Be a Supporter!

Question RE: Gulf war no.1!

  • 453 Views
  • 11 Replies
New Topic Respond to this Topic
Kiwi-Clock
Kiwi-Clock
  • Member since: Jun. 28, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 18:53:15 Reply

Me and a friend were just wondering..
What, if any, good came out of the first gulf war, besides some of that great cruise missile footage of buildings exploding?

Saddam: still in power
Diplomatic relations with middle east: up shit creek
Iraqi people: suffering even more than before!

Please!! If anyone can tell us what the world gained from that conflict, we'd love to know.

NEMESiSZ
NEMESiSZ
  • Member since: Apr. 13, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 45
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 18:57:58 Reply

Coalition forces drove Iraq from Kuwait, and Kuwait is now an ally of the United States, and a crucial stragecic point in the new invasion.

The only reason forces didn't pursue Saddam into Iraq is because the UN would not allow it.

BinLadenmustdie
BinLadenmustdie
  • Member since: Oct. 23, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 17
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:02:11 Reply

At 3/18/03 06:53 PM, My-anus-is-BLEEDING wrote: Me and a friend were just wondering..
What, if any, good came out of the first gulf war, besides some of that great cruise missile footage of buildings exploding?

Saddam: still in power
Diplomatic relations with middle east: up shit creek
Iraqi people: suffering even more than before!

Please!! If anyone can tell us what the world gained from that conflict, we'd love to know.

We depleted Saddam's weapondry quite a bit, though he still wouldn't provide bio/chem stuff from day one. Plus it made their military morale shit, which is why Iraqi soldiers are already surrendering now, even before the first shot is fired.

Question RE: Gulf war no.1!

Kiwi-Clock
Kiwi-Clock
  • Member since: Jun. 28, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:06:49 Reply

Ahh.. okay. and all that depleted uranium poisoning the land and people of Iraq (honestly I'm asking, I'm not entirely clear on all this) was that from their weapons, or the 'Allies'?

NEMESiSZ
NEMESiSZ
  • Member since: Apr. 13, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 45
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:14:23 Reply

The coalition used no atmoic weapons, so any radioactive elements were in-house in Iraq.

Kiwi-Clock
Kiwi-Clock
  • Member since: Jun. 28, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 11
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:26:33 Reply

I read that The U.S. used alot of uranium depleted shells, so many infact that children and animals in the major areas of conflict were born with deformities.

NEMESiSZ
NEMESiSZ
  • Member since: Apr. 13, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 45
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:31:26 Reply

Yeah, there's lots of anti-usa propaganda.

NJDeadzone
NJDeadzone
  • Member since: Aug. 16, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 19:32:58 Reply

a lesson that if a country's army does not march through the capital city of its enemy nation, the war was not won by the victor. Kosovo was won after the US marched through its capital(unfortunately Russia marched first though it did little of the work). But after this invasion red white and blue are going through Baghdad.

JMHX
JMHX
  • Member since: Oct. 18, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 15
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-18 22:51:04 Reply

At 3/18/03 07:32 PM, NJDeadzone wrote: a lesson that if a country's army does not march through the capital city of its enemy nation, the war was not won by the victor. Kosovo was won after the US marched through its capital(unfortunately Russia marched first though it did little of the work). But after this invasion red white and blue are going through Baghdad.

Well, I'm glad to see that someone clings to delusional, Nazi-era methods of declaring victory. Would it be better if it were behind the smoldering ashes of Baghdad with wounded children all around.


BBS Signature
karasz
karasz
  • Member since: Nov. 22, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 08
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-19 00:18:05 Reply

At 3/18/03 07:14 PM, NEMESiSZ wrote: The coalition used no atmoic weapons, so any radioactive elements were in-house in Iraq.

the shells that were fired from the US tanks were made of depleted uranium...

NJDeadzone
NJDeadzone
  • Member since: Aug. 16, 2002
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 12
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-19 00:47:03 Reply

At 3/18/03 10:51 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
At 3/18/03 07:32 PM, NJDeadzone wrote:
Well, I'm glad to see that someone clings to delusional, Nazi-era methods of declaring victory. Would it be better if it were behind the smoldering ashes of Baghdad with wounded children all around.

the losing proletariat is not supposed to enjoy defeat of the government it never tried to revolt against. and i'm sure the Kurds will be jumping for joy now that we've probably unleashed a greater evil on the world. War is costly. But this war was never finished.

Commander-K25
Commander-K25
  • Member since: Dec. 4, 2001
  • Offline.
Forum Stats
Member
Level 13
Blank Slate
Response to Question RE: Gulf war no.1! 2003-03-19 01:37:42 Reply

At 3/18/03 10:51 PM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote:
Well, I'm glad to see that someone clings to delusional, Nazi-era methods of declaring victory. Would it be better if it were behind the smoldering ashes of Baghdad with wounded children all around.

Who said anything about Nazis or destroying Baghdad?

Victory is not about a literal capital, though. It means removing your enemy from any position (geographic, political, etc.) in which he could threaten you.