Newgrounds.com — Everything, By Everyone.

Seriously, I'd love an answer.

Americans have sooo many freedoms that we tend to run out of ways of expressing them occasionally. Thus, we often contradict ourselves, and create double standards.

In short, Americans like to protest shit. Doesn't matter what, doesn't matter when, doesn't matter how, as long as it's agaisnt a government action.

America's NEW favorite pastime!!

I posted in the wrong topic.

I'm too upset tonight.

As long as I'm here, Saddam threw people in plastic shredders you assholes.

cheering for a mans death isn't right he didn't DO anything to america I see no point in celebrating what are we accomplishing ya we got the demon but did we catch the devil? no because idiots everywhere are cheering over catchin and killing the WRONG guy.

saddam's being hung. WTH!!! [what the heck] take him out, cap him, creamate him take ashes to lava pit and throw them in! hangings not enough

BUSH NOT FOR PREZ!!!

Y bother killing him when it will do no good.........
The hanging's probably in time for Bush's election....

At 11/7/06 01:38 AM, JoS wrote:

At 11/7/06 01:15 AM, cellardoor6 wrote: No they are just labeled that way by people whose only point of reference to judge FOX against is the monopoly of LIBERAL-owned News agencies such as CNN, MSN, ABC, CBS, NBC and so forth.

Actually Im from canada so I dont reeally watch any of those. I watch the CBC and the BBC.

CBC and BBC are even worse. Even American liberals acknowledge that CBC and BBC are indredibly liberally biased.

Of course FOX is considered to be biased when it is actually the only conservative-owned news organization in the mainstream, compared to the host of INCREDIBLY BIASED liberal news that people are used to and swallow as fact.

Use of capital letters does not make your arguement any better.

Since this BBS system has an inconvenient italics and bold letters system, I use capital letters as a way of emphasizing the idea. Deal with it.

Explain to me Glenn Beck getting a job on CNN. He is a very conservative person, but he gets a job on the "incredibly biased liberal news".

Explain to me Alan Colmes getting a job on FOX news. Alan Colmes is incredibly liberal. The thing is, FOX news has many shows in which 2 political opponents are allowed the same airtime. On CNN and certainly CBC and BBC, this almost never happens.

Liberal media is usually just a slanted, continuous monologue of information that isn't refuted by other other views, and isn't put into context. Name one show other than on FOX news where both a Liberal and a Conservative co-host a show. There used to be one on MSNBC but that is long gone.

FOX News is far more biased then any other news station. The fact it also trys to portray itslef as "fair and balanced" makes it even worse.

FOX news is only appears to be more biased because people are used to the mainstream liberal media that dominates.

However, FOX news is the only mainstream news channel that allows Democrats and Republicans to simultaneously have air time and argue their points. Therefore they have the right to claim fairness and balance, it may not be completely fair and balanced, but much more so than any other mainstream media outlet.

It's funny to single out Fox, meanwhile NBC, CNN, and ABC are all owned by DEMOCRATS. In fact, the owned of CNN, Ted Turner, was the single largest private donator to the Democratic party in 2004. Yet magically his bias and political favoring doesn't trickle down to the news that his tightly-controlled company spreads to the world?

You alos forgot to mention that Disneys Chairman (which owns ABC) is the former Senate Majority leader for the Dems up untill 1995, and was offered a job on the SC by Clinton.

I was unaware of that. But thank you, that fortifies my point.

ABC also fired Bill Myher for citizing President Bush on his show.

Bill Maher wasn't necessarily fired, but the contract for his show just wasn't renewed. Because besides having poor ratings, he made a bad remark about US troops. He wasn't fired for criticizing President Bush, thats ridiculous.

Bill Maher called the US military cowardly for "lobbing cruise missiles from 2000 miles away" and complimenting terrorists for being courageous by "staying in the plane while it hits the building". He insulted the US military and gave an on air compliment to terrorists, suggesting that terrorists were 'dumber' yet 'not as cowardly' as the US military.

He was fired because his ratings were shit and he made an innappropriate remark that the viewers themselves disapproved of.

So tell me how this bias bleeds intot he very fabric of the bias new on the left?

You made a pathetic analogy. If you think that Bill Maher was fired by ABC because he criticized Bush, then every other journalist in ABC would have been fired as well.

The bias of the liberal elites who control the mainstream news outlets does bleed down into the coverage of their shows. It's funny how shortly before the 04 elections, the only show that aired the video tape of Osama Bin laden specifically telling Americans to vote for Democrat John kerry was FOX news. The liberal media of CNN, MSNC, ABC and CBS decided not to report about it until after the election, they did this specifically because they are controlled by people who favor the Democratic party.

While FOX news was airing a videotape by Osama bin-freaking Laden, the liberal news channels were airing comedy reels of Bush stuttering and slurring his speach and showed pep-rallies of John Kerry.

But when Bush publicly announced that he thought there was a chance that Bin laden was dead. The liberal media quickly aired old video tapes of Osama Bin laden walking around with an AK-47 in his hand.

Anyone who suggests that the mainstream media (minus FOX news) isn't liberally biased is under an illusion. I'm not saying FOX news isn't biased, but it certainly isn't any more biased than CNN, BBC, MSNBC, ABC, CBC, or CBC.

I hope after they kill him, they spread his ashes in international waters, making no nation his official resting place.

At 11/7/06 08:52 PM, Imperator wrote:
4. Al-Qaeda and Saddam were not on the best of terms. If bin Laden kicked it, I'm sure the fanaticism within his group would propel him to martyr status. But the Republican Guard and most of his supporters are dead, in hiding, or defected. Everyone else hated his guts......

Hang on, what's that? Saddam and al-Qu'eda not on good terms? Great, so add that to the fact there's no Weapons of Mass Destruction, that's two very reasons that Saddam could achieve martyr status, as an example of the lies the Americans tell in order to impose their will on the Arab World (or something similar, anyway).

And you'd be surprised what effect his death might have. After all, Stalin is revered in Russia, despite being on the Hitler scale and this being well known.

sadaam deserves worse for what he did. id prefer causing him the most pain possible in a very punisheresqe fashion.

At 11/6/06 07:36 PM, Imperator wrote:

Not a big propoent of "eye for an eye" eh?

Read some of his previous posts.

Its ridiculas, he deserves worse. Like having his balls crushed.

And you'd be surprised what effect his death might have. After all, Stalin is revered in Russia, despite being on the Hitler scale and this being well known.

Well, his death will certainly TRY to be used, but (especially in Iraq) I don't think a martyr Saddam will hold much water.

Stalin had an iron grip on Eastern Europe, with his ideas being indoctrinated in the same way as the Kims in Korea, Imerial Japan, etc.

Saddam had this control in Iraq ALONE, and even there his only real support on that level came from the Republican Guard.

He wasn't even well liked in the Arab world, and was especially hated by his neighbors (Iran comes to mind...).

It would also be very hard for Al-Qaeda to convince their fanatics that Saddam is now a hero, as opposed to several years ago when he was viewed as a devil.

Al-Zarqawi will become a martyr, but not Saddam......

At 11/8/06 10:54 AM, D2KVirus wrote:

At 11/7/06 08:52 PM, Imperator wrote:

that's two very reasons that Saddam could achieve martyr status, as an example of the lies the Americans tell in order to impose their will on the Arab World (or something similar, anyway).

If he recieved martyr status it's because, and only becuase, the arab networks out-lie the Americans any day of the week.

Al-Jazeera makes CNN look like Rush Limbaugh.

hanging saddam is more of a symbol than any other method of execution (i think).
fo rthose who say it's too barbaric, look at saddam's record. then castrate yourselves for being complete morons. i would be in favor of torturing him to death, as it would be sort of ironic, unfortunately though, torture is against my morals....damn morals.

I think that Saddam Hussein deserves everything he gets, and more. (EVEN MORE!!!)

At 11/6/06 07:29 PM, NewgroundsTerrorist wrote: force him to listten to Celine Dion

I know he's a bad person, but let's be human here!

wow. 78 replys. i didnt know so many ppl hated saddam :)

saddom is a fag he also shoudl get his dick cut off and be hung all at once,

fuck the fuzz/5-0

,Malarki

At 11/6/06 07:42 PM, K-RadPie wrote:

At 11/6/06 06:27 PM, Scobbanatur13 wrote:
BUSH NOT FOR PREZ!!!

it was decided by an IRAQI COURT not BUSH

WELL no duh!!!

At 11/7/06 03:25 PM, Old-Drippy wrote: Saddam IS being hung? I thought that it was just a rumor my classmates made up. Poor Saddam. He's going to be killed for crimes he didn't commit. He deserves death but not for this. And we wonder why everyone hates America! Sciencedammit. This just proves that America has become extremely corrupt since Bush became President.

If Saddam deserves death, and he is getting a necktie party, then what's the problem? also he was tried by the iraqis, not americans.

personally i believe he should be executed by flogging or evisceration. and yeah, by evisceration i mean gut em alive!

At 11/17/06 09:12 PM, Scobbanatur13 wrote:

At 11/6/06 07:42 PM, K-RadPie wrote:

At 11/6/06 06:27 PM, Scobbanatur13 wrote:
BUSH NOT FOR PREZ!!!

it was decided by an IRAQI COURT not BUSH

WELL no duh!!!

More like, it was decided IN an Iraqi court, Saddam was given a death sentence before the trial even started. Saddam had no chance of a fair trial from the get-go. Half of his defence team was murdered, the rest ran for their lives. He faced 3 different judges in the same trial. The only sad realization for Bush is, Saddam is probably the only person who can fix the mess that is now Iraq.

we COULD drag em to death you know...

Personally, I believe that the sentance doesn't fit the crime. I'm sure we all remember what Saddam did to the Kurds in the past... To simply hang the S.O.B. is really a travesty of justice - he deserves a much, much more painful death than simply a mere hanging... My suggestion? Gas the bastard so his inner organs start to melt and internal bleeding commences, then drag him out of the gas filled room, tie him down to a table and w/o anethesia, slice him open from the top of the chest to the bottom of the stomach and remove his entrails while the f***er is still alive...then when that's all done, quarter him into pieces and spread them across Iraq, with his head mounted on a large pole for amusement to the people.

At 11/6/06 07:28 PM, Begoner wrote: Hanging is too immoral.

It not only immoral. It break your neck and make you soil your pant...

"Hanging is too immoral. It's a cruel method of killing as it causes a lot of pain prior to death." this is actually not true as the death by hanging is caused by the breaking of the neck when you fall from the stool... However i think that Saddam shouldn't be killed but put in jail for life. I mean think about it, what's worst being stuck until you die in a crappy cell with no one to talk to and nothing to do or just die without any pain. I think Saddam should suffer for his crimes in the most democratic way that exists: imprisonment.

"Man is just a monkey with a bigger brain and less hair... think about it"

I don't see why people really care if the condemned feels pain before he dies, considering that WHEN he dies. he won't be feeling anything.

hanging is an effective and impersonal way to execute someone. it would be MUCH faster and just as effective to decapitate him with an axe, or plunge a knife into his chest, or maybe a bullet in the back of the head...

personally i think saddam should get an acid bath for an execution, using boric or maybe even hydrochloric acid, fill a tank that is 7 feet high to 2 feet, break one of his legs and toss em in and watch the show.

America isn't hanging him, its the Iraqi government. Read the facts people.

I'd sell the Brooklyn Bridge just to be able to be the one who executes Saddam.

The day Saddam gets linched. Im gonna take all ma mates to the clubs and get hammered. I mean steaming.

Pure wasted in celebration of that cunt getting but fucked by saten while he waits for 2 particular canadians to get killed in a war started off by Kyles mother. The movie will be even funnier now that when you watch it you know hes dead.

At 11/6/06 07:28 PM, Begoner wrote: Hanging is too immoral. It's a cruel method of killing as it causes a lot of pain prior to death. Lethal injection or a bullet in the head would be preferable -- maybe Saddam was inhuman, but that doesn't make our vengeance against him righteous. Give the man a painless death.

think about lethal injection for a second imagine being injected with the needle then u feel groggy and u know that once u go out u are never going to wake up again and no matter how hard u fight it u can't and u just keep falling "asleep"

A hanging is too good for Saddam, they ought to Shoot him in the head, blow him up, throw his remains into a volcano, and seal the volcano up. He is worthless scum and should be killed in the most horrible way possible. That son of a bitch should be launched into deep space with an armed explosive. Launch his stupid ass into the God damn sun. Bush's dumb-fuck of a father is the one who let him go the first time, and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, this is Bush's fault, it's his fault this country is screwed up now, it's his fault that we're at war in Iraq. HE FUCKED US OVER! IT'S HIS FAULT!! Kill Saddam, and then impeach Bush! That's what I think should be done!