Attack Canada

[gostgamer]

we should just acttack just because there their and also the only war i can think of that had canadins was the french-canadian war and it didn't even have canadians.

[Arkatsson]

We share an undefended border with them. I think the French Prime Minister will call Bush up and start cursing at him if he takes out an ALLY. Lets just focus on keeping the Islamic extremism under control (by under control I mean not overrunning the world). Or keep an eye on Mr.Jong over in North Korea.

[Draconias]

But we like Canada.

If anything, we should attack southward and conquer everything from Mexico to Panama, then kick out everyone and send them as refugees to South America, then build heavy defenses at the thinnest part of Panama.

That way we shrink the border, solve the illegal immigration problem, and don't get a craphole country to burden us.

[bcdemon]

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack just because there their and also the only war i can think of that had canadins was the french-canadian war and it didn't even have canadians.

This is why you shouldn't think. We were in both world wars, you know, World War 1, and World War 2. We were in the first Gulf War and the Korean War. We have fought many times, hell were even fighting the "war on terror" in Afghanistan. I say again, don't think, read.

[Locusts]

So we should just attack canada because they have been in very little wars?

wow....

[JoS]

We beat your ass in 1812 and we will whoop you again.

[Steel-Reserve]

Canada has mounties, and mooses, and some flash artist they call poxpower, and many other awe-inspiring things.

[JakeHero]

At 11/24/06 12:26 AM, JoS wrote: We beat your ass in 1812 and we will whoop you again.

More like Britain beat our ass in 1812(which we kicked even harder layer into the war) Canada was just piggy-backing England's glory.

[JoS]

At 11/24/06 12:32 AM, BanditByte wrote:

At 11/24/06 12:26 AM, JoS wrote: We beat your ass in 1812 and we will whoop you again.

More like Britain beat our ass in 1812(which we kicked even harder layer into the war) Canada was just piggy-backing England's glory.

No you got your ass handed to you by Canadian militias and bands of natives. There were only a handful of British troops in Canada, who were nto trained or equiped for fighting in the forests of canada, but the open fields of Europe. It was the Canadian militias (farmers, lumberjacks and ordinary people, not professional soliders) and the natives who won the war. We burned down the bloody White House.

[SephirothFreidel677]

Why should we attack Canada? IT would have resounding effects around the world. America would tryly live up to the false conception that we are bullies. Besides, CAnada is actually an Ally to the United States.

[cellardoor6]

At 11/24/06 01:03 AM, JoS wrote:

At 11/24/06 12:32 AM, BanditByte wrote:

At 11/24/06 12:26 AM, JoS wrote: We beat your ass in 1812 and we will whoop you again.

More like Britain beat our ass in 1812(which we kicked even harder layer into the war) Canada was just piggy-backing England's glory.

No you got your ass handed to you by Canadian militias and bands of natives. There were only a handful of British troops in Canada, who were nto trained or equiped for fighting in the forests of canada, but the open fields of Europe. It was the Canadian militias (farmers, lumberjacks and ordinary people, not professional soliders) and the natives who won the war. We burned down the bloody White House.

You'd don't know what the fuck you're talking about. There was no such thing as "Canadians" back then anyway, they were only British colonists. The MAJORITY of people who fought on the "Canadian" side were Britain-born British troops. There was only a small amount of civilian militias who fought on the "Canadian side".

Read a fucking history book, or learn not to lie so blatantly.

We burned down the bloody White House.

Um it was British soldiers who caught the White House on fire, and they didn't even burn it down. Besides, we burned your ENTIRE fucking Capital at York (which is now Toronto). Funny how you completely ignore all the inconvenient facts in order to serve your pathetic Canadian fantasy.

Silly misinformed little Canadians. You pretend that your country is innocent of killing Native Americans because you were only part of Britain then. Yet you take credit for something that British soldiers did when it serves your ego? How pathetic can you possibly get?

Get a clue you delusional Canadian dipshit.

[JoS]

At 11/24/06 01:20 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: You'd don't know what the fuck you're talking about. There was no such thing as "Canadians" back then anyway, they were only British colonists. The MAJORITY of people who fought on the "Canadian" side were Britain-born British troops. There was only a small amount of civilian militias who fought on the "Canadian side".

No the majority of the troops were Provincial troops, not British troops. Meaning they were Canadian born and in Canadian units that reported to the British. They didnt wear Red Coats, they wore their gunits colours, and were often made by the wives of the men in the unit. They were not British regulars. The British regulars were figthing with Napolean and shit aroudn this time I do believe.

Read a fucking history book, or learn not to lie so blatantly.

We burned down the bloody White House.

Um it was British soldiers who caught the White House on fire, and they didn't even burn it down. Besides, we burned your ENTIRE fucking Capital at York (which is now Toronto). Funny how you completely ignore all the inconvenient facts in order to serve your pathetic Canadian fantasy.

No you shelled York and hit the munitions silo. YOu didnt march through the streets of York with torches in hand, you fired from the lake with cannons.

Silly misinformed little Canadians. You pretend that your country is innocent of killing Native Americans because you were only part of Britain then. Yet you take credit for something that British soldiers did when it serves your ego? How pathetic can you possibly get?

I never said ANYTHING about being innocent of killing natives. We did horrible things to them, South Africa based their aparthied system on our reservation system for the natives. We did awful stuff, but there is a reason they fought on our side in the War of 1812, because it was betetr than having to live with you guys.

Get a clue you delusional Canadian dipshit.

Now thats just going to far.

[cellardoor6]

At 11/24/06 01:31 AM, JoS wrote:

At 11/24/06 01:20 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: You'd don't know what the fuck you're talking about. There was no such thing as "Canadians" back then anyway, they were only British colonists. The MAJORITY of people who fought on the "Canadian" side were Britain-born British troops. There was only a small amount of civilian militias who fought on the "Canadian side".

No the majority of the troops were Provincial troops, not British troops. Meaning they were Canadian born and in Canadian units that reported to the British. They didnt wear Red Coats, they wore their gunits colours, and were often made by the wives of the men in the unit. They were not British regulars. The British regulars were figthing with Napolean and shit aroudn this time I do believe.

Um?

I'm gonna let you take a look at Wikipedia because you are so wrong its not even funny.

I will say this though, the British were focused on fighting the French when the War of 1812 started, but they still had significant forces in present day Canada. Many times more so than provincial and miltia forces. The British were the reason the US was repelled, Canadian provincial forces and militia only provided a miniscule strategic contribution.

The only successful battle fought by Canadian provincials without British support was at Chatueguay.

We burned down the bloody White House.

Um it was British soldiers who caught the White House on fire, and they didn't even burn it down. Besides, we burned your ENTIRE fucking Capital at York (which is now Toronto). Funny how you completely ignore all the inconvenient facts in order to serve your pathetic Canadian fantasy.

No you shelled York and hit the munitions silo. YOu didnt march through the streets of York with torches in hand, you fired from the lake with cannons.

Um WRONG. US naval forces started the Battle of York and defeated the garisson there. But then US militia and infantry took the docks, the parliament ( and burned it), and looted the shit out of york. (Canada/British forces surrendered).

Silly misinformed little Canadians. You pretend that your country is innocent of killing Native Americans because you were only part of Britain then. Yet you take credit for something that British soldiers did when it serves your ego? How pathetic can you possibly get?

I never said ANYTHING about being innocent of killing natives. We did horrible things to them, South Africa based their aparthied system on our reservation system for the natives. We did awful stuff, but there is a reason they fought on our side in the War of 1812, because it was betetr than having to live with you guys.

Well I have personally heard Canadians pretend that they are innocent of the deaths of Natives because they happened to be British subjects at the time. Then Canadians (you) take credit for a British victory against the US, having the best of both worlds so to speak.

We did awful stuff, but there is a reason they fought on our side in the War of 1812, because it was betetr than having to live with you guys.

What do you mean "they" fought on your side? Only a few Indian tribes did, its not like all the Natives had a single allegiance to Canada. They had hundreds if not thousands of different tribes.

Besides, there were Native Americans on the US side as well.

Get a clue you delusional Canadian dipshit.

Now thats just going to far.

I think you and other Canadians are going to far when you make up bullcrap about a war and make the false claim that "Wee (Canadians) kikt uR aSses and bUrnT Ur wHighT hoUsE, Durrr.."

[Abyss]

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack just because there their

I don't think you should attack a country just because they exsist, they did nothing wrong and therefore, leave them alone.

[Jaketheclonetrooper]

At 11/24/06 03:25 AM, Abyss wrote:

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack just because there their

I don't think you should attack a country just because they exsist, they did nothing wrong and therefore, leave them alone.

Tell that to Hitler and Bush.

[emmytee]

how about we just come over and whoop yo' ass again?

[bcdemon]

At 11/24/06 02:15 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: I think you and other Canadians are going to far when you make up bullcrap about a war and make the false claim.....

Considering your track record on false claims, you know, the "Canada supplied Saddam with WMD" and "500 binary sarin shells in Iraq", you have no right to bitch. Besides, when asked to prove your claims you ran.

Hypocrite.

[JoS]

Is this one better?

The number of British regulars was about 5000. They are the reason for victories like the Battle of Stoney Creek. And you are right there is no Canadians at the time, kind of like how there were no Americans fighting during the War of INdependence, just a bunch of pissed of British fighting the British.

And if I do recall correctly we (British forces assigned to Canada) actually got to New Orleans. We lost but we go tthat far.

In the end does it matter the nationality of the troops? The Canadian side of the battle won. Just because we were a British colony doesnt mean you attacked or were fighting the British solely. If you had atatcked Australia and lost would you claim the Australians beat you or the British still?

Does it hurt your ego that you lost to us when you had far superior numbers and your equipment was much better suited for warfare here than the British equipment (your weapons had longer barrels making them more accurate which was an advantage for fighting in wooded areas, British training was to stand in a line and just make a wall fo lead come, which worked great in open areas, but sucked in wooded areas, which most of Canada was.

Face it, you lost one of the wars youa ctually declared to a bunch of Canadian colonists and a handfull of Britih regulars. From what I have heard they dont even teach kids in the US about the War of 1812.

And how many times have I heard you (Americans) say "AmErIca is The GrEAtest CounTrY EvER, aNd EVerYOne is JeaLous oF Us."

[cold-as-hell]

I got a brilliant idea hows about America attack nobody. Its crazy idea but it just might work

[NeoNecronox]

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack just because there their and also the only war i can think of that had canadins was the french-canadian war and it didn't even have canadians.

So basically you're insisting that Canada should be attacked, on the grounds that the nation hasn't been involved in any recent wars? I'm guessing (hoping) you know that Canada's military has assisted virtually all recent battles or wars, even Vietnam. And, yes, Canada defeated the United States in 1812. America is not an undefeated nation.

It would be cool if Kim Jong Il were competent enough to nuke the United States. That way, imperialistic nations would be free to fight for colonies without the American's sticking their shit noses in.

[bcdemon]

Here is something sort of humorous.

An american girl, moves with her family (mom and dad too) to Canada, and marries a Canadian guy. The war breaks out, and because her [fathers] family is american, they have to house american soldiers. One night this girl (we will call her Laura) overhears the yankees talking about taking Beaver Dams. So she runs for 18 hours through swamp and summer heat to warn the British troops of an impending attack. The Brits, Canadians (yeah yeah, men that were born here as opposed to being shipped from Britain) and the natives make a stand and defeat the americans thus preventing the americans from gaining the entire Niagara region.

Laura, after the war, demanded money from the government for her services. She now has a chain of stores that sell awesome chocolate.

The humor you ask?

An american helped the British defend Canada against the Americans, and then wants money for her services. Laura Secord proves that americans, from the beginning of their time, will do ANYTHING for money.

[GSioufi]

Yes I like that thanks for posting this.

And you, the topic starter, how can you even think about attacking Canada in any way? At least we can be proud of ourselves thatwe only accomplished our goals through diplomacy.

[JakeHero]

At 11/24/06 08:59 AM, JoS wrote: And how many times have I heard you (Americans) say "AmErIca is The GrEAtest CounTrY EvER, aNd EVerYOne is JeaLous oF Us."

It's nnot really arrogance when it's 100% true. Besides, if you don't like the USA move to a planet we don't own.

[Snakemaster-13]

This thread is pointless. What would we achieve there. Although, I have read in the world book encyclopedia that Canada mines the most uranium.

Oh crap. did I say that out loud?

But seriously, a Canadian invasion is out of the question.

[SolInvictus]

At 11/24/06 12:31 AM, Steel-Reserve wrote: Canada has mounties, and mooses, and some flash artist they call poxpower, and many other awe-inspiring things.

you forgot about our infinite number of super-secret arctic bases. check and mate gringos.

[Dash-Underscore-Dash]

At 11/24/06 08:59 AM, JoS wrote: Face it, you lost one of the wars youa ctually declared to a bunch of Canadian colonists and a handfull of Britih regulars. From what I have heard they dont even teach kids in the US about the War of 1812.

And how many times have I heard you (Americans) say "AmErIca is The GrEAtest CounTrY EvER, aNd EVerYOne is JeaLous oF Us."

That's funny, seeing as how I just finished a test on the war of 1812 a week ago.

[Senatus]

At 11/23/06 10:42 PM, gostgamer wrote: we should just acttack

Sure, forget the years of good relations between our nations and all the conflicts we fought side by side together. Retard.

[Steel-Reserve]

At 11/24/06 08:32 PM, UnusQuoMeridianus wrote:
you forgot about our infinite number of super-secret arctic bases. check and mate gringos.

I can see I was referencing the very tip of the iceberg.

o_o

It certainly paves the way for a debate on the fate of draft-evading Americans seeking sanctuary in Canada. I mean, honestly, where would they go? They can't run away to Canada if Canada was at war with the Yankee Imperialists, and just suppose Mexico joined the fight.
Americans would have to escape to Europe, and Europeans hate Americans.

[cellardoor6]

At 11/24/06 08:57 AM, bcdemon wrote:

At 11/24/06 02:15 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: I think you and other Canadians are going to far when you make up bullcrap about a war and make the false claim.....

Considering your track record on false claims, you know, the "Canada supplied Saddam with WMD" and "500 binary sarin shells in Iraq", you have no right to bitch. Besides, when asked to prove your claims you ran.

Hypocrite.

Now you're being a fucking liar. I proved that Canada supplied Saddam Hussein with WMD because Canada is a member of NATO and NATO unanimously agreed to assist Saddam Hussein, Canada provided precursor chemicals for Iraqs WMD program. If you deny that, then you're obviously a fucking imbecile.

And I gave a source proving the WMD found in Iraq were Sarin gas warheads with binary activation. But since you're such a fucking delusional moron... go herehere and here and read the sources.

I don't make false claims, you just go to great lengths to deny reality when I prove something. Just like how you still denied it when i PROVED that Calgary is officially considered Canada's oil capitol by providing an official government website as a source. Then you just cried and ran away.

So a dipshit like you cannot credibly determine reality in the first place, so anything you say means nothing.

At 11/24/06 08:59 AM, JoS wrote: Is this one better?

The number of British regulars was about 5000.

Um Source? I know your wrong, very wrong. But I'm gonna entertain that lie a little.

They are the reason for victories like the Battle of Stoney Creek. And you are right there is no Canadians at the time, kind of like how there were no Americans fighting during the War of INdependence, just a bunch of pissed of British fighting the British.

Now you're being stupid. In the war of Independence there were Dutch, Spanish, French, German, and many other immigrants who were fighting as new American citizens. It was colonists, who declared independence from Britain and fought AGAINST them. The people who fought against the US in in 1812 were British citizens who were supported by the British crown.

Your analogy is ridiculous.

And if I do recall correctly we (British forces assigned to Canada) actually got to New Orleans. We lost but we go tthat far.

Um the British Navy was already in the Gulf of Mexico, its not like the British/Canadians fought all the way to New Orleans on the ground.

In the end does it matter the nationality of the troops? The Canadian side of the battle won. Just because we were a British colony doesnt mean you attacked or were fighting the British solely. If you had atatcked Australia and lost would you claim the Australians beat you or the British still?

Um you were just a part of Great Britain (you technically still are). The people who fought against Americans were British citizens with British weapons, in a country ran by British.

According to every account of this war in the world, the US fought against Great Britain, Canada as it is today didn't even exist.

Does it hurt your ego that you lost to us when you had far superior numbers and your equipment was much better suited for warfare

My country didn't lose to you, we lost to the British. Quit distorting reality to pretend otherwise. Besides, we had more militia, but our weapons were far inferior to the British. The British Empire had the most advanced weapons of the time, America had second-rate French and home made weapons.

Read a fucking book you imebile.

... here than the British equipment (your weapons had longer barrels making them more accurate which was an advantage for fighting in wooded areas,

That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You know absolutely nothing about military science and you have no honesty, you just proved that. Longer barrels would be far worse in wooded areas and would better in wide open, long range figthing. Now you're just pulling nonsense out of your ass to cover your tracks.

Its fun watching you squirm. You actually have to lie and make up crap to attempt to substantiate your pathetic Canadian fantasy.

British training was to stand in a line and just make a wall fo lead come, which worked great in open areas, but sucked in wooded areas, which most of Canada was.

Face it, you lost one of the wars youa ctually declared to a bunch of Canadian colonists and a handfull of Britih regulars.

You're so full of crap, why do you insist on lying like a disgruntled child? The US fought the British, Canada wasn't even a country, and the MAJORITY (as I proved before) of the people that fought on the British side were BRITISH regulars who were redcoats.

The only way you can possibly attempt to salvage your dignity is by making up bullshit. That shows how fragile your precious little Canadian ego is, you have to intentionally distort reality to hold on to your false notion that your pathetic country actually defeated the US.

You make me laugh.

From what I have heard they dont even teach kids in the US about the War of 1812.

That is a testament to how wrong everything you hear is. I learned about the War of 1812 all throughout school. And in my current Military Science class we learn about the individual engagements that took place during the war.

And how many times have I heard you (Americans) say "AmErIca is The GrEAtest CounTrY EvER, aNd EVerYOne is JeaLous oF Us."

How many times have we heard pathetic Canadians with inferiority complexes make up bullshit claims about the US and glorified lies about their own country to salvage their weak Canadian pride? Canadians can't even base their anti-US nonsense on facts, they have to lie through their teeth and fabricate stories in order to hide the facts.

[Demosthenez]

At 11/25/06 01:10 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: How many times have we heard pathetic Canadians with inferiority complexes make up bullshit claims about the US and glorified lies about their own country to salvage their weak Canadian pride?

As a recent topic title of flis fits this situation so well, so said the pot to the kettle.

As a note, if you ever served in the military I would hate to serve under you. You are chickenshit. I have a damn healthy ego and for damn sure I am always right, but you take it to a whole new level.

Make sure you keep that military science degree in the private sector and out of the government. It is Napoleon Jr.'s like you in civilian drab who have fucked our situation royally in Iraq.