Cambodia
- EvilGovernmentAgents
-
EvilGovernmentAgents
- Member since: Jan. 12, 2003
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 08
- Blank Slate
- JMHX
-
JMHX
- Member since: Oct. 18, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
- EvilGovernmentAgents
-
EvilGovernmentAgents
- Member since: Jan. 12, 2003
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 08
- Blank Slate
- Enoll
-
Enoll
- Member since: Oct. 25, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Send Private Message
- Browse All Posts (16,925)
- Block
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 32
- Writer
- Slizor
-
Slizor
- Member since: Aug. 7, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
I've never been to Cambodia, but I did talk to a drunk at 7 o'clock in the morning a while ago, who had been.
How often will you hear someone say that?!
- Slizor
-
Slizor
- Member since: Aug. 7, 2000
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
"From 1979 to 1991, Washington indirectly backed the Khmer Rouge, then a component of the guerrilla coalition fighting the Vietnamese installed Government [in Phnom Penh]." This does seem awkward: the United States and its allies giving economic, military, and political support to Pol Pot, and voting for over a decade to have his government retain Cambodia’s UN seat, but now urging his trial for war crimes. The Times misstates and understates the case: the United States gave direct as well as indirect aid to Pol Pot—in one estimate, $85 million in direct support—and it "pressured UN agencies to supply the Khmer Rouge," which "rapidly improved" the health and capability of Pol Pot’s forces after 1979 (Ben Kiernan, "Cambodia’s Missed Chance," Indochina Newsletter, Nov.-Dec. 1991). U.S. ally China was a very large arms supplier to Pol Pot, with no penalty from the U.S. and in fact U.S. connivance—Carter’s National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski stated that in 1979 "I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot...Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him but China could."
- EvilGovernmentAgents
-
EvilGovernmentAgents
- Member since: Jan. 12, 2003
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 08
- Blank Slate
- TheShrike
-
TheShrike
- Member since: Jan. 5, 2001
- Offline.
-
- Send Private Message
- Browse All Posts (10,536)
- Block
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 39
- Gamer
- VasIndustries
-
VasIndustries
- Member since: Apr. 26, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 17
- Blank Slate
- MarijuanaClock
-
MarijuanaClock
- Member since: Mar. 9, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
At 3/17/03 01:02 AM, VasIndustries wrote:At 3/16/03 03:56 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: The U.N. is the most contradictory organization ever formed.It could be, but I think NATO is a contender. After all, it was formed against Russia (USSR), and now they are part of it.
Russia is not apart of NATO, what are you retarded?
- MarijuanaClock
-
MarijuanaClock
- Member since: Mar. 9, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 03
- Blank Slate
- JMHX
-
JMHX
- Member since: Oct. 18, 2002
- Offline.
-
- Forum Stats
- Member
- Level 15
- Blank Slate
At 3/17/03 03:05 AM, MarijuanaClock wrote:At 3/16/03 03:56 AM, JudgeMeHarshX wrote: The U.N. is the most contradictory organization ever formed.No, America comes first. The land of the free is anything but free.
Good to see you back, Mary-Jane Clock. And yes, we're cutting down on those pesky civil liberties and domestic freedoms, but it's streamlining the whole process. Soon we'll just have tribunals and not have to pay Johnny Cochran.



