Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 12/20/06 09:00 PM, TommyGun wrote: I believe god just needs to work on his chemistry homework.

I do not think Chemistry is the subject matter, your argument concerns. It's more Geology based.

Otherwise, it's fair to ascertain what you wish, I believe the story non the less.

At 12/20/06 09:36 PM, Funkybob2 wrote:

At 12/20/06 09:21 PM, OrdinaryFreak wrote:

After the flood, God promised Noah that never again would there be an endless flood, and that he won't cause an entire massacre of the human race.

He said he wouldn't use a flood to exterminate mankind. He still has the option of Meteorite, fire, hurricanes...endless apocalyptic choices for the almighty.

He in fact at that moment created chemistry, ensuring that another worldwide flood would be imposible.

At 12/20/06 09:39 PM, TommyGun wrote:

He in fact at that moment created chemistry, ensuring that another worldwide flood would be imposible.

Doesn't that contradict everything you just said about the Noah's Arc story?

At 12/20/06 09:44 PM, Funkybob2 wrote:

At 12/20/06 09:39 PM, TommyGun wrote:

He in fact at that moment created chemistry, ensuring that another worldwide flood would be imposible.

Doesn't that contradict everything you just said about the Noah's Arc story?

Contradiction didn't exist till god inventd it in 2032 so i'm in the clear for now

But there was a great flood that covered Irag, and all the other middle eastern countries. It was unlikely to cover the entire earth.

At 12/20/06 09:01 PM, BigLundi wrote: Anyway, the whole point of a bible story isn't to strengthen your faith in god, but to teach a lesson.

^ what he said

At 12/20/06 09:48 PM, Some-Stupid-Idiot wrote: But there was a great flood that covered Irag, and all the other middle eastern countries. It was unlikely to cover the entire earth.

Well then God is pretty pathetic then, lying saying he drowned the whole earth whilst actually just isolating it whilst people in Asia and Africa sat back and relaxed.

Hey! Let me believe in what I believe in and f*** off.

HEATHEN!!!!!

i am so gunna get flamed for this.

1.) We have scientific evidence of a worldwide flood.

2.) Noah's Arc didn't happen 12,000 years ago, no one thinks that. As a matter of fact, some date it back to less than 6,000 years ago, you're an uninformed idiot.

oh i get it so with katrina, global warming, and the tsunami, he used the loophole of entire massacre of human race to justify it. I see...

At 12/20/06 10:01 PM, Dre-Man wrote: 1.) We have scientific evidence of a worldwide flood.

Never lie. I will find and hurt you

2.) Noah's Arc didn't happen 12,000 years ago, no one thinks that. As a matter of fact, some date it back to less than 6,000 years ago, you're an uninformed idiot.

It'll be impossible you idiot, A worldwide flood would lead to an Ice age. The only time the entire earth was pure water was before the continents had actually risen. And last time there was an ice age was like 12,000 years ago or so.

At 12/20/06 10:04 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:01 PM, Dre-Man wrote: 1.) We have scientific evidence of a worldwide flood.

Never lie. I will find and hurt you

I wasn't lying... Explain why continental and ocean floor sedimentary rocks are exactly the same. Okay then.

2.) Noah's Arc didn't happen 12,000 years ago, no one thinks that. As a matter of fact, some date it back to less than 6,000 years ago, you're an uninformed idiot.

It'll be impossible you idiot, A worldwide flood would lead to an Ice age. The only time the entire earth was pure water was before the continents had actually risen. And last time there was an ice age was like 12,000 years ago or so.

A worldwide flood wouldn't cause an ice age, unless there was a significant drop in temperature whilst the flood was occuring. And the last Ice Age was far before the flood ever happened.

Why do only like three people know that it's spelled Ark?

An arc is part of a circle. An ark is a huge chest, most notably Noah's Ark and the Ark of the Covenant.

Yes, spelling does matter.

At 12/20/06 10:07 PM, Maus wrote: Why do only like three people know that it's spelled Ark?

Why are you the only one who cares?

An arc is part of a circle. An ark is a huge chest, most notably Noah's Ark and the Ark of the Covenant.

Yes, spelling does matter.

At 12/20/06 10:07 PM, Dre-Man wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:04 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:01 PM, Dre-Man wrote: 1.

A worldwide flood wouldn't cause an ice age, unless there was a significant drop in temperature whilst the flood was occuring. And the last Ice Age was far before the flood ever happened.

AHAHHAHAHAHAHA

Oh sorry, it seems like you have absolutely NO IDEA HOW AN ICE AGE happens.

The Earth undergoes an eternal process, as the Ice Caps recedes, so water level rises. After the water level has risen to a significant level above what we call sea level, due to atmospheric pressure (or lack of) water boils at lower temperature. because of excess water and water evaporates quicker and easier, we get excess clouds. Because we have excess clouds the earth is blanketed. Because the earth is blanketed heat can't penertrate effectively, causing temperature to drop. and because of that effect, the ice caps will rapidly expand, taking 3/4's of the earth's surface. Then the cloud's will eventually disperse, and since the world's evaporative water supply is mostly covered, clouds become less common. And such, the ice caps begin to reced again.

Irony is, Global "warming" will eventually cause and ice age.

At 12/20/06 10:12 PM, Dre-Man wrote: Why are you the only one who cares?

Because spelling it 'arc' makes you look like a pack of dummies, that's why.

At 12/20/06 10:18 PM, Maus wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:12 PM, Dre-Man wrote: Why are you the only one who cares?

Because spelling it 'arc' makes you look like a pack of dummies, that's why.

Since it was originally written in Ancient hebrew, who really cares?

God doesnt fail to chemistry!! CHem fails to God!!

At 12/20/06 10:18 PM, TommyGun wrote: A whole bunch of scientific shit that amounted to apsolutely nothing.

That's still way off topic, and you still have no way of telling me that we don't have evidence of a worldwide flood.

At 12/20/06 10:28 PM, Dre-Man wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:18 PM, TommyGun wrote: A whole bunch of scientific shit that amounted to apsolutely nothing.

That's still way off topic, and you still have no way of telling me that we don't have evidence of a worldwide flood.

It did. It states that before the water levels get anywhere near Worldwide flood levels and Ice Age occurs.

A WATERWORLD LIKE PLACE IS IMPOSSIBLE, MORON!

At 12/20/06 10:21 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:18 PM, Maus wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:12 PM, Dre-Man wrote: Why are you the only one who cares?

Because spelling it 'arc' makes you look like a pack of dummies, that's why.

Since it was originally written in Ancient hebrew, who really cares?

Since you're typing in American English, it'd do you well to be able to spell the things you debate about. It's really obvious you've done hardly any research, because reading even a little bit about it, or even just the Bible story itself would clue you in to the fact that it's spelled Ark.

Unless you count research as watching tv programs.

I dunno, I'm cranky right now, but it's irritating to watch a bunch of people argue about something they've never read about.

You go ahead and keep thinking that buddy :)

At 12/20/06 10:35 PM, Maus wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:21 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:18 PM, Maus wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:12 PM, Dre-Man wrote:

Maku

Why does it really matter that i misspelt it Ark? It would be more intelligent if we debated the subject matter, no the fact i mispelt a word.

And a galactic overlord placing thetans around a volcano is a more logical?

At 12/20/06 08:59 PM, Pinball-Wizard wrote: Typical Athiest thread.

But hes right

At 12/20/06 10:40 PM, Jose wrote: And a galactic overlord placing thetans around a volcano is a more logical?

Hey this isn't a religion bashing thread, this is one of science and logic. So can't conclusively disprove Scientology. You can with Noah's Ark.

At 12/20/06 10:51 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:40 PM, Jose wrote: And a galactic overlord placing thetans around a volcano is a more logical?

Hey this isn't a religion bashing thread, this is one of science and logic. So can't conclusively disprove Scientology. You can with Noah's Ark.

You're using science and logic to bash religion.

Don't you think an omnipotent god could work around physics and geology?

You point out flaws in other's beliefs, yet do not address those flaws in your own beliefs.

Kind of makes you a hypocrit, doesn't it?

At 12/20/06 10:56 PM, Jose wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:51 PM, TommyGun wrote:

At 12/20/06 10:40 PM, Jose wrote: And a galactic overlord placing thetans around a volcano is a more logical?

Hey this isn't a religion bashing thread, this is one of science and logic. So can't conclusively disprove Scientology. You can with Noah's Ark.

Maku

Actually, my religion believes in the same god as you.
Shcoker isn't it?

At 12/20/06 11:17 PM, Xtesh wrote:

Yeah, the majority of us already know that religion is bullshit anyway

90% of people disagree with you. and 30% believe in that part of the bible.

Over 90% of the entire world confesses to believe in some kind of deity, and over 80% of people in america are Christians, so basically your entire argument just got pwned there by solid facts.