At 8/20/09 02:17 PM, Doomsday-One wrote:
At 8/20/09 01:44 PM, Glaiel-Gamer wrote:
I don't get that logic.
Jokes aside, the idea behind it isn't completely ridiculous.
But rejecting people with an IQ equivalent of about 125? Sure, it's high, but it's not like he was in MENSA or anything.
I don't see how the logic is bad at all, and the higher the expense of training the more it makes sense to interview people who are likely to make it their career. 125 isn't that high, but I assume they get plenty of applicants, and you have to draw the line somewhere.
Besides, it could be argued that a smart person is more likely to commit to a job, considering all the thinking they (probably) put into choosing it.
Eh, with the job market the way it is, people are trying to get any job they can. People with college degrees are applying for service jobs and are being rejected for being over qualified, since if they could get a job somewhere else they would, and that means they will probably be leaving within a few years.
I think it makes sense, but whether it's discrimination or not is an interesting question.