At 4/4/03 05:55 PM, Jiperly wrote:
uhhhh....no the war doesn't have a decent reason
1.They could go after diplomatic solutions to get Saddam out, but instead they rushed it
True, I mean that was the most progress we ever got from him but we wouldnt have got that if we werent shipping the troops in, It was going to end in this anyways.
2.Saddam has been in power for over 30 years, and for over 25 years of that he received support from the US- why now?
He's been in power for 24 years, he became president in 1979. I dont know where you got this from we havent supported them for 14 years.
3. Who are we to judge the citizens and determine that they are will to die for this war? over 600 civilians have had the privlage to die in this war, regardless of how they feel about Saddam.
600 civilians is barely anything, thats .3 civilians per bomb. And Saddam was forcing civilians to die, the same with the troops, thats why he brought out the fedayeen which are not trained for high tech combat all they can do is jump out of holes and wrestle you.
4. Is that what Bush is talking about now? funny....at the beginning it was WMD...then he couldn't prove that, so he moved right along to terrorism.....had no evidence of that either, so he went for the jugular and used the American peoples hatred for Saddam and used it as an excuse.
You dont honestly think Saddam doesnt have weapons of mass destruction? Jiperly your smarter than that...
Killing over 600(and more to come) to stop one bad man?o ya....thats a war full of morals there....
Saddam killed 2 million of his own people in 14 years (he wasnt crazy in the begining he was actually a very good president). 600 is nothing to what he did to his citizens DURING this war.