Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

At 11/25/06 01:56 AM, Demosthenez wrote: As a note, if you ever served in the military I would hate to serve under you.

but if ever you organise a bayonnet charge call me cause i'm fucking in.

At 11/25/06 01:56 AM, Demosthenez wrote:

At 11/25/06 01:10 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: How many times have we heard pathetic Canadians with inferiority complexes make up bullshit claims about the US and glorified lies about their own country to salvage their weak Canadian pride?

As a recent topic title of flis fits this situation so well, so said the pot to the kettle.

As a note, if you ever served in the military I would hate to serve under you. You are chickenshit. I have a damn healthy ego and for damn sure I am always right, but you take it to a whole new level.

Make sure you keep that military science degree in the private sector and out of the government. It is Napoleon Jr.'s like you in civilian drab who have fucked our situation royally in Iraq.

Are you aware that you didn't argue any of my points, all you did was devote an entire post to attacking me personally.

Good job, you pretty much validated what I said.

At 11/25/06 01:10 AM, cellardoor6 wrote:

At 11/24/06 08:57 AM, bcdemon wrote:

At 11/24/06 02:15 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: I think you and other Canadians are going to far when you make up bullcrap about a war and make the false claim.....

Considering your track record on false claims, you know, the "Canada supplied Saddam with WMD" and "500 binary sarin shells in Iraq", you have no right to bitch. Besides, when asked to prove your claims you ran.

Hypocrite.

Now you're being a fucking liar. I proved that Canada supplied Saddam Hussein with WMD because Canada is a member of NATO and NATO unanimously agreed to assist Saddam Hussein, Canada provided precursor chemicals for Iraqs WMD program. If you deny that, then you're obviously a fucking imbecile.

You gave a Wikipedia link. Nowhere on that page did it say what Canada gave to Iraq during that time, it did say that "Germany also supplied reactors, heat exchangers, condensors and vessels. France, Austria, Canada, and Spain provided similar equipment." Similar equipment could mean dual-use items aswell. All I wanted was credible source of what Canada supplied. But you quote Wikipedia like it is the absolute fact, ever look at a Wikipedia Talk Page. It's a page full of people arguing over what should be on the page and what should not be on the page. You can't prove what Canada sent to Iraq in the 70s and 80s so therefor making the statement that "YOUR OWN COUNTRY gave Saddam Hussein WMD assistance" is false, until proven otherwise.

And I gave a source proving the WMD found in Iraq were Sarin gas warheads with binary activation. But since you're such a fucking delusional moron... go herehere and here and read the sources.

Actually you didn't. You made the statement "but the warheads that use Sarin gas that we found in Iraq have a binary agent mixer", then I asked twice on that same page for a link to that information, you failed to give one.
Holy doodle, is that "Brain Shaving" link ever bias lmao. It doesn't say anything pertaining to your claim. It talks about unity sarin munitions short life span and that Iraq was "storing the precursors separately to eliminate the degradation problem". Storing the precursors separately doesn't sound anything like a 'binary munition device'. And then your source says "So we can presume that hidden Iraqi Sarin munitions would exist in binary form". Presume? Shit, you invaded Iraq on a presumption. Presumptions are not facts, sorry.
Now, your second post here mentions the word "binary" once, and it refers to the one single binary type sarin munition that i had already mentioned on 11/21/06 "I have only read about one binary sarin shell, that was used as an IED back in March 04."

You have amazingly failed (with 3 different links) to prove that the over 500 Sarin shells found in Iraq are of the binary type. Again, presumptions are not facts.

I don't make false claims, you just go to great lengths to deny reality when I prove something. Just like how you still denied it when i PROVED that Calgary is officially considered Canada's oil capitol by providing an official government website as a source. Then you just cried and ran away.

Actually I did not run away, I posted a response saying how you finally found some quality links to say Calgary is the oil capital, it was right below your link actually, how did you miss it?

So a dipshit like you cannot credibly determine reality in the first place, so anything you say means nothing.

Run Forrest RUUUUUUUUUN!

Syrup, Hockey, and a Universal Health Care System.
Oil from Iraq and all these things from Canada!
I really don't see a problem with takin' over the maple
leafers. Canadians' are really nice people they might
just let us have the country, especially if we give them
some American dollars... hear that Canadians...
mmmmm...... American dollars......

At 11/25/06 03:07 AM, ploik wrote: Syrup, Hockey, and a Universal Health Care System.
Oil from Iraq and all these things from Canada!
I really don't see a problem with takin' over the maple
leafers. Canadians' are really nice people they might
just let us have the country, especially if we give them
some American dollars... hear that Canadians...
mmmmm...... American dollars......

Oil from Iraq? LMAO, you get diddly from Iraq compared to Canada you ungrateful, american... And to be honest, my dollar gets me a dollars worth of stuff, yours gets me $1.13 worth of stuff. I would rather lose 13 cents on the dollar than be called an American.

Your right. I bow down to your correctness.
The Iraq war is estimated to pump near a
trillion dollars into the economy courtesy
of the World Bank (good luck getting that
back), this measly sum is no match for the
mighty Canadian Economic Machine a?

At 11/25/06 02:29 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: Are you aware that you didn't argue any of my points, all you did was devote an entire post to attacking me personally.

Good job, you pretty much validated what I said.

I dont care what you are saying, you are chickenshit. I dont need to get in a dick measuring contest of guys from different countries who have been dead for over a century. I am concerned with now, the fuck do I care who fought who 200 years ago. Canada and America are friends now so that war back then is moot, it has no reprecussions to this day that I can begin to be aware of.

This is a dick measuring contest. Nothing more. And I got my own dick, I dont need to substitute some dudes dick from 200 years ago for my own.

Sorry for double post.

At 11/25/06 03:25 AM, bcdemon wrote: I would rather lose 13 cents on the dollar than be called an American.

Come on man. Gimme a break. You shouldnt knock Americans for their nationalism and pride when you are just as bad.

This is FAB by the way.

Why would america want to attack canada in the first place???

You know absolutely nothing. First off how are we still part of Britian when we ahve our own constitution, we pass our own laws, dont pay taxes to the British. We are an indepedent coutnry. I woudl like to hear your reasoning of why we are still part of Britian.

Second you state hwo it was so much different the Americas in the war of Independence, that theyw ere Americas becuase thye werent British.. Again, your arguement that Canada didnt exsist so they werent Canadians. Under this arguement it was the Germans and Dutch who fough the British, stil not Americas as America did not exsist. And Upper Canada at the time of the War of 1812 had a huge immigrant population, of Americans.

As for torching our capital city, York was only a provincial capital, the capital of Canada at teh time was Kingston.

I would give you my source for the number of troops who were Canadian but unfortuinatly I cannot refrence a book as easily as a website.

At 11/25/06 05:01 AM, Demosthenez wrote: Sorry for double post.

At 11/25/06 03:25 AM, bcdemon wrote: I would rather lose 13 cents on the dollar than be called an American.

Come on man. Gimme a break. You shouldnt knock Americans for their nationalism and pride when you are just as bad.

This is FAB by the way.

Howdy Fabo, I am not knocking Americans for their nationalism and pride. But would you take 13 cents on every dollar if it meant USA became a part of Canada and you becoming a Canadian? Most likely not, that's what I was getting at.

At 11/25/06 03:25 AM, bcdemon wrote: I would rather lose 13 cents on the dollar than be called an American.

Ha, I knew this kid was anti-American. I'm just glad he isn't such a pussy and shows his true colors.

We should attack just because they're there?

At 11/25/06 03:55 PM, Dante-Son-Of-Sparda wrote: great another thread posted mindlessly by the Pre-pubecient users and flooding the BBS with mindless spam. Wade has to make a rule about 13 year olds posting in Politics Christ its becoming unbearable.

French-canadian war
Quiet Revolution (the making Quebec I believe I cant remeber)
Second Boer War
Korean War
First Gulf War
the first World War (WWI)
the Second World War (WWII)
int the WW wars canda didnt play as much help as they should have but Participated

they were there and if you dont believe me go to Wikipedia

Canada participated hugely in the world wars. In the first world war, Canada did more than america. In the Second world war america did much more, howether compared to the size of the country canada put more in.

In the Second world war
America's population decreased by 0.32%
Canada's popultaion decreased by 0.53%
Britains Population decreased by 1.23%

So you can't say canada didn't put as much as they could into the world wars because they put huge amounts.

At 11/25/06 08:59 AM, bcdemon wrote: Howdy Fabo, I am not knocking Americans for their nationalism and pride. But would you take 13 cents on every dollar if it meant USA became a part of Canada and you becoming a Canadian? Most likely not, that's what I was getting at.

Fair enough, I see what you are getting at. Sovreignity is not worth the 13 cents, you're right.

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack just because there their and also the only war i can think of that had canadins was the french-canadian war and it didn't even have canadians.

You forgot both World Wars and the ongoing war in Afghanistan. Either this topic was made sarcastically or you're a dumbass.

At 11/24/06 12:16 PM, GSioufi wrote: Yes I like that thanks for posting this.

And you, the topic starter, how can you even think about attacking Canada in any way? At least we can be proud of ourselves thatwe only accomplished our goals through diplomacy.

its not topic starter its gostgamer

At 11/25/06 06:59 AM, cold-as-hell wrote: Why would america want to attack canada in the first place???

becase thier there

At 11/25/06 08:12 PM, gostgamer wrote:

At 11/25/06 06:59 AM, cold-as-hell wrote: Why would america want to attack canada in the first place???

becase thier there

Sure, attack a contry because they're there. That's logical...

Bad tacticle move. Where do you think you get your oil and water, not Iraq, that's for sure. Plus, where do you get the Idea Canada wasn't in any wars, were fight YOUR war on terror in Afganistan.

Your probably some stupid kid who thinks war is fun.

At 11/26/06 01:07 PM, FlashFilter wrote:

At 11/25/06 08:12 PM, gostgamer wrote:

At 11/25/06 06:59 AM, cold-as-hell wrote: Why would america want to attack canada in the first place???

becase thier there

Sure, attack a contry because they're there. That's logical...

You do realize he was being facetious when he said "Because they're there?"

Considering he started the topic, I doubt it.

Lets attack kettering

At 11/24/06 12:26 AM, JoS wrote: We beat your ass in 1812 and we will whoop you again.

I see Celladoor has taken the bait......

Come on JoS, I expected something a little sneakier. I mean, a phrase like that is like shooting fish in a barrel......

No offense, but the most your troops are doing in Afghanistan, is serving our troops lunch.
When was the last time you heard of canadian casualties?? Ive heard of american, Iraqi, English, and even Italian and japanese, but not one canadian.

Well thats beacause there haven't been any in the last few months, but apperantly september was the worst month. Either way Canada is leading the operation in Afganistan, not the US. We have more troops in aganistan the any other contry (expept for maybe afganistan itself). As for Iraq, that's another story...

At 11/26/06 05:14 PM, Mercator wrote: No offense, but the most your troops are doing in Afghanistan, is serving our troops lunch.
When was the last time you heard of canadian casualties?? Ive heard of american, Iraqi, English, and even Italian and japanese, but not one canadian.

You have got to be kidding me. We took over your sectors when you pulle dout to go to Afganistan. we have deaths on a near weekly basis.

Death tols for Canada. Last month you killed 1 and wounded 30 mroe when a coupel of AC-Thunderbolts straffed us. Another 4 were kileld near the begingin when you pilots dropepd a 500lb bomb on us during a training exercise.

Lol, in my school we were told it was the British who burnt the White House and not the canadians. The same is concluded on the history channel.

Yup. Good job on the mop up duty! After all, we only went in there in the first place and left you the table scraps to clean up!

I hardly call fighting a bunch of rogues a war. Reconstruction and maintaning peace is far more important (and harder to do). Somthing wich you are far to lazy to do.

GO US! Always using our insight for tomorrow's problems. Of course, I bet that the canadians werent told due to their lousy communications operations. If they had been, its likely that their fat ass canadian bacon officers didnt do jack shit about it. Plz lemme know when you go to war k?

You go drop on bomb, then plam in on us? Maybe your pilots need more trainning?

Maybe your officers need more training on disbatching orders??

What orders, do you mean the "go stand over there so you can get bombed by an imcompitant pilot" It's not our fault it's the stupid pilot was triger happy.

Either way this topic is just going to lead to a flame war...