Boys Vs Girls Magazines.

[Night-Mare]

Something is wrong if you see my point the way I do.

Theres a Girl Magazine in Australia that teaches girls how to Masturbate and it shows pictures of the vigina in and out of it and pictures of what they think of when they are doing it Completely uncencored, but then there is people trying and ban Girls posing in bikinis and short shorts in boy magazines in Australia and people trying to ban underaged sex.

And that girl magazine is for 9 year olds to 18 year olds. and the boy magazines are for 13 year olds to 18 year olds.

And also sex education is taught in my school when you are in year 9, most people have already had sex by then.

I just thought I should of said something. :)

~ <3 Lachlan. Your fellow idiot.

P.S Please forgive me for the 18+ type of thread.

[Pwnage-In-A-Can]

Who gives a shit? As long as the magazines generate finances, why should people try and interfere?

[<deleted>]

At 9/17/06 11:56 AM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Who gives a shit? As long as the magazines generate finances, why should people try and interfere?

That sounds a bit anarchist to me.

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 11:56 AM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Who gives a shit? As long as the magazines generate finances, why should people try and interfere?

No my point is people are trying to ban pictures of girls wearing small clothes in one magazine that doesnt show enough to pleasure someone, but in the other they are showing real pornography and teaching how to pleasure yourself and nobody seems to care about banning that.

[Pwnage-In-A-Can]

At 9/17/06 11:59 AM, zeus-almighty wrote: That sounds a bit anarchist to me.

Not really, I'm sure these magazines would sell less if they have no girls posing in bikins. So keeping the pictures in would help sell more. "

Economics trumps morality.

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 12:06 PM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Not really, I'm sure these magazines would sell less if they have no girls posing in bikins. So keeping the pictures in would help sell more. "

I dont have anything agenced not keeping the pictures, im just saying why are they trying to ban mild pornography in one magazine and not try and ban real pornography in the other.

[Pwnage-In-A-Can]

At 9/17/06 12:12 PM, Night-Mare wrote: I dont have anything agenced not keeping the pictures, im just saying why are they trying to ban mild pornography in one magazine and not try and ban real pornography in the other.

I think they should ban the pornography. Considering it's in a magazine for 9-18 year old girls.

[Narusegawa]

At 9/17/06 11:59 AM, zeus-almighty wrote:

At 9/17/06 11:56 AM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Who gives a shit? As long as the magazines generate finances, why should people try and interfere?

That sounds a bit anarchist to me.

Anarchist? No buddy you've got your terms confused. His statement has a certain capitalist theme.

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 12:14 PM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: I think they should ban the pornography. Considering it's in a magazine for 9-18 year old girls.

Exactly my point. They are basicly teaching people sex before they even get close to pubity. And they are attempting to ban underaged sex at the same time.

[Rockthebestmusic]

(Hypocrites) Hey i bet young girls arent the only ones who buy those magazines... Interesting how screwed up this world is.

[Night-Mare]

Okay lets put it this way.

Your 9 year old daughter wanted a magazine.
You brought her the magazine.
She read the magazine.
She found that article about masturbation.
She tries it out.
Then 2-3 years later she wants more and wants to have sex before she is even a teenager. And because sex ed isnt tought in schools until highschool in some schools, they would most likely not know how to use protection, and then if they are misfortunete they might have a child before they are even 14 and most likely die because of the birth because they are so young and if the girl does survive she has to raise a child at 13-14 years old.

How would that make you feel.

If this post doesnt help my arguement. well I have more things to say about this topic but I wont now.

~Think about it.

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 01:11 PM, Rockthebestmusic wrote: (Hypocrites) Hey i bet young girls arent the only ones who buy those magazines... Interesting how screwed up this world is.

I know about this because my friend (who is infact a girl, Yes I have friends who are girls) Showed me this article about masturbation.

And yes this world is screwed up alot.

[ImmoralLibertarian]

At 9/17/06 11:53 AM, Night-Mare wrote: P.S Please forgive me for the 18+ type of thread.

Forgive you? We need more of them on here...

But yeah, for a pretty unshockable person, this is pretty shocking...

Teaching 9 year old girls how to flick their beans? wtf?!?

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 01:17 PM, o-r-i-g-i-n-a-l wrote: Forgive you? We need more of them on here...

Its because I'm only 14 years old and its kind of a 18+ thread.

Teaching 9 year old girls how to flick their beans? wtf?!?

I've gone back to this post 3 times and I still think that term 'Flick their Beans' Is still funny.. But it is still very disturbing.

[irockout2525]

Night-Mare said that Austrailia is trying to ban underage sex, and you are complainin about a girls magazine teachin girls how to masterbate. Would you rather have girls and guys masterbating, or would you rather have them running around having sex?

[RadioactiveRabbit]

At 9/17/06 11:56 AM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Who gives a shit? As long as the magazines generate finances, why should people try and interfere?

I wonder why people think moral fabric is dissapating.

[Samuel-HALL]

At 9/17/06 01:15 PM, Night-Mare wrote: Your 9 year old daughter wanted a magazine.
You brought her the magazine.
She read the magazine.
She found that article about masturbation.
She tries it out.
Then 2-3 years later she wants more and wants to have sex before she is even a teenager.

Oh, sure.
Because masturbation always leads to copulation.
And marijuana always leads to crack smoking.

And yes - capitilism trums morality.
Every fucking time.

[SmilingAssasin]

At 9/17/06 01:17 PM, o-r-i-g-i-n-a-l wrote:
But yeah, for a pretty unshockable person, this is pretty shocking...

Teaching 9 year old girls how to flick their beans? wtf?!?

Yeah I know! They should be teaching them how to mastrubate us..... properly! Not trying to tear the fucking thing off.

Yes......... I was joking there.

[rockizzy]

At 9/17/06 01:15 PM, Night-Mare wrote: Your 9 year old daughter wanted a magazine.
You brought her the magazine.

now, why would you buy her the magazine if you know the contents and disapprove of them?!

She read the magazine.
She found that article about masturbation.
She tries it out.

i dont see the problem there. okay, it might be a little... weird... to think of a nine year old girl masturbating, but if shes, you know, physically far enough to do it, then wheres the problem? i mean, come on, dont little boys do the same as soon as it starts working down there?!

Then 2-3 years later she wants more and wants to have sex before she is even a teenager.

just because she "tried out" masturbation she wants to have sex? theres a big difference between masturbation and actually engaging in sexual activities with another person.

And because sex ed isnt tought in schools until highschool in some schools, they would most likely not know how to use protection, and then if they are misfortunete they might have a child before they are even 14 and most likely die because of the birth because they are so young and if the girl does survive she has to raise a child at 13-14 years old.

first of all, school isnt the only place kids could be taught about sex. ever heard of those people called parents? if kids arent taught about sex in school early enough, their parents should tell them everything about it, if they didnt anyway. i mean, what kind of parents would let their kid get into puberty without even knowing what the hell is happening to them?! horrible! so if the kid at some point does have sex and doesnt use protection for whatever reason, and then in fact does get pregnant... i dont think she will die. she can have an abortion. and if she doesnt, i doubt she will "most likely" die.

also, i think you cant really expect people to comment on a magazine theyve never seen, read, or heard of.

[KingCharles]

At 9/17/06 11:53 AM, Night-Mare wrote:
And also sex education is taught in my school when you are in year 9, most people have already had sex by then.

Sorry, WHAT? If you lose you virginity by age NINE, something is WRONG. Most people aren't even sexually mature by then.

[ImmoralLibertarian]

At 9/17/06 07:13 PM, KingCharles wrote:

At 9/17/06 11:53 AM, Night-Mare wrote:
And also sex education is taught in my school when you are in year 9, most people have already had sex by then.

Sorry, WHAT? If you lose you virginity by age NINE, something is WRONG. Most people aren't even sexually mature by then.

He said year nine, not age nine. I'm not familiar with the Auzzie school system but i'm guessing that means the ages of 14-15.

[KingCharles]

At 9/17/06 07:20 PM, o-r-i-g-i-n-a-l wrote:
He said year nine, not age nine. I'm not familiar with the Auzzie school system but i'm guessing that means the ages of 14-15.

Ah, my bad. That's much more plausible.

[<deleted>]

At 9/17/06 12:06 PM, Pwnage-In-A-Can wrote: Economics trumps morality.

its talk like that that will bring about global anarchy!

[Humbucker740]

At 9/17/06 07:13 PM, KingCharles wrote:

At 9/17/06 11:53 AM, Night-Mare wrote:
And also sex education is taught in my school when you are in year 9, most people have already had sex by then.

Sorry, WHAT? If you lose you virginity by age NINE, something is WRONG. Most people aren't even sexually mature by then.

LOL hahahah i thought i was the only one who noticed that in this thread, no one said anything lolololol, wtf is 9 years old? thats just messed up!

[Night-Mare]

At 9/17/06 07:03 PM, rockizzy wrote: now, why would you buy her the magazine if you know the contents and disapprove of them?!

My parents brought me a magazine without knowing what was in there..

i dont see the problem there. okay, it might be a little... weird... to think of a nine year old girl masturbating, but if shes, you know, physically far enough to do it, then wheres the problem? i mean, come on, dont little boys do the same as soon as it starts working down there?!

Yes I know but they are teaching girls to masturbate before pubity begins.

just because she "tried out" masturbation she wants to have sex? theres a big difference between masturbation and actually engaging in sexual activities with another person.

I know 17 girls at my school who want sex because they learnt about sexual stuff before they where 12

first of all, school isnt the only place kids could be taught about sex. ever heard of those people called parents? if kids arent taught about sex in school early enough, their parents should tell them everything about it, if they didnt anyway. i mean, what kind of parents would let their kid get into puberty without even knowing what the hell is happening to them?! horrible! so if the kid at some point does have sex and doesnt use protection for whatever reason, and then in fact does get pregnant... i dont think she will die. she can have an abortion. and if she doesnt, i doubt she will "most likely" die.

My parents have said nothing to me, They are letting me go thru pubity by myself. I learnt what a condom is thru the movie Bruce Wiggalo Male Gigalo or whatever when i was 11. I learnt about sex when I was 10 but I had no idea how to do it safely or anything only about the main parts.

also, i think you cant really expect people to comment on a magazine theyve never seen, read, or heard of.

I could find the website or get photo copys of the page later on tonight. But now I have homework.

I believe that it is wrong that one magazine is teaching girls to pleasure themselves before pubity and actually has porn in the magazine is not attempted to be banned, but a magazine without porn but only girls posing in bikinis and actually wearing clothes and is for guys who are in pubity and know about sex and stuff is attempting the be banned.

[ImmoralLibertarian]

At 9/17/06 09:22 PM, Humbucker740 wrote: LOL hahahah i thought i was the only one who noticed that in this thread, no one said anything lolololol, wtf is 9 years old? thats just messed up!

Why do people have such a problem differentiating the words year and age?

[Night-Mare]

Year 9 = when you are 15-16 years old
Also know as;
Grade 9
Level 9
Highschools Level 3 (Highschool starts in year 7 [11-12 years old])

I just want to know why they are trying to ban one magazine with girls with small clothes on, but not trying to ban the other magazine which teaches girls to masturbate by when they are 9, and actually has a picture of a vigina and a penis.

[lothian59]

the problem is.. the negative is viewed more than the positive. glasses and understanding is much needed for most.. sorry to say

[Elfer]

When men think about sex, it's abuse.

When women think about sex, it's liberation.

[fahrenheit]

At 9/17/06 09:29 PM, Night-Mare wrote: Year 9 = when you are 15-16 years old

Also known as freshman year.
And they taught us sex ed in 5th grade, a time when no one really understood it and the word penis brought the entire class into a eruption of giggles.