms, Canada and Mexico individually are both more important to the US economically than China is.
Right now, in the current scheme of things, if the US wanted to, it could completely destroy China economically (and militarily I must add). China could hurt the US in the process, but the US would survive, and China would collapse.
Yay, Obama won. Let's thank his supporters:
-The compliant mainstream media for their pro-Obama propaganda.
-Black Panthers for their intimidation of voters.
- yeahha
-
yeahha
- Member since: Sep. 22, 2004
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Supporter
- Level 55
- Movie Buff
well america could not take vietnam so why the hell would they win over china? + china has allso vietnam, laos and north korea on there side ... and... why the hell must usa allways take a part of any war today? they are allways helping someone even if its nothing about them at all


