Bush VS Osma ..

[zombieong]

Wot is the diffrent bout this 2 ppl ..... they are just a murderer .... they kill ppl because of their own purpose ... i just don't get it ... could u tell me

[NJDeadzone]

At 4/2/03 02:45 PM, zombieong wrote: Wot is the diffrent bout this 2 ppl ..... they are just a murderer .... they kill ppl because of their own purpose ... i just don't get it ... could u tell me

one stands for more tolerance and freedom than the other...guess who

[DarkCyrstal]

At 4/2/03 02:45 PM, zombieong wrote: Wot is the diffrent bout this 2 ppl ..... they are just a murderer .... they kill ppl because of their own purpose ... i just don't get it ... could u tell me

First, learn how to spell. Next, the difference is that Osama killed civilians at a time of peace. Bush is sending troops to attack, only if fired upon first. Look at the Olly Mosque. How many Muslims do you think were in that American regiment?

What's with the Osama post? I havn't heard about him for awhile. I am pretty sure he is dead. Same with Saddam. He is either very ill or decapitated.

[bumcheekcity]

the difference is that osama was provoked well before 9/11 whereas the iraquis have been doing nothing to the yanks so far.

[Kryogenik]

At 4/3/03 09:41 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote: Bush is sending troops to attack, only if fired upon first.

the words - What. The. Fuck!?

[DarkCyrstal]

At 4/3/03 11:15 AM, bazzo wrote:

At 4/3/03 09:41 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote: Bush is sending troops to attack, only if fired upon first.

the words - What. The. Fuck!?

It means, that so far, if the Enemy hasn't attacked our troops, we don't attack them. Well, if they have the white flag and all that crap. By the wa Bazzo, Plz change your Signiture pic. America is a country were you can say that and not get arrested. I say we move you to Singapore for awhile.

[Der-Ubermensch]

At 4/3/03 11:36 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote:

It means, that so far, if the Enemy hasn't attacked our troops, we don't attack them. Well, if they have the white flag and all that crap...

Sure, but if you're a woman or a child, prepare to get your brains blown out.

[BinLadenmustdie]

At 4/3/03 11:47 AM, Ruination wrote:

At 4/3/03 11:36 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote:

It means, that so far, if the Enemy hasn't attacked our troops, we don't attack them. Well, if they have the white flag and all that crap...

Sure, but if you're a woman or a child, prepare to get your brains blown out.

Possibly. But that would be because the Iraqi soldiers have been using women and children as human shields. That shows the cowardly heart of this regime in a nutshell.

[RoboTripper]

At 4/3/03 09:41 AM, DarkCyrstal wrote:

First, learn how to spell. Next, the difference is that Osama killed civilians at a time of peace.

A time of peace in your opinion, not in his.

Bush is sending troops to attack, only if fired upon first.

Ummmmmm... no. I really don't think that's how it's working over there. Also, it's not just the troops - we rain missiles and bombs on them day and night.

[Kryogenik]

bin laden wasnt really provoked directly, the US just did shit he doesnt like (ie supporting israel)

[panik]

dude your 13 shouldn't you be playing out side or something. How can you hate something you know nothing about and have never experianced, you'll learn little one, it really doesn't make you that cool to be controversal...oh wait....awwwwwwww thats so cute he's rebelling, how sweet. :::hands him a lollipop:::

[fourdaddy]

hey bazzo.....get bent

you dont have to like america or bush, but i think youre out of line.

why do you even care? bush isnt your leader. your sentiment resembles that of the taliban....he isnt telling you what to do, but hes in charge of lots of people who could kick your ass and hes doing something you dont approve of.

if hes not telling you personally what to do, why do you care?

being 13, i doubt you have enough knowledge to take an intelligent stand on this issue that is based on your own beliefs (as opposed to those of your parents or others you associate with)

i support bush fully and, if you dont, may you be the victim of saddams desperation attacks, which i assure you there will be

[DarkCyrstal]

At 4/3/03 01:29 PM, fourdaddy wrote: hey bazzo.....get bent

you dont have to like america or bush, but i think youre out of line.

why do you even care? bush isnt your leader. your sentiment resembles that of the taliban....he isnt telling you what to do, but hes in charge of lots of people who could kick your ass and hes doing something you dont approve of.

if hes not telling you personally what to do, why do you care?

being 13, i doubt you have enough knowledge to take an intelligent stand on this issue that is based on your own beliefs (as opposed to those of your parents or others you associate with)

i support bush fully and, if you dont, may you be the victim of saddams desperation attacks, which i assure you there will be

I really don't think bazoo is gonna be responding to that. He does though resemble the taliban. Though, i am sure he doesn't hate America. It's called being an Attention Whore. I think we should be banned, but that my oppinion. But if he is, i just did something i will regret. Taking away the HUGE tolerance of the BBS forums that i love a respect since it came out. I have been seeing the rates of bans go up lately, and i am just wondering what going on here?

[y13gregace]

well who the hell cares wut their doing in afganistan ......its such a waste of land ne way they dont even have any food its just dumb bush wins...............