nuke iraq

[David-Green]

i dont understand why we have to be the great america.i mean cant we just go and nuke them all. shoot if we were at war and an iraqi civilian found a gun or just had a gun and we were walkin down the streets over there what do u think the iraqi would do say oh we love america, hell no they would just blow as many of us apart as they could. so if u think about it they arent civlians i mean its like a country populated completly by its army. so i dont see why we cant just nuke them. whats your opinion.

[lapslf]

My opinion is that you're a scary stupid littly gnome. Go buy yourself some dynamite, stick it in your ass and go sit by the fireplace.

[Tacitacial]

You really think that civilians will engage the American army? I doubt that, if these people would actually want to fight against America, they would just join the Iraqi army.
There are innocents in Iraq too. Nuking them is nuts, this way civilian casualties will be much higher. And don't forget Fallout, the radiation will spread and do damage for years to come.

[Explodapop]

Like dude.............
Althoug I am for the invasion, you can't do that.
You are very crazy and shuold be locked upp.

[RoboTripper]

My opinion is that you are insane. There are some pretty hardcore right-wingers on this forum, but I bet they would agree with me.

[bumcheekcity]

you can't go and nuke iraq because then every single country in the world would then cut off all sales with you. you would collapse into an economy and fall into the metaphorical void

[Dig-the-Man]

Let's all get real here.

1. America can't just use her nukes.... it's called deterrence for a reason.

2. Iraqi civilians with guns most likely will take a few pot shots at soldiers if they get the chance.

3. Tactical nukes, however, could be fun.... ?

[David-Green]

then i guess i stand out

[NoNameProphet]

At 3/19/03 09:02 AM, David_Green wrote:

:so i dont see why we cant just nuke them. whats your opinion.

Um, I hope you're joking but that's kinda scary. I won't insult you or comment beyond that since there's no point to that. You've got the right to voice your opinion, but I, and most people, just won't agree with you that's all.

HOLD BACK THE URGE TO FLAME PEOPLE!

[Taxman2A]

I do not believe nuclear weapons should play a role in any way.

The US already takes an unfairly large share of the blame for pollution, nuking another country, killing much more than necessary, and completely fucking up the planet is a bad idea.

[JudgeDredd]

At 3/19/03 10:12 AM, warriormage wrote: You really think that civilians will engage the American army?

no - but if half your family get blown away "accidently" in the initial bombings - what would you do?

my feeling is that Saddam may not even use chemical or biological weapons against US forces or Isreal because there's more international support for it's "defense" if this war is faught "conventionally"
_

[shamROCK678]

wow that original point sucked, we'd fire upon them if they were armed and firing up on us, under no other circumstances would we attack civilians

[NoNameProphet]

At 3/19/03 08:43 PM, Taxman2A wrote: I do not believe nuclear weapons should play a role in any way.

There's no chance US will need or even dare to use nuclear weapons on Iraq, there's no need. They don't stand a chance as it is, and this little war in particular won't last too long.... Wars that this war may cause later is a different matter altogether.

Like Russia getting pissed off because their oil deals with Iraq/their chance at getting some of the pie/US is growing in its sphere of control.. then the Russians, Chineese, and North Koreans ((who I've heard have some kind of light alliance. China having helped North Korea in wars before and things like that. Japan is an enemy of NK so they're considering stocking up on nukes in defence against NK's nukes so... things are getting dangerous)) end up getting retribution. In chain reactions like that

[JMHX]

I'm sorry, but the thought of a nuclear weapon being used against a third-world nation we can just roll through is sad...very very sad. Never run for elected office.

[Zapman]

Nuking any country has serious concequences! First by using the nukes, other countries that hate us will use nukes on us. They will justify using the nukes on us by saying that we are a threat and need to be eliminated. Second, by using the warheads, our world status will suffer. We will lose many allies. Even our relationship with Britian might go down the drain. Thats my opinion so dont freak if you dont agree with me.

[mysecondstar]

i swear that is one of the most uninformed piece of rubbish i've heard since jimsween. you obviously don't know what you are talking about, and it is obvious that you are incredibly unintelligent. you have no idea what nuclear weapons are used for. in fact you have just made everyone stupider by your post. i hope you please, PLEASE inform yourself and inform yourself a great deal before you even write anything again.

[NoNameProphet]

At 3/19/03 11:56 PM, mysecondstar wrote: i swear that is one of the most uninformed piece of rubbish i've heard since jimsween. you obviously don't know what you are talking about, and it is obvious that you are incredibly unintelligent. you have no idea what nuclear weapons are used for. in fact you have just made everyone stupider by your post. i hope you please, PLEASE inform yourself and inform yourself a great deal before you even write anything again.

Lol. I kinda hope he doesn't read his topic again, infact... I suggest everyone stop posting here =P. Lets just let this one drift into oblivion! ^^

[Mercynary]

If you think about it...if we nuke those bastards...aren't we just as bad as them? Why the hell would we want to demote ourselves to their level?

[Commander-K25]

Just don't post replies to this topic, people.

[David-Green]

so u think the brits give a flyin fuck about us as it is

[David-Green]

they wont nuke them i know that, thats why they will have to deploy a bunch of men in like me. if we get drafted u guys are the ones that are going to be sitting on the frontline asking for veggie burgers and pie, screeming and kicking saying "i dont wanna go in" and im the one marching in there taking out as many as i can. and no i would not save u guys if u got shot.

[panik]

I'm sure others have said the same thing but I don't have time to read all the responses.

Why would we nuke a country that we are trying to liberate and help the civilians. We are at War with one man in Iraq not Iraq itself. Don't you think that would be a little barbaric to destroy hundreds of thousands of people just because you feel like it. And don't bring up the use of nukes in WWII because that is a completly diffrent matter.

[Insomne]

lol.. David_Green, I have to agree. Most of these hippies woulden't stand a chance in war. Probably would just protest and go block some roads again.

[Alejandro1]

You know, I hate Saddam (that little SOB) but nukeing Iraq is out of the question. It doesnt matter that all the citizens of Iraq hate our guts, if we drop a nuke, you can kiss any relationship between the US and the Middle East goodbye. And how do you think that other countries that are aiding us in the war would look at it?

Let's keep going after that asshole the way we have been. If Saddam uses chemical weapons, that will greatly influence other countries to fight against him.

[Dagodevas]

At 3/19/03 09:02 AM, David_Green wrote: i dont understand why we have to be the great america.i mean cant we just go and nuke them all. shoot if we were at war and an iraqi civilian found a gun or just had a gun and we were walkin down the streets over there what do u think the iraqi would do say oh we love america, hell no they would just blow as many of us apart as they could. so if u think about it they arent civlians i mean its like a country populated completly by its army. so i dont see why we cant just nuke them. whats your opinion.

After pissing off the UN as much as we have already, I think it'd be best if we go about this war as solemn as possible. It's rather obvious.

Kazuo Kiriyama

[NSS-SEPP]

At 3/28/03 02:05 PM, Kazuo_Kiriyama wrote:

At 3/19/03 09:02 AM, David_Green wrote: i dont understand why we have to be the great america.i mean cant we just go and nuke them all. shoot if we were at war and an iraqi civilian found a gun or just had a gun and we were walkin down the streets over there what do u think the iraqi would do say oh we love america, hell no they would just blow as many of us apart as they could. so if u think about it they arent civlians i mean its like a country populated completly by its army. so i dont see why we cant just nuke them. whats your opinion.

After pissing off the UN as much as we have already, I think it'd be best if we go about this war as solemn as possible. It's rather obvious.

Kazuo Kiriyama

I aint got any problem with nuking the iraq.
It would be a very fast and painless death for those "innocent" people.

Anyways even if the UN gets very pissed, what can they do? Isolate or attack the US? I dont think so.

[karasz]

At 3/28/03 02:25 PM, NSS-SEPP wrote: I aint got any problem with nuking the iraq.
It would be a very fast and painless death for those "innocent" people.

yeah, that makes sense a very quick and painless death for some innocent people... damn towelheads...

and u know what the best part is the ones that dont die, will have skin fall off of their body, hair and teeth fall out... NOW THATS REALITY TV... and then the people that are still alive will have to deal with 2 things... SUPER-HUMAN POWERS (comic books dont lie) and not being able to make food cuz the once FERTILE CRESENT becomes as barren as the space between ur ears...

Anyways even if the UN gets very pissed, what can they do? Isolate or attack the US? I dont think so.

ok, lets say you get in a fight with 3rd graders... now you can take like 7 or 8 of them at once... but what happens when 40 of them, all with more nukes that u are ready to turn ur little country into a gigantic crater...

and yes if the other nations decide to say FUCK AMERICA they can easily isolate the US, granted it would take about 10-15 years to get out of the following depression but nothing is impossible...

nuking baghdad is pointless... my question is what if they use chemical weapons on us? do we retailate with other WMD OR do we restrain ourselves?

[NSS-SEPP]

At 3/28/03 02:54 PM, karasz wrote:

At 3/28/03 02:25 PM, NSS-SEPP wrote: I aint got any problem with nuking the iraq.
It would be a very fast and painless death for those "innocent" people.

yeah, that makes sense a very quick and painless death for some innocent people... damn towelheads...

and u know what the best part is the ones that dont die, will have skin fall off of their body, hair and teeth fall out... NOW THATS REALITY TV... and then the people that are still alive will have to deal with 2 things... SUPER-HUMAN POWERS (comic books dont lie) and not being able to make food cuz the once FERTILE CRESENT becomes as barren as the space between ur ears...

Anyways even if the UN gets very pissed, what can they do? Isolate or attack the US? I dont think so.

ok, lets say you get in a fight with 3rd graders... now you can take like 7 or 8 of them at once... but what happens when 40 of them, all with more nukes that u are ready to turn ur little country into a gigantic crater...

and yes if the other nations decide to say FUCK AMERICA they can easily isolate the US, granted it would take about 10-15 years to get out of the following depression but nothing is impossible...

nuking baghdad is pointless... my question is what if they use chemical weapons on us? do we retailate with other WMD OR do we restrain ourselves?

if the other nations would decide to go against the US it would be like going against themselves since they almost totally depend on america. their economy is linked with the US economy. if the US for example would take ALL its money and all its resources out of Germany or france then their goverments would start to become unstable because they dont have the resources they´d normally have and they would then eventually crumble from within. Even now with the full support of the international community both of those countries have serious financial troubles and are at the brink of a recesion or maybe even a new great depression.

[karasz]

At 3/28/03 03:20 PM, NSS-SEPP wrote: if the other nations would decide to go against the US it would be like going against themselves since they almost totally depend on america. their economy is linked with the US economy. if the US for example would take ALL its money and all its resources out of Germany or france then their goverments would start to become unstable because they dont have the resources they´d normally have and they would then eventually crumble from within. Even now with the full support of the international community both of those countries have serious financial troubles and are at the brink of a recesion or maybe even a new great depression.

just remember, if 1 industrialized country has a depression soon ALL countries will soon hit a recession, which would mean the economy would go south and then Georgey McBushbush wont be re-elected... and then we say hello to the new President... (my pick is still HOWARD DEAN)

[Disguy-youknow]

One thing: America can't take the whole world on. The American economy is highly globalized and feeds on its multitude of trading agreements. If sactions were placed on America, theworld wouold hurt, but we would hurt more. Furthermore, the American military is not all powerful. China alone has the largest army of the world. The American Navy and Air Force do not outnumber the globe's combined power. Plus, if American uses nukes on others, what makes you think other nations won't, in turn nuke us? We are not all powerful. No nation is, or ever will be.

Regardless of the fact that it is, um, you know, IMMORAL to massacure the Iraqi civilians. You need to realize that Iraqis don't have the ability to protesttheir government without being shot at. Even as we pass through, we still leave Saddam's thugs in power. Who knows what the Iraqis really think?