Be a Supporter!
wwwyzzerdd
wwwyzzerdd
  • Member since: Jun. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Musician
Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:11 AM Reply

Non-Nude Photography, or Pornography as it's labeled by critics as; is a growing fad among the mainstream public. Fueled by the advent of such publications like Maxim and FHM, and with the ever-growing popularity of web communities targeted towards teens and females.

Typical NNP content is usually classified as an image meant to arouse the viewer with the illusion of nudity, or highly sexually provocative scenes without the actual showing of nudity. While a large number of people view this as no actual problem since the models, regardless of age, are typically consenting to pose, and do so in a non-exploitive way. Others feel that the images serve the same purpose as any other general form of pornography, and note that girls under the age of consent are still being exploited by the viewer(s).

While the more obvious origins of this trend can be seen at places such as MySpace, LiveJournal, or various other blogging/chat sites, the proliferation of Non-Nude Modeling sites has grown throughout the years. While some fans of the site are of the age of the models themselves or just candid fans of fashion and/or modeling, a great deal of members are also alleged fans of exploitive child-modeling. This has caused an uproar with many individuals in classifying this practice as child pornography.

So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?

Non-Nude Porn


BBS Signature
Tancrisism
Tancrisism
  • Member since: Mar. 26, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 28
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:12 AM Reply

Those critics have no credibility. So no. Go forth and be aroused.


Fancy Signature

Ozcar
Ozcar
  • Member since: May. 12, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 32
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:13 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:11 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?

How old are the girls?

No b0ners here >:\

Zen444
Zen444
  • Member since: Mar. 1, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 36
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:13 AM Reply

If they're 14-17, they're legal in Canada.

Twerpo
Twerpo
  • Member since: Jan. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 14
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:15 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:13 AM, Ozcar wrote:
At 11/3/06 01:11 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?
How old are the girls?

No b0ners here >:\

Same here. They have a decent body and everything but it just doesn't work. I don't know why.


BBS Signature
MadCow
MadCow
  • Member since: May. 27, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 25
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:15 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:11 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote:
So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?

Are you considered a pedofile if you're attracted to a girl under 18 years old, yet at the same time is several years older than you?


REAL TALK: you better go get a glass of orange juice & spill it all over yourself likea big dumb baby before i tear through your hymen like a dog tears through a piece of meat

BBS Signature
Greenskullkid
Greenskullkid
  • Member since: Apr. 13, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 18
Audiophile
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:16 AM Reply

lol, no boner here. but that wasn't the point, I don't think you would be considerd a pedo, seeing as you aren't whacking off too it.


gsk.

<deleted>
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:18 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:15 AM, MadCow wrote:
At 11/3/06 01:11 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote:
So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?
Are you considered a pedofile if you're attracted to a girl under 18 years old, yet at the same time is several years older than you?

I've always actually wanted to ask that..

studio-nightbird
studio-nightbird
  • Member since: May. 19, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:21 AM Reply

at first i was like. non-nude porn...ha how dose that work. but then i went OHHHHH non-NUDE porn. now i see.

wwwyzzerdd
wwwyzzerdd
  • Member since: Jun. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Musician
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:21 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:12 AM, Tancrisism wrote: Those critics have no credibility.

By credibility, do you mean "sexual tendencies?"

At 11/3/06 01:13 AM, Ozcar wrote: How old are the girls?

I dunno; Wikipedia doesn't say.

At 11/3/06 01:13 AM, Zen444 wrote: If they're 14-17, they're legal in Canada.

Is there anything illegal in Canada?
Well, other than culture?

At 11/3/06 01:14 AM, Mezco wrote: I could get off to that, I have a very active imagination.

That or desperate standards.

At 11/3/06 01:15 AM, MadCow wrote: Are you considered a pedofile if you're attracted to a girl under 18 years old, yet at the same time is several years older than you?

No, just creepy.

Now I don't find this to be "arousing" myself; maybe the tye-dye is throwing me off.

Non-Nude Porn


BBS Signature
Warrickneff
Warrickneff
  • Member since: Dec. 13, 2004
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 28
Reader
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:22 AM Reply

That image was fairly arousing.
I'd actually like to know what age they are, the curiosity is killing me.

Although, I've never even considered thinking about the right and wrongs of asking young women to pose for non-nude porn though. Kindof makes me wonder if there are actually people trying to exploit a market like that, or whether or not it just manages to happen.


BBS Signature
Twerpo
Twerpo
  • Member since: Jan. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 14
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:23 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:21 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote:
At 11/3/06 01:12 AM, Tancrisism wrote:
Now I don't find this to be "arousing" myself; maybe the tye-dye is throwing me off.

No that is slightly hawter. I have to bookmark this cause I know you will be posting some hawt pics later. It's always good to have some good fap topics on hand.


BBS Signature
GelsamelXV
GelsamelXV
  • Member since: Mar. 24, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 05
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:26 AM Reply

Maybe there is something wrong with the perspective.

Non-Nude Porn

LadyGrace
LadyGrace
  • Member since: Nov. 19, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 40
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:27 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:21 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: Now I don't find this to be "arousing" myself; maybe the tye-dye is throwing me off.

Nah, they look like they're about to take a shit.


BBS Signature
Zen444
Zen444
  • Member since: Mar. 1, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 36
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:30 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:21 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: Is there anything illegal in Canada?
Well, other than culture?

Your mother.

OH SNAP! WOF WOF WOF WOF!
wwwyzzerdd
wwwyzzerdd
  • Member since: Jun. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Musician
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:34 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:23 AM, Twerpo wrote: No that is slightly hawter.

Not the one on the right. She's already got the cottage cheese thighs going.
God damn, put the fucking fork down fatty-fat-fatty!

I have to bookmark this cause I know you will be posting some hawt pics later. It's always good to have some good fap topics on hand.

Apparently (according to Wiki), the term for those attracted to post-pubescent children is Ephebophilia, whereas Pedophilia is an attraction to pre-pubescent kids.

You bunch of ephebos!

Non-Nude Porn


BBS Signature
Sportsboy
Sportsboy
  • Member since: Oct. 26, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 39
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:35 AM Reply

The first one is hotter than the 2nd one. I found them both somewhat arousing. How old are they?


Martha Wasington was a hip, hip, hip lady, man-Slater
Best Club Ever

BBS Signature
wwwyzzerdd
wwwyzzerdd
  • Member since: Jun. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Musician
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:37 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:35 AM, Sportsboy170 wrote: The first one is hotter than the 2nd one. I found them both somewhat arousing. How old are they?

Wikipedia doesn't say. The 3rd one is a rip-off though, since the site even posts an "all models are 18+" disclaimer.

And those rumors about me being a tranny are completely false and were never proven!


BBS Signature
cellardoor6
cellardoor6
  • Member since: Apr. 4, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 20
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:37 AM Reply

More pictures!


Yay, Obama won. Let's thank his supporters:
-The compliant mainstream media for their pro-Obama propaganda.
-Black Panthers for their intimidation of voters.

BBS Signature
GelsamelXV
GelsamelXV
  • Member since: Mar. 24, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 05
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:38 AM Reply

You can see the veins in her breast.

Hawt.
Sportsboy
Sportsboy
  • Member since: Oct. 26, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 39
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:40 AM Reply

nvm I like the 3rd one. Shes pobably about my age too. by the time I post there will probably be more pictures.


Martha Wasington was a hip, hip, hip lady, man-Slater
Best Club Ever

BBS Signature
Kenneth-Knows-All
Kenneth-Knows-All
  • Member since: Oct. 20, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 41
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:41 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:34 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: You bunch of ephebos!

And who has the collection of Non-nude Porn...?


/b/

BBS Signature
Ozcar
Ozcar
  • Member since: May. 12, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 32
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:49 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:41 AM, Kenneth-Knows-All wrote:
At 11/3/06 01:34 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: You bunch of ephebos!
And who has the collection of Non-nude Porn...?

And... who knows a lot about the topic and started a topic about it on Newgrounds?

* Dun dun dun! *

JoS
JoS
  • Member since: Aug. 11, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Moderator
Level 04
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:50 AM Reply

The origins of NNP I woudl say go back to the early 90's and the discovery of Baywatch, or atleast thats when it was trusted into the spotlight.

MySpace and LiveJournal just made it mroe accessible for younger models. They had already been doing this, just now they had a medium to publish them on, other than just a couple of photos in a scrapbook ro something.


Bellum omnium contra omnes

BBS Signature
Bunzi
Bunzi
  • Member since: Jul. 9, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 01:53 AM Reply

Hurray now pedos can't get busted. :D

IPoopedInYourMailbox
IPoopedInYourMailbox
  • Member since: Oct. 30, 2006
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 10
Blank Slate
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 03:09 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:26 AM, GelsamelXV wrote: Maybe there is something wrong with the perspective.

And the chick on the right has a streak mark. I'll take this picture for study...


Please disregard the above post.

BBS Signature
Ressurection666
Ressurection666
  • Member since: Oct. 19, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Game Developer
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 03:20 AM Reply

i don-t think there in anything wrong with it cos these girls are eisily over 16 n i'm british so thats legal

wwwyzzerdd
wwwyzzerdd
  • Member since: Jun. 16, 2005
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 02
Musician
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 04:34 AM Reply

Oh BTW, that picture with the two ass girls, the one with the weird stomach is turning towards the camera, but since her face isn't visible, you cannot quite tell that she's turned.

I didn't want to show any of their faces, because that's just wrong.


BBS Signature
<deleted>
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 04:35 AM Reply

At 11/3/06 01:11 AM, wwwyzzerdd wrote: Non-Nude Photography, or Pornography as it's labeled by critics as; is a growing fad among the mainstream public. Fueled by the advent of such publications like Maxim and FHM, and with the ever-growing popularity of web communities targeted towards teens and females.


So my question to you is; if you get a boner from this picture, are you a pedo?

No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.No. Just aslong as you dont follow through.

Shadow-XII
Shadow-XII
  • Member since: Jul. 15, 2003
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 26
Voice Actor
Response to Non-Nude Porn Nov. 3rd, 2006 @ 05:48 AM Reply

I'm actually into Non-Nude over Nude-Nude.

*bonarrrr*


BBS Signature