Israel wants to nuke Iran

[LilDwarf]

Oh boy :P

I wonder if they really did that :P This may be the start of something big :O

[Brownie210]

Israeli nukes, eh? Who saw that?

I guess the Jericho Sanction does exist.

I wonder if the Samson Sanction does too....

[qygibo]

I never got the point of calling them "secret plans". They're not that secret if other people know about them.

[Tancrisism]

I do sincerely hope this is not carried out.

[SolInvictus]

now that the media got this you know this isn't going to happen.

and i'm sure Israel isn't happy about that

[SyntheticTacos]

It doesn't say when or if it actually will be carried out. If not, then I don't see anything wrong with having plans in case military action is necessary. From what I can see it appears this is only a hypothetical plan.
Now you might say that it's unlikely that Iran would use nuclear weapons, but think of who they might give them to. =\

[Memorize]

At 1/6/07 11:02 PM, LilDwarf wrote: Israel wants to nuke Iran

C'mon... you know want to.

*tune* You know you want to, press the button. So they can go boom, go boom!

[cellardoor6]

At 1/6/07 11:02 PM, LilDwarf wrote: Oh boy :P

I wonder if they really did that :P This may be the start of something big :O

Um they only drew up plans to use Nuclear weapons so that they can be prepared if they ever need to do this in the future if the situation becomes dire. Every country with a credible military does the same thing.

Did you know that the France has plans drawn up to invade Canada? Does this mean they are scheming and desire to do so? No.

That shows how irrelevant and meaningless it is if countries just make sure they are prepared for any possible turn in events.

In fact, NATO has plans already set to defend/attack/nuke every scare mile in the entire world just in case it ever needs to be done for self preservation.

That article means nothing, its just an example of out of context emotional reporting to stir the pot for better ratings.

[Der-Ubermensch]

"The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb."

Boo hoo.

[Dr-Colossus]

That's not a lot of nuke.

Still quite a bit though, but it's lacking. And if they do nuke them, then they'll probably get a fist-full of much more powerful nukes from NATO.

Not like that's going to happen of course...

[Kalle-R]

This is probably one of the most ridiculously provocative topic titles I've seen in a while.

[TwO-FaCeD-PaRaNoID]

I hope they will carry it out, finally some real action, i'm getting bored of car bombs in Iraq.

[Begoner]

Maybe the US should carry out a preemptive strike against the rogue nation which illegally possesses and is threatening to use nuclear weapons. They seem so adept at those kinds of attacks.

[Arktaran]

At 1/7/07 09:51 AM, MickTheChampion wrote: Make no mistake about it: Israel has nukes, the support of this World's modern Super-power and the fourth most powerful military on Earth.

If anything, these so-called hostile states around Israel are in much more danger than Israel itself.

Israel can defend itself perfectly fine, but they talk a lot of shit, as well. The Arabs do not like them whatsoever, but not all of them are constantly banging on Israel's door with a IED to blow up more civilians.

The country talks big, and continues to do so because, no matter how wrong they are in certain stances, the US backs up Israel. It's the big brother effect, and if you mess with the little brother, US is gonna sanction you or whatnot. I think if Israel was totally on it's own, it wouldn't be as aggressive as it is. And they wouldn't have so many nukes. :P

[reviewer-general]

At 1/6/07 11:53 PM, qygibo wrote: I never got the point of calling them "secret plans". They're not that secret if other people know about them.

OMG!!! Iran will never figure out whats gonna happen!

[Bolo]

I can't say I completely agree that a pre-emptive strike is the ethical course of action for Israel to take.

[reviewer-general]

When has Israel ever been worried aboutethics?

[Sigma-Lambda]

A nuclear attack, no matter how small, can seriously destabilize the region. They are provoking a conflict with Iran, I can see the Iranian government declaring it an act of war. This is in no way a smart thing to do.

[Sigma-Lambda]

At 1/7/07 08:46 AM, TwO-FaCeD-PaRaNoID wrote: I hope they will carry it out, finally some real action, i'm getting bored of car bombs in Iraq.

If you are prepared to welcome war because the death of people through car bombs is getting boring, you really need to get some help. You wouldn't dare say you were getting bored with car bombings in the U.S., would you? Would your opinions change if the victims were from the U.S.? I don't want to sound like I'm intentionally overreacting, but that really does sicken me. Have you no sense of humanity?

[Tomsan]

The israeli gov has said that this new bulletin isnt true

[Jose]

I love how every story that has to do with Israel includes the Holocaust in it. Emotional images and text do not sway me, they just bother me. I'd love for the US to pull it's support from Israel, and see how fucking tough they talk without our support.

[reviewer-general]

At 1/7/07 05:04 PM, Jose wrote: I'd love for the US to pull it's support from Israel, and see how fucking tough they talk without our support.

Exactly how I feel . . . here

[troubles1]

At 1/7/07 12:09 PM, Begoner wrote: Maybe the US should carry out a preemptive strike against the rogue nation which illegally possesses and is threatening to use nuclear weapons. They seem so adept at those kinds of attacks.

You have no idea what you are talking about as usual.

as far as the topic goes having a plan drawn up for a possible tactical objective is not the same thing as giving the go ahead. they are just saying they are ready to defend themselves if necessary. We the US have all sorts of what if scenarios always thinking ahead, because being better prepared then your enemy will usually ensure your survival.

[RacistBassist]

Oh shit here we go